State Ballot Measure Monthly: 2018 Ballot Measures Finalized (September 2018)
2018 U.S. state ballot measures | |
---|---|
2019 »
« 2017
| |
![]() | |
Overview | |
Scorecard | |
Tuesday Count | |
Deadlines | |
Requirements | |
Lawsuits | |
Readability | |
Voter guides | |
Election results | |
Year-end analysis | |
Campaigns | |
Polls | |
Media editorials | |
Filed initiatives | |
Finances | |
Contributions | |
Signature costs | |
Ballot Measure Monthly | |
Signature requirements | |
Have you subscribed yet?
Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew.
|
By Ballot Measures Project staff
Voters in 38 states will decide 154 statewide ballot measures in November. Since August 23, 10 new statewide measures were certified to go before voters in 2018, and four measures were removed from the ballot by court rulings. Two additional measures in Florida (Amendment 6) and Washington (Initiative 1639) were put back on the ballot by state supreme court rulings after being removed by lower court decisions. This resulted in a net increase of seven in the number of statewide measures set to go before voters.
A total of 166 statewide ballot measures were certified for 2018 ballots, but 12 were decided at pre-November elections.
The last of the pending potential measures were either put on the ballot, failed to qualify, or were approved directly by the state legislature in Michigan through the state's indirect initiative process. This means the ballot measures for November are final, pending several ongoing court cases.
|
|
This year started out with a lower-than-average number of statewide measures certified for the ballot. By the 10th week of the year, the certification count was at about two-thirds of the average since 2010. The average number of certified measures for even-numbered years from 2010 through 2016 was 164 by the third Tuesday of August. The average number of total statewide measures certified for the ballot by the end of the year from 2010 through 2016 was 173.
- 2010: By the third Tuesday of September in 2010, 184 measures had been certified for the 2010 ballot.
- Ultimately, 184 statewide measures were put on the ballot in 2010.
- 2012: By the third Tuesday of September in 2012, 185 measures had been certified for the 2012 ballot.
- Ultimately, 188 statewide measures were put on the ballot in 2012.
- 2014: By the third Tuesday of September in 2014, 158 measures had been certified for the 2014 ballot.
- Ultimately, 158 statewide measures were put on the ballot in 2014.
- 2016: By the third Tuesday of September in 2016, 163 measures had been certified for the 2016 ballot.
- Ultimately, 162 statewide measures were put on the ballot in 2016.
The graph below shows the number of certifications in each week of 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016, as well as the average for each week. The graph also shows 2018 certifications and will be updated each week until ballots are finalized for all states, and the last measure is certified for the ballot. See the chart in the following section for a full list and timeline of certifications.
Notable topics and trends in 2018
Click on the arrows (▼) below for details about each topic and a list of 2018 ballot measures
Elections policy: - 19 measures in 15 states concerning redistricting, voting restrictions, ballot access, campaign finance, and ethics
Measures concerning voting restrictions and ballot access were on the ballot in eight states in November. Topics include voter identification requirements, term limits, automatic and same-day voter registration, the ability to vote after a felony conviction, the ability to run for office after a felony conviction, and ballot collection.
Five states featured measures concerning campaign finance, political spending, and ethics: Colorado, Massachusetts, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The Missouri measure is combined with the redistricting proposal. All of these measures were put on the ballot through citizen initiative petitions.
Voters considered ballot measures addressing election policy in 15 states in 2018.
Redistricting:
- See also: Redistricting measures on the ballot
- Ohio Issue 1, Congressional Redistricting Procedures Amendment (May 2018)
- The Ohio State Legislature, through a bipartisan vote, referred Issue 1 to the ballot for the election on May 8, 2018. The measure was written to change the vote requirements to pass congressional redistricting maps and the standards used in congressional redistricting in Ohio. Voters approved Issue 1.
- Colorado Amendment Y, Independent Commission for Congressional Redistricting Amendment (2018)
- The amendment was written to create a 12-member commission responsible for approving district maps for Colorado's congressional districts. Democrats and Republicans in the Colorado State Legislature voted to refer the measure. It was approved.
- Colorado Amendment Z, Independent Commission for State Legislative Redistricting Amendment (2018)
- The amendment was written to create a 12-member commission responsible for approving district maps for Colorado's state House and state Senate. Democrats and Republicans in the legislature voted to refer the amendment. It was approved.
- Michigan Proposal 2, Independent Redistricting Commission Initiative (2018)
- The organization Voters Not Politicians collected more than the required 315,654 signatures for the initiative. The initiative was designed to transfer the power to draw the state's congressional and legislative districts from the Michigan State Legislature to an independent redistricting commission. It was approved.
- Missouri Amendment 1, Lobbying, Campaign Finance, and Redistricting Initiative (2018)
- The PAC Clean Missouri collected signatures to get the initiated amendment on the ballot. The measure made changes to the state's lobbying laws, campaign finance limits for state legislative candidates, and legislative redistricting process. The position of nonpartisan state demographer was created. Amendment 1 made the demographer responsible for drawing legislative redistricting maps and presenting them to the House and Senate apportionment commissions.
- Utah Proposition 4, Independent Advisory Commission on Redistricting Initiative (2018)
- The measure created a seven-member independent redistricting commission to draft maps for congressional and state legislative districts. The committee Utahns for Responsive Government collected more than the required 113,143 signatures to get the initiative certified for the ballot.
Voting requirements and ballot access:
- Arkansas Issue 2, Voter ID Amendment (2018)
- Issue 2 was designed to require individuals to present a valid photo ID to cast non-provisional ballots in person or absentee. The Arkansas State Legislature referred the measure to the ballot, with Republicans and four of 30 Democrats voting to put Issue 2 on the ballot. It was approved.
- Florida Amendment 4, Voting Rights Restoration for Felons Initiative (2018)
- The committee Floridians for a Fair Democracy collected more than the required 766,200 signatures to get Amendment 4 placed on the ballot. The measure was designed to automatically restore the right to vote for people with prior felony convictions, except those convicted of murder or a felony sexual offense, upon completion of their sentences, including prison, parole, and probation. It was approved.
- Louisiana Amendment 1, Felons Disqualified to Run for Office for Five Years Amendment (2018)
- This measure was put on the ballot by the state legislature. Louisiana voters approved Amendment 9 in 1998 to prevent convicted felons from seeking or holding public office for 15 years following the completion of their sentences. Amendment 9 was struck down by the Louisiana Supreme Court in 2016. It was approved.
- Maryland Question 2, Election-Day Voter Registration Amendment (2018)
- Legislative Democrats voted to place the amendment the ballot. The measure was designed to authorize a process for registering qualified individuals to vote at a precinct polling place on election day. It was approved.
- Michigan Proposal 3, Voting Policies in State Constitution Initiative (2018)
- Promote the Vote collected more than 315,654 valid signatures to get the initiative placed on the ballot. Proposal 3 was designed to add several voting policies to the Michigan Constitution, including straight-ticket voting, automatic voter registration, no-excuse absentee voting, and same-day voter registration. It was approved.
- Montana LR-129, Ballot Collection Measure (2018)
- The Montana State Legislature voted to place the measure on the ballot, through the support of 80 of 91 Republicans and one of 59 Democrats. The measure was written to ban persons from collecting the election ballots of other people, with exceptions for certain individuals. It was approved.
- Nevada Question 5, Automatic Voter Registration via DMV Initiative (2018)
- The measure was designed to provide for the automatic voter registration of eligible citizens when receiving certain services from the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The Nevada Election Administration Committee, a project of iVote, collected more than the required 55,234 signatures to get Question 5 placed on the ballot. It was approved.
- North Carolina Voter ID Amendment (2018)
- This amendment was referred to the ballot by the state legislature along party lines with Republicans voting in favor of it and Democrats voting against it. It created a constitutional requirement that voters present a photo ID to vote in person. It was approved.
- North Dakota Measure 2, Citizen Requirement for Voting Amendment Initiative (2018)
- North Dakotans for Citizen Voting collected more than the required 26,904 valid signatures to qualify this initiative for the ballot. The measure was designed to clarify that only a U.S. citizen can vote in federal, state, and local elections in North Dakota. It was approved.
