Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

States and cities with police union agreements that require performance evaluations

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Criminal Justice Banner Gray.png
Police hiring, training, and discipline
Criminal Justice Icon 200x200.png

Police collective bargaining agreements (CBAs)
Ballotpedia CBA dashboard
Reform proposals
CBA areas of inquiry and disagreement
Arguments about police collective bargaining
Index of articles about criminal justice policy
Click here for more analysis of police hiring, training, and disciplinary requirements by state and city on Ballotpedia


This page contains information from a Ballotpedia analysis about which states and cities have police union agreements that require performance evaluations for law enforcement officers. It is part of an analysis of police union collective bargaining agreements and related arrangements with police unions concerning hiring, training, and disciplinary requirements in the 50 states and top 100 cities by population.

According to the analysis, 13 states and 41 cities have police union agreements that require performance evaluations for law enforcement officers as of December 2023.

This page features the following sections:

Maps

Map of states which have police union agreements that require annual performance evaluations for law enforcement officers

Map of cities which have police union agreements that require annual performance evaluations for law enforcement officers

Background

Through the lens of more than 30 research questions related to police hiring, training, and discipline, Ballotpedia examined the collective bargaining agreements, statutes, and regulatory codes governing the 50 states and the top 100 US cities by population.

Some of the hiring, training, and discipline standards for police officers not established by statutes or regulations arise from negotiations with police unions. Those negotiations are often codified in collective bargaining agreements. Those agreements are the contracts that states and cities sign following negotiations with police unions. Some states and cities restrict collective bargaining, but may still negotiate with police unions using other methods. After negotiating with the unions, those jurisdictions sometimes establish police standards through documents including memoranda of understanding or meet and confer agreements.

You can find lists of all the collective bargaining agreements and other documents used by Ballotpedia for this survey here for states and here for cities.

Summary of findings

Ballotpedia's analysis of state and city union policies produced the following key takeaways (as of 2023):

  • There are 13 state CBAs and 41 city CBAs that contain provisions related to performance evaluations
  • There are 13 state CBAs and 38 city CBAs that do not contain provisions related to performance evaluations
  • There are 22 states and 21 cities that do not have police CBAs
  • There are two states and one city in which the request for information on police CBAs was denied or information could not be verified

Results

The tables below include each state and city in alphabetical order and indicate those that have police union agreements that require police departments to conduct annual performance evaluations for law enforcement officers. To see the provisions Ballotpedia used to support these results, click here.

  • YES means that the jurisdiction has police union agreements that require performance evaluations
  • NO means that the jurisdiction does not have police union agreements that require police departments require performance evaluations
  • UNKNOWN means that Ballotpedia could not verify whether the jurisdiction had police union agreements that require performance evaluation
  • NO CBA means that the jurisdiction does not have a police union agreement
  • FOIA DENIED means that the jurisdiction rejected Ballotpedia's request to review any collective bargaining agreements

Results by state

Stateperformance-evaluation
AlabamaNO CBA
AlaskaYES

All employees receive performance evaluations

Members with probationary status received semiannual written evaluations; members with permanent status receive annual evaluations with their rater; non-permanent employees employed for more than thirty days receive a written evaluation.

ArizonaNO CBA
ArkansasNO CBA
CaliforniaYES

Performance evaluations referenced in CBA; no details given

ColoradoNO CBA
ConnecticutYES

Performance evaluations required at least once a year

Performance evaluations are required at least annually in advance of the employee's employment anniversary date to permit the exhaustion of the appeal process; evaluations are used to determine promotions and lateral assignments

DelawareFOIA DENIED
District of ColumbiaYES

Required; outlined in General Order 201 .20, Performance Rating Plan

FloridaYES

Performance reviews are to be conducted in accordance with Rule 60L-35, F.A.C., Performance Evaluation System

Performance reviews are performed by the employee's immediate supervisor; numerical quotes are not used as a factor in the review; no specifications for how frequently reviews are to be conducted

GeorgiaNO CBA
HawaiiYES

Evaluations referenced in terms of grievances

IdahoNO CBA
IllinoisNO
IndianaNO CBA
IowaYES

All employees receive annual performance evaluations

Employees are provided a copy of the evaluation; performance standards found in Accountable Government Act

