Historical Minnesota budget and finance information

---

This article does not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.

---

The historical Minnesota budget and finance information below applies to years prior to the most current fiscal year. With the exception of the tab labeled "Prior fiscal year budgets," the tabs below display information, from several different fiscal years, as it was presented on Ballotpedia in prior calendar years. For more current information regarding Minnesota's budget and finances, click here.

As published 2016

Minnesota budget and finances

General information

Budget calendar: Biennial

Fiscal year: 2017

State credit rating: AA+ (as of 2014)

Current governor: Mark Dayton

Financial figures

Total spending (state and federal funds): $35.2 billion (estimated for 2015)

Per capita spending: $6,414.68 (estimated for 2015)

Total state tax collections: $23.1 billion (2014)

Per capita tax collections: $4,238.29 (2014)

State debt: $85.9 billion (as of 2014)

Per capita state debt: $15,965 (as of 2014)

State budget and finance pages • Total state expenditures • State debt • Tax policy in Minnesota

In Minnesota, as in other states, lawmakers and public officials are elected in part to manage the state's finances. This includes generating revenues (money coming into the state from various sources) and approving expenditures (the money spent on governmental functions and servicing state debt). State budgets are complex and fluid, as they depend on anticipated revenues and planned expenditures, which may alter over the course of a fiscal year. If revenues do not keep pace with expenditures, states generally have to raise taxes, cut services, borrow money, or a combination of the three. State budget decisions are also influenced by policy decisions at the national level, such as the Affordable Care Act or energy and environmental regulations, and issues at the local level, such as crime and the quality of education.

HIGHLIGHTS

Between fiscal years 2014 and 2015, total government spending in Minnesota increased by approximately $3.3 billion—from $31.9 billion in fiscal year 2014 to an estimated $35.2 billion in 2015. This represents a 9.43-percent increase.

In Minnesota in fiscal year 2014, 46.9 percent of total tax revenues came from income taxes. Sales taxes and gross receipts accounted for 42.2 percent of total state tax collections.

Education accounted for 32.6 percent of state expenditures in fiscal year 2015, while 29.8 percent went to Medicaid.

The Minnesota state budget and financial data presented here come from different years because the states and the federal government report and publish the information at different times.

Definitions

The following terms are used to describe a state's finances:

• Revenues come mainly from tax collections, licensing fees, federal aid, and returns on investments.
• Expenditures generally include spending on government salaries, infrastructure, education, public pensions, public assistance, corrections, Medicaid, and transportation.
• State debt refers to the money borrowed to make up for a deficit when revenues do not cover spending.
• The state credit rating is the grade given by a credit rating agency based on the general financial health of the state's government and economy.
• State funds include general and other state-based funds. A general fund is "the predominant fund for financing a state's operations." Other state funds are "restricted by law for particular governmental functions or activities."
• Federal funds are "funds received directly from the federal government."
• Total spending is calculated by adding together the totals for state and federal funds used for expenditures.

Note: In comparing dollar amounts across the states, it is important to note that the cost of living can from state to state and within a state. The amounts given on this page have not been adjusted to reflect these differences. For more information on "regional price disparities" and the Consumer Price Index, see the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Revenues

2014 revenues

See also: State government tax collections by source

The table below breaks down state government tax collections by source in 2014 (comparable figures from surrounding states are also provided to give additional context). Figures for all columns except "2013 population" and "Per capita collections" are rendered in thousands of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000). Figures in the columns labeled "2013 population" and "Per capita collections" have not been abbreviated.

Compared to neighboring states, Minnesota had the second highest state tax collections per capita, at $4,238.

State tax collections by source ($ in thousands), 2014
State	Property taxes	Sales and gross receipts	Licenses	Income taxes	Other taxes	Total	2013 population	Per capita collections
Minnesota	$836,743	$9,759,346	$1,314,463	$10,844,216	$374,133	$23,128,901	5,457,125	$4,238
Iowa	N/A	$3,771,938	$808,047	$3,586,277	$105,577	$8,271,839	3,109,481	$2,660
North Dakota	$3,026	$1,848,130	$227,245	$748,966	$3,293,068	$6,120,435	740,040	$8,270
South Dakota	N/A	$1,296,748	$277,787	$24,819	$9,142	$1,608,496	853,304	$1,885
Wisconsin	$159,069	$7,359,539	$1,040,619	$7,779,733	$71,965	$16,410,925	5,759,432	$2,849
United States	$14,232,835	$411,414,175	$51,120,024	$357,104,785	$31,880,270	$865,752,089	318,907,401	$2,715
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "2014 annual survey of state government tax collections by category," accessed April 4, 2016

Minnesota tax collections by source in 2014.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau

The table below lists 2014 tax collections by source as percentages of total collections. About 46.9 percent of Minnesota's total state tax collections came from income taxes.

