Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Jim Gunter

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Jim Gunter
Image of Jim Gunter
Prior offices
Arkansas Supreme Court Position 4

Education

Bachelor's

Texas A&M University

Law

University of Houston


Jim Gunter was an associate justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court. He was elected to his first eight-year term on the court in the state's Nonpartisan popular elections in 2004. He retired at the end of his term in January 2013.[1][2][3][4]

Education

Justice Gunter earned his undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University and his J.D. from the University of Houston.[1]

Professional career

Justice Gunter began his legal career in 1973 as a private practice lawyer for the offices of John L. Wilson. He then became a founding partner with Wilson at the firm Wilson and Gunter beginning in 1974. The two later added on a third partner to create Wilson, Gunter and Walker in 1975. From 1977 to 1982 he was a Prosecuting Attorney with Arkansas's 8th Judicial District. From 1983 until 1991, he served as Chancellor for the 8th Judicial District. Beginning in 1991, Judge Gunter served as a circuit and chancery judge. In 1999 he became a circuit judge with the 8th Judicial District North where he served until his 2004 election to the Arkansas Supreme Court.[1]

Awards and associations

Associations

  • Past President, Arkansas Judicial Council
  • Member, American Bar Association
  • Member, Arkansas Bar Association
  • Member, Southwest Arkansas Bar Association
  • Member, Hempstead County Bar Association
  • Member, Arkansas Supreme Court Civil Rules Committee
  • Member, Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Child Support
  • Chair, Criminal Detention Facility
  • Member, Education Committee, Arkansas Judicial College
  • Member, Calvary Baptist Church
  • Past President, Lions World Services for the Blind
  • Member, Habitat for Humanity
  • Chair, Criminal Detention Facility Board
  • Chair, Arkansas Judicial College, Education Committee
  • Member, Alternate Dispute Resolution Committee
  • Member, Calvary Baptist Church, Hope, Arkansas
  • Assistant Scoutmaster, Boy Scouts of America
  • Member, Hope Lions Club
  • District Governor, Lions of Arkansas
  • Past President, Lions World Services for the Blind

Elections

2004

Arkansas Supreme Court, Associate Justice, Position 4
2004 General election results
Candidates Votes Percent
Jim Gunter Green check mark transparent.png 110,250 37.8%
Collins Kilgore 91,897 31.5%
Paul Danielson 89,741 30.8%
  • Click here for 2004 General Election Results from the Arkansas Secretary of State.

Noteworthy cases

Arkansas Death Penalty

Justice Jim Gunter authored the 2009 ruling that upheld the Arkansas Death Penalty in the case Arkansas Department of Correction v. Frank Williams, Jr. (08-1031). The ruling overturned a lower court's stay of execution based on Act 1296 which sought to ensure that injections were lethal, quick and as pain free as possible. The ruling included a section that highlighted the Arkansas Department of Correction's sovereign immunity and that the directive in question that first held off the execution was not a "rule" as defined by the Administrative Procedures Act.[5]

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Gunter received a campaign finance score of -0.4, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was less liberal than the average score of -0.48 that justices received in Arkansas.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[6]

See also

External links

Footnotes