Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
WILLIAMS et al. v. NORTH CAROLINA (1945)

| WILLIAMS et al. v. NORTH CAROLINA |
|---|
| Term: 1944 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: October 13, 1944 |
| Decided: May 21, 1945 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 6-3 |
| Majority |
| Felix Frankfurter • Stanley Reed • Owen Josephus Roberts |
| Concurring |
| Robert Jackson • Frank Murphy • Harlan Fiske Stone |
| Dissenting |
| Hugo Black • William Douglas • Wiley Rutledge |
WILLIAMS et al. v. NORTH CAROLINA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 21, 1945. The case was argued before the court on October 13, 1944.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the North Carolina State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1940s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Stone Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: jurisdiction (jurisdiction over non-resident litigants)
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: North Carolina
- Citation: 325 U.S. 226
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Harlan Fiske Stone
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Felix Frankfurter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes