Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

South Dakota Initiated Measure 29, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

U.S. House • State executive offices • State Senate • State House • Supreme court • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • Municipal • How to run for office
Flag of South Dakota.png


South Dakota Initiated Measure 29
Flag of South Dakota.png
Election date
November 5, 2024
Topic
Marijuana
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
State statute
Origin
Citizens

South Dakota Initiated Measure 29, the Marijuana Legalization Initiative, was on the ballot in South Dakota as an initiated state statute on November 5, 2024.[1] The ballot measure was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported legalizing the recreational use, possession, and distribution of marijuana.

A "no" vote opposed legalizing the recreational use, possession, and distribution of marijuana.


Election results

See also: Results for marijuana and psychedelics ballot measures, 2024

South Dakota Initiated Measure 29

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 189,916 44.46%

Defeated No

237,228 55.54%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What would Initiated Measure 29 have done?

See also: Text of measure

Initiated Measure 29 would have legalized the recreational use, possession, and distribution of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia for individuals aged 21 and over. It would have set possession limits at 2 ounces of marijuana, 16 grams of concentrated cannabis, and 1,600 mg of THC contained in cannabis products.[1]

The measure would have allowed individuals to possess up to six marijuana plants, with a maximum of 12 plants per household, provided the plants were kept in a private residence, in a locked space, and out of public view.[1]

The measure would have maintained prohibitions on the possession, ingestion, and distribution of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia for individuals under 21. It would have also banned operating a vehicle or being inside an operated vehicle while under the influence of marijuana. Additionally, it would have prohibited marijuana use on the grounds of any preschool, elementary school, high school, or juvenile detention facility and banned smoking cannabis in public places or where tobacco smoking is prohibited.[1]

The measure would not have required employers to permit or accommodate employee conduct allowed by the measure, nor would it have restricted employers from enforcing rules on cannabis use among employees.[1]

Did South Dakota voters previously vote to legalize marijuana?

See also: Marijuana ballot measures in South Dakota

This was the third time South Dakota voters decided on legalizing recreational marijuana.

In 2020, South Dakota voters approved Constitutional Amendment A by a vote of 54.18%-45.82% to legalize recreational marijuana. Voters also approved Initiated Measure 26 in the same election, which legalized medical marijuana. However, in 2021, Circuit Judge Christina Klinger ruled that the measure was unconstitutional, finding that it violated the state’s single-subject rule and constituted a revision of the constitution rather than an amendment. South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws, who also sponsored Amendment A, appealed to the South Dakota Supreme Court, which upheld the lower court ruling.

In 2022, South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws qualified another marijuana legalization measure for the ballot, Initiated Measure 27, which would have legalized the recreational use of marijuana for anyone over 21. Voters rejected the measure by a vote of 47.08%-52.92%.

Who was behind the campaigns surrounding the initiative?

South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws Inc was leading the campaign in support of the initiative. Matthew Schweich, the director of South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws, said in support of the measure, "I think for me, the strongest reason at its core is that if we’re going to allow alcohol to be legal in our society, then it makes absolutely no sense to punish people for using cannabis because alcohol is more harmful to the individual and to society than cannabis."[2]

Protecting South Dakota Kids was leading the campaign opposing the initiative. Protecting South Dakota Kids said opposing the measure, "We need your support to fight off a well-funded, out of state pot lobby that has invested millions to 'educate' South Dakotans about the 'merits' of their product while seeking to increase their market at the expense of the health and safety of our families and our communities. Increased sales increase suicide, mental illness, lowered IQ’s, and add more crime and more addiction!"[3]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[4]

Title: An Initiated Measure Legalizing the Recreational Use, Possession, and Distribution of Marijuana.

Attorney General Explanation: This initiated measure allows individuals 21 years of age or older to possess, grow, ingest, and distribute marijuana or marijuana paraphernalia. Individuals may possess up to two ounces of marijuana in a form other than marijuana concentrate or other marijuana products. Individuals may possess up to six marijuana plants with no more than twelve plants per household. The measure also places limits on the possession of other forms of marijuana and marijuana products.

Under the measure, the possession, ingestion, and distribution of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia remains illegal for individuals under the age of 21. Driving under the influence of marijuana remains illegal.

The measure restricts where individuals may possess or consume marijuana, such as schools or where tobacco is prohibited.

The measure allows employers to restrict an employee's use of marijuana. Property owners may also regulate the use of marijuana on their property.

The measure does not affect State laws dealing with hemp. It also does not change laws concerning the State's medical marijuana program.

The measure legalizes marijuana-derived substances considered felony controlled substances under State law. Marijuana remains illegal under federal law.

Judicial or legislative clarification of this measure may be necessary.

Vote "Yes" to adopt the initiated measure. Vote "No" to leave South Dakota law as it is. [5]

Full text

The full text of the ballot initiative is below:[1]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The attorney general wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 20, and the FRE is -24. The word count for the ballot title is 12.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 15, and the FRE is 15. The word count for the ballot summary is 193.


Support

South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws Inc was leading the campaign in support of the initiative.[6]

Arguments

  • Matthew Schweich, director of South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws: "I think for me, the strongest reason at its core is that if we’re going to allow alcohol to be legal in our society, then it makes absolutely no sense to punish people for using cannabis because alcohol is more harmful to the individual and to society than cannabis."


Oppose

Protecting South Dakota Kids was leading the campaign opposing the initiative.[7]

Arguments

  • Protecting South Dakota Kids: "We need your support to fight off a well-funded, out of state pot lobby that has invested millions to 'educate' South Dakotans about the 'merits' of their product while seeking to increase their market at the expense of the health and safety of our families and our communities. Increased sales increase suicide, mental illness, lowered IQ’s, and add more crime and more addiction!"


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for South Dakota ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through December 31, 2024.


South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws was registered in support of the ballot measure.[8]

Protecting South Dakota Kids and the Protecting SD Kids Ballot Question Committee were registered to oppose the ballot measure.[8]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $1,299,852.16 $281,367.70 $1,581,219.86 $1,313,620.69 $1,594,988.39
Oppose $502,713.63 $3,120.00 $505,833.63 $502,661.37 $505,781.37
Total $1,802,565.79 $284,487.70 $2,087,053.49 $1,816,282.06 $2,100,769.76

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.[8]

Committees in support of Initiated Measure 29
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws Inc. $901,289.16 $224,589.45 $1,125,878.61 $895,722.93 $1,120,312.38
Yes on 29 $398,563.00 $56,778.25 $455,341.25 $417,897.76 $474,676.01
Total $1,299,852.16 $281,367.70 $1,581,219.86 $1,313,620.69 $1,594,988.39

Donors

The following were the top donors who contributed to the support committees.

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
GLP SD LLC $230,000.00 $0.00 $230,000.00
Genesis Farms LLC $140,000.00 $0.00 $140,000.00
Besame Wellness SD LLC $110,000.00 $0.00 $110,000.00

Opposition

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in opposition to the measure.[8]

Committees in opposition to Initiated Measure 29
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Protecting SD Kids Ballot Question Committee $464,881.40 $3,120.00 $468,001.40 $464,857.27 $467,977.27
Protecting SD Kids PAC $37,832.23 $0.00 $37,832.23 $37,804.10 $37,804.10
Total $502,713.63 $3,120.00 $505,833.63 $502,661.37 $505,781.37

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Polls

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls
Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
South Dakota Initiated Measure 29, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024)
Poll
Dates
Sample size
Margin of error
Support
Oppose
Undecided
South Dakota News Watch 10/12/24-10/26/24 500 RV ± 3.3% 44% 51.4% 4.6%
Question: "How will you vote on recreational marijuana measure?"
Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill 10/19/24-10/22/24 825 LV ± 3.3% 45.3% 50.2% 4.5%
Question: "Would you vote yes or no on South Dakota Initiated Measure 29, An Initiated Measure Legalizing the Recreational Use, Possession, and Distribution of Marijuana? A yes vote adopt the measure to allow individuals 21 years of age or older to possess, grow, ingest, and distribute marijuana or marijuana paraphernalia. A no vote would leave the law as is."
South Dakota News Watch/Chiesman Center for Democracy 05/10/24-5/13/24 500 RV ± 4.5% 41.6% 51.8% 6.6%
Question: "Do you support the recreational marijuana initiative?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Background