KansasYES

Performance reviews conducted at least annually by employee's immediate supervisor

Specific periods are designated for annual and mid-year reviews for permanent employees, and the appeals process is outlined

KentuckyNO CBA
LouisianaNO CBA
MaineNO
MarylandNO
MassachusettsNO
MichiganNO
MinnesotaNO
MississippiNO CBA
MissouriNO CBA
MontanaNO
NebraskaYES

Referenced only; gives one-time bonus structure for satisfactory performance evaluation ratings

NevadaYES

Annual performance reviews required for permanent employees; more frequent reviews for probationary officers

Annual performance evaluations coincide with officers' pay progression dates; probationary officers are subject to performance reviews every 3-4 months at specified intervals

New HampshireNO
New JerseyNO
New MexicoNO CBA
New YorkNO
North CarolinaNO CBA
North DakotaNO CBA
OhioYES

All non-probationary employees have an annual performance review

Performance reviews are used for merit positions, raises, and promotions; employees must receive and sign a copy of their review; employee may appeal any section that is not labeled as "meets" or "above" standards

OklahomaNO CBA
OregonNO
PennsylvaniaNO
Rhode IslandNO
South CarolinaNO CBA
South DakotaNO CBA
TennesseeNO CBA
TexasNO CBA
UtahNO CBA
VermontYES

Annual performance evaluations required

Annual evaluations should take place within 45 days of the officer's original probation date; annual station evaluations take place in a different area each month

VirginiaNO CBA
WashingtonYES

Job Performance Appraisal (JPA) process provides an opportunity for employees and supervisors to discuss performance goals and expectations

West VirginiaUNKNOWN
WisconsinYES

Referenced in terms of appealing the evaluation, but not specifically outlined in the CBA

WyomingNO CBA

Results by city

Cityperformance-evaluation
Albuquerque, New MexicoNO
Anaheim, CaliforniaNO
Anchorage, AlaskaNO
Arlington, TexasNO CBA
Atlanta, GeorgiaNO CBA
Aurora, ColoradoYES

References yearly performance evaluations in terms of promotions

Austin, TexasNO
Bakersfield, CaliforniaYES

References annual performance evaluations in terms of bonuses

Baltimore, MarylandNO
Baton Rouge, LouisianaNO
Birmingham, AlabamaNO CBA
Boise, IdahoNO
Boston, MassachusettsYES

Requires annual evaluations

Buffalo, New YorkUNKNOWN
Chandler, ArizonaNO
Charlotte, North CarolinaNO CBA
Chesapeake, VirginiaNO CBA
Chicago, IllinoisNO
Chula Vista, CaliforniaNO
Cincinnati, OhioYES

Annual performance evaluations referenced in terms of grievance process

Cleveland, OhioNO
Colorado Springs, ColoradoNO CBA
Columbus, OhioYES

Performance evaluations required, but not specified to be annual

Evaluations based on Commission on the Accreditation of Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA); officers will not receive evaluations until after their probationary period; officers receive a copy of their evaluation; rater must make specific comments on every area of rating; evaluations are kept as records for 38 months

Corpus Christi, TexasNO
Dallas, TexasNO
Denver, ColoradoYES

Yearly evaluation ratings referenced in terms of promotions

Detroit, MichiganNO
Durham, North CarolinaNO CBA
El Paso, TexasYES

Referenced in terms of outside employment approvals

Fort Wayne, IndianaNO
Fort Worth, TexasNO
Fremont, CaliforniaNO
Fresno, CaliforniaYES

Evaluations required annually, upon exit of position, and monthly during the probationary period

Each piece of criteria is ranked 1-5; employee has 30 days to file written appeal

Garland, TexasNO CBA
Gilbert, ArizonaNO CBA
Glendale, ArizonaYES

Evaluations completed by HR

Greensboro, North CarolinaNO CBA
Henderson, NevadaNO
Hialeah, FloridaNO
Honolulu, HawaiiYES

Evaluations referenced in terms of grievances

Houston, TexasYES

Semi-annual Job Performance Reviews (JPR) referenced in terms of grievances

Indianapolis, IndianaNO
Irvine, CaliforniaYES

Performance evaluations required at unspecified intervals

Department directors rate employees using forms provided by Personnel Officers; employees must sign evaluation after discussing it with their supervisor

Irving, TexasNO CBA
Jacksonville, FloridaYES

Evaluations must be completed by an officer of a higher rank

Evaluations must be standardized and in writing; specially assigned officers may be reviewed by a civilian supervisor in coordination with a higher-ranked officer; grievance procedures are in place

Jersey City, New JerseyNO
Kansas City, MissouriNO
Laredo, TexasNO
Las Vegas, NevadaNO
Lexington, KentuckyYES

Referenced in relation to promotions

Lincoln, NebraskaYES

Newly promoted employees conduct performance reviews six months into the new position

Long Beach, CaliforniaNO
Los Angeles, CaliforniaYES

Employee performance is reviewed at least annually

Employee performance is reviewed annually and when their performance falls below the minimum requirement for receiving the next merit service step; reviewers are at least one rank above the employee being reviewed

Louisville, KentuckyYES

References annual performance evaluations in relation to complaints and discipline

Lubbock, TexasNO CBA
Madison, WisconsinNO
Memphis, TennesseeYES

Performance evaluations conducted annually by the employee's commanding officer

Officers will receive a copy of their evaluation and have the opportunity to appeal its contents

Mesa, ArizonaNO CBA
Miami, FloridaNO
Milwaukee, WisconsinYES

Referenced in relation to Early Intervention Programs

Minneapolis, MinnesotaYES

Performance evaluations are mentioned throughout the CBA, but the frequency of these evaluations is not included

Nashville, TennesseeNO
Newark, New JerseyNO
New Orleans, LouisianaNO CBA
New York, New YorkNO
Norfolk, VirginiaNO CBA
North Las Vegas, NevadaYES

Referenced in relation to longevity pay

Oakland, CaliforniaYES

Performance evaluations are mentioned throughout the CBA, but the frequency of these evaluations is not included

Oklahoma City, OklahomaYES

Referenced in relation to promotions

Omaha, NebraskaYES

Job performance interviews are conducted on an as-needed basis

Orlando, FloridaYES

Required annually

Evaluations filed in personnel history folders; evaluations used for promotions and merit pay

Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaNO
Phoenix, ArizonaYES

Referenced in relation to appeals

Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaYES

Required annually

Plano, TexasNO CBA
Portland, OregonYES

Required annually

Conducted by member's immediate supervisor; cannot be used for pay increases but can be used for promotions; cannot be based on alleged conduct; must be in writing

Raleigh, North CarolinaNO CBA
Reno, NevadaNO
Richmond, VirginiaNO CBA
Riverside, CaliforniaYES

Required at unspecified intervals

"Lieutenants shall review draft performance evaluations with Unit members prior to their finalization and being passed on to Captains."

Sacramento, CaliforniaYES

Employee performance evaluations are conducted at the discretion of the appointing authority

Employees on probationary status receive evaluations at "reasonable intervals"; can be used for transfers and salary step increases; can be appealed but not eligible for grievance procedures

San Antonio, TexasNO
San Bernardino, CaliforniaYES

Referenced in relation to personnel files

San Diego, CaliforniaYES

Annual performance evaluations referenced in relation to formal representation

San Francisco, CaliforniaYES

Referenced in relation to step advancements

San Jose, CaliforniaYES

"The performance evaluation rating period will coincide with annual shift change"

Santa Ana, CaliforniaYES

Referenced in relation to step advancements, appeals

Scottsdale, ArizonaNO CBA
Seattle, WashingtonYES

Annual performance appraisals required

Conducted by employee's immediate supervisor; supervisor must meet with employee regarding the appraisal; appraisal cannot reference alleged misconduct; employees can challenge appraisals

St. Louis, MissouriNO
Stockton, CaliforniaNO
St. Paul, MinnesotaNO
St. Petersburg, FloridaYES

Referenced in relation to progressions in pay plans and promotions

Tampa, FloridaYES

Referenced in relation to promotions

Toledo, OhioYES

Referenced in relation to the selection of field training officers

Tucson, ArizonaYES

Referenced in relation to probationary employees

Tulsa, OklahomaNO
Virginia Beach, VirginiaNO CBA
Wichita, KansasNO
Winston-Salem, North CarolinaNO CBA

See also

Footnotes