Mississippi Right to Hunt and Fish Amendment, HCR 30 (2014)
| ||||||||||
|
The Mississippi Right to Hunt and Fish Amendment, HCR 30 was on the November 4, 2014 ballot in Mississippi as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure established a constitutional right to hunt, fish and harvest game species throughout Mississippi.[1]
HCR 30 was sponsored in the Mississippi Legislature by State Representative Lester Carpenter (R-1).[1]
In Mississippi, a proposed amendment can be passed by majority vote, provided that the total number of votes cast on the initiative equals at least 30 percent of the total votes cast in the election.
Election results
Mississippi HCR 30 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 524,423 | 87.97% | ||
No | 71,683 | 12.03% |
Election results via: Mississippi Secretary of State
Text of measure
Ballot title
The official ballot text was as follows:[2]
“ | House Concurrent Resolution 30 - This proposed constitutional amendment establishes hunting, fishing and the harvesting of wildlife, including by the use of traditional methods, as a constitutional right subject only to such regulations and restrictions that promote wildlife conservation and management as the Legislature may prescribe by general law. Yes ___ |
” |
Constitutional changes
- See also: Article III, Mississippi Constitution
HCR 30 added a Section 12A to Article III of the Mississippi Constitution. The new section reads as:[2]
Background
As of November 2024, 24 states had constitutional provisions providing for the right to hunt and fish. Vermont was the first state to constitutionalize such a right in 1777. The other 22 states have adopted right to hunt and fish amendments since 1996. The state constitutions of California and Rhode Island include amendments guaranteeing the right to fish, but not to hunt.[4]
List
The following is a list of state ballot measures to adopt right to hunt and fish amendments:
State | Year | Type | Title | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FL | 2024 | Amendment 2 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt and fish |
|
6,941,307 (67%) |
3,365,987 (33%) |
|
UT | 2020 | Constitutional Amendment E | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt and to fish |
|
1,063,212 (75%) |
355,848 (25%) |
|
NC | 2018 | Right to Hunt and Fish Amendment | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife |
|
2,083,123 (57%) |
1,563,090 (43%) |
|
IN | 2016 | Public Question 1 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and trap, including traditional methods |
|
1,893,467 (79%) |
492,300 (21%) |
|
KS | 2016 | Constitutional Amendment 1 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and trap, including traditional methods |
|
926,970 (81%) |
213,104 (19%) |
|
TX | 2015 | Proposition 6 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and trap, including traditional methods |
|
1,260,763 (81%) |
294,973 (19%) |
|
AL | 2014 | Amendment 5 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife, including traditional methods |
|
789,777 (80%) |
199,483 (20%) |
|
MS | 2014 | HCR 30 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and trap, including traditional methods |
|
524,423 (88%) |
71,683 (12%) |
|
ID | 2012 | HJR 2 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and trap, including traditional methods |
|
456,514 (73%) |
165,289 (27%) |
|
KY | 2012 | Amendment | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife |
|
1,298,340 (84%) |
238,320 (16%) |
|
NE | 2012 | Amendment 2 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife |
|
557,534 (77%) |
169,250 (23%) |
|
WY | 2012 | Amendment B | Provide for a state constitutional right to harvest wild bird, fish, and game |
|
212,561 (89%) |
25,564 (11%) |
|
AR | 2010 | Amendment 1 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, trap, and harvest wildlife |
|
612,495 (83%) |
127,444 (17%) |
|
AZ | 2010 | Proposition 109 | Provide for state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife |
|
714,144 (44%) |
926,991 (56%) |
|
SC | 2010 | Amendment 1 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife |
|
1,126,228 (89%) |
139,668 (11%) |
|
TN | 2010 | Amendment | Provide for state constitutional right to hunt and fish |
|
1,255,840 (87%) |
181,465 (13%) |
|
OK | 2008 | State Question 742 | Establish a constitutional right to hunt, trap, fish, and take game, granting authority to the Wildlife Conservation Commission. |
|
1,082,341 (80%) |
269,787 (20%) |
|
GA | 2006 | Amendment 2 | Preserve the ability to fish and hunt in Georgia and ensure it is managed by law and regulation for the public good |
|
1,626,226 (81%) |
379,024 (19%) |
|
LA | 2004 | Question 1 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and trap |
|
1,195,445 (81%) |
279,926 (19%) |
|
MT | 2004 | C-41 | Provide for a state constitutional right to harvest wild fish and game |
|
345,505 (81%) |
83,185 (19%) |
|
WI | 2003 | Question 1 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, trap, and take game |
|
668,459 (82%) |
146,182 (18%) |
|
ND | 2000 | Measure 1 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, trap, and take game |
|
206,443 (77%) |
61,531 (23%) |
|
VA | 2000 | Question 2 | Provide for a right to hunt, fish, and harvest game |
|
1,448,154 (60%) |
970,266 (40%) |
|
MN | 1998 | Amendment 3 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt, fish, and take game |
|
1,570,720 (77%) |
462,749 (23%) |
|
AL | 1996 | Amendment 1 | Provide for a state constitutional right to hunt and fish |
|
955,149 (81%) |
218,350 (19%) |
Map
The following map shows which states have constitutional rights to hunt and fish in their state constitutions:
Support
The measure was introduced into the legislature by Rep. Lester Carpenter (R-1).[1]
Supporters
Officials
The amendment received unanimous support in the Mississippi Senate.
