Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Scot Dollinger

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Scot Dollinger
Image of Scot Dollinger
Prior offices
Texas 189th District Court

Elections and appointments
Last election

March 1, 2022

Education

Bachelor's

Northwestern University, 1984

Law

Emory University School of Law, 1987

Personal
Birthplace
Beaumont, Texas
Profession
Judge
Contact

Scot Dollinger (Democratic Party) (also known as Dolli) was a judge of the Texas 189th District Court. He assumed office on January 1, 2019. He left office on December 31, 2022.

Dollinger (Democratic Party) ran for re-election for judge of the Texas 189th District Court. He lost in the Democratic primary on March 1, 2022.

Dollinger completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.

Dollinger was a 2014 judicial candidate for the Harris County Civil Court at Law in Texas.[1]

Biography

Scot Dollinger was born in Beaumont, Texas. Dollinger earned an undergraduate degree in speech from Northwestern University (Evanston, Illinois) in 1984. He went on to receive his J.D. from Emory University Law School in 1987. Below is a summary of Dollinger's professional experience.[2][3]

  • 2002: Owner and litigation attorney, Dollinger Law Firm
  • 1996-2001: Litigation attorney, The Klinger Law Office
  • 1995-1996: Litigation attorney, Scot G. Dollinger, Attorney at Law
  • 1994-1995: Litigation attorney, Rodney D. Young Insurance Company
  • 1990-1994: Litigation attorney, Benckenstein, Norvell, Bernsen & Nathan
  • 1988-1990: Litigation attorney, Orgain, Bell & Tucker
  • 1987-1988: Law clerk, U.S. District Judge Howell Cobb[2]

Elections

2022

See also: Municipal elections in Harris County, Texas (2022)

General election

General election for Texas 189th District Court

Tamika Craft defeated Erin Lunceford in the general election for Texas 189th District Court on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Tamika Craft
Tamika Craft (D)
 
50.1
 
533,710
Image of Erin Lunceford
Erin Lunceford (R)
 
49.9
 
530,967

Total votes: 1,064,677
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas 189th District Court

Tamika Craft defeated Lema Mousilli and incumbent Scot Dollinger in the Democratic primary for Texas 189th District Court on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Tamika Craft
Tamika Craft
 
54.5
 
78,563
Image of Lema Mousilli
Lema Mousilli Candidate Connection
 
26.3
 
37,876
Image of Scot Dollinger
Scot Dollinger Candidate Connection
 
19.2
 
27,716

Total votes: 144,155
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas 189th District Court

Erin Lunceford advanced from the Republican primary for Texas 189th District Court on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Erin Lunceford
Erin Lunceford
 
100.0
 
140,719

Total votes: 140,719
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

To view Dollinger's endorsements in the 2022 election, please click here.

2018

General election

General election for Texas 189th District Court

Scot Dollinger defeated Sharon Hemphill in the general election for Texas 189th District Court on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Scot Dollinger
Scot Dollinger (D)
 
55.4
 
655,707
Image of Sharon Hemphill
Sharon Hemphill (R)
 
44.6
 
526,976

Total votes: 1,182,683
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas 189th District Court

Scot Dollinger defeated Fred Cook in the Democratic primary for Texas 189th District Court on March 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Scot Dollinger
Scot Dollinger
 
50.8
 
70,799
Fred Cook
 
49.2
 
68,632

Total votes: 139,431
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas 189th District Court

Sharon Hemphill defeated Erin Lunceford in the Republican primary for Texas 189th District Court on March 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Sharon Hemphill
Sharon Hemphill
 
55.9
 
71,891
Image of Erin Lunceford
Erin Lunceford
 
44.1
 
56,636

Total votes: 128,527
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Selection method

See also: Partisan election of judges

The judges of the Texas District Courts are chosen in partisan elections. They serve four-year terms, after which they must run for re-election if they wish to continue serving.[4]

Though Texas is home to more than 400 district courts, the courts are grouped into nine administrative judicial regions. Each region is overseen by a presiding judge who is appointed by the governor to a four-year term. According to the state courts website, the presiding judge may be a "regular elected or retired district judge, a former judge with at least 12 years of service as a district judge, or a retired appellate judge with judicial experience on a district court."[5]

Qualifications
To serve on the district courts, a judge must be:

  • a U.S. citizen;
  • a resident of Texas;
  • licensed to practice law in the state;
  • between the ages of 25 and 75;*[6]
  • a practicing lawyer and/or state judge for at least four years; and
  • a resident of his or her respective judicial district for at least two years.[4]

*While no judge older than 74 may run for office, sitting judges who turn 75 are permitted to continue serving until their term expires.[4]

2014

See also: Texas judicial elections, 2014

Dollinger ran for election to the Harris County Civil Court at Law.
Primary: He ran unopposed in the Democratic primary on March 4, 2014.
General: He was defeated in the general election on November 4, 2014, after receiving 44.2 percent of the vote. He competed against Theresa Chang. [1][7][8] 

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Scot Dollinger completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Dollinger's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I have been practicing law for over 34 years focusing my practice on civil trial work. I've been a judge for about 3 years, elected in 2018. I was born and raised in Beaumont, Texas and moved to Harris County in about 1991. I am married with three older daughters, 33, 27 & 26. I clerked with a federal judge starting out, then did civil defense work for about 8 years thereafter. I started doing civil plaintiffs work thereafter and ran my own firm for about twenty years before taking the bench. I am a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates, Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law - Texas Board of Legal Specialization since 1998. I am AV rated by the Martindale-Hubbel lawyer rating service - the highest rating. I ran the Houston Marathon in 2009 in under four hours. I like to grow food and make pies for my juries. My way of saying thank you for your service.
  • "You have the right to be treated fairly."
  • I am a highly skilled professional with wide support in the legal community. I have done an excellent job as judge of this court by all accounts from lawyers, parties, juries and peers. I am asking for your vote to be re-elected.
  • Every judge has an obligation to treat every person politely and rule promptly. I usually rule from the bench or within four days of the hearing.
Judges do not make public policy. So, I stay out of the public policy lane.

In terms of our courts, I believe all judges should have an appreciation for different points of view especially in a widely diverse county like Harris County where over 140 different languages are spoken at home on any given day.

Judges need to appreciate that the law is intended to serve humankind, not humankind serve the law. In other words, the law can be liberating or oppressive. To the extent a civil judge has discretion in applying the law, the judge should do so with a sense of mercy and mindful that the ultimate goal of law is to lift humankind up - to treat both sides fairly. Everyone should walk away saying "I won" or "I lost" . . . "fair and square."
I look up to just about every teacher I ever had. They have collectively made me who I am.
They taught me the importance of helping others along the way just like they helped me with their life's work.
To Kill a Mockingbird. I read it in the fifth grade and several times thereafter.

I believe in being the kind of dedicate servant that Atticus Finch was full of integrity, humility, hard work and courage to do the right thing.
Elected officials should have a heart for the people - a dedication to formulate policies which promote the greatest good for the greatest number.

Elected officials must be willing to say no to special interest groups when necessary - integrity is paramount.

Elected officials should be dedicated to the notion of equality - equal protection of the laws.

Elected officials should be respectful of civil rights - constitutions were meant to promote an expansive view of civil rights.

These are general statements because as a judge, I do not make policy and am not allowed to advocate for specific policies.

I have a healthy respect for the Legislative Process and believe both sides have an obligation to work together to solve problems - find as much common ground as they can and always be respectful of each other and different points of view.
Integrity, humility, strong work ethic, empathetic, hard working, sense of humor, dedicated to fairness and justice - correct outcomes in every case.
To be a highly skilled professional dedicated to being a neutral administrator of the judicial process which resolves disputes through motion practice and trials.

Motion practice is where a party asks the court to do something like issue an injunction or order work to be done in a file or to dispose of the case without a trial based on undisputed facts and the law.

If there is a factual or legal dispute, it is the judge's responsibility to bring the matter before a fact finder - jury or judge if the parties want a bench trial - try the case and resolve it efficient and fairly.
A reputation for fairness, treating people well, hard work dedicated to trying cases fairly and efficiently.
Raking leaves for my grandmother when I was 6. I raked leaves for her until she died when I was 15.
To Kill a Mockingbird or any John Grisham book - I like reading about lawyers, trials, justice.
Being too hard on myself.

