Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Paul Womack

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Paul Womack

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 4

Education

Bachelor's

Louisiana State University, 1970

Law

University of Texas School of Law, 1975


Paul Womack was a judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. He was elected to this position on November 5, 1996.[1] He was retained by voters in 2002 and 2008.[2]Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title[3] Womack did not run for re-election in 2014 and retired at the end of his term.[4]

Education

Womack received his undergraduate degree from Louisiana State University in 1970 and his J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law in 1975.[3]

Career

After graduating from law school, Womack taught at the Thurgood Marshall School of Law. Next, he spent two years in private practice. In 1978, he became a research assistant for Judge Truman Roberts of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In 1982, Womack became as assistant district attorney in Travis County. Five years later, he became first assistant district attorney in Williamson County, where he stayed until joining the court in 1997.[3]

Awards and associations

  • Adjunct professor, University of Texas, School of Law[3]

Elections

2008

Womack was re-elected to the court Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2008.Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title

Candidate IncumbentSeatPartyElection %
Supreme-Court-Elections-badge.png
Paul Womack ApprovedA YesPlace 4Republican52.9%
J.R. Molina NoPlace 4Democratic43.7%
Dave Howard NoPlace 4Libertarian3.2%


Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Womack received a campaign finance score of 1.09, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was more conservative than the average score of 0.91 that justices received in Texas.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[5]

See also

External links

Footnotes