Arkansas Issue 3, a legislative term limits initiative, was certified for the ballot but was blocked by an Arkansas Supreme Court ruling. The measure would have imposed term limits of six years for members of the Arkansas House of Representatives and eight years for members of the Arkansas Senate. The ruling came too late to remove the measure from the ballot, but the supreme court ordered election officials to not count or certify votes for Issue 3.
Campaign finance, political spending, and ethics:
- Colorado Amendment 75, Campaign Contribution Limits Initiative (2018)
- Proponents collected more than the required 136,328 valid signatures and met the state's distribution requirement to qualify this initiative for the ballot. The measure would have established that if any candidate for state office directs (by loan or contribution) more than one million dollars in support of his or her own campaign, then every candidate for the same office in the same primary or general election may accept five times the aggregate amount of campaign contributions normally allowed. It was defeated.
- Massachusetts Question 2, Advisory Commission for Amendments to the U.S. Constitution Regarding Corporate Personhood and Political Spending Initiative (2018)
- This citizen initiative was designed to establish a 15-member citizens' commission to advocate for certain amendments to the United States Constitution regarding political spending and corporate personhood. It was approved.
- Missouri Amendment 1, Lobbying, Campaign Finance, and Redistricting Initiative (2018)
- Besides the redistricting provisions of Amendment 1 described above, Missouri Amendment one also made changes to the state's lobbying laws and campaign finance limits for state legislative candidates.
- North Dakota Measure 1, Ethics Commission, Foreign Political Contribution Ban, and Conflicts of Interest Initiative (2018)
- North Dakotans for Public Integrity collected more than the required 26,904 valid signatures to qualify this initiative for the ballot. Measure 1 established an ethics commission, ban foreign political contributions, and enact provisions related to lobbying and conflicts of interest. It was approved.
- South Dakota Constitutional Amendment W, State Campaign Finance and Lobbying Laws, Government Accountability Board, and Initiative Process Amendment (2018)
- The committee Represent South Dakota collected more than the required 27,741 signatures to get the initiative certified for the ballot. The measure was designed to revise campaign finance and lobbying laws, create a government accountability board, and enact new laws governing the initiative and referendum process. It was defeated.
- South Dakota Initiated Measure 24, Ban Out-of-State Contributions to Ballot Question Committees Initiative (2018)
- This citizen initiative banned out-of-state contributions to committees supporting or opposing ballot measures within South Dakota. Rep. Mark Mickelson (R-13), speaker of the South Dakota House of Representatives, sponsored the initiative. It was approved.
Marijuana: - eight measures in six states concerning legalization of medical or recreational marijuana
See also: Marijuana on the ballot
Restrictions on taxes: - eight measures in six states concerning restrictions or limitations on taxes
- See also: Taxes on the ballot
In 2018, voters in six states considered ballot measures to cap, limit, or restrict types of taxes. In Oregon and Washington, voters decided ballot initiatives to prohibit governments from enacting taxes on groceries. Oregan voters rejected the grocery tax ban. In Washington, the measure was ahead by 5 percentage points with 64 percent of precincts reporting.
In Arizona, an initiative to prohibit new taxes or increased tax rates on services was approved. Voters in California defeated an initiated measure to require voter approval for the state legislature to impose, increase, or extend fuel taxes or vehicle fees in the future. It would have also repealed a gas tax increase passed in 2017.
Legislatures in Florida and North Carolina referred constitutional amendments capping taxes to the ballot and both were approved. Voters in Florida and Oregon also considered ballot measures to require supermajorities of the state legislature to increase taxes. In Florida, the measure was approved, and, in Oregon, it was defeated.
An additional initiative qualified for the ballot in California but was withdrawn after proponents agreed to a compromise bill with legislators to keep the initiative off the ballot. The initiative would have required a two-thirds vote of the electorate on all local taxes, including soda taxes. The compromise legislation prohibited local soda taxes until 2031.