Marijuana ballot measures in South Dakota

Constitutional Amendment A (2020)

See also: South Dakota Constitutional Amendment A, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2020)

In 2020, South Dakota voters approved Amendment A, which legalized the recreational use of marijuana and required the South Dakota State Legislature to pass laws providing for the use of medical marijuana and the sale of hemp by April 1, 2022. Amendment A was passed by 54.18%-45.82% on November 3, 2020.

On February 8, 2021, Circuit Judge Christina Klinger ruled that the measure was unconstitutional, finding that it violated the state's single-subject rule and constituted a revision of the constitution rather than an amendment. Amendment A sponsors South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws appealed to the South Dakota Supreme Court, which upheld the lower court ruling.

Initiated Measure 27 (2022)

See also: South Dakota Initiated Measure 27, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2022)

In 2022, South Dakota voters defeated Initiated Measure 27 by 47.08%-52.92%. Initiated Measure 27 would have legalized the use and possession of recreational marijuana, as well as marijuana accessories and paraphernalia, in South Dakota for people who are at least 21 years old.

There were some differences between Amendment A and Initiated Measure 27.

  • Amendment A authorized the State Department of Revenue to issue marijuana-related licenses for commercial cultivation, testing, manufacturing, wholesale, and retail. Initiated Measure 27 did not cover licensing.
  • Amendment A imposed a 15% tax on marijuana sales, while Initiated Measure 27 did not cover any taxation.
  • Amendment A authorized local governments to enact regulations surrounding licensees operating in its jurisdiction, while Initiated Measure 27 did not cover local regulations.
  • Amendment A required the South Dakota State Legislature to pass laws providing for a program for medical marijuana and the sale of hemp by April 1, 2022. Initiated Measure 27 did not cover hemp or medical marijuana.

Recreational marijuana by state

As of May 31, 2024, 24 states and Washington, D.C., had legalized the possession and personal use of marijuana for recreational purposes.[9][10][11][12]

  • In 13 states and D.C., the ballot initiative process was used to legalize marijuana.
  • In two states, the legislature referred a measure to the ballot for voter approval.
  • In nine states, bills to legalize marijuana were enacted into law.

Marijuana laws enacted by statewide ballot measures

The following table provides information on states that have legalized recreational marijuana or medical marijuana through state ballot measures.

State Year Measure Yes No Origin Type
Alaska 1998 Measure 8 58.67% 41.33% Initiative Medical
Nevada 1998 Question 9 58.65% 41.35% Initiative Medical
Oregon 1998 Measure 67 54.60% 45.40% Initiative Medical
Washington 1998 Initiative 692 58.97% 41.03% Initiative Medical
Maine 1999 Question 2 61.41% 38.59% Initiative Medical
Colorado 2000 Initiative 20 53.78% 46.22% Initiative Medical
Nevada 2000 Question 9 65.38% 34.62% Initiative Medical
Montana 2004 I-148 61.81% 38.19% Initiative Medical
Michigan 2008 Proposal 1 62.66% 37.34% Initiative Medical
Maine 2009 Question 5 58.87% 41.13% Initiative Medical
Arkansas 2016 Issue 6 53.11% 46.89% Initiative Medical
Montana 2016 I-182 57.87% 42.13% Initiative Medical
North Dakota 2016 Measure 5 63.79% 36.21% Initiative Medical
Missouri 2018 Amendment 2 65.59% 34.41% Initiative Medical
Oklahoma 2018 State Question 788 56.86% 43.14% Initiative Medical
Utah 2018 Proposition 2 52.75% 47.25% Initiative Medical
Mississippi 2020 Ballot Measure 1 68.52% 31.48% Initiative Medical
South Dakota 2020 Initiated Measure 26 69.92% 30.08% Initiative Medical
Colorado 2012 Initiative 64 55.32% 45.68% Initiative Recreational
Washington 2012 Initiative 502 55.70% 44.30% Initiative Recreational
Washington, D.C. 2014 Initiative 71 70.06% 29.94% Initiative Recreational
Alaska 2014 Ballot Measure 2 53.23% 46.77% Initiative Recreational
California 2016 Proposition 64 57.13% 42.87% Initiative Recreational
Massachusetts 2016 Question 4 53.66% 46.34% Initiative Recreational
Maine 2016 Question 1 50.26% 49.74% Initiative Recreational
Nevada 2016 Question 2 54.47% 45.53% Initiative Recreational
Michigan 2018 Proposal 1 55.89% 44.11% Initiative Recreational
Arizona 2020 Proposition 207 60.03% 39.97% Initiative Recreational
Montana 2020 CI-118 57.84% 42.16% Initiative Recreational
Montana 2020 I-190 56.90% 43.10% Initiative Recreational
New Jersey 2020 Public Question 1 67.08% 32.92% Referral Recreational
Maryland 2022 Question 4 67.20% 32.80% Referral Recreational
Missouri 2022 Amendment 3 53.10% 46.90% Initiative Recreational
Ohio 2023 Issue 2 57.19% 42.81% Initiative Recreational

Path to the ballot

Process in South Dakota

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in South Dakota

In South Dakota, the number of signatures required to qualify an initiated state statute for the ballot is equal to 5 percent of the votes cast for governor in the previous gubernatorial election. Signatures must be submitted by the first Tuesday of May during a general election year.

The requirements to get an initiated state statute certified for the 2024 ballot:

Once the signatures have been gathered and filed, the secretary of state verifies the signatures using a random sample method.

Stages of this ballot initiative

  • The South Dakota Secretary of State approved the initiative for circulation on September 6, 2023.[13]
  • On May 7, 2024, South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws submitted 29,030 signatures to the secretary of state.[14]
  • On June 3, 2024, the secretary of state's office announced that 22,558 signatures were deemed valid based on the random sampling.[15]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in South Dakota

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in South Dakota.

How to vote in South Dakota


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 South Dakota Secretary of State, "Text of Initiative," accessed September 20, 2023
  2. The Associated Press, "Recreational marijuana backers try to overcome rocky history in South Dakota," May 7, 2024
  3. Protecting South Dakota Kids, "Homepage," accessed May 7, 2024
  4. South Dakota Secretary of State, "2024 Ballot Questions," accessed September 13, 2024
  5. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  6. South Dakota for Better Marijuana Laws, "Homepage," accessed June 27, 2024
  7. Protecting South Dakota Kids, "Homepage," accessed June 27, 2024
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 South Dakota Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance Reporting System," accessed June 28, 2024
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed July 23, 2024
  10. Smart Approaches to Marijuana, "MJ Laws Map," accessed June 15, 2022
  11. Marijuana Policy Project, "Map of state marijuana laws," accessed June 15, 2022
  12. This number does not include South Dakota, where voters approved a marijuana legalization initiative in 2020 that was later struck down by the state's supreme court
  13. South Dakota Secretary of State, "Potential 2024 Ballot Questions," accessed September 20, 2023
  14. X, "South Dakotans For Better Marijuana Laws," May 7, 2024
  15. South Dakota Secretary of State, "Marijuana Validation Press Release," June 3, 2024
  16. South Dakota Secretary of State, “General Voting Information,” accessed July 23, 2024
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 South Dakota Secretary of State, “Register to Vote, Update Voter Registration or Cancel Voter Registration,” accessed July 23, 2024
  18. 2025 South Dakota Legislature, "HB 1066," accessed April 2, 2025
  19. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  20. 20.0 20.1 South Dakota Secretary of State, "General Voting Information," accessed July 23, 2024