Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Chicago, Illinois, Retail Sale of Alcohol Ban Continuation Measure (November 2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local ballot measure elections in 2016

Retail Sale of Alcohol Ban Continuation: Chicago
LocalBallotMeasures Final.png
The basics
Election date:
November 8, 2016
Status:
Defeatedd Defeated
Topic:
Local alcohol
Related articles
Local alcohol on the ballot
November 8, 2016 ballot measures in Illinois
Cook County, Illinois ballot measures
See also
Chicago, Illinois

A referral was on the ballot for Chicago voters in Cook County, Illinois, on November 8, 2016. It was defeated.

A yes vote was a vote in favor of continuing the prohibition of the sale at retail of alcoholic liquor in the 26th Precinct of the 17th Ward of the City of Chicago
A no vote was a vote against continuing the prohibition of the sale at retail of alcoholic liquor in the 26th Precinct of the 17th Ward of the City of Chicago

Election results

Retail Sale of Alcohol Ban Continuation Measure
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No24151.94%
Yes 223 48.06%
Election results from Chicago Board of Election Commissioners

Text of measure

Ballot question

The following question appeared on the ballot:[1]

Shall the prohibition of the sale at retail of alcoholic liquor be continued in this 26th Precinct of the 17th Ward of the City of Chicago (as such precinct existed as of the last general election)?[2]

Full text

The full text of the measure is available here.

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Illinois

This measure was put on the ballot through a vote of the governing officials of Chicago, Illinois.

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Chicago Local alcohol. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, "Offices, Candidates, Retention Judges, Constitutional Questions, Referenda And Local Options," November 8, 2016
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.