Measure | Origin | Description | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Arizona Proposition 126 | Initiative | Prohibits the state and local governments from enacting new taxes or increasing tax rates on services | ![]() |
California Proposition 6 | Initiative | Requires voter approval for the state legislature to impose, increase, or extend fuel taxes or vehicle fees in the future | ![]() |
Florida Amendment 2 | Legislature | Makes permanent the cap of 10 percent on annual nonhomestead parcel assessment increases set to expire | ![]() |
Florida Amendment 5 | Legislature | Requires a two-thirds vote of each chamber of the state legislature to enact new taxes or fees or increase existing ones | ![]() |
North Carolina Amendment | Legislature | Lowers the maximum allowable state income tax rate from 10 percent to 7 percent | ![]() |
Oregon Measure 103 | Initiative | Prohibits state and local governments from enacting taxes on groceries | ![]() |
Oregon Measure 104 | Initiative | Requires a three-fifths vote of each chamber of the state legislature to increase revenue, such as via increasing taxes and decreasing tax exemptions | ![]() |
Washington Initiative 1634 | Initiative | Prohibits local governments from enacting taxes on groceries | ![]() |
Medicaid expansion and healthcare: - five measures in five states concerning Medicaid expansion or funding for Medicaid expansion and five other measures related to healthcare
Energy: - four measures in three states concerning fossil fuel and renewable energy
Voters in Nevada considered a ballot initiative, Question 3, to eliminate electricity monopolies and require a competitive energy market. Question 3 was rejected. Although Question 3 would not have directly affected the use of renewable resources in Nevada, supporters and opponents of the initiative campaigned on the issue of Question 3's effect on the use of renewable resources, contending that deregulation would either increase or decrease the use of renewable resources.[4]
Below are the most notable energy-related measures of 2018. For a full list, click here.
Measure | Description | Status |
---|---|---|
Arizona Proposition 127 | Requiring electric utilities in Arizona to acquire 50 percent of electricity from renewable resources by 2020 | ![]() |
Nevada Question 3 | Requiring “an open, competitive retail electric energy market” and prohibiting state-sanctioned electrical-generation monopolies | ![]() |
Nevada Question 6 | Requiring electric utilities to acquire 50 percent of their electricity from renewable resources by 2030. | ![]() |
Washington Initiative 1631 | Enacting a carbon emissions fee with revenue going to fund environmental programs and projects | ![]() |
Abortion: - three measures in three states concerning abortion access and abortion funding
Abortion measures on the ballot in 2018 | |
---|---|
State | Measures |
Alabama | Alabama Amendment 2: State Abortion Policy ![]() |
West Virginia | West Virginia Amendment 1: No Right to Abortion in Constitution Measure ![]() |
Oregon | Oregon Measure 106: Ban Public Funds for Abortions Initiative ![]() |
Minimum wage: - two minimum wage increase measures in two states
Minimum wage measures on the ballot in 2018 | |
---|---|
State | Measures |
Missouri | Missouri Proposition B: $12 Minimum Wage Initiative ![]() |
Arkansas | Arkansas Issue 5, Minimum Wage Increase Initiative ![]() |
2018 campaign contribution leader boards
- See also: Ballot measure campaign finance, 2018
According to reports available as of September 12, 2018, $459.8 million had been reported in contributions to support and opposition campaigns for statewide ballot measures, and $246.1 million had been reported in expenditures. To see leaderboard lists, a break down of contributions for support and opposition, and information on campaign finance for each of the 2018 measures, click here.
Top five measures
According to reports available as of September 12, 2018, the following five measures featured the most in campaign contributions:
1. California Proposition 8, Limits on Dialysis Clinics' Revenue and Required Refunds Initiative (2018) - Total: $64.6 million in contributions
- Support: $17.4 million
- Top donor: SEIU-UHW West
- Opposition: $47.2 million
- Top donors: dialysis businesses DaVita and Fresenius Medical Care North America
2. California Proposition 10, Local Rent Control Initiative (2018) - Total: $47.4 million
- Support: $12.6 million
- Top donor: AIDS Healthcare Foundation
- Opposition:
- Top donors: Michael K. Hayde, including Western National Group & Affiliated Entities, and Blackstone Property Partners, L.P.; Breit MF Holdings LLC; Blackstone Real Estate Partners (VI Through VIII), L.P.; and their Holdings
3. Nevada Question 3, Changes to Energy Market and Prohibit State-Sanctioned Electric-Generation Monopolies Amendment (2018) - Total: $31.7 million[5]
- Support: $19.7 million
- Top donors: Switch and the Las Vegas Sands Corporation
- Opposition: $12.0 million
- Top donor: NV Energy
4. Florida Amendment 6, Marsy's Law Crime Victims Rights, Judicial Retirement Age, and Judicial Interpretation of Laws and Rules Amendment (2018) - Total: $30.4 million
- Support: $30.4 million
- Top donor: Marsy's Law for All
- Opposition: $0
5. California Proposition 6, Voter Approval for Future Gas and Vehicle Taxes and 2017 Tax Repeal Initiative (2018) - Total: $29.8 million
- Support: $3.6 million
- Top donors: California Republican Party, Kevin McCarthy for Congress, and John Cox for Governor 2018
- Opposition: $26.2 million
- Top donors: Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition Issues PAC, Members' Voice of the State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, and Southern California District Council of Laborers Issues PAC
Top five states
According to reports available as of September 12, 2018, the following 10 states featured the most in ballot measure campaign contributions:
- California - $183,381,831.37 in contributions
- Florida - $74,376,439.83 in contributions
- Nevada - $34,804,641.14 in contributions
- Missouri - $30,974,841.69 in contributions
- Arizona - $29,283,569.24 in contributions
- Washington - $22,568,752.66 in contributions
- Massachusetts - $15,878,503.12 in contributions
- Montana - $13,013,824.12 in contributions
- Alaska - $10,290,920.67 in contributions
- Oregon - $9,217,978.19 in contributions
2018 certifications
From August 23 through September 12, 2018, the following measures were certified for the ballot, put back on the ballot by a court ruling, or removed from the ballot on the dates listed:
August 23, 2018:
- Colorado Proposition 110, "Let's Go Colorado" Transportation Bond and Sales Tax Increase Initiative (2018) - This initiative would increase the state sales and use tax rate by 0.62 percent from 2.9 percent (2018) to 3.52 percent for 20 years starting on January 1, 2019, through January 1, 2039. The initiative would also authorize the Colorado Department of Transportation to issue bonds up to $6 billion to fund transportation and to be repaid through the sales tax increase with a maximum repayment cost of $9.4 billion.
August 24, 2018:
- Nebraska Initiative 427, Medicaid Expansion Initiative (2018) - On August 24, 2018, Secretary of State John Gale certified the ballot initiative to appear on the general election ballot. This initiative would require the state to expand Medicaid coverage for persons under the age of 65 and with incomes equal to or below 138 percent of the federal poverty line. Nebraska was one of five states featuring statewide ballot measures relating to Medicaid expansion or funding for Medicaid expansion in 2018.
- Washington Initiative 1639, Changes to Gun Ownership and Purchase Requirements Measure (2018) - This initiative was previously certified for the ballot and removed by a court ruling. The Washington Supreme Court, however, overturned the lower court's decision and put the measure back on the ballot. Initiative 1639 would implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.
August 27, 2018:
- New Jersey School Projects Bond (2018) - This measure would authorize issuing $500 million in general obligation bonds for project grants related to vocational schools, college career and technical education, school water infrastructure, and school security. The state Assembly and state Senate originally approved this measure with an amount of $1 million on June 21, 2018, and July 1, 2018, respectively. On August 23, 2018, Gov. Phil Murphy (D) issued a conditional veto on Senate Bill 2293, saying, "While I certainly endorse the priorities established in this bill, I also believe that their long-term fiscal implications must be carefully considered." Gov. Murphy recommended revisions to S2293, including cutting the bond measure from $1 billion to $500 million. The legislature approved a revised version, and the governor signed it on August 27, certifying it for the ballot.[6]
- Removal Florida Amendment 6, Marsy's Law Crime Victims Rights, Judicial Retirement Age, and Judicial Interpretation of Laws and Rules Amendment (2018) - Amendment 6 was a combination of three proposals to do the following: (a) add specific rights of crime victims, together known as a Marsy's Law, to the Florida Constitution; (b) increase the judicial retirement age from 70 to 75 years of age; and (c) prohibit state courts from deferring to an administrative agency’s interpretation of a state statute or rule in lawsuits. This measure was put on the ballot by the Florida Constitution Revision Commission (CRC). It was removed from the ballot by Leon County Judge Karen Gievers on August 27, 2018. On September 7, 2018, however, the Florida Supreme Court reversed the lower court's ruling, ordering the amendment to appear on the ballot.
August 28, 2018:
- Colorado Proposition 111, Limits on Payday Loan Charges Initiative (2018) - This initiative would restrict the charges on payday loans to a yearly rate of 36 percent and eliminate all other finance charges and fees associated with payday lending. Coloradans to Stop Predatory Payday Loans, the group behind the initiative, submitted around 112,998 valid signatures based on a random sample method of signature verification. A total of 98,492 valid signatures were required.
- Colorado Compensation to Owners for Decreased Property Value Due to State Regulation Amendment (2018) - This initiative would require that property owners be compensated for any reduction in property value caused by state laws or regulations. Proponents of the measure submitted around 137,029 valid signatures based on a random sample method of signature verification. A total of 98,492 valid signatures were required. Proponents also met the distribution requirement for initiated constitutional amendments mandating that the petition contain signatures equal to 2 percent of the registered voters who live in each of the state's 35 senate districts.
- Washington Initiative 940, Police Training and Criminal Liability in Cases of Deadly Force Measure (2018) - This initiative would create a good faith test to determine when the use of deadly force by police is justifiable, require police to receive de-escalation and mental health training, and require law enforcement officers to provide first aid. This initiative previously qualified to go before the state legislature, which, as a compromise with proponents and law enforcement agencies, approved the initiative and then immediately amended it. As an Initiative to the Legislature, a type of indirect initiated state statute, the measure could be enacted by the legislature without going to the ballot. Initiative activist Tim Eyman, however, sued over the legislature's action to approve and then amend the initiative. Thurston County Superior Court ruled that Initiative 940 had to go on the ballot, and the Washington Supreme Court upheld the ruling on August 28, 2018.
Aug 29, 2018:
- Colorado Proposition 112, Minimum Distance Requirements for New Oil, Gas, and Fracking Projects Initiative (2018) - This initiative would mandate that new oil and gas development projects, including fracking, be a minimum distance of 2,500 feet from occupied buildings and other areas designated as vulnerable. Of the 172,834 signatures submitted by Colorado Rising, the sponsor of the initiative, 123,195 were found to be valid. A total of 98,492 valid signatures were required. Proponents also met the distribution requirement for initiated constitutional amendments mandating that the petition contain signatures equal to 2 percent of the registered voters who live in each of the state's 35 senate districts.
- Removal Arizona Proposition 207, Tax on Incomes Exceeding $250,000 for Teacher Salaries and School Operations Initiative (2018) - This measure would have increased taxes on income above $250,000 and allocated revenue to teacher salaries and school operations and maintenance purposes. On August 29, 2018, the Arizona Supreme Court removed Proposition 207 from the ballot because petitions did not state that the measure would eliminate indexing tax brackets to changes in the Consumer Price Index. Chief Justice Scott Bales said this "creates a significant danger of confusion or unfairness."[7]
September 4, 2018
- Colorado Amendment 75, Campaign Contribution Limits Initiative (2018) - The measure would provide that, if any candidate for state office directs (by loan or contribution) more than one million dollars in support of his or her own campaign (or candidate committee), then every candidate for the same office in the same primary or general election may accept five times the aggregate amount of campaign contributions normally allowed. This initiative qualified for the ballot on On September 4, 2018. Proponents of the measure submitted 212,332 signatures, of which, 136,328 were found to be valid. A total of 98,492 valid signatures were required to qualify. Proponents also met the distribution requirement for initiated constitutional amendments mandating that the petition contain signatures equal to 2 percent of the registered voters who live in each of the state's 35 senate districts.
September 5, 2018:
- Arkansas Casinos Authorized in Crittenden, Garland, Pope, and Jefferson Counties Initiative (2018) - This measure, Issue 4, would authorize casinos in Crittenden, Garland, Pope, and Jefferson Counties. Of the 138,880 signatures submitted by proponents, 99,988 were found to be valid. A total of 84,859 were required to qualify.
September 6, 2018:
- Michigan Voting Policies in State Constitution Initiative (2018) - This initiative would add eight voting policies to the Michigan Constitution, including (1) vote using a secret ballot; (2) military members and overseas voters receive an absentee ballot at least 45 days before the election; (3) register to vote by mail at least 15 days before an election; (4) register to vote in person during the final 14 days before an election; (5) the option to vote straight party in partisan general elections; (6) automatic voter registration when conducting business with the state regarding a driver's license or personal identification card; (7) absentee voting for all voters during the 40 days prior to an election; and (8) the auditing of election results. On September 6, 2018, the Board of State Canvassers certified the measure to appear on the ballot. Proponents were required to collect 315,654 valid signatures. Proponents collected an estimated 433,069 signatures. Based on a random sample of signatures, elections staff estimated that 321,755 signatures were valid.
September 7, 2018:
- Florida Amendment 6, Marsy's Law Crime Victims Rights, Judicial Retirement Age, and Judicial Interpretation of Laws and Rules Amendment (2018) - Amendment 6 was a combination of three proposals to do the following: (a) add specific rights of crime victims, together known as a Marsy's Law, to the Florida Constitution; (b) increase the judicial retirement age from 70 to 75 years of age; and (c) prohibit state courts from deferring to an administrative agency’s interpretation of a state statute or rule in lawsuits. This measure was put on the ballot by the Florida Constitution Revision Commission (CRC). It was removed from the ballot by Leon County Judge Karen Gievers on August 27, 2018. On September 7, 2018, the Florida Supreme Court reversed the lower court's ruling, ordering the amendment to appear on the ballot.
- Removal Florida Amendment 7, First Responder and Military Member Survivor Benefits, Supermajority Board Votes for College Fees, and State College System Amendment (2018) - Amendment 7 was a combination of three proposals. This measure was put on the ballot by the Florida Constitution Revision Commission (CRC). On September 7, 2018, Leon County Circuit Court Judge Karen Gievers ruled that Amendment 7 could not go on the ballot because it combined independent and unrelated provisions in a single amendment, preventing voters from making a single decision on what provisions of the amendment to support. The ruling was appealed.
- Removal Florida Amendment 9, Ban Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling and Ban Vaping in Enclosed Indoor Workplaces Amendment (2018) - Amendment 9 was a combination of two proposals. This measure was put on the ballot by the Florida Constitution Revision Commission (CRC). On September 7, 2018, Leon County Circuit Court Judge Karen Gievers ruled that Amendment 9 could not go on the ballot because it combined independent and unrelated provisions in a single amendment, preventing voters from making a single decision on what provisions of the amendment to support. The ruling was appealed.
- Removal Florida Amendment 11, Repeal Prohibition on Aliens’ Property Ownership, Delete Obsolete Provision on High-Speed Rail, and Repeal of Criminal Statutes' Effect on Prosecution Amendment (2018) - Amendment 11 was a combination of three proposals. This measure was put on the ballot by the Florida Constitution Revision Commission (CRC). On September 7, 2018, Leon County Circuit Court Judge Karen Gievers ruled that Amendment 11 could not go on the ballot because the ballot language was misleading. The ruling was appealed.
Context from past years
In 2016, there was a surge in the number of citizen-initiated measures; 76 initiatives and veto referendums were put on the ballot. This was more citizen-initiated measures than we've seen since 2006.
For initiatives to reach the ballot, they must first be filed for the various approval processes in each state and circulated for signature gathering. Only a small percentage of the initiatives filed actually make the ballot. For example, for the 2016 election cycle, an above-average 1,069 initiatives were filed with state officials. This resulted in 2016's 76 certified citizen-initiated measures, a success rate of 7 percent. Since 2010, Maryland (75%), South Dakota (73%), North Dakota (47%), Alaska (43%), and Maine (32%) had the highest success rates on average. Maryland has a veto referendum process but no initiative process; since 2010, four veto referendums have been filed, and three made the ballot.
Ultimately, 947 initiatives were filed for circulation targeting 2018 elections. For the 2016 election cycle, 1,069 initiatives were filed targeting the 2016 ballot. In 2010, 2012, and 2014, the average total number of initiatives filed with state officials was about 610. Of the 26 states that feature an initiative process, 2018 initiatives or veto referendums were filed for circulation in 23 of them. Click on the links below to see information about initiatives in each state.
|
|
Illinois, Maryland, and New Mexico had no filings as of November 1, 2017. Maryland and New Mexico feature the veto referendum power but do not have a process for ballot initiativess. Illinois' initiative process has severe subject restrictions limiting initiatives to procedural elements of laws governing the state legislature.
On average since 2010, the most initiatives were filed in Washington, California, and Colorado, where more than 100 are filed for any given even-numbered year on average. California has seen the highest average number of successful initiative attempts. For 2018, Missouri featured the most filings at 373—more than three and a half times the state's average of 97 since 2010.
The map and expandable chart below show the average success rates per year of filed initiatives and referendums (I&R) in each state over the last eight years (in even-numbered years).
|
|
The percentage of filed initiatives that reach the ballot does not necessarily correlate with the ease or difficulty of putting an initiative on the ballot in that state. Some states make filing more difficult or more expensive, making only more serious petitioners take that first step. In some states, initiative proponents file multiple versions of substantively the same initiative and ultimately put their efforts behind one.
The data—including the specific success percentage rates—represented by the map above is available below and can be expanded by clicking show.
Data for average even-year initiative success rates (2010-2018) | |||
---|---|---|---|
State | Av. filed | Av. certified | Av. success rate |
Alabama | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Alaska | 5.20 | 2.00 | 38.46% |
Arizona | 27.40 | 1.60 | 5.84% |
Arkansas | 7.40 | 1.60 | 21.62% |
California | 95.00 | 10.20 | 10.74% |
Colorado | 102.80 | 5.00 | 4.86% |
Connecticut | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Delaware | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Florida | 29.20 | 1.80 | 6.16% |
Georgia | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Hawaii | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Idaho | 7.80 | 1.00 | 12.82% |
Illinois | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Indiana | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Iowa | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Kansas | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Kentucky | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Louisiana | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Maine | 6.20 | 2.20 | 35.48% |
Maryland | 0.80 | 0.60 | 75.00% |
Massachusetts | 31.80 | 3.40 | 10.69% |
Michigan | 11.20 | 2.20 | 19.64% |
Minnesota | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Mississippi | 8.60 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Missouri | 184.50 | 3.20 | 1.73% |
Montana | 18.80 | 2.20 | 11.70% |
Nebraska | 6.60 | 0.60 | 9.09% |
Nevada | 9.40 | 1.80 | 19.15% |
New Hampshire | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
New Jersey | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
New Mexico | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% |
New York | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
North Carolina | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
North Dakota | 7.60 | 3.80 | 50.00% |
Ohio | 21.80 | 0.40 | 1.83% |
Oklahoma | 6.80 | 1.20 | 17.65% |
Oregon | 63.00 | 5.60 | 8.89% |
Pennsylvania | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Rhode Island | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
South Carolina | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
South Dakota | 8.40 | 3.80 | 45.24% |
Tennessee | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Texas | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Utah | 2.60 | 0.60 | 23.08% |
Vermont | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Virginia | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Washington | 128.60 | 4.60 | 3.58% |
West Virginia | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Wisconsin | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
Wyoming | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Average total | 756.20 | 59.40 | 7.86% |
See also
- 2018 ballot measures
- Ballot measure campaign finance, 2018
- List of ballot measures by state
- List of ballot measures by year
- Ballot initiatives filed for the 2018 ballot
- Ballot Measure Scorecard, 2018
- Ballotpedia's Tuesday Count for 2018
Related articles
Footnotes
- ↑ The numbers in the second column indicate the net increase in how many ballot measures are on the ballot; for example a "+3" could mean that three measures were certified in the last month or that five were certified and two were removed.
- ↑ This number includes citizen-initiated measures, legislative referrals, and an automatically referred measure.
- ↑ The Atlantic, "Will Washington State Voters Make History on Climate Change?" August 15, 2018
- ↑ Nevada Current, "What Question 3 and Question 6 say about renewable energy," August 23, 2018
- ↑ Note: Question 3 was also on the ballot in 2016. For Question 3 of 2016, a combined total of $4.35 million was raised between supporters and opponents.
- ↑ New Jersey Governor, "Veto of Senate Bill 2293," August 23, 2018
- ↑ Tucson.com, "Arizona Supreme Court throws 'Invest in Ed' initiative off ballot," August 29, 2018
|