It’s the 12 Days of Ballotpedia! Your gift powers the trusted, unbiased information voters need heading into 2026. Donate now!

Mars Scott

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 10:21, 11 August 2024 by Kirsten Corrao (contribs) (Add PersonCategories widget; remove some hard-coded categories)
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Mars Scott
Image of Mars Scott
Elections and appointments
Last election

June 2, 2020

Education

Bachelor's

University of Montana, 1975

Law

University of Montana School of Law, 1980

Military

Years of service

1984 - 2006

Personal
Birthplace
San Luis Obispo, Calif.
Religion
Protestant
Profession
Attorney
Contact

Mars Scott ran for election for judge of the Montana Supreme Court. He lost in the primary on June 2, 2020.

Scott completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Mars Scott was born in San Luis Obispo, California. He earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Montana in June 1975 and his law degree from the University of Montana School of Law in June 1980. Scott's professional experience includes working as an attorney at law. He also served in the United States Navy from 1984 to 2006. Scott has been affiliated with the American Legion, Reserve Officers Association, the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, the National Board of Trial Advocacy, the State Bar of Montana Professionalism Committee and Family Law Section, Montana Trial Lawyers, American Bar Association, the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, and Missoula Children's Theatre.[1]

Elections

2020

See also: Montana Supreme Court elections, 2020

General election

General election for Montana Supreme Court

Incumbent Laurie McKinnon defeated Mike Black in the general election for Montana Supreme Court on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Laurie McKinnon
Laurie McKinnon (Nonpartisan)
 
57.0
 
303,839
Image of Mike Black
Mike Black (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
43.0
 
229,232

Total votes: 533,071
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for Montana Supreme Court

Incumbent Laurie McKinnon and Mike Black defeated Mars Scott in the primary for Montana Supreme Court on June 2, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Laurie McKinnon
Laurie McKinnon (Nonpartisan)
 
53.3
 
169,546
Image of Mike Black
Mike Black (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
29.7
 
94,445
Image of Mars Scott
Mars Scott (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
17.0
 
54,036

Total votes: 318,027
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2020

Video for Ballotpedia

Video submitted to Ballotpedia
Released March 25, 2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Mars Scott completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Scott's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I'm a third generation Montanan. My grandparents homesteaded in eastern Montana. I grew up in Helena and attended the University of Montana graduating with honors in psychology and political science. I also played varsity tennis for four years. I earned my law degree at the University of Montana in 1980. I've operated my own law firm since 1983. I've been married to my wife, Elaine, for over 35 years. We have two sons both of whom are attorneys.

In 1984, I was directly commissioned into the United States Naval Reserve as an Ensign and retired 22 years later as a Commander. I was recalled to active duty twice. My specialty was Intelligence and I worked for Reserve Unit Seal Team One and was assigned to various commands at the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Office of Naval Intelligence, and the Pentagon. After 9/11, I was one of 26 reservists trained at the Naval Academy to be a certified NCIS agent.

I was the chairperson for the Family Law Section for over 15 years. I currently serve on three Supreme Court groups--the Commission on Technology, the Standing Master Advisory Committee, and the E-filing Advisory Committee. I'm a Fellow in the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, a Certified Family Law Arbitrator, on the National Board of Trail Advocacy (Family Law), a member of the State Bar Professionalism Committee, and the Missoula Children's Theatre. I twice received the award for the outstanding article in the Montana Lawyer magazine.
  • Fighting for Montana Families
  • Access to Justice for All Citizens of Montana
  • Consistency, Common Sense, and Balance in all Judicial Decisions
Access to justice and consistency in the family law cases are extremely important issues that need addressing. Currently, many Montanans do not have access to our judicial system because of the cost. "How much justice can you afford" should not be a joke that people make about our legal system. Instead, we should look for ways to ensure that anyone with a legal dispute can access our court system with legal representation. I would look at promoting limited scope representation, and also possibly certifying legal technicians to provide limited legal advice in certain situations such as domestic relations law and landlord tenant disputes. There are ways to solve this problem if we get creative.

Further, my 40 years of experience in domestic relations law would bring added knowledge and proficiency to the Montana Supreme Court in family law cases. Four of the seven justices were former criminal prosecutors and three were former criminal public defenders. One justice did have limited family law experience and three were former district court judges so they did hear family law cases. Criminal law is well represented on the Supreme Court, but not domestic relations law. I have focused my practice on domestic relations law and I think I can provide more balance and a better in-depth analysis in domestic relations cases which would make the outcomes more predictable and thereby reduce the stress and cost for parties.
The personal will to serve the public needs must be the most important characteristic for an elected official. A public official should not run for office for self-enhancement, but should run for office with the sincere desire to meet the public's needs as required by the office sought. After that, I think characteristics such as honesty, common sense, respect for people, respect for the law, fairness, civility timeliness, and clarity of thought and expression are some of the characteristics that are important for an elected justice.
Energy and enthusiasm and the sincere desire to engage in the task of promoting access to the court system for all Montanans, and to bring consistency and predictability in domestic relations cases. After that, I think I have the leadership skills to achieve these goals along with the qualities I've listed above for officials who hold elected office.
The first historical event I remember was the Cuban missile crisis. I was 9 years old.
I like Jeff Shaara's Gods and Generals, a novel about the Civil War, not only because of the fascinating historical discussion of the events leading up to the Battle of Gettysburg, but also because of the way the author portrays the characters as real people with real life stresses and tells the story of the battles and events from their point of view, with their thoughts and their feelings. Reading this book helps me appreciate that even though leadership is not an easy task, a person can be a leader with perseverance and a desire to overcome human frailties to do your duty to accomplish the stated objective.
The Montana Supreme Court has administrative authority over the state court system and authority to adopt rules of practice and procedure for lower courts. The Supreme Court is responsible for promoting the system of justice in Montana and for ensuring that all Montanans have access to the legal system to solve their disputes. Both of these responsibilities need to be pursued and promoted by all members of the Montana Supreme Court.

Further, the Montana Supreme Court regulates the admission of attorneys to the state bar and regulates the conduct of attorneys and judges. These issues require great sensitivity to balance the public image of the legal profession with the lawyer's license to practice law. I've been a member of the Montana State Bar Professionalism committee for over 30 years, and I understand the professionalism issues that arise in dealing with clients, courts and colleagues.
I believe the will of the people is expressed in the Montana State Constitution and also through the laws passed by the legislature. Judges need to be independent in their decision making and follow the law as expressed by the people because the judicial system is the people's judicial system, not the judge's judicial system and not the lawyer's judicial system. The Montana judicial system must be responsive to the legal needs of Montana's citizens, and judges meet that goal when they apply the law to the facts of a case in an unbiased manner.
The issue with this question maybe whether an empathetic judge would not follow a law if the judge thought the result seemed to harsh, but I do believe that empathy is an extremely important quality for a judge because human beings, not computers, are involved in the legal system so judges need to be people oriented. However, if the legislature passed a law that may result in a harsh outcome, the law still needs to be followed, but where the law gives discretion to a judge, the judge should be willing to listen to a person's story to see if an outcome might be fashioned that has a positive result for all parties. After all, a judge's job is to judge and render decisions based on the facts of the case.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on April 9, 2020