Nevada Exempt School Teachers from Public Employee Strike Ban Initiative (2026)
Nevada Exempt School Teachers from Public Employee Strike Ban Initiative | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Labor disputes and strikes and Public school teachers and staff |
|
Status |
|
Type Indirect initiated state statute |
Origin |
The Nevada Exempt School Teachers from Public Employee Strike Ban Initiative is not on the ballot in Nevada as an indirect initiated state statute on November 3, 2026.[1]
This measure would have exempted licensed teachers, instructional support staff, school counselors, school nurses, and certain other school employees from state laws that prohibit strikes by public employees. In 1969, Nevada passed legislation making strikes illegal for state and local government employees, including public school teachers.[2]
On May 29, Gov. Joe Lombardo (R) signed Senate Bill 161, which clarified that protests and pickets don't constitute a strike under state law, but would allow a school to discipline teachers for striking during school hours. As a result of the passage of SB 161, the initiative was withdrawn.[3]
Overview
What would the ballot measure have done regarding teacher and school personnel strikes in Nevada?
- See also: Text of measure
The ballot initiative would have exempted teachers and certain school personnel from the state’s ban on labor strikes by public employees, thereby allowing them to legally strike. The exemption would have applied to licensed teachers and specified school personnel, including:[4]
- teachers who spend at least 50% of their work year providing instruction or discipline to students;
- instructional support staff who are not supervisors and who spend no more than 50% of their work year providing instruction, such as librarians and other instructional support staff; and
- school counselors, school nurses, and other employees who spend at least 50% of their work year providing emotional support, non-instructional guidance, or medical support to students.
The measure would have also extended the exemption to the labor unions, including employee organizations, bargaining agents, and bargaining units, representing these employees.[4]
Prior to the signing of Senate Bill 161 in May of 2025, Nevada law prohibited state and local government employees, including public school teachers and personnel, from striking. In Nevada, a public employee strike is defined as any concerted stoppage of work, slowdown, or interruption of operations by public employees, including absences based on false pretenses, such as illness.[5] SB 161 clarified that protests and pickets don't constitute a strike, but would not allow teachers to strike during school hours.
What were the arguments surrounding the measure?
- See also: Support and opposition
Marie Neisess, president of the Clark County Education Association, supported the initiative, saying, "We’re looking for resolutions. This isn’t a quick fix to say oh, we’re immediately going to call for a strike. We don’t want to do that. We want to be able to change this process. Because, clearly, binding arbitration does not work and having our educators as well as our students and community wait months on end for things to be settled is not acceptable."[6]
Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo (R) opposes the initiative. He said, "It’s not a good business model to have firemen and policemen or your first responders, and teachers in my opinion are a necessity, to be able to go on strike for wages and collective bargaining was brought in as part of that solution."[7]
Did other states prohibit teachers from going on strike?
As of 2025, 37 states and Washington, D.C., prohibited public school teachers from striking.[8] Nevada enacted its ban on public employee strikes in 1969.[5]
Text of measure
Full text
The ballot measure would add a Section 720 to Chapter 288 to the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS). The following underlined text would be added:[4]
NRS 288.720 Prohibitions on strikes do not apply to certain local government employees, employee organizations, bargaining agents, and bargaining units. 1. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the provisions of NRS 288. 700 through NRS 288. 715 and any other law prohibiting strikes shall not apply to local government employees licensed as teachers pursuant to Chapter 391 of the Nevada Revised Statutes and their employee organizations, bargaining agents, and bargaining units. 2. As used in this section: "teacher" means a person licensed pursuant to chapter 391 of NRS who is classified by the board of trustees of a school district: (a) As a teacher and who spends at least 50 percent of his or her work year providing instruction or discipline to pupils; (b) As instructional support staff, who does not hold a supervisory position and who spends not more than 50 percent of his or her work year providing instruction to pupils. Such instructional support staff includes, without limitation, librarians and persons who provide instructional support; or (c) As school counselors, school nurses and other employees who spend at least 50 percent of their work year providing emotional support, non instructional guidance or medical support to pupils. |
Support
A Teacher in Every Classroom is leading the campaign in support of the measure.
Supporters
Officials
- State Sen. Nicole Cannizzaro (D)
Unions
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Officials
- Gov. Joe Lombardo (R)
Arguments
Campaign finance
A Teacher in Every Classroom is the campaign registered in support of the initiative.[9]
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $2,500,000.00 | $0.00 | $2,500,000.00 | $2,380,350.90 | $2,380,350.90 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $2,500,000.00 | $0.00 | $2,500,000.00 | $2,380,350.90 | $2,380,350.90 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.[9]
Committees in support of Exempt School Teachers from Public Employee Strike Ban Initiative | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
A Teacher in Every Classroom | $2,500,000.00 | $0.00 | $2,500,000.00 | $2,380,350.90 | $2,380,350.90 |
Total | $2,500,000.00 | $0.00 | $2,500,000.00 | $2,380,350.90 | $2,380,350.90 |
Methodology
To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.
