Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Penny Robe

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Penny Robe
Image of Penny Robe
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 3, 2020

Education

Bachelor's

Lubbock Christian University, 1989

Law

Texas Tech University School of Law, 1992

Military

Service / branch

U.S. Air Force

Years of service

1995 - 2000

Contact

Penny Robe (Democratic Party) ran for election for judge of the Texas 380th District Court. Robe lost in the general election on November 3, 2020.

Robe completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Penny Robe served in the United States Air Force from 1995 to 2000. She earned a bachelor's degree from Lubbock Christian University in 1989 and a J.D. from Texas Tech University School of Law in 1992.[1]

Elections

2020

See also: Municipal elections in Collin County, Texas (2020)

General election

General election for Texas 380th District Court

Incumbent Benjamin N. Smith defeated Penny Robe in the general election for Texas 380th District Court on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Benjamin N. Smith (R)
 
56.5
 
258,945
Image of Penny Robe
Penny Robe (D) Candidate Connection
 
43.5
 
199,461

Total votes: 458,406
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas 380th District Court

Penny Robe advanced from the Democratic primary for Texas 380th District Court on March 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Penny Robe
Penny Robe Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
57,081

Total votes: 57,081
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas 380th District Court

Incumbent Benjamin N. Smith defeated Melvin Thathiah in the Republican primary for Texas 380th District Court on March 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Benjamin N. Smith
 
82.5
 
48,213
Image of Melvin Thathiah
Melvin Thathiah
 
17.5
 
10,262

Total votes: 58,475
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Penny Robe completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Robe's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am committed to fairness and following the law. I will bring a balanced perspective to the bench, from having practiced over 25 years, and in every area of law that this court handles. For criminal cases, I have been both a criminal prosecutor, and a criminal defense attorney, which gives me the ability to be fair, and see that justice is served. Having served from both sides in criminal cases, I understand the bias created from only serving as a prosecutor, and I do not have that bias. My ability to be fair is further strengthened by the broad legal experience and wisdom gained by serving in different roles throughout my career, and having been in the trenches for all the different types of cases that come before this court. I was a JAG in the US Air Force. One of my assignment was as a criminal defense counsel for the Air Force Base where I was assigned. I learned that it is important to stand up for what is right, even when it goes against those in authority over you. Integrity First.Service before self. Excellence in all we do. These are the core values of the Air Force, and the guiding values I live every day.
  • Fairness and balance are important. Every person coming to this court deserves to have their cases decided with those key traits - fairness and balance.
  • Integrity first. Service before self. Excellence in all we do. I learned these core values in the US Air Force and would bring them with me as a Judge
  • Life experience matters. The breadth of my experience and knowledge, and the wisdom earned through this experience, make me an ideal person for this position.
Our system of government includes separation of powers, and an independent judiciary. Judges don't create the law. Judges interpret the law, balancing justice with mercy. As a judge, I would follow the law and apply it to the cases before me with fairness and balance. Access to justice for low-income people is an area I feel so passionate about that I currently serve on the Board of Directors for Legal Aid of NorthWest Texas, Inc. and I have been named pro bono attorney of the year for Collin County, Texas. I believe that in a fair legal system, justice is equally available to all parties.
My very first job was as a cashier at KMart. I kept that job throughout high school, and during breaks from college during my freshman year of college.
Empathy is a key quality for a judge. Good judicial temperament requires an awareness of the importance and impact of the cases on each participant in the proceedings before the court. Empathy gives judges patience and compassion, both of which are necessary for a good judge.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on September 21, 2020