Utah Eliminate the Independent Redistricting Commission Initiative (2026)
| Utah Eliminate the Independent Redistricting Commission Initiative | |
|---|---|
| Election date |
|
| Topic Redistricting policy |
|
| Status Signatures submitted |
|
| Type Initiated state statute |
Origin |
The Utah Eliminate the Independent Redistricting Commission Initiative may appear on the ballot in Utah as an initiated state statute on November 3, 2026.
Overview
What would the initiative change about the redistricting process in Utah?
- See also: Text of measure
The initiative would repeal Proposition 4, which was approved by voters in 2018, thereby eliminating the seven-member non-politician redistricting commission known as the Utah Independent Redistricting Commission.[1] Additionally, the measure would repeal Senate Bill 200, approved by the state legislature in 2020, which amended Prop 4.
Click here to read more about the provisions that were implemented with Prop 4. Click here to read more about how Senate Bill 200 amended the initiative.
With Prop 4 repealed, the state legislature would again have sole authority to draw the state legislative and congressional districts. The lines would be subject to veto by the governor. Redistricting would occur in the legislative session immediately following the federal census, a schedule which was adopted when Amendment 8 was approved by Utah voters in 2008.
Text of measure
Full text
The full text of the ballot initiative is below:[1]
Fiscal impact statement
The fiscal impact statement, prepared by the Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst, is available here.
Support
Utahns for Representative Government is leading the campaign in support of the initiative.[2]
Supporters
Officials
- President Donald Trump (R)
- U.S. Sen. Mike Lee (R)
- Utah Attorney General Derek Brown (R)
Candidates
- Carolyn Phippen (R) - Former candidate for U.S. Senate
Former Officials
- Former U.S. Rep. Robert Bishop (R)
Political Parties
Organizations
Individuals
- Robert Axson - Utah Republican Party Chair
- Brad Bonham (R) - Republican National Committeeman
- Donald Trump Jr. - Executive VP of the Trump Organization
Arguments
Opposition
Protect Utah Voters is leading the campaign in opposition to the measure.[3]
Opponents
Former Officials
- Former State Rep. Brian King (D)
Organizations
- ACLU of Utah
- Alliance for a Better Utah
- Better Boundaries
- League of Women Voters of Utah
- Mormon Women for Ethical Government
Arguments
Polls
| Poll | Dates | Sample size | Margin of error | Support | Oppose | Undecided | Sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics Question"There is currently an effort to gather signatures for a ballot proposition that would eliminate Utah's independent redistricting commission, which was established in 2018 when voters passed Proposition 4. Do you support of oppose eliminating that commission?" | – | 769 RV | ± 4.00% | 27.0% | 32.0% | 41.0% | |
Embold Research Question"In 2018, Utah voters passed Proposition 4, a ballot initiative that established the Utah Independent Redistricting Commission and included a set of neutral criteria that all redistricting maps in Utah must follow. Prop 4 also banned the manipulation of election district maps to unfairly benefit one political party (“gerrymandering”). Do you support or oppose Prop 4?" | – | 1,731 RV | ± 2.50% | 64.0% | 19.0% | 18.0% | Better Boundaries |
Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics Question"There is currently an effort to gather signatures for a ballot proposition that would eliminate Utah's independent redistricting commission, which was established in 2018 when voters passed Proposition 4. Do you support of oppose eliminating that commission?" | – | 799 RV | ± 3.00% | 26.0% | 29.0% | 44.0% | |
| Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. | |||||||
Background
Redistricting in Utah between 2018 and 2026
Proposition 4 (2018)
In 2018, Utah voters approved Prop 4; 50.3% voted yes on the measure. Proposition 4 created a seven-member independent redistricting commission to draft maps for congressional and state legislative districts. Members are appointed by the governor and state legislative leaders. A person is not eligible to serve as a commissioner if, during the four years before appointment, he or she was a lobbyist; was a candidate for or holder of any political or elected office; received compensation from a political party, political party committee, or political action committee associated with a political party. Members are required to submit redistricting plans to the Legislature for approval or rejection. Click here to read more about the commission members. Click here to read more about the commission's process and standards for creating new maps.
Senate Bill 200 (2020)
- See also: Legislative alteration
In 2020, the state legislature altered Prop 4 when they passed Senate Bill 200 (SB 200). Prop 4 originally granted the commission sole authority to draft congressional and state legislative district maps and to recommend them to the state legislature for approval. SB 200 created a legislative committee that also had the power to draft and recommend district maps. SB 200 also repealed provisions that barred the commission and legislators from using partisan political data, such as partisan election results and voting records, when drafting maps, and from drawing districts that purposefully or unduly favored or disfavored any incumbent, candidate, or political party. The state Senate passed SB 200 by a vote of 25-0, and the state House passed SB 200 by a vote of 67-4.