The following officials sponsored the amendment in the Mississippi Legislature:[1]
- Rep. Lester Carpenter (R-1)
- Rep. Charles Busby (R-111)
- Rep. Tracy Arnold (R-3)
- Rep. Mark Baker (R-74)
- Rep. Manly Barton (R-109)
- Rep. Jim Beckett (R-23)
- Rep. C. Scott Bounds (R-44)
- Rep. Randy Boyd (R-19)
- Rep. Chris Brown (R-20)
- Rep. Larry Byrd (R-104)
- Rep. Gary Chism (R-37)
- Rep. Carolyn Crawford (R-121)
- Rep. Becky Currie (R-92)
- Rep. Dennis DeBar (R-105)
- Rep. Scott DeLano (R-117)
- Rep. Andy Gipson (R-77)
- Rep. Jeffrey Guice (R-114)
- Rep. Joey Hood (R-35)
- Rep. Kevin Horan (R-21)
- Rep. Trey Lamar (R-8)
- Rep. Rita Martinson (R-58)
- Rep. Brad Mayo (R-12)
- Rep. Doug McLeod (R-107)
- Rep. Nolan Mettetal (R-10)
- Rep. Tom Miles (D-75)
- Rep. Alex Monsour (R-54)
- Rep. Ken Morgan (R-100)
- Rep. Brad Oberhousen (D-73)
- Rep. Bill Pigott (R-99)
- Rep. Randy Rushing (R-78)
- Rep. Jerry Turner (R-18)
- Rep. Jason White (R-48)
- Rep. Charles Young (D-82)
- Rep. Henry Zuber, III (R-113)
Organizations
- Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks[5]
- National Rifle Association (NRA)[6]
- Safari Club International[7]
Arguments
- Lacey Biles, spokesperson for the National Rifle Association (NRA), stated, "Years down the road, even a hunter-friendly state might turn the other way. It might be 20 years down the road, it might be 50. That's the whole point of a constitutional amendment, to protect the future, and a hunting heritage that is rich in Mississippi currently, we want that to be enshrined for generations to come."[8]
Opposition
There was no organized opposition to the amendment.[9]
Opponents
- The Humane Society[9]
Arguments
- Tracy Coppola, director of the Humane Society’s Wildlife Abuse Campaign, said, “[The amendment] could prevent really progressive reform that would be necessary if there were really egregious abuse, certain forms of trapping like the kind we’re trying to fight against in Maine.”[9]
Path to the ballot
Mississippi Constitution |
---|
![]() |
Preamble |
Articles |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 |
- See also: Amending the Mississippi Constitution
The amendment was required to be approved by a two-thirds vote in both state legislative chambers. HCR 30 was approved by the Mississippi House of Representatives on March 15, 2013. The amendment was approved by the Mississippi Senate on April 10, 2013.[1]
House vote
March 15, 2013 House vote
Mississippi HCR 30 House Vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 104 | 88.14% | ||
No | 14 | 11.86% |
Senate vote
April 10, 2013 Senate vote
Mississippi HCR 30 Senate Vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 52 | 100.00% | ||
No | 0 | 0.00% |
Related measures
See also
Additional reading
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Mississippi Legislature, "House Concurrent Resolution 30," accessed February 17, 2014
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Mississippi Legislature, "House Concurrent Resolution 30 Text," accessed February 17, 2014
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ National Shooting Sports Foundation, "State “Right to Hunt and Fish” Protections," accessed May 20, 2015
- ↑ Sun Herald, "Analysis: Voters may enshrine right to hunt, fish," February 16, 2014
- ↑ NRA-ILA, "Mississippi: Right to Hunt and Fish Constitutional Amendment Needs Your Help!" March 30, 2012
- ↑ Safari Club International, "Support Letter for HCR 30," accessed February 17, 2014
- ↑ Sun Herald, "Mississippians could make hunting a right," September 6, 2014 (dead link)
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Governing, "'Right to Hunt' Amendments Pit Gun Rights vs. Animal Welfare," September 19, 2014
![]() |
State of Mississippi Jackson (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |