Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Oscar Magaña and Veronica Guardado recall, Maywood, California (2014)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Maywood Mayor and City Council recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
Oscar Magaña
Veronica Guardado
Recall status
Did not go to a vote
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2014
Recalls in California
California recall laws
Mayoral recalls
City council recalls
Recall reports

An effort to recall Mayor Oscar Magaña and city council member Veronica Guardado in Maywood, California, from their positions was launched in early 2014.[1] As of December 2015, this recall effort appeared to be abandoned and Ballotpedia discontinued active coverage. Please contact us if new developments occur with this recall effort.


Recall proponent arguments

Recall proponents accused Magaña and Guardado of the following:[2]

  • Hiring former Bell Assistant City Administrator Angela Spaccia as a temporary manager in 2010;
  • Turning Maywood Park over to a private group, the YMCA;
  • Paying two city employees a total of $360,000 a year;
  • Filing suit against the Los Angeles Unified School District in an unsuccessful attempt to halt the acquisition of homes for school construction on 58th Street; and
  • Opposing the construction of a new sheriff's station in the city.

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in California

The Maywood City Council approved an ordinance on April 14, 2013, establishing recall procedures. The city claimed that recall proponents were circulating petitions not issued by the city, which is a violation of state election laws. Further, Tom Crunk, an official appointed by the city to oversee the recall process, claimed that recall supporters "failed to timely file proofs of publication and two blank copies of each petition (as required by law), therefore the recalls initiated against Council members Veronica Guardado and Oscar Magaña have failed." Crunk contended that recall proponents must file new notices of intent in order to establish a legitimate recall effort.[2]

Recall proponents countered that the petitions they circulated were approved by the city clerk.[2] Supporters had an appeal hearing before the Los Angeles County Superior Court scheduled for November 18, 2014.[3]

See also

Footnotes