Patricia Hartmann was born in Shakopee, Minnesota. She received her bachelor's degree from Hamline University in 1975 and her Juris Doctor from William Mitchell College of Law in 1981. Hartmann's professional experience includes being an attorney.[1]
The ranked-choice voting election was won by Saura Jost in round 2 . The results of Round are displayed below. To see the results of other rounds, use the dropdown menu above to select a round and the table will update.
Undeclared Write-insUndeclared write-in candidates may advance past the first round in some ranked-choice elections. If the official source reports write-in votes by candidate name, Ballotpedia displays them alongside the ballot-qualified candidates. However, if write-in votes are reported without a name, they will instead be included in the total write-in votes figure in Round 1. Please consult the official elections source for more details about unnamed write-in candidate vote totals past Round 1.
0.3
33
0
There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source
Total votes: 13,186
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
Endorsements
Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Hartmann in this election.
Undeclared Write-insUndeclared write-in candidates may advance past the first round in some ranked-choice elections. If the official source reports write-in votes by candidate name, Ballotpedia displays them alongside the ballot-qualified candidates. However, if write-in votes are reported without a name, they will instead be included in the total write-in votes figure in Round 1. Please consult the official elections source for more details about unnamed write-in candidate vote totals past Round 1.
0.4
55
0
Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source
Total votes: 13,237
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
Patricia Hartmann completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2019. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Hartmann's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
I am a 41 year resident of St. Paul with 37 years in the Macalester Groveland neighborhood where I raised my family. I have been a small business owner and self-employed as an attorney for more than 35 years. I am working with a broad coalition of neighbors and community members from across the spectrum who feel that the City of St. Paul is headed in the wrong direction and that it needs change.
The streets of St. Paul show how desperately we need to get back to taking care of basic city services. They have deteriorated to the extent that they are not safe for pedestrians, cars or bikes. They present a public safety issue for all residents and visitors.s
Public safety is a concern due to the daily shootings, increasing theft and 911 calls. Despite this alarming trend, our elected officials have chosen to cut funding for our first responders and police force.
The taxes and fees the City levies continue to increase at an unsustainable rate, while our city services continue to decline.
Government transparency and accountability are of primary importance and play a huge factor in the issues we confront today. Although our city holds informational meetings, these are staged 'listening sessions' that do not allow for true citizen engagement. If the City has prepared any handouts, they usually wait until the meeting to make the information available, when the information could have been posted on the city website for download ahead of the meeting.
The City will not allow citizens to ask oral questions at meetings, but are told to put any questions on paper that are to be deposited into a box or collected by city staff. Online comments are hard to find on the city website. The time to submit citizen comments is usually very brief and it is apparent that it always follows the time when the city has actually decided on its course of action. There is no meaningful opportunity for people to contribute ideas or ask questions of our city leaders.
In terms of leadership I think the greatest example was Abraham Lincoln. He had to make difficult decisions in a time of extreme chaos surrounding the civil war. He was not only bright and guided by extremely high principles, he was extremely evolved. Lincoln was known for his ability to approach someone who had been an opponent of his and invite that person into his cabinet or staff.
Lincoln's writings were beyond prosaic. They inspired and ennobled people. Lincoln's Gettysburg address may be his most famous speech--and for obvious reasons. I personally favor his second inaugural address with its post civil war pledge to go forward with 'charity for all and malice toward none,' as the most eloquent speech ever given. He was an incomparable leader.
An elected official needs to be free of bias and favoritism. Decisions should be made based on the merits of the ideas, not the political leanings or favors one might expect to gain from a special interest group. People need to be mature enough to admit when they have made a mistake.
I still remember the assassination of President Kennedy. I was in fourth grade. I remember hearing a couple of students talk about it as we returned to our classrooms after lunch and recess. A few minutes later the school principal came into our classroom to announce that the President had been shot. Very soon after that came the announcement that he had died.
Plato's Republic. I thought it was ingenious in showing how people it analogized individuals to forms of government and quite convincingly showed the results in both cases, depending on the values of the individual or the government.
A sincere desire to be helpful to the community you represent and a willingness to be open to new ways of thinking about the problems and issues. It is very important that we stop rubber stamping the old ideas of the current administration.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
Ballotpedia features 618,534 encyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional staff of editors, writers, and researchers. Click here to contact our editorial staff or report an error. For media inquiries, contact us here. Please donate here to support our continued expansion.