State tax collections by source (as percentages), 2014
State	Property taxes	Sales and gross receipts	Licenses	Income taxes	Other taxes
Minnesota	3.6%	42.2%	5.7%	46.9%	1.6%
Iowa	N/A	45.6%	9.8%	43.4%	1.3%
North Dakota	0.0%	30.2%	3.7%	12.2%	53.8%
South Dakota	N/A	80.6%	17.3%	1.5%	0.6%
Wisconsin	1.0%	44.8%	6.3%	47.4%	0.4%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "2014 annual survey of state government tax collections by category," accessed April 4, 2016

Federal aid to the state budget

See also: Federal aid to state budgets

State governments receive aid from the federal government to fund a variety of joint programs, mainly in the form of grants for such things as Medicaid, education, and transportation. In 2013 federal aid to the states accounted for roughly 30 percent of all state general revenues. Federal aid varies from state to state. For example, Mississippi received approximately $7.5 billion in federal aid in 2013, accounting for about 43 percent of the state's general revenues, the highest percentage of all of the states. By contrast, North Dakota received about $1.5 billion in federal aid in 2013, or just 19 percent of the state's general revenues, the lowest percentage in the nation.

The table below notes what share of Minnesota’s general revenues came from the federal government in 2013. That year, Minnesota received approximately $9.1 billion in federal aid, 26.4 percent of the state's general revenues. Taking into consideration the state's 2013 population, this came out to about $1,687 in federal aid per capita. Figures from surrounding states are provided for additional context.

Federal aid to state budgets, 2013
State	Total federal aid ($ in thousands)	Federal aid as a % of general revenues	Ranking (by % of general revenues)	Est. 2013 population	Aid per capita
Minnesota	$9,141,995	26.4%	39	5,420,380	$1,687
Iowa	$5,915,221	31.9%	27	3,090,416	$1,914
North Dakota	$1,529,135	19.0%	50	723,393	$2,114
South Dakota	$1,575,212	39.0%	4	844,877	$1,864
Wisconsin	$8,952,020	27.7%	36	5,742,713	$1,559
Sources: United States Census Bureau, "State Government Finances: 2013," accessed April 4, 2016 United States Census Bureau, "State totals: Vintage 2013," accessed April 8, 2016 Note: Per-capita figures were generated by Ballotpedia by dividing total federal aid for the state by the estimated population of that state in 2013.

Spending

Estimated 2015 expenditures

See also: Total state expenditures

The table below breaks down estimated spending totals for fiscal year 2015 (comparable figures from surrounding states are included to provide additional context). Figures for all columns except "Population” and “Per capita spending" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the columns labeled "Population” and “Per capita spending" have not been abbreviated.

Minnesota's total estimated government spending in fiscal year 2015 was $35.2 billion, which was the second highest amount when compared to surrounding states.

Total estimated state spending, FY 2015 ($ in millions)
State	State funds	Federal funds	Total spending	Population	Per capita spending
Minnesota	$24,613	$10,601	$35,214	5,489,594	$6,414.68
Iowa	$15,429	$6,335	$21,764	3,123,899	$6,966.93
North Dakota	$6,074	$1,674	$7,748	756,927	$10,236.13
South Dakota	$2,542	$1,347	$3,889	858,469	$4,530.16
Wisconsin	$34,275	$11,122	$45,397	5,771,337	$7,865.94
Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total spending and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census Bureau estimates. Source: National Association of State Budget Officers, "Examining fiscal 2013-2015 state spending," accessed April 4, 2016

Spending by function

Breakdown of spending by function in FY 2014.
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

See also: State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures

State spending in Minnesota can be further broken down by function (elementary and secondary education, public assistance, etc.). Fiscal year 2014 information is included in the table below (information from neighboring states is provided for additional context). Figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category.

In fiscal year 2014, Medicaid accounted for 29.8 percent of Minnesota's total expenditures.

State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures, FY 2014
State	K-12 education	Higher education	Public assistance	Medicaid	Corrections	Transportation	Other
Minnesota	28.2%	4.4%	1.5%	29.8%	1.5%	9.5%	25.1%
Iowa	16.6%	26.7%	0.5%	20.9%	2.3%	7.2%	25.8%
North Dakota	15.8%	17.3%	0.1%	12.9%	1.6%	19.0%	33.4%
South Dakota	14.0%	21.6%	0.7%	20.3%	2.7%	14.5%	26.3%
Wisconsin	16.1%	14.2%	0.4%	18.4%	2.8%	6.6%	41.5%
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."

Spending trends

Between 2010 and 2014, the share of the Minnesota state budget spent on K-12 education increased from 21.7 percent in 2010 to 28.2 percent in 2014. See the table below for further details (figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category).

Spending by function from 2010 to 2014 (as percentages)
Year	K-12 education	Higher education	Public assistance	Medicaid	Corrections	Transportation	Other
2014	28.2%	4.4%	1.5%	29.8%	1.5%	9.5%	25.1%
2013	29.2%	4.7%	1.4%	24.3%	1.5%	10.7%	28.2%
2012	23.8%	9.7%	1.4%	27.6%	1.5%	8.3%	27.7%
2011	22.9%	10.2%	1.5%	25.3%	1.6%	10.1%	28.4%
2010	21.7%	10.7%	1.5%	25.1%	1.6%	9.8%	29.6%
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."

Fiscal year budgets

See also: Historical Minnesota budget and finance information

Fiscal years 2016 and 2017

See budget bill: Budget bills for fiscal years 2016 and 2017

Governor Mark Dayton released his budget proposal for fiscal years 2016 and 2017 on January 27, 2015. The proposal called for $42 billion in general fund spending, with 42 percent of that going toward K-12 spending. Another 28 percent of the general fund was designated for health and human services spending. The state's Budget and Economic Forecast projected a $1.87 billion surplus through this plan, leading the governor to recommend an additional $735 million be spent on children and families.

On June 13, 2015, Governor Dayton signed the last of the budget bills for the 2016 and 2017 fiscal years. The total budget designated $38.2 billion in total spending for fiscal year 2016 and $38.8 billion in fiscal year 2017. The budget's balance by the end of fiscal year 2017 was projected to equal about $2.5 billion.

State debt

See also: State debt

According to a January 2014 report by the nonprofit organization State Budget Solutions, Minnesota had a state debt of approximately $85.9 billion. Its state debt per capita was $15,965. In this report for fiscal year 2012, state debt was calculated based on four components: "market-valued unfunded public pension liabilities, outstanding government debt, unfunded other post employment benefit (OPEB) liabilities, and outstanding unemployment trust fund loans." The report revealed that altogether state governments faced a combined $5.1 trillion in debt, which amounted to $16,178 per capita in the nation.

Total 2012 state debt
State	Total state debt	State debt per capita	Per capita debt ranking
Minnesota	$85,879,526,000	$15,965	21
Iowa	$37,783,060,000	$12,290	38
North Dakota	$9,263,742,000	$13,241	30
South Dakota	$7,707,458,000	$9,249	46
Wisconsin	$45,026,643,000	$7,863	47
Sources: State Budget Solutions, "State Budget Solutions' Fourth Annual State Debt Report," January 8, 2014

Taxpayer burden

TIA Methodology: To figure a state’s taxpayer burden or surplus, TIA looked at a state’s total reported assets minus capital assets and assets restricted by law (buildings, roads, land, etc.) to calculate “available assets,” which were then compared to the amount of money the state owes in bills, including retirement obligations such as pension plans and healthcare benefits for retirees. If the difference between available assets and total bills was positive, TIA called this a surplus; if it was negative, this was a burden. This amount was then divided by the number of individual tax returns with a positive tax liability, thus expressing the total state surplus or burden on a per-taxpayer basis.

According to a report released in September 2015 by the nonprofitTruth in Accounting (TIA), Minnesota ranked 16th best in the country in “taxpayer burden.” Rather than using per capita state debt, TIA ranked states based on what it called a “taxpayer burden,” a term that reflects “the amount each taxpayer would have to send to their state’s treasury in order for the state to be debt-free.” On the other hand, states that had sufficient resources to pay their bills were said to have a “taxpayer surplus,” which represents the amount that each taxpayer would receive if the state were to disburse its excess funds.

Based on analysis of Minnesota’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report from June 30, 2014 and actuarial reports for the state’s retirement plans, TIA concluded that $3.8 billion in promised retirement benefits were unfunded, but only $577.9 million of these liabilities were reported on Minnesota’s balance sheet. With all of the unfunded retirement benefits included in the total debt, the state had a shortfall of $4.3 billion, or a taxpayer burden of $2,200.

Public pensions

See also: Minnesota public pensions and Minnesota public employee salaries

Between fiscal years 2008 and 2012, the funded ratio of Minnesota's state-administered pension plans decreased from 83.8 percent to 75 percent. The state paid 81 percent of its annual required contribution, and for fiscal year 2012 the pension system's unfunded accrued liability totaled $9.4 billion. This amounted to $3,197 in unfunded liabilities per capita.

Credit ratings

See also: State credit ratings

Credit rating agencies, such as Standard and Poor's, assign grades to states that take into account a state's ability to pay debts and the general health of the state's economy. Generally speaking, a higher credit rating indicates lower interest costs on the general obligation bonds states sometimes sell to investors in order to finance large-scale undertakings (e.g., road construction and other public works projects). This in turn results in lower interest costs, thereby lowering the cost to taxpayers.

The table below lists the Standard and Poor's credit ratings for Minnesota and surrounding states from 2004 to 2014. Standard and Poor's grades range from AAA, the highest available, to BBB, the lowest.

State credit ratings, 2004 to 2014
State	2014	2013	2012	2011	2010	2009	2008	2007	2006	2005	2004
Minnesota	AA+	AA+	AA+	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA
Iowa	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA+
North Dakota	AAA	AAA	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA-
South Dakota	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA
Wisconsin	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA-	AA-	AA-	AA-
Source: Stateline: The Daily News Service of The Pew Charitable Trusts, "Infographic: S&P State Credit Ratings, 2001-2014," June 9, 2014

Economic indicators

See also: Economic indicators by state

Minnesota's GDP increased by 1.4 percent in 2014. Click the image to view a larger version.

Broadly defined, a healthy economy is typically one that has a "stable and strong rate of economic growth" (gross state product, in this case) and low unemployment, among many other factors. The economic health of a state can significantly affect its healthcare costs, insurance coverage, access to care, and citizens' physical and mental health. For instance, during economic downturns, employers may reduce insurance coverage for employees, while those who are laid off may lose coverage altogether. Individuals also tend to spend less on non-urgent care or postpone visits to the doctor when times are hard. These changes in turn may affect the decisions made by policymakers as they react to shifts in the industry. Additionally, a person's socioeconomic status has profound effects on their access to care and the quality of care received.