I have a very hard time accepting injustice - I hate to see people mistreated.
Civil District Judges appoint a lot of guardian ad litems to review settlements involving minors. After taking office, I greatly expanded the appointment list by including more women and minorities to be fair to the entire legal community.

How one exercises judicial power is very important. A judge has to make sure she/he is polite to make sure the judge does not unnecessarily harm the souls of those appearing in front of the judge.
We can all do our work politely. The office of judge gives greater force to the words of a judge. So a judge has to be careful what is said to lawyers, parties and juries.

Judges set out their personal operating rules on their website. Lawyers and self-represented parties should go find the court's procedures and following them as best they can. Plus, there are a lot of resources posted on the court's website especially for folks who are representing themselves. There are some free legal services posted as well as reduced cost services.
I have an expansive view of civil rights. The law is intended to promote the greatest good for the greatest number and at the same time protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. I have a sign at my desk that says: 1. Be polite to everyone. 2. These people need you to make a decision. 3. Make your decisions promptly. Every good judge needs to have integrity, humility and a strong work ethic. Everyone should walk away saying "I won" or "I lost" . . . "fair and square."
I worked for a federal judge right out of law school, the Honorable Howell Cobb, U.S. District Judge - Eastern District of Texas. You learn a lot about a judge working for him/her over a year's time.
Judge Cobb demonstrated those three great qualities of all judges: integrity, humility and a strong work ethic. He also treated everyone politely and made prompt decisions. Finally, he had a sense of humor. He did not take himself too seriously though he took is work very seriously.
Very much so. Judges must be sensitive to the suffering of humanity on both sides of every case.
Martindale-Hubble is the gold standard of rating systems and has been around for a very long time. I have the highest rating of AV Preeminent.

The Houston Bar Association has given me high marks in my rating.
I ran in 2018 to bring civil rights protection to the forefront in Harris County. Judge were not marrying same sex couples and were reluctant to give Chapter 33 hearings.

I also ran on efficiency -- increasing the number of jury trials and looking for ways to be more efficient. For example, I am 100% paperless which makes it easier for me to prepare for hearings and I sign every ORDER electronically which makes it available within 24 hours.

We have made great progress in improving the 189th Civil District Court and I want to continue giving great service to the people of Harris County. I am doing an excellent job by all accounts and I would like to continue in the work. I have dedicated my entire professional life to doing civil trial work. I believe every party is entitled to a highly skilled hardworking judge to give them the very best access to the court system to which they are entitled.

When judges work hard and give great service, we should reward them with re-election if they so desire.
Every lawyer who desires to be a judge should have extensive experience in the court they seek to manage as judge.
Judges are neutrals and so it is important for a judge to be able to demonstrate a commitment overtime to be fair to both sides.
We have a backlog of cases from Hurrican Harvey and COVID-19.
We need to formulate a coordinated plan to best work through the backlog.
Good government is about bringing people together to solve problems based on facts and evidence. Judges have a unique opportunity to demonstrate good government because we call juries to come together and help us solve problems with their verdicts.

In our very divided society, judges and juries can help bring us back together as we use rationalism and empiricism to solve problems in every case.
No. I am a civil trial lawyer who only wants to be a civil trial judge. I have no desire to seek higher judicial office.
Not really even though mine have been good - among the highest.

Not very many lawyers vote in the bar polls, the metrics are too general.
Sometimes I think lawyers rate judges without even appearing in front of them.
For example, I rule from the bench regularly and never let a ruling go past 3 or 4 days of a hearing which is a quick ruling metric and yet I get a few marks as needing improvement on rulings?

It tells me to take all these ratings with a grain of salt - both high and low.
When lawyers die, why do they bury them 40 feet in the ground?

Because deep down they are good people.

The only lawyer joke I ever tell if I tell it.

I don't believe in telling jokes about the work people do for a living.

I think this joke lifts lawyers up and causes people to take a second look and realize that lawyers are human also and so many are really good people.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes