Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
States and cities with police union agreements that require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly
| Police hiring, training, and discipline |
|---|
|
| • Police collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) • Ballotpedia CBA dashboard •Reform proposals •CBA areas of inquiry and disagreement •Arguments about police collective bargaining • Index of articles about criminal justice policy |
| Click here for more analysis of police hiring, training, and disciplinary requirements by state and city on Ballotpedia |
This page contains information from a Ballotpedia analysis about which states and cities have police union agreements that require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly. It is part of an analysis of police union collective bargaining agreements and related arrangements with police unions concerning hiring, training, and disciplinary requirements in the 50 states and top 100 cities by population.
According to the analysis, zero states and one city have police union agreements that require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly as of December 2023.
This page features the following sections:
Maps
Map showing which states with police union agreements require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly
Map showing which cities with police union agreements require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly
Background
Through the lens of more than 30 research questions related to police hiring, training, and discipline, Ballotpedia examined the collective bargaining agreements, statutes, and regulatory codes governing the 50 states and the top 100 US cities by population.
Some of the hiring, training, and discipline standards for police officers not established by statutes or regulations arise from negotiations with police unions. Those negotiations are often codified in collective bargaining agreements. Those agreements are the contracts that states and cities sign following negotiations with police unions. Some states and cities restrict collective bargaining, but may still negotiate with police unions using other methods. After negotiating with the unions, those jurisdictions sometimes establish police standards through documents including memoranda of understanding or meet and confer agreements.
You can find lists of all the collective bargaining agreements and other documents used by Ballotpedia for this survey here for states and here for cities.
Summary of findings
Ballotpedia's analysis of state and city union policies produced the following key takeaways (as of December 2023):
- There are zero state CBAs and one city CBA that require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly
- There are 26 state CBAs and 78 city CBAs that do not require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly
- There are 22 states and 21 cities that do not have police CBAs
- There are two states and one city in which the request for information on police CBAs was denied or information could not be verified
Results
The tables below include each state and city in alphabetical order and indicate those that have police union agreements that require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly. To see the provisions Ballotpedia used to support these results, click here.
- YES means that the jurisdiction has police union agreements that require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly
- NO means that the jurisdiction does not have police union agreements that require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly
- UNKNOWN means that Ballotpedia could not verify whether the jurisdiction had police union agreements that require law enforcement officers to do driving training regularly
- NO CBA means that the jurisdiction does not have a police union agreement
- FOIA DENIED means that the jurisdiction rejected Ballotpedia's request to review any collective bargaining agreements
| State | driving-training |
|---|---|
| Alabama | NO CBA |
| Alabama | NO CBA |
| Alaska | NO |
| Alaska | NO |
| Arizona | NO CBA |
| Arizona | NO CBA |
| Arkansas | NO CBA |
| Arkansas | NO CBA |
| California | NO |
| California | NO |
| Colorado | NO CBA |
| Colorado | NO CBA |
| Connecticut | NO |
| Connecticut | NO |
| Delaware | FOIA DENIED |
| Delaware | FOIA DENIED |
| District of Columbia | NO |
| District of Columbia | NO |
| Florida | NO |
| Florida | NO |
| Georgia | NO CBA |
| Georgia | NO CBA |
| Hawaii | NO |
| Hawaii | NO |
| Idaho | NO CBA |
| Idaho | NO CBA |
| Illinois | NO |
| Illinois | NO |
| Indiana | NO CBA |
| Indiana | NO CBA |
| Iowa | NO |
| Iowa | NO |
| Kansas | NO |
| Kansas | NO |
| Kentucky | NO CBA |
| Kentucky | NO CBA |
| Louisiana | NO CBA |
| Louisiana | NO CBA |
| Maine | NO |
| Maine | NO |
| Maryland | NO |
| Maryland | NO |
| Massachusetts | NO |
Employees may participate in driver safety trainings while off-duty, but they are not required | |
| Massachusetts | NO |
Employees may participate in driver safety trainings while off-duty, but they are not required | |
| Michigan | NO |
| Michigan | NO |
| Minnesota | NO |
| Minnesota | NO |
| Mississippi | NO CBA |
| Mississippi | NO CBA |
| Missouri | NO CBA |
| Missouri | NO CBA |
| Montana | NO |
| Montana | NO |
| Nebraska | NO |
| Nebraska | NO |
| Nevada | NO |
Mandatory trainings include defensive driving, but the frequency of these trainings is not clear | |
| Nevada | NO |
Mandatory trainings include defensive driving, but the frequency of these trainings is not clear | |
| New Hampshire | NO |
| New Hampshire | NO |
| New Jersey | NO |
| New Jersey | NO |
| New Mexico | NO CBA |
| New Mexico | NO CBA |
| New York | NO |
| New York | NO |
| North Carolina | NO CBA |
| North Carolina | NO CBA |
| North Dakota | NO CBA |
| North Dakota | NO CBA |
| Ohio | NO |
| Ohio | NO |
| Oklahoma | NO CBA |
| Oklahoma | NO CBA |
| Oregon | NO |
| Oregon | NO |
| Pennsylvania | NO |
| Pennsylvania | NO |
| Rhode Island | NO |
| Rhode Island | NO |
| South Carolina | NO CBA |
| South Carolina | NO CBA |
| South Dakota | NO CBA |
| South Dakota | NO CBA |
| Tennessee | NO CBA |
| Tennessee | NO CBA |
| Texas | NO CBA |
| Texas | NO CBA |
| Utah | NO CBA |
| Utah | NO CBA |
| Vermont | NO |
| Vermont | NO |
| Virginia | NO CBA |
| Virginia | NO CBA |
| Washington | NO |
A training matrix following vehicle collisions is included, which can result in driving training. It also mentions bi-annual driving certification, but the scope of this certification process is not included | |
| Washington | NO |
A training matrix following vehicle collisions is included, which can result in driving training. It also mentions bi-annual driving certification, but the scope of this certification process is not included | |
| West Virginia | UNKNOWN |
| West Virginia | UNKNOWN |
| Wisconsin | NO |
| Wisconsin | NO |
| Wyoming | NO CBA |
| Wyoming | NO CBA |
See also
Footnotes
| |||||||||||||||||