In 2013, Minnesota had the largest percentages of residents that earned incomes below the federal poverty level (FPL) and at least 400 percent above the FPL. Minnesota's median annual household income between 2011 and 2013 was $59,847, higher than in any neighboring state.

Note: Gross state product (GSP) on its own is not necessarily an indicator of economic health; GSP may also be influenced by state population size. Many factors must be looked at together to assess state economic health.

Various economic indicators by state
State	Distribution of population by FPL* (2013)				Median annual income (2011-2013)	Unemployment rate		Total GSP (2013)†
	Under 100%	100-199%	200-399%	400%+		Sept. 2013	Sept. 2014
Minnesota	12%	14%	28%	46%	$59,847	4.9%	4.1%	$312,081
North Dakota	10%	17%	33%	40%	$55,583	2.8%	2.8%	$56,329
South Dakota	11%	17%	35%	37%	$50,488	3.7%	3.4%	$46,732
Wisconsin	11%	15%	31%	42%	$54,205	6.6%	5.5%	$282,486
United States	15%	19%	30%	36%	$52,047	7.2%	5.9%	$16,701,415
* Federal Poverty Level. "The U.S. Census Bureau's poverty threshold for a family with two adults and one child was $18,751 in 2013. This is the official measurement of poverty used by the Federal Government." † Median annual household income, 2011-2013. ‡ In millions of current dollars. "Gross State Product is a measurement of a state's output; it is the sum of value added from all industries in the state." Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts"

Budget process

State documents and agenciesBelow are links to official Minnesota budget and financial documents. The first is the state's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). A CAFR is a detailed presentation of a government entity's financial condition. This includes fiscal activities and balances for a fiscal year. The second link is to the state's relevant budget agency or office. Minnesota CAFR Minnesota budget agency

The state operates on a biennial budget cycle. The sequence of key events in the budget process is as follows:

1. Budget instructions are sent to state agencies between May and June of the year preceding the start of the new biennium.
2. State agencies submit their budget requests to the governor by October 15.
3. The governor submits his or her proposed budget to the state legislature on the fourth Tuesday in January. This deadline is extended to the third Tuesday in February for a newly elected governor.
4. The legislature typically adopts a budget in May. A simple majority is required to pass a budget. The biennium begins on July 1 of odd-numbered years.

Minnesota is one of 44 states in which the governor has line item veto authority.

The governor is legally required to submit a balanced budget proposal. Likewise, the legislature is legally required to pass a balanced budget.

Agencies, offices and committees

The following standing committees in the Minnesota State Legislature deal with budget and finance matters:

1. Taxes Committee, Minnesota House of Representatives
2. Ways and Means Committee, Minnesota House of Representatives
3. Finance Committee, Minnesota State Senate

The Minnesota State Auditor is a constitutional officer charged with overseeing spending by local governments. The Minnesota Legislative Auditor audits state agencies and constitutional offices. Both auditing authorities publish their audit reports online

Transparency

See also: "Following the Money" report, 2015

The U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a consumer-focused nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., released its annual report on state transparency websites in March 2015. The report, entitled "Following the Money," measured how transparent and accountable state websites were with regard to state government spending. According to the report, Minnesota received a grade of B and a numerical score of 85, indicating that Minnesota was "Advancing" in terms of transparency regarding state spending.

As published 2015

State finances in the U.S.
State tax policy in the U.S.
Pension Policy
State finances on the ballot Taxes on the ballot Glossary of state budget terms Public pensions

The information on this tab contains: Spending (fiscal years 2013 and 2014) Revenues (fiscal year 2013) State debt (fiscal year 2012) Federal aid to the state budget (fiscal year 2012) Budget process

Between fiscal years 2013 and 2014, total government spending in Minnesota increased by approximately $3.1 billion, from $32.3 billion in fiscal year 2013 to an estimated $35.4 billion in 2014. This represents a 9.6 percent increase. The cumulative rate of inflation during the same period was 1.58 percent, calculated using the Consumer Price Indices for January 2013 and January 2014. As of 2014, financial services firm Standard and Poor's had assigned Minnesota a credit rating of AA+.

HIGHLIGHTS

Total state tax collections in Minnesota in 2013 equaled $21 billion.

This amounted to $3,878.93 per capita.

Spending

Definitions

The following terms are used to describe a state's finances:

• Revenues come mainly from tax collections, licensing fees, federal aid, and returns on investments.
• Expenditures generally include spending on government salaries, infrastructure, education, public pensions, public assistance, corrections, Medicaid, and transportation.
• State debt refers to the money borrowed to make up for a deficit when revenues do not cover spending.
• The state credit rating is the grade given by a credit rating agency based on the general financial health of the state's government and economy.
• State funds include general and other state-based funds. A general fund is "the predominant fund for financing a state's operations." Other state funds are "restricted by law for particular governmental functions or activities."
• Federal funds are "funds received directly from the federal government."
• Total spending is calculated by adding together the totals for state and federal funds used for expenditures.

2014 expenditures

See also: Total state expenditures

The table below breaks down estimated spending totals for fiscal year 2014 (comparable figures from surrounding states are included to provide additional context). Figures for all columns except "Population” and “Per capita spending" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the columns labeled "Population” and “Per capita spending" have not been abbreviated.

In Minnesota in fiscal year 2014, total estimated government spending equaled $35.4 billion. Estimated per capita spending was $6,478.

Total estimated state spending, FY 2014 ($ in millions)
State	State funds	Federal funds	Total spending	Population	Per capita spending
Minnesota	$25,861	$9,492	$35,353	5,457,173	$6,478.26
Iowa	$13,957	$6,122	$20,079	3,107,126	$6,462.24
North Dakota	$5,186	$1,590	$6,776	739,482	$9,163.17
South Dakota	$2,669	$1,420	$4,089	853,175	$4,792.69
Wisconsin	$33,887	$11,006	$44,893	5,757,564	$7,797.22
Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total spending and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census Bureau estimates. Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

Spending by function

See also: State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures

Breakdown of spending by function in FY 2013
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

State spending in Minnesota can be further broken down by function (elementary and secondary education, public assistance, etc.). Fiscal year 2013 information is included in the table below (information from neighboring states is provided for additional context). Figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category.

In Minnesota in fiscal year 2013, K-12 education accounted for 29.2 percent of total state spending, a greater share than in any neighboring state.

State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures, FY 2013
State	K-12 education	Higher education	Public assistance	Medicaid	Corrections	Trans- portation	Other
Minnesota	29.2%	4.7%	1.4%	24.3%	1.5%	10.7%	28.2%
Iowa	16.4%	26.0%	0.5%	19.8%	2.1%	6.8%	28.3%
North Dakota	15.0%	19.0%	0.1%	13.7%	1.9%	16.1%	34.2%
South Dakota	14.1%	22.3%	0.7%	19.9%	2.5%	15.0%	25.5%
Wisconsin	16.2%	14.3%	0.3%	17.2%	2.9%	6.9%	42.1%
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."

Spending trends

Between 2009 and 2013, the share of the Minnesota state budget spent on higher education decreased from 10.4 percent to 4.7 percent. See the table below for further details (figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category).

Spending by function from 2009 to 2013 (as percentages)
Year	K-12 education	Higher education	Public assistance	Medicaid	Corrections	Transportation	Other
2013	29.2%	4.7%	1.4%	24.3%	1.5%	10.7%	28.2%
2012	23.8%	9.7%	1.4%	27.6%	1.5%	8.3%	27.7%
2011	22.9%	10.2%	1.5%	25.3%	1.6%	10.1%	28.4%
2010	21.7%	10.7%	1.5%	25.1%	1.6%	9.8%	29.6%
2009	25.5%	10.4%	1.3%	22.2%	1.7%	9.4%	29.4%
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."

Revenues

2013 revenues

See also: State government tax collections by source

The table below breaks down state government tax collections by source in 2013 (comparable figures from surrounding states are also provided to give additional context). Figures for all columns except "Population" and "Per capita revenue" are rendered in thousands of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000). Figures in the columns labeled "Population" and "Per capita revenue" have not been abbreviated.

In Minnesota in 2013, total state tax collections amounted to $21 billion. Per capita tax collections were $3,879.

State tax collections by source ($ in thousands)
State	Property taxes	Sales and gross receipts	Licenses	Individual income taxes	Corporation net income taxes	Other taxes	Total	2013 population	Per capita collections
Minnesota	$821,799	$8,289,780	$1,184,465	$8,950,755	$1,363,128	$421,882	$21,031,809	5,422,060	$3,878.93
Iowa	N/A	$3,608,991	$798,137	$3,436,758	$428,554	$101,936	$8,374,376	3,092,341	$2,708.10
North Dakota	$2,808	$1,763,437	$207,482	$641,766	$225,719	$2,457,558	$5,298,770	723,857	$7,320.19
South Dakota	N/A	$1,228,262	$257,220	N/A	$37,172	$11,009	$1,533,663	845,510	$1,813.89
Wisconsin	$148,600	$7,088,411	$1,035,743	$7,227,690	$955,752	$66,416	$16,522,612	5,742,953	$2,877.02
Source: Tax Policy Center, "State Tax Collection Sources 2000-2013," June 20, 2014

Minnesota tax collections by source in 2013
Source: Tax Policy Center

The table below lists 2013 tax collections by source as percentages of total collections. In Minnesota, corporation net income taxes accounted for 6.5 percent of total state tax collections, a greater share than in any neighboring state.

State tax collections by source (as percentages)
State	Property taxes	Sales and gross receipts	Licenses	Individual income taxes	Corporation net income taxes	Other taxes
Minnesota	3.91%	39.42%	5.63%	42.56%	6.48%	2.01%
Iowa	N/A	43.1%	9.53%	41.04%	5.12%	1.22%
North Dakota	0.05%	33.28%	3.92%	12.11%	4.26%	46.38%
South Dakota	N/A	80.09%	16.77%	N/A	2.42%	0.72%
Wisconsin	0.9%	42.9%	6.27%	43.74%	5.78%	0.4%
Source: Tax Policy Center, "State Tax Collection Sources 2000-2013," June 20, 2014

State debt

See also: State debt

According to a January 2014 report by the nonprofit organization State Budget Solutions, Minnesota had a state debt of approximately $85.9 billion. Its state debt per capita was $15,965. In this report for fiscal year 2012, state debt was calculated based on four components: "market-valued unfunded public pension liabilities, outstanding government debt, unfunded other post employment benefit (OPEB) liabilities, and outstanding unemployment trust fund loans." The report revealed that altogether state governments faced a combined $5.1 trillion in debt, which amounted to $16,178 per capita in the nation.

