Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Sam Benningfield

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Sam Benningfield
White/VanBuren County General Sessions Court
Tenure
Present officeholder

Education
Bachelor's
Tennessee Technological University
Law
Nashville School of Law

Sam E. "Sammie" Benningfield is a judge for the White/VanBuren County General Sessions Court in Tennessee. He also has jurisdiction over the juvenile courts of White County and Van Buren County. He is based in Sparta.[1]

Benningfield was first elected to the office in 1998. He was re-elected in 2014.[2]

Biography

Benningfield earned a B.A. from the Tennessee Technological University in 1982. He went on to earn a J.D. from the Nashville School of Law in 1991. He was admitted to the Tennessee Bar the same year.[3]

Elections

2014

See also: Tennessee judicial elections, 2014
Benningfield ran for re-election to the White/VanBuren County General Sessions Court.
General: He won without opposition in the general election on August 7, 2014. [2]

1998

Benningfield was first elected to the court in 1998.

Noteworthy events

Sentence reduction for birth control and sterilization (2017)

On November 15, 2017, Benningfield received a public reprimand from the Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct for offering White County inmates a 30-day credit toward their jail time if they volunteered for long acting reversible contraception (LARC), or sterilization. "You have acknowledged that even though [you] were trying to accomplish a worthy goal in preventing the birth of substance addicted babies by the entry of your order of May 15, 2017," the board wrote in its reprimand letter, "you now realize that this order could unduly coerce inmates into undergoing a surgical procedure which would cause at least a temporary sterilization, and it was therefore improper."[4]

The standing order offered male inmates vasectomies and female inmates an implant effective for up to four years, to be administered by the Tennessee Department of Health at no charge to the inmates. Inmates were also offered a two-day credit toward their sentences if they completed a neonatal syndrome education program.[5]

Benningfield said his intention in issuing the order was to discourage repeat drug offenders who could not afford child support from having more children. "I hope to encourage them to take personal responsibility and give them a chance, when they do get out, to not to be burdened with children. This gives them a chance to get on their feet and make something of themselves," he said.[5] "As I contemplated this program, it occurred to me that many of the same women I had incarcerated were the very same from whom I was having to remove their children in my role as the juvenile judge because they were born addicted to drugs," he continued. "Many of the male population had multiple children for whom they were constantly in trouble for not supporting."[6]

District Attorney Bryant Dunaway, Tennessee 4th Circuit Court Judge O. Duane Slone, and the Tennessee Department of Health each voiced opposition to the order.[5][6] Slone, who started a program that offered LARC to female inmates in Sevier County and Cocke County but did not offer jail time credits, said he shared Benningfield's concerns about children being born into households with substance abuse. "[Benningfield's] intentions, I'm sure, were really good ones," he said, "but we really need to think about this in a broader sense, all the good that can be accomplished and is being accomplished in the right way."[6] Dunaway noted that, "It’s comprehensible that an 18-year-old gets this done, it can’t get reversed and then that impacts the rest of their life."[7]

The ACLU, which also opposed the order, issued the following statement about it:

Offering a so-called 'choice' between jail time and coerced contraception or sterilization is unconstitutional. Such a choice violates the fundamental constitutional right to reproductive autonomy and bodily integrity by interfering with the intimate decision of whether and when to have a child, imposing an intrusive medical procedure on individuals who are not in a position to reject it. Judges play an important role in our community – overseeing individuals’ childbearing capacity should not be part of that role.[8]
—ACLU (2017)[5]

Benningfield withdrew the order in late July 2017.[9] The county reported that, during the time the order was effective, 32 female inmates had received implants as part of the program and 38 male inmates had signed up for vasectomies. In his filing rescinding the order, Benningfield said that inmates who had signed up for the procedures during the order's effective period could still receive credit on their sentences if they also took "serious and considered steps toward their rehabilitation."[5][9]

Benningfield released the statement below after the initial reaction to his order and before his reversal of the order: <

See also

External links

Footnotes