New Hampshire Education Amendment (2012)
This Ballotpedia article needs to be updated.
This Ballotpedia article is currently under review by Ballotpedia staff as it may contain out-of-date information. Please email us if you would like to suggest an update.
Not on Ballot |
---|
![]() |
This measure was not put on an election ballot |
The New Hampshire Education Amendment did not make the November 2012 ballot in New Hampshire as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment.[1]
Two versions were proposed: CACR 12 and CACR 14.
The amendment would allow the legislature to set standards for public education such as, targeting education aid to certain communities. For example, lawmakers currently propose funds be targeted to the state's poorest communities.[2][3] Additionally, the measure proposes ending per pupil distribution of state funds and remove the courts from education decisions.[4]
The proposals are sponsored by Rep. David Hess and Sen. Nancy Stiles. Both proposals were placed on hold on June 1, 2011.
A public hearing on the matter was scheduled for November 22, 2011. According to reports, there may be a vote on what has been called "Lynch's education proposal" on November 30, 2011. Some, including House Leader Terie Norelli and Gov. John Lynch argue that the vote is premature. House Speaker William O'Brien scheduled the session to vote on the proposal after Lynch emailed his proposed language to the media in October 2011 without notifying O'Brien or Senate President Peter Bragdon.[5] Norelli has called the vote a media stunt, while O'Brien called the governor's proposal a media stunt. Bragdon has said that he will not bring the Senate back into session until January. Lynch is expected to address the issue in his State of the State address in January 2012.[6]
On November 30, 2011 the House failed to pass the proposal - 114 in support and 264 against. The governor's proposal was substituted for the Senate's proposal (CACR 14). The House proposal (CACR 12) still remains pending. In response to the vote, Gov. Lynch said, "Amending our Constitution is serious work, and I would have expected this amendment to go through the normal hearing process, with an opportunity for careful review and public input. Unfortunately, this was not the case."[7]
Background
In 2007 and 2008 the New Hampshire House of Representatives rejected similar constitutional amendments. Some of the main issues that derailed the proposed amendments included: how much oversight the courts should have, whether every district would be entitled to some money and whether the Legislature could use an amendment to shortchange education funding.[2]
According to state law as of 2011, the state is "responsible for funding the full cost of an adequate education for all students." According to reports, the state's formula that goes into effect July 2011 would require the state pay a base amount of $3,450 per student with additional funds to schools with large numbers of low-income students, students learning English and special education students.[2]
The New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that the state is required to provide all public school children with an adequate education. Following the 1997 ruling the state began providing a base amount to all communities.[5]
Support
- Rep. Pamela Tucker said, "This will give the people of New Hampshire the right to vote on how they want to finance education. This is towns and cities getting back local control of their schools."[8]
- Rep. William O'Brien called the proposed measure a first step in ending court battles. "This amendment affirms that people's elected representatives, not the court system, will have responsibility for determining school funding decisions, setting targeted aid and helping to make sure that we can focus our Legislature's attention on offering our students an outstanding education, not an adequate one," he said.[8]
Opposition
- Former Rep. Kim Casey calls the proposed measure a "cynical attempt" to sell the illusion of local control. "They think they've discovered a new and improved form of democracy, but there is already a tremendous amount of local control of education in funding and hiring. What they (the Legislature) have done is given themselves the permission to do nothing." According to Casey, the courts became involved after the legislature failed to fulfill its obligations to develop a "rational funding system."[8]
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the New Hampshire constitution
In order for the state legislature to place a proposed constitutional amendment on the statewide ballot, both chambers of the state legislature must approve doing so by a vote in each house of at least 60%. Once any such constitutional amendment is on the ballot, the state's voters must approve it by a 2/3 vote for it to pass.
CACR 12:
- On March 16, 2011 the New Hampshire House of Representatives voted 252-113 in favor of CACR 12.[9]
- On June 1, 2011 the Senate delayed action on the amendment. According to reports, the Senate plans to hold onto the bill until further study in the summer and fall.[10]
CACR 14:
- On March 30, 2011 the New Hampshire State Senate voted 16-8 in favor of CACR 14.[11]
- On June 1, 2011 the House tabled the amendment.[12]
Gov. Lynch's amendment:
- On November 30, 2011 the House failed to pass the proposal - 114 in support and 264 against. The governor's proposal was substituted for the Senate's proposal (CACR 14).[7]
See also
- 2012 ballot measures
- New Hampshire 2012 ballot measures
- Laws governing ballot measures in New Hampshire
Articles
- Gov. Lynch's education amendment defeated by the House, another proposal remains pending
- New Hampshire education amendment headed to a vote next week
- New Hampshire lawmakers place education reform amendment on hold
- New Hampshire House votes to end court role in education funding
- New Hampshire lawmakers renew efforts to amend the state's education law
External links
Additional reading
- New Hampshire Union Leader, "O'Brien says Lynch's school funding plan keeps courts in control," November 23, 2011
- Associated Press, "NH Senate takes up school funding amendment," March 27, 2011
- UnionLeader.com, "Senate panel OKs amendment to ease targeting school aid," March 22, 2011
- Eagle-Tribune, "NH House to vote on education funding," March 15, 2011
Editorials
Footnotes
- ↑ Associated Press, "NH speaker's school funding proposal gets hearing," March 7, 2011 (dead link)
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Concord Monitor, "Education amendments in the works," December 31, 2010
- ↑ Concord Monitor, "O'Brien outlines school amendment," March 5, 2011
- ↑ New Hampshire Union Leader, "Amendment proposed to limit judicial oversight of NH school funding," March 4, 2011
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Associated Press, "N.H. hearing, vote set on Lynch school aid proposal," November 21, 2011
- ↑ Associated Press, "N.H. House returning Nov. 30 for school amendments," November 12, 2011
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Concord Monitor, "Lynch's ed funding plan rejected," December 1, 2011
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Seacoastonline.com, "Constitutional amendment on education funding stirs emotions," March 27, 2011
- ↑ UnionLeader.com, "Constitutional amendment to end court role in school funding approved," March 16, 2011
- ↑ Associated Press, "Consensus elusive on NH school funding amendment," June 1, 2011
- ↑ Associated Press, "NH Senate passes school funding amendment," March 30, 2011
- ↑ New Hampshire General Court, "Status CACR 14," accessed June 3, 2011
![]() |
State of New Hampshire Concord (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
This state ballot measure article is a sprout; we plan on making it grow in the future. If you would like to help it grow, please consider donating to Ballotpedia. |