Total 2012 state debt
State	Total state debt	State debt per capita	Per capita debt ranking
Minnesota	$85,879,526,000	$15,965	21
Iowa	$37,783,060,000	$12,290	38
North Dakota	$9,263,742,000	$13,241	30
South Dakota	$7,707,458,000	$9,249	46
Wisconsin	$45,026,643,000	$7,863	47
Sources: State Budget Solutions, "State Budget Solutions' Fourth Annual State Debt Report," January 8, 2014

Public pensions

See also: Minnesota public pensions and Minnesota public employee salaries

Between fiscal years 2008 and 2012, the funded ratio of Minnesota's state-administered pension plans decreased from 83.8 percent to 75 percent. The state paid 81 percent of its annual required contribution, and for fiscal year 2012 the pension system's unfunded accrued liability totaled $9.4 billion. This amounted to $3,197 in unfunded liabilities per capita.

Credit ratings

See also: State credit ratings

Credit rating agencies, such as Standard and Poor's, assign grades to states that take into account a state's ability to pay debts and the general health of the state's economy. Generally speaking, a higher credit rating indicates lower interest costs on the general obligation bonds states sometimes sell to investors in order to finance large-scale undertakings (e.g., road construction and other public works projects). This in turn results in lower interest costs, thereby lowering the cost to taxpayers.

The table below lists the Standard and Poor's credit ratings for Minnesota and surrounding states from 2004 to 2014. Standard and Poor's grades range from AAA, the highest available, to BBB, the lowest.

State credit ratings, 2004 to 2014
State	2014	2013	2012	2011	2010	2009	2008	2007	2006	2005	2004
Minnesota	AA+	AA+	AA+	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA
Iowa	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AAA	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA+
North Dakota	AAA	AAA	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA-
South Dakota	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA+	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA
Wisconsin	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA	AA-	AA-	AA-	AA-
Source: Stateline: The Daily News Service of The Pew Charitable Trusts, "Infographic: S&P State Credit Ratings, 2001-2014," June 9, 2014

Federal aid to the state budget

See also: Federal aid to state budgets

State governments receive aid from the federal government to fund a variety of joint programs, such as Medicaid. Federal aid varies from state to state. For example, Mississippi received approximately $7.7 billion in federal aid in 2012, which accounted for more than 45 percent of the state's general revenues. By contrast, Alaska received roughly $2.9 billion in federal aid in 2012, just under 20 percent of the state's general revenues.

The table below notes what share of Minnesota’s general revenues came from the federal government in 2012. That year, Minnesota received approximately $9.6 billion in federal aid, 28.1 percent of the state's total general revenues. Figures from surrounding states are provided for additional context.

Federal aid to state budgets, 2012
State	Total federal aid ($ in thousands)	Federal aid as a % of general revenue	Ranking
Minnesota	$9,608,018	28.13%	39
Iowa	$6,073,376	33.08%	26
North Dakota	$1,750,134	24.76%	45
South Dakota	$1,630,220	40.84%	4
Wisconsin	$8,855,079	28.19%	38
Source: United States Census Bureau, "State Government Finances: 2012," accessed February 24, 2014

Stimulus

Minnesota received $3.75 billion in federal stimulus funding between February 2009 and June 2013.

Budget process

The state operates on a biennial budget cycle. The sequence of key events in the budget process is as follows:

1. Budget instructions are sent to state agencies between May and June of the year preceding the start of the new biennium.
2. State agencies submit their budget requests to the governor by October 15.
3. The governor submits his or her proposed budget to the state legislature on the fourth Tuesday in January. This deadline is extended to the third Tuesday in February for a newly elected governor.
4. The legislature typically adopts a budget in May. A simple majority is required to pass a budget. The biennium begins on July 1 of odd-numbered years.

Minnesota is one of 44 states in which the governor has line item veto authority.

The governor is legally required to submit a balanced budget proposal. Likewise, the legislature is legally required to pass a balanced budget.

Agencies, offices, and committees

The following standing committees in the Minnesota State Legislature deal with budget and finance matters:

1. Taxes Committee, Minnesota House of Representatives
2. Ways and Means Committee, Minnesota House of Representatives
3. Finance Committee, Minnesota State Senate

The Minnesota State Auditor is a constitutional officer charged with overseeing spending by local governments. The Minnesota Legislative Auditor audits state agencies and constitutional offices. Both auditing authorities publish their audit reports online

Studies and reports

U.S. PIRG "Following the Money" report

See also: "Following the Money" report, 2014

The U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a consumer-focused nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., released its annual report on state transparency websites in April 2014. The report, entitled "Following the Money," measured the transparency and accountability of state websites with regard to state government spending. According to the report, Minnesota received a grade of D+ and a numerical score of 64, indicating that Minnesota was lagging in terms of transparency regarding state spending.

