Justin Brown (Kentucky)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Justin Brown

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Elections and appointments
Last election

November 8, 2022

Education

Bachelor's

University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, 1999

Personal
Birthplace
Knoxville, Tenn.
Religion
Christian
Contact

Justin Brown ran for election for judge of the Kentucky 30th District Court 6th Division. He lost in the general election on November 8, 2022.

Brown completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Justin Brown was born in Knoxville, Tennessee. Brown earned a bachelor's degree from the University of Tennessee, Chattanooga in 1999 and a J.D. from the University of Tennessee College of Law in 2002.[1]

Brown has been affiliated with the Louisville Jazz Society and WXOX 97.1 FM.[1]

Elections

2022

See also: City elections in Louisville, Kentucky (2022)

General election

General election for Kentucky 30th District Court 6th Division

Incumbent Lisa Langford defeated Justin Brown in the general election for Kentucky 30th District Court 6th Division on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Lisa Langford (Nonpartisan)
 
58.4
 
113,982
Justin Brown (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
41.0
 
79,999
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.6
 
1,184

Total votes: 195,165
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

The primary election was canceled. Incumbent Lisa Langford and Justin Brown advanced from the primary for Kentucky 30th District Court 6th Division.

Endorsements

To view Brown's endorsements in the 2022 election, please click here.

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Justin Brown completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Brown's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am not running to be judge for a title; I am running because when elected I will continue my service to this city and its amazing and diverse citizenry. I truly believe that a judge is a servant to the community and to the law. I have spent nearly two decades fighting for the people of this community; tirelessly being a voice for those that have been marginalized or even forgotten. The job of a defense attorney is not just to get people out of jail. My job has been to hold those in power: the judges, the prosecution, and law enforcement accountable for their conduct all of the while being advocating for due process of law for the accused. For nearly 19-years, I have practiced and argued in State and Federal Courts. I am a trial attorney and that matters. It matters beacuse a trial attorney must know the law, understand the law and be able to apply the law; which is precisely the obligation of a Judge. I am ready from day one to continue to serve the community that I love.
  • As a father, husband and citizen of Louisville, community safety is critical. The reason that I am running for Judge is because I don't recognize the community that I love. It is important to have a Judge on the bench that knows the law, understands the law and applies the law; being guided by the law in all decision from setting bail to imposing sentences is paramount to the safety of our community. Louisville is not safer than it was 4-years ago. Why in the world would we as a community that cares about our neighbors being secure in their homes and in public re-elect the same Judge(s) that have been on the bench for these last 4-years? For the sake of our city, it is time for a change. It is time to clear the bench!
  • My nearly 19-years of experience has shown that the exclusive use of the cash bail system leads to a large number of people incarcerated pretrial. This system undermines the presumption of innocence resulting in economically and racially divergent impacts and pretrial detention lengths. The disparate nature of this system has yielded alternatives that may be appropriate (depending on criminal history and the nature of the charges) such as home incarceration or surety bonds. It is important to follow the law when setting bail.
  • I am also veyr much involved in the three District Court Specialty Courts. These Courts: Drug Court, Veterans Treatment Court and Mental Health Court are geared to assist the citizens of our community get the help that they need, be it treatment for substance abuse or mental mental health services. Moreover, these Courts can assist people in finding affordable housing and employment. A Judge must volunteer to preside over these three courts; something that may opponent (despite her 2018 Ballotpedia responses) that she has failed to do. I will gladly volunteer my time and my energy for the people of Louisville!
As espoused above, I am particularly passionate about assisting those in need to find the assistance that they may seek; be it substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment, to find a job, to continue an education, to find housing, etc. How do you as a judge reduce recidivism? Well, one way is certainly to refer and recommend our neighbors to programs that can help them. There is a mountain of difference between violent offenders and those with non-violent charges who need help. It is my nearly 19-years of practical courtroom and client experience that make me perfectly suited to make the determination between an orange jumpsuit and counseling.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on October 10, 2022