Background
Status of public employee striking in Nevada
In 1969, the Local Government Employee-Management Relations Act was passed in Nevada, which made it illegal for local government employees to strike. This included public schools teachers, police officers, firefighters, sanitation workers, and other municipal and county employees. The law provided for government employees to be represented by unions. State law defines a strike as any concerted stoppage of work, slowdown or interruption of operations by public employees, including absences based on false pretenses, such as illness.[5][10]
Lawsuits
In September 2023, the Clark County School District (CCSD) filed a lawsuit against the Clark County Education Association (CCEA), a union representing 18,000 school staff in 380 schools in Clark County, in the Clark County District Court. The lawsuit said that the "sickouts", or coordinated teacher absences, constituted an illegal strike under the 1969 Local Government Employee-Management Relations Act, which bans work stoppages, slowdowns, or other concerted disruptions by public-sector employees. On September 11, 2023, Judge Crystal Eller granted a preliminary injunction in favor of the district, ruling that the sickouts did in fact constitute a strike and ordering CCEA to cease further disruption.[11]
On October 9, 2023, the CCEA filed a lawsuit against the CCSD and the state of Nevada. The CCEA said that the Local Government Employee-Management Relations Act is unconstitutional and violates the First Amendment right of the employees to free speech and right to assembly. CCEA also filed an anti-SLAPP motion, saying that CCSD’s lawsuit was also a violation of protected speech. That motion was later denied by the court. CCEA appealed both the injunction and the anti-SLAPP ruling to the Nevada Supreme Court.[12] On May 3, 2024, the Nevada Supreme Court dismissed CCEA’s appeal, since the underlying dispute had been resolved through contract negotiations in 2024. As of June 2025, CCEA's constitutional challenge to the strike prohibition remained active in the Clark County District Court.[13]
Laws regarding public school employee strikes in other states
As of June 2025, 37 states and Washington, D.C., prohibit public school employees from striking. The map below shows which states permit and which states prohibit public school employees from striking:[8]
Path to the ballot
Process in Nevada
In Nevada, the number of signatures required to qualify an indirect initiated state statute for the ballot is equal to 10 percent of the total votes cast in the most recent general election. Moreover, signature gathering must be distributed equally among each of the state's four congressional districts. The initial filing of an initiated state statute cannot be made before January 1 of the year preceding the next regular legislative session. Signature petitions must be filed with county officials by the second Tuesday in November of an even-numbered year—two years prior to the targeted election date. The final submission of signatures to the secretary of state must be made at least 30 days prior to the start of the next regular legislative session.
The requirements to get an initiated state statute certified for the 2026 ballot:
- Signatures: 102,362 valid signatures were required.
- Deadline: The deadline to submit signatures to county clerks was November 20, 2024.
Signatures are verified by county clerks using a random sampling method if more than 500 signatures were submitted in that county. If enough signatures are submitted and verified, the initiative goes before the legislature. If the legislature approves and the governor signs the measure, there is no election. Otherwise, the initiative goes on the next general election ballot.
Stages of this ballot initiative
- The A Teacher in Every Classroom committee filed the measure with the secretary of state on January 11, 2024.[4]
- According to the campaign, signatures were submitted during the week of November 18, 2024. The campaign hired Advanced Micro Targeting to gather signatures.[14]
- On December 11, 2024, the secretary of state verified that the petition had enough valid signatures. Petitioners were required to gather at least 25,591 valid signatures in each of the four petition districts and 102,362 valid signatures statewide. In total, petitioners submitted 127,812 valid signatures. The signature amount in each district was as follows:[14]
- The initiative was received by the Nevada State Legislature on February 3, 2025, and read for the first time on March 3, 2025. Pursuant to the Nevada Constitution, no further action could be taken on the legislation after March 15, 2025, thus certifying the measure for the ballot.[15]
- On May 29, Gov. Joe Lombardo (R) signed Senate Bill 161, which clarified that protests and pickets don't constitute a strike under state law, but would allow a school to discipline teachers for striking during school hours. As a result of the passage of SB 161, the initiative was withdrawn on June 9, 2025.[14]
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Nevada
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Nevada.
See also
|
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ The Nevada Independent, "Are teacher strikes illegal in Nevada?" accessed November 22, 2024
- ↑ The Nevada Independent, "Are teacher strikes illegal in Nevada?" accessed November 22, 2024
- ↑ The Nevada Legislature, "SB 161" accessed September 26, 2026
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedtext
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 The Nevada Independent, "Are Teacher Strikes Legal in Nevada?" September 6, 2023
- ↑ Fox 5, "CCEA files petition to let voters decide whether teachers can strike in Nevada" January 11, 2025
- ↑ KTNV Las Vegas, "Gov. Joe Lombardo opposes teacher strikes, film tax credit in exclusive interview with Channel 13" February 4, 2025
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Florish, "School Employee Strikes: Where They Can and Can't Happen," accessed June 11, 2025
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Nevada Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance," accessed April 10, 2025
- ↑ The Nevada Independent, "Lombardo says Nevada teachers should not be allowed to strike," March 8, 2024
- ↑ Nevada Current, "CCSD ‘sickouts’ ruled an illegal strike, teachers union to appeal decision," September 14, 2023
- ↑ AP News, "Las Vegas-area teachers union challenges law prohibiting members from striking," October 9, 2023
- ↑ Las Vegas Sun, "Nevada Supreme Court dismisses teachers’ appeal of sickout injunction," May 7, 2024
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 Nevada Secretary of State, "2024 Petitions & General Election Ballot Questions," accessed January 30, 2025
- ↑ Nevada State Legislature', "IP1," accessed May 22, 2025
- ↑ Nevada Legislatures, "Nev. Rev. Stat. § 293.273," accessed September 18, 2025
- ↑ Clark County, Nevada, "Election Day Voting," accessed September 18, 2025
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Nevada Secretary of State, “Elections,” accessed September 18, 2025
- ↑ Nevada Secretary of State, “Registering to Vote,” accessed September 18, 2025
- ↑ Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles, “Voter Registration,” accessed September 18, 2025
- ↑ Nevada Secretary of State, “Voter Registration Form,” accessed September 18, 2025
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Nevada Legislatures, "Nev. Rev. Stat. § 293.277," accessed October 7, 2025
- ↑ Congress, "H.R.3295 - Help America Vote Act of 2002," accessed September 30, 2025