As published 2014

The information on this tab contains: Spending (fiscal year 2013) Spending by function (fiscal year 2012) Spending trends (fiscal years 2008 to 2012) Revenues (fiscal year 2013) Historical spending (fiscal years 2009 to 2012) Budget transparency

Between fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2013, Minnesota's total expenditures increased by approximately $5.868 billion, from $29.898 billion in 2009 to $35.766 billion in 2013. This represented a 19.62 percent increase, outpacing the cumulative rate of inflation during the same period (9.06 percent, calculated using the Consumer Price Indices for January 2009 and January 2013).

Spending

Definitions

Although each state executes its budget process differently, the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) breaks down state expenditures into four general categories. This allows for comparisons among the 50 states. NASBO's categories are as follows:

• General fund: "The predominant fund for financing a state’s operations. Revenues are received from broad-based state taxes. However, there are differences in how specific functions are financed from state to state."
• Other funds: "Expenditures from revenue sources that are restricted by law for particular governmental functions or activities. For example, a gasoline tax dedicated to a highway trust fund would appear in the 'Other funds' column. For Medicaid, other state funds include provider taxes, fees, donations, assessments, and local funds."
• Federal funds: "Funds received directly from the federal government."
• Bonds: "Expenditures from the sale of bonds, generally for capital projects."

2013

Breakdown of expenditures in FY 2013
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

The table below breaks down expenditures for fiscal year 2013 (comparable figures from surrounding states are provided to give additional context). Figures for all columns except "Per capita expenditures" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the column labeled "Per capita expenditures" have not been abbreviated.

Total state expenditures, FY 2013 ($ in millions)
State	General fund	Federal funds	Other funds	Bonds	Total	Per capita expenditures
Minnesota	$20,056	$8,637	$6,263	$810	$35,766	$6,598.43
Iowa	$6,231	$5,682	$7,539	$157	$19,609	$6,345.10
North Dakota	$2,220	$1,621	$2,072	$26	$5,939	$8,209.92
South Dakota	$1,302	$1,487	$1,307	$35	$4,131	$4,889.47
Wisconsin	$14,042	$10,815	$17,912	$0	$42,769	$7,447.53
Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total expenditures and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census estimates. Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

Spending by function

2012

Breakdown of expenditures by function in FY 2012
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

State expenditures in Minnesota can be further broken down by function (elementary and secondary education, public assistance, etc.). Fiscal year 2012 data is included in the table below (information from neighboring states is provided for additional context). Figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category.

Expenditures by function, FY 2012 (as percentages)
State	Elementary and secondary ed.	Higher ed.	Public assistance	Medicaid	Corrections	Transportation	Other
Minnesota	23.8%	9.7%	1.4%	27.6%	1.5%	8.3%	27.7%
Iowa	16.8%	25.0%	0.6%	19.6%	2.7%	7.5%	27.8%
North Dakota	13.8%	17.7%	0.1%	12.1%	1.9%	16.4%	38.0%
South Dakota	14.3%	17.7%	0.8%	20.9%	2.7%	15.9%	27.7%
Wisconsin	16.7%	14.1%	0.4%	16.5%	2.9%	6.9%	42.5%
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."

Spending trends

From 2008 to 2012, elementary and secondary education spending fell by 2.60 percentage points, or 9.8 percent, as a share of the budget. During the same period, Medicaid expenditures rose by five percentage points, or 22.1 percent, as a share of the budget. The table below details changes in expenditures from 2008 to 2012. Figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category.

Expenditures from 2008 to 2012 (as percentages)
Year	Elementary and secondary ed.	Higher ed.	Public assistance	Medicaid	Corrections	Transportation	Other
2012	23.8%	9.7%	1.4%	27.6%	1.5%	8.3%	27.7%
2011	22.9%	10.2%	1.5%	25.3%	1.6%	10.1%	28.4%
2010	21.7%	10.7%	1.5%	25.1%	1.6%	9.8%	29.6%
2009	25.5%	10.4%	1.3%	22.2%	1.7%	9.4%	29.4%
2008	26.4%	10.7%	1.3%	22.6%	1.8%	8.9%	28.2%
Change in %	-2.60%	-1.00%	0.10%	5.00%	-0.30%	-0.60%	-0.50%
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."

Revenues

Breakdown of general fund revenue sources in FY 2013
Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

The table below breaks down general fund revenues by source in fiscal year 2013 (comparable figures from surrounding states are also provided to give additional context). Figures for all columns except "Per capita revenue" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the column labeled "Per capita revenue" have not been abbreviated.

Revenue sources in the general fund, FY 2013 ($ in millions)
State	Sales tax	Personal income tax	Corporate income tax	Gaming tax	Other taxes and fees	Total	Per capita revenue
Minnesota	$4,817	$8,649	$1,165	$39	$2,786	$17,456	$3,220.44
Iowa	$2,109	$3,315	$448	$120	$645	$6,637	$2,147.61
North Dakota	$1,256	$596	$162	$5	$528	$2,547	$3,520.91
South Dakota	$776	$0	$0	$1	$587	$1,364	$1,614.44
Wisconsin	$4,410	$7,497	$925	$0	$1,254	$14,086	$2,452.85
Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total revenues and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census estimates for 2013. Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

Revenue trends

The table below details the change in revenue sources in the general fund from 2009 to 2013. Figures for all columns except "Per capita revenue" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the column labeled "Per capita revenue" have not been abbreviated.

