Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Texas Proposition 8, Homestead Tax Exemption for Surviving Spouses of Military Fatally Injured in the Line of Duty Amendment (2021)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Texas Proposition 8
Flag of Texas.png
Election date
November 2, 2021
Topic
Taxes and Veterans
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

2021 measures
November 2
Texas Proposition 1 Approved
Texas Proposition 2 Approved
Texas Proposition 3 Approved
Texas Proposition 4 Approved
Texas Proposition 5 Approved
Texas Proposition 6 Approved
Texas Proposition 7 Approved
Texas Proposition 8 Approved
Polls
Voter guides
Campaign finance
Signature costs

Texas Proposition 8, the Homestead Tax Exemption for Surviving Spouses of Military Fatally Injured in the Line of Duty Amendment, was on the ballot in Texas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 2, 2021.It was approved.[1]

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to allow the legislature to provide a homestead property tax exemption for the surviving spouse of a military member "killed or fatally injured in the line of duty."

A "no" vote opposed amending the state constitution, thereby maintaining the existing language that authorizes a tax exemption for the spouse of a military member "killed in action."



Election results

Texas Proposition 8

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,291,920 87.76%
No 180,179 12.24%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Overview

How did Proposition 8 change property tax exemptions for surviving spouses of members of the armed services?

See also: Text of measure

The measure amended the Texas Constitution to authorize a total residence homestead property tax exemption for a surviving spouse of a member of the armed services "who is killed or fatally injured in the line of duty." At the time of the election, the constitution granted the exemption to the surviving spouse of a member of the armed services "who is killed in action." The amended language included service members who are killed or fatally injured during military training or other military duties.[2]

In the amendment's Statement of Intent, the 17 senators who sponsored the amendment said, "Due to its phrasing, the [current] exemption does not include members of the military who die during their service due to injuries sustained that are not combat-related. For example, members of the Air Force who are killed in a training exercise are not included in the current exemption, even though their death was a direct result of their duties in the military."[3]

The amendment took effect on January 1, 2022.[2]

When was the property tax exemption first granted to surviving spouses?

See also: Proposition 1 (2013)

In 2013, Texas voters approved Proposition 1 by a margin of 86.98% to 13.01%. The measure granted the legislature authorization to provide property tax exemptions on all or part of the market value of the home of a member of the armed services who was killed in action to the surviving spouse, provided that the surviving spouse has not since remarried. Senate Bill 163, the enabling legislation for the amendment, took effect on January 1, 2014.[4]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for the amendment was as follows:[2]

The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for an exemption from ad valorem taxation of all or part of the market value of the residence homestead of the surviving spouse of a member of the armed services of the United States who is killed or fatally injured in the line of duty.[5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 8, Texas Constitution

The measure amended section 1-b(m) of article 8 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2]

(m) The legislature by general law may provide that the surviving spouse of a member of the armed services of the United States who is killed or fatally injured in the line of duty in action is entitled to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of all or part of the market value of the surviving spouse’s residence homestead if the surviving spouse has not remarried since the death of the member of the armed services. [5]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2021
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 25, and the FRE is 11. The word count for the ballot title is 53, and the estimated reading time is 14 seconds.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Progress Texas
  • Texas Freedom Caucus

Opposition

If you are aware of any opponents or opposing arguments, please send an email with a link to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Texas ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2021 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on Proposition 8.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • The Fort Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board: "Surviving spouses of active-duty military members killed in action are eligible for continued property-tax exemption. This amendment expands the protection to those who die in the line of duty, such as in a job-related accident, not just combat. As with Proposition 7, it does a lot of good for a relative handful of people. Our recommendation: Yes."
  • The San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "We recommend voters cast a ballot FOR Proposition 8. This amendment expands an important benefit to surviving spouses of all military people killed in the line of duty versus only those killed in combat. Currently, spouses of those killed in training accidents, crashes or other noncombat service are ineligible. Military service is inherently dangerous, and it’s the moral and patriotic choice to support surviving spouses, regardless of the circumstances of their loved one’s death."
  • The Austin American-Statesman Editorial Board: "If voters approve Prop 8, analysts expect the impact to the tax base would be negligible, as fewer than 10 Texas families a year would be added to the property tax exemption list. The statement to military families, however, would be significant. Prop 8 is a recognition that deaths in the line of duty can take many forms, but each one signifies a sacrifice that Texans revere. We urge voters to support Prop 8 extending the property tax exemption to spouses of soldiers killed outside of combat."
  • The Dallas Morning News Editorial Board: "Recommendation: Yes. This amendment broadens the qualifications for a tax break from people whose spouses died in combat to those whose spouses died in non-combat operations. We support this amendment to honor all veterans."
  • El Paso Times Editorial Board: "Texans can end this disparity by passing Proposition 8 on the Nov. 2 ballot. The measure would amend the Texas Constitution to extend the property tax break to the spouse of any soldier “who is killed or fatally injured in the line of duty,” encompassing other service-related deaths."

Opposition

  • The Austin Chronicle Editorial Board: "Propositions 7 and 8: AGAINST. These are both tweaks to existing state law regarding what property tax homestead exemptions can continue to be claimed by the surviving spouse of a deceased owner. Prop 7 applies when the owner was disabled (lowering the surviving spouse's age of eligibility to 55), Prop 8 to service members killed in the line of duty (as opposed to "in combat" as current law reads). To support them in good faith, one must support the exemptions themselves, which we do not. We are all for making it easier for taxing entities in Texas to account for personal hardship; we do not think that linking favorable tax treatment to moralistic virtue signaling is the way to go. Our democracy is in crisis precisely because the people who run this place want to preserve the benefits of good government for whom they deem the right kind of people; this is more of that, and it should be rejected."


Background

Senate Bill 611 (2021)

Senate Bill 611 (SB 611) was the enabling legislation passed by the Texas State Legislature for the 2021 amendment. The bill amends Section 11.133 of the Tax Code to extend the property tax exemption on the total appraised value of the homestead of a surviving spouse of a military service member killed or fatally injured in the line of duty, as long as the spouse has not remarried.[6]

SB 611 was approved on April 8, 2021, by the Senate in a vote of 29-1 with one absent. On May 24, 2021, the House approved SB 611 in a vote of 146-0 with four not present or not voting.[6]

Texas Tax Exemption on Residences of Service Members Killed in Action Amendment, Proposition 1 (2013)

See also: Proposition 1 (2013)

In 2013, Texas voters approved Proposition 1 by a margin of 86.98% to 13.01%. The measure granted the legislature authorization to provide property tax exemptions on all or part of the market value of the home of a member of the armed services who was killed in action to the surviving spouse, provided that the surviving spouse has not since remarried. Additionally, if the surviving spouse qualifies for and receives such an exemption and later qualifies a different property as his or her residence, the spouse is still entitled to a property tax exemption on the new home equal to the amount of the original exemption for the first home.[4]

At the time of Proposition 1's approval, Section 1-b, Article VIII of the Texas Constitution allowed for various property tax exemptions on the homes of disabled veterans and their surviving spouses but did not previously grant such exemptions for the surviving spouses of service members who were killed in action.[4]

The legislatively referred measure was approved unanimously in the Senate and the House.[4]

Texas Constitutional amendments related to tax exemptions for veterans

Between 1972 and 2021, Ballotpedia tracked the following constitutional amendments related to tax exemptions for veterans.

Referred amendments on the ballot

See also: List of Texas ballot measures

The following statistics are based on ballot measures between 1995 and 2020 in Texas:

  • Ballots featured 169 constitutional amendments.
  • An average of 13 measures appeared on odd-year statewide ballots.
  • The number of ballot measures on odd-year statewide ballots ranged from 7 to 22.
  • Voters approved 91% (154 of 169) and rejected 9% (15 of 169) of the constitutional amendments.
Legislatively-referred constitutional amendments, 1995-2020
Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Odd-year average Odd-year median Odd-year minimum Odd-year maximum
169 154 91.1% 15 8.9% 12.8 11 7 22


During the 2021 regular and first special legislative sessions, 251 constitutional amendments were filed in the Texas State Legislature. In the regular session, legislators filed 218 amendments, and in the first special session, legislators filed 33 amendments. Between 2009 and 2020, an average of 192 constitutional amendments were filed during regular legislative sessions. The state legislature approved an average of nine constitutional amendments during regular legislative sessions. Therefore, the average rate of certification during regular legislative sessions was 4.7%. In 2021, eight of the 218 proposed constitutional amendments were certified for the ballot during the regular session, meaning the rate of certification was 3.7%, down from 4.6% in 2019.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Texas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 35 (SJR 35) on February 8, 2021. On April 8, 2021, the state Senate passed SJR 35 in a vote of 29-1, with one absent. Senator Nathan Johnson (D) was the sole senator to vote against the amendment. On May 23, 2021, the House approved SJR 35 in a vote of 144-0 with six not present or not voting.[1]

Vote in the Texas State Senate
April 8, 2021
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2911
Total percent93.5%3.2%3.2%
Democrat1111
Republican1800

Vote in the Texas House of Representatives
May 23, 2021
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 100  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total14406
Total percent96.0%0.0%4.0%
Democrat6502
Republican7904

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Texas State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 35 Overview," accessed April 7, 2021
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Texas State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 35 Text," accessed April 7, 2021
  3. Texas State Legislature, "SJR 35 Analysis," accessed September 28, 2021
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Texas Legislative Council's Official Voter Guide, "Amendment No. 1 (HJR 62)," accessed October 7, 2013
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  6. 6.0 6.1 Texas State Legislature, "Overview of Senate Bill 611," accessed May 25, 2021
  7. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  8. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  9. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed July 28, 2024
  11. Texas Secretary of State, "Request for Voter Registration Applications," accessed July 28, 2024
  12. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  13. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  14. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  15. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  16. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  17. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content