Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Wisconsin Question 3, Work Requirement for Welfare Benefits Advisory Question (April 2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wisconsin Question 3
Flag of Wisconsin.png
Election date
April 4, 2023
Topic
Welfare
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Advisory question

The Wisconsin Question 3, the Work Requirement for Welfare Benefits Advisory Question, was on the ballot in Wisconsin as a advisory question on April 4, 2023. It was approved.[1][2]

A "yes" vote supported advising the state legislature to require "able-bodied, childless adults... to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits."

A "no" vote opposed advising the state legislature to require "able-bodied, childless adults... to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits."


Election results

Wisconsin Question 3

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,417,035 79.57%
No 363,941 20.43%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did the question advise the state to do?

See also: Text of measure

The advisory question asked voters if able-bodied childless adults should be required to look for work in order to receive welfare benefits. The question was not legally binding and did not enact a work requirement law for welfare benefits.[2]

At the time of the election, state law required able-bodied individuals without dependents to look for work in order to receive unemployment insurance. There was also a work requirement for Wisconsin's food stamp program, Wisconsin Foodshare, but the requirement had been waived since October 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic.[3][4]

Who supported and opposed the advisory question?

See also: Support and Opposition

The question was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R-9). Foundation for Government Accountability also supported the measure. Sam Adolphsen, policy director of the Foundation for Government Accountability, said, "The workforce crisis in the Badger State has been driven largely by rapidly expanding welfare programs like food stamps, BadgerCare, and other cash benefits that, for three years, have been disconnected from work. Wisconsin has nearly a quarter million open jobs. Employers are desperate for workers, and voters will soon weigh in on whether they prefer able-bodied adults to be working for a paycheck or receiving a welfare check."[5]

Senate Minority Leader Melissa Agard (D-16) spoke in opposition to the question, saying, "Their resolution, simply put, attacks low-income people in the state of Wisconsin, and it's born out of a consideration to their base for the spring election. They're trying to gin up their voters, simply put."[6]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[2]

Shall able-bodied, childless adults be required to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits?[7]

Full text

The full text of the measure was as follows:[2]

Resolved by the senate, the assembly concurring, That the following question be submitted, for advisory purposes only, to the voters of this state at the spring election to be held in April 2023:

“Shall able-bodied, childless adults be required to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits?"[7]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2023

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 12, and the FRE is 45. The word count for the ballot title is 19.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Foundation for Government Accountability

Arguments

  • Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R): "It's so important to show the support of Wisconsin voters that if you're going to receive welfare benefits that you need to apply for work. Able-bodied adults should be working."
  • State Sen. Chris Kapenga (R): "We are confident the public supports this. We think this will put public pressure on the governor."
  • Sam Adolphsen, policy director of the Foundation for Government Accountability: "The workforce crisis in the Badger State has been driven largely by rapidly expanding welfare programs like food stamps, BadgerCare, and other cash benefits that, for three years, have been disconnected from work. Wisconsin has nearly a quarter million open jobs. Employers are desperate for workers, and voters will soon weigh in on whether they prefer able-bodied adults to be working for a paycheck or receiving a welfare check."


Opposition

Opponents

Officials

Organizations

  • Wisconsin Democracy Campaign

Arguments

  • Senate Minority Leader Melissa Agard (D): "Their resolution, simply put, attacks low-income people in the state of Wisconsin, and it's born out of a consideration to their base for the spring election. They're trying to gin up their voters, simply put."


Campaign finance

The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through July 17, 2023.


See also: Campaign finance requirements for Wisconsin ballot measures

Ballotpedia identified one committee registered in support of the advisory question: Keep Wisconsin Working. The committee reported $480,000 in contributions. [8]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $480,000.00 $0.00 $480,000.00 $384,760.45 $384,760.45
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $480,000.00 $0.00 $480,000.00 $384,760.45 $384,760.45

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the ballot measure.[8]

Committees in support of Question 3
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Keep Wisconsin Working $480,000.00 $0.00 $480,000.00 $384,760.45 $384,760.45
Total $480,000.00 $0.00 $480,000.00 $384,760.45 $384,760.45

Donors

The following table shows the top donors to the committee registered in support of the ballot measure.[8]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Wisconsin Alliance for Reform $480,000.00 $0.00 $480,000.00

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Media editorials

See also: 2023 ballot measure media endorsements

Support

The following media editorial board published an editorial supporting the ballot measure:

  • Wisconsin State Journal Editorial Board: "The second statewide ballot question this spring is only advisory. It asks: 'Shall able-bodied child-less adults be required to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits?' Of course they should. And that’s why they already have to do so if they want to collect unemployment benefits and food stamps. The question is too cute by half in seeking to manufacture outrage. Nonetheless, we recommend voting 'yes.' Support the merits of the words, even if they’re redundant."


Opposition

Ballotpedia did not locate media editorial boards in opposition to the ballot measure.

Background

Work search requirements for state unemployment insurance

At the time of the election,Wisconsin state law required beneficiaries of state unemployment insurance to report on four activities related to searching for work each week to obtain benefits. On March 18, 2020, Gov. Tony Evers (D) issued an emergency order waiving the work search requirement during the duration of the public health emergency order. On May 19, 2021, the state legislature voted to reinstate the work search requirement.[9][10]

State unemployment statistics

As of December 2022, the unemployment rate was 2.3% in Wisconsin. The state labor force participation rate was 64.7%.[11][12]

Work requirements for state FoodShare program

At the time of the election,Wisconsin state law required persons between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have any dependents to meet certain work requirements. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the work requirement was waived as of October 1, 2020.[13]

In 2022, Gov. Tony Evers (D) vetoed Assembly Bill 935 (AB 935) after the state legislature passed the bill along party lines. AB 935 would have required the state Department of Health Services to re-enforce a federal work requirement for able-bodied adults without dependents to participate in the state’s FoodShare program. AB 935 passed in the state Assembly by a vote of 58-34 and in the state Senate by a vote of 21-12. A two-thirds (66.67%) vote was required to override the governor's veto. During the 2021-2022 legislative session, Republicans had a majority in both chambers but did not have the votes to override the veto.[14][15]

FoodShare Wisconsin statistics

As of December 2022, 374,877 assistance groups (individuals who live in the same household) received FoodShare benefits. Of that total, 33.8% of assistance groups included minors, and 47.7% included elderly, blind, or disabled members. The share of adults employed who received FoodShare benefits was 36.0%.[16]

Advisory questions on the ballot in Wisconsin

Between 1980 and 2023, Wisconsin voters decided on 10 advisory questions. In 1982, the state legislature voted to send an advisory question to voters on whether the state should advise the president and congress to negotiate a mutual nuclear weapons moratorium and reduction with the Soviet Union and other nations. It was approved with 75.8% of the vote. In 1983, Wisconsin voters decided on an advisory question regarding the construction of a high-level radioactive waste disposal site in Wisconsin. It was defeated with 88.9% of the vote.

In 1993, the state legislature sent five advisory questions to the ballot regarding gambling and a state lottery. Two were defeated, and three were approved.

In 2006, Wisconsin voters approved a question advising the state legislature to support the death penalty in certain circumstances. It was approved with 55.5% of the vote.

Path to the ballot

To put a advisory question before voters, a simple majority is required in both the Wisconsin State Senate and the Wisconsin House of Representatives. The governor's signature is not required.

The advisory question was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 4 (SJR 4). It passed the state Senate on January 17, 2023, by a vote of 22-10. On January 19, the state Assembly passed SJR 4 by a vote of 62-35 with two not voting.[1]

Vote in the Wisconsin State Senate
January 17, 2023
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in one session
Number of yes votes required: 17  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total22100
Total percent68.75%31.25%0.00%
Democrat1100
Republican2100

Vote in the Wisconsin House of Representatives
January 19, 2023
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in one session
Number of yes votes required: 50  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total62352
Total percent62.63%35.35%2.02%
Democrat0350
Republican6202

Lawsuit

  
Lawsuit overview
Issue: Whether the state legislature filed the measures with the correct elections office before the referral deadline
Court: Dane County Circuit Court
Ruling: Ruled in favor of defendants; measures allowed to appear on April ballot
Plaintiff(s): EXPO Wisconsin and WISDOMDefendant(s): Wisconsin Elections Commission
Plaintiff argument:
The state legislature needed to file the referrals with county election officials by January 25 but missed the deadline by a day.
Defendant argument:
The state legislature needed to file the referrals with the state elections commission by January 25 and did so.

  Source: Kenosha News

On January 31, 2023, EXPO Wisconsin and WISDOM, two groups that oppose the bail amendments, filed a lawsuit challenging the certification of all three ballot measures sent to the April ballot by the state legislature. The lawsuit filed in Dane County Circuit Court argues that the state legislature needed to submit the referrals to county election officials by January 25 to abide by the state law that requires ballot measures to be "filed with the official or agency responsible for preparing the ballots" at least 70 days before the election. The state legislature filed the ballot measures with the state elections commission on January 19 and with county election officials on January 26.[17]

On February 20, Dane County Circuit Judge Rhonda Lanford ruled that the measures could appear on the April ballot. The judge found that the lawsuit lacked the legal requirements for the court to intervene.[18]

On October 16, 2023, Judge Lanford denied a motion from the state legislature and state elections commission seeking to dismiss the case. A hearing was scheduled for March 19, 2024.[19]

On September 16, 2024, Judge Lanford ruled that the measure would stand despite procedural flaws.[20]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Wisconsin

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Wisconsin.

How to vote in Wisconsin


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Wisconsin State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 4 Overview," accessed January 18, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Wisconsin State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 4," accessed January 18, 2023
  3. Wisconsin Public Radio, "Wisconsin Republicans to add referendum questions on crime, welfare to ballot ahead of crucial Wisconsin Supreme Court race," January 17, 2023
  4. Wausau Pilot and Review, "Assembly approves bail amendment, welfare work requirement for April ballot," January 21, 2023
  5. Foundation of Government Accountability, "FGA praises Wisconsin legislators for putting work on the ballot," accessed February 14, 2023
  6. WPR, "Wisconsin Republicans add referendum questions crime welfare ballot ahead crucial Wisconsin election," accessed February 14, 2023
  7. 7.0 7.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Wisconsin Campaign Finance Information System, "Search," accessed January 30, 2023
  9. Wisconsin State Legislature, "Section 108.04," accessed February 14, 2023
  10. Wisconsin State Legislature, "Emergency Rule EmR2106," accessed February 14, 2023
  11. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, "Wisconsin & MSA Quick View," accessed February 14, 2023
  12. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, "Labor Force Participation Rate for Wisconsin," accessed February 14, 2023
  13. Wisconsin Department of Health Services, "FoodShare Employment and Training," accessed February 14, 2023
  14. Wisconsin State Legislature, "Assembly Bill 935," accessed February 10, 2023
  15. Wisconsin Department of Health Services," accessed February 14, 2023
  16. Wisconsin Department of Health Services, "FoodShare at a Glance: December 2022," accessed February 14, 2023
  17. Kenosha News, "Lawsuit seeks to block 2 measures from April ballot," January 31, 2023
  18. Channel 3000, "Wisconsin judge OKs ballot measures for April election," February 20, 2023
  19. Wisconsin State Journal, "Lawsuit challenging Republican workforce, cash bail measures can proceed, judge says," October 17, 2023
  20. AP News, "Wisconsin’s voter-approved cash bail measures will stand under judge’s ruling," September 16, 2024
  21. Wisconsin Election Commission, “Election Day Voting,” accessed May 4, 2023
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 Wisconsin Elections Commission, "Voter Registration and Proof of Residence," accessed May 4, 2023
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 20, 2024
  24. Wisconsin Elections Commission, "Wisconsin Voter Registration Application," accessed November 2, 2024
  25. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  26. 26.0 26.1 Wisconsin Elections Commission, "Photo ID," accessed May 4, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "wvid" defined multiple times with different content
  27. 27.0 27.1 Wisconsin Department of Transportation, "Wisconsin ID card for voting purposes - petition process," accessed May 4, 2023