Revenue sources in the general fund, Minnesota ($ in millions)
Year	Sales tax	Personal income tax	Corporate income tax	Gaming tax	Other taxes and fees	Total	Per capita revenue
2013	$4,817	$8,649	$1,165	$39	$2,786	$17,456	$3,220.44
2012	$4,678	$7,972	$1,044	$41	$2,691	$16,426	$3,053.36
2011	$4,403	$7,529	$925	$42	$2,764	$15,663	$2,929.25
2010	$4,177	$6,531	$664	$40	$2,759	$14,171	$2,668.57
2009	$4,344	$6,988	$708	$43	$2,730	$14,813	$2,812.84
Change in %	10.89%	23.77%	64.55%	-9.30%	2.05%	17.84%	14.49%
Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total revenues and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census estimates. Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

Historical spending

The information on state budget historical spending below was compiled by the National Association of State Budget Officers. Figures reflect the reported "Total Expenditures" in Table 1. Figures for all columns are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000).

Historical state spending in Minnesota ($ in millions)
Fiscal year	General Fund		Other funds		Federal funds		Bonds		Budget totals
	Total	% of Budget	Total	% of Budget	Total	% of Budget	Total	% of Budget
2011-2012	$17,741	57%	$4,809	15%	$8,170	26%	$609	2%	$31,329
2010-2011	$16,332	52%	$5,022	16%	$9,200	29%	$847	3%	$31,401
2009-2010	$15,425	52%	$4,409	15%	$9,370	31%	$746	2%	$29,950
Averages:	$16,499	53%	$4,747	15%	$8,913	29%	$734	2%	$30,893

Budget transparency

Transparency evaluation
	Minnesota transparency website
Searchability	Y
Grants	N
Contracts	Y
Line item expenditures	N
Dept./agency budgets	Y
Public employee salaries	P
Last evaluated in 2009.

See also: Evaluation of Minnesota state website and Constitutional provisions regarding reading of bills

Minnesota launched a spending database in March 2009 (over one year after the mandated launch date). According to an article in The Star Tribune, the Department of Administration had not launched the website because "an old state computer system, which was being updated, was not Internet-friendly. It's not clear if the new computer system would include a spending database because the Legislature didn't appropriate the $1 million to $1.5 million needed for it."

According to a press release from the Office of the Governor, "The site was created by Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB) and offers on-line, round-the-clock access to data on state payments for schools, local governments, contractors and other vendors. With just a few clicks, citizens can access detailed information on most state spending. The data is supplied by the state's accounting system and updated nightly."

The table to the right is helpful in evaluating the level of transparency provided by the state spending database.

Multi-measure budget transparency profile

The Institute of Government and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois created a multi-measure transparency profile for Minnesota, which measured state transparency as of September 2011 using indicators from a range of organizations. These indicators measured both website transparency and other recognized facets of governmental transparency. In addition, IGPA presented four unique indicators of non-transparency based on the observation that transfers or reassignments between general and special funds can obscure the true fiscal condition of a state.

IGPA devised a budget transparency index based on information available from the National Association of State Budget Officers. Minnesota tied for 20th in the nation with 12 other states, earning five out of eight possible points.

Minnesota - IGPA score for budget process, contents and disclosure
Budget transparency indicator	Yes or no?
Performance measures	N
"Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" budget	N
Multi-year forecasting
Annual cycle	N
Binding revenue forecast
Legislative revenue forecast
Nonpartisan staff	Y
Constitution or statutory tax/spend limitations	Y
TOTAL	5

In addition to the individual state profile, IGPA offers a 50-state comparison and profiles for other states.

Prior fiscal year budgets

Fiscal years 2016 and 2017

See budget bill: Budget bills for fiscal years 2016 and 2017

Governor Mark Dayton released his budget proposal for fiscal years 2016 and 2017 on January 27, 2015. The proposal called for $42 billion in general fund spending, with 42 percent of that going toward K-12 spending. Another 28 percent of the general fund was designated for health and human services spending. The state's Budget and Economic Forecast projected a $1.87 billion surplus through this plan, leading the governor to recommend an additional $735 million be spent on children and families.

On June 13, 2015, Governor Dayton signed the last of the budget bills for the 2016 and 2017 fiscal years. The total budget designated $38.2 billion in total spending for fiscal year 2016 and $38.8 billion in fiscal year 2017. The budget's balance by the end of fiscal year 2017 was projected to equal about $2.5 billion.

Fiscal years 2014 and 2015

On May 23, 2013, Governor Mark Dayton signed into law several bills that together comprised the 2013-2015 biennium budget. Among these was a tax bill designed to raise in excess of $2 billion in new revenues through an income tax increase on wealthy residents, a cigarette tax increase, and the elimination of select corporate subsidies. The new revenues were set to be used for public education spending, property tax relief, and deficit reduction.

The enacted budget is not codified in a single bill, but is rather spread across several appropriations bills. For a summary of state spending in the 2012-2013 and 2014-2015 bienniums, see this series of charts.

On May 20, 2014, Dayton signed into law a supplemental budget for the biennium, which called for an additional $283 million in spending. The supplemental budget can be accessed here.

Fiscal years 2012 and 2013

See also: Minnesota state budget (2011-2013)

Fiscal year 2011

See also: Minnesota state budget (2010-2011)

Fiscal year 2010

See also: Minnesota state budget (2009-2010)

See also

• Minnesota state budget and finances