Litigation
In 2021, the legislative committee created electoral maps used in the 2022 election cycle. In July 2022, the Utah League of Women Voters, along with Mormon Women for Ethical Government, filed a lawsuit challenging both the legality of SB 200 and the 2021 redistricting maps adopted by the state legislature.[4]
On August 25, 2025, Judge Gibson of the Utah Third Judicial District Court ruled that SB 200 was unconstitutional. She held, "that the Legislature unconstitutionally repealed Prop 4, and enacted SB 200, in violation of the people’s fundamental right to reform redistricting in Utah and to prohibit partisan gerrymandering."[5] Therefore, the congressional districts created in 2021 were also unconstitutional. The ruling required the legislature to adopt a new map that complies with Proposition 4's requirements.
On October 6, in a special legislative session, the state legislature passed Senate Bill 1012. The bill adopted a new map for congressional districts. The state Senate approved the bill in a vote of 18-9 and the House approved the bill in a vote of 56-17.[6]
On November 10, Judge Gibson ruled that the maps enacted by the legislature violated Prop 4. As such, the court adopted an alternate map as the judicial remedy, stating that it “better satisfies the redistricting standards and requirements contained in Proposition 4."[7] That map is the one in place as of February 2026. However, the state legislature moved the filing deadline for congressional candidates from January to March 2026 to allow time for an appeal in the case.[8]
For a more detailed breakdown of the lawsuit and legal proceedings, click here.
Changes in congressional districts
The following maps compare the congressional district boundaries enacted after the 2020 census with those enacted in 2025 by Judge Gibson and are colored by partisan change according to 2024 presidential results.
Redistricting efforts between 2024 and 2026
As of February 2026, six states had congressional district maps that were subject to change before the 2026 elections, and six states—California, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, and Utah—had new congressional maps. Three states were reportedly exploring voluntary redistricting, and three states had congressional maps that were subject to change due to litigation. Before 2025, only two states had conducted voluntary mid-decade redistricting since 1970.[9]
The map below shows redistricting activity between the 2024 and 2026 elections.
The table below shows redistricting activity between the 2024 and 2026 elections as well as the pre-redistricting U.S. House delegation in each state.
| State | Reason for redistricting | Status | Method of redistricting | U.S. House delegation before redistricting | Potential result of new maps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New map enacted | |||||
| California | Voluntary redistricting | Voters approved the use of a new map on Nov. 4, 2025. | Commission | 43 D - 9 R | +5 D |
| Missouri | Voluntary redistricting | Gov. Mike Kehoe (R) signed new map into law on Sept. 28, 2025. | Legislature-dominant | 6 R - 2 D | +1 R |
| North Carolina | Voluntary redistricting | Legislature passed new map into law on Oct. 22, 2025 | Legislature-dominant | 10 R - 4 D | +1 R |
| Ohio | Required by law to redistrict | Redistricting commission approved a new map on Oct. 31, 2025 | Legislature-dominant | 10 R -5 D | +2 R |
| Texas | Voluntary redistricting | U.S. Supreme Court ruled the new Texas map could be used in 2026 | Legislature-dominant | 25 R -12 D with 1 vacancy | +5 R |
| Utah | Changed due to litigation | Court approved new plaintiff-submitted map | Legislature-dominant | 4 R - 0 D | +1 D |
| Net | +3 R | ||||
| New map possible | |||||
| Florida | Voluntary redistricting | Special session to occur April 2026 | Legislature-dominant | 20 R - 8 D | - |
| Georgia | Subject to change due to litigation | Litigation ongoing | Legislature-dominant | 9 R - 5 D | - |
| Louisiana | Subject to change due to litigation | Litigation ongoing | Legislature-dominant | 4 R - 2 D | - |
| Maryland | Voluntary redistricting | House approved new map | Legislature-dominant | 7 D - 1 R | - |
| New York | Subject to change due to litigation | Litigation ongoing | Hybrid | 19 D - 7 R | - |
| Virginia | Voluntary redistricting | Constitutional amendment to allow redistricting pending voter approval | Hybrid | 6 D - 5 R | - |
Utah congressional representatives, 2026
As of 2026, Utah has four congressional districts, with voters within each district electing a member of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Gov. Spencer Cox (R) called a special session to begin on November 9, 2021. The Utah legislature voted to approve the House and Senate district maps on November 10, 2021. These maps were in effect for Utah's 2022 and 2024 legislative elections. Click here for more information about the congressional maps enacted in Utah after the 2020 census.
The current members of the U.S. House from Utah are:
| Office | Name | Party | Date assumed office | Date term ends |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. House Utah District 1 | Blake Moore | Republican | January 3, 2021 | January 3, 2027 |
| U.S. House Utah District 2 | Celeste Maloy | Republican | November 28, 2023 | January 3, 2027 |
| U.S. House Utah District 3 | Mike Kennedy | Republican | January 3, 2025 | January 3, 2027 |
| U.S. House Utah District 4 | Burgess Owens | Republican | January 3, 2021 | January 3, 2027 |
Path to the ballot
Process in Utah
An initiated state statute is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends state statute. There are 21 states that allow citizens to initiate state statutes, including 14 that provide for direct initiatives and nine (9) that provide for indirect initiatives (two provide for both). An indirect initiated state statute goes to the legislature after a successful signature drive. The legislatures in these states have the option of approving the initiative itself, rather than the initiative appearing on the ballot.
In Utah, the number of required signatures is tied to the number of active voters as of January 1 following the most recent regular general election. For directly initiated statutes, proponents must gather signatures equal to 8 percent of the total number of active voters. For directly initiated state statutes, signatures must be collected from each of at least 26 of the 29 Utah State Senate districts equal to 8 percent of active voters in the state as of January 1 of the year following the last regular general election.
State law establishes a final signature deadline for direct initiated state statutes as either 316 days after the initial initiative application was filed or February 15 of the election year, whichever is earlier. Moreover, signature petition sheet packets for direct initiatives must be submitted to county clerks on a rolling basis no more than 30 days after the first signature is added to the packet.
The requirements to get an initiated state statute certified for the 2026 ballot:
- Signatures: 140,748 valid signatures were required.
- Deadline: The deadline to submit signatures was February 15, 2026. An initiative also has a specific deadline 316 days following the initial application.
Stages of this ballot initiative
The following is the timeline of the initiative:[10]
- October 14, 2025: The initiative was filed by Robert Axson, chairperson of the Utah Republican Party, and is pending official review by the secretary of state.[11]
- October 24, 2025: Sponsors of the initiative repealed the initial version and filed a second version of the measure. This changed the type of measure from an indirectly initiated state statute to a directly initiated state statute.[12][13]
- November 3, 2025: Public hearings for the initiative were held.[14] After the completion of the public hearings, the initiative was cleared to begin gathering signatures.
- February 15, 2026: Robert Axson announced that sponsors had gathered and submitted more than 200,000 signatures in support of the initiative.[15]
- March 2, 2026: Utah Political Watch announced the campaign had met the distribution requirement in 26 of Utah's 29 senate districts.[16]
- March 3, 2026: As of this date, the Lt. Governor had verified 163,012 signatures.[17]
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Utah
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Utah.
See also
View other measures certified for the 2026 ballot across the U.S. and in Utah.
Explore Utah's ballot measure history, including citizen-initiated ballot measures.
Understand how measures are placed on the ballot and the rules that apply.
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Vote.Utah.gov, "Full text of Repeal of Independent Redistricting Commission Direct Initiative," accessed October 27, 2025
- ↑ Utahns for Representative Government, "Homepage," accessed January 26, 2026
- ↑ Protect Utah Voters, "Homepage," accessed January 26, 2026
- ↑ Justia Law, "League of Women Voters v. Utah State Legislature," accessed August 23, 2024
- ↑ Utah Third Judicial District Court, "Ruling and Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Legislative Defendants’ Cross-motion for Summary Judgment," August 25, 2025
- ↑ Utah State Legislature, "S.B. 1012 Congressional Boundaries Designation," accessed February 17, 2026
- ↑ Democracy Docket, "League of Women Voters of Utah et. al. v. Utah State Legislature," accessed January 5, 2025
- ↑ Utah State Legislature, "S.B. 2001 Election Amendments," accessed February 19, 2026
- ↑ Pew Research Center, "Redistricting between censuses has been rare in the modern era," August 28, 2025
- ↑ Vote.Utah.gov, "Initiatives and Referenda," accessed October 16, 2025
- ↑ Utah attorney general backs GOP initiative to repeal redistricting laws, "Deseret News," accessed October 16, 2025
- ↑ Vote.Utah.gov, "Formal withdrawal of indirect initiative email," accessed October 27, 2025
- ↑ Facebook, "Post by Utah Republican Party," accessed October 27, 2025
- ↑ Utah Initiatives and Referenda, "Public Hearings Round 2 Schedule," accessed October 31, 2025
- ↑ The Hill, "Utah Republicans say they have support for redistricting ballot proposal," accessed February 17, 2026
- ↑ Utah Political Watch, "Numbers keep climbing: Prop. 4 repeal effort speeding toward ballot," accessed March 3, 2026
- ↑ Utah.gov, "Repeal of the Independent Redistricting Commission and Standards Act Direct Initiative List of Signers," accessed March 3, 2026
- ↑ Utah State Legislature, “Utah Code 20A-1-302. Opening and closing of polls on election day.” accessed May 13, 2025
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Utah State Legislature, “Utah Code 20A-2-101. Eligibility for registration.” accessed May 13, 2025
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 Utah Lieutenant Governor, “Welcome to the Utah Voter Registration Website,” accessed May 13, 2025
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Utah State Legislature, “20A-2-207. Registration by provisional ballot.” accessed May 13, 2025
- ↑ NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed May 13, 2025
- ↑ Utah State Legislature, “Utah Code 20A-2-401. Fraudulent registration -- Penalty.” accessed May 13, 2025
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 Utah State Legislature, "Utah Code 20A-1-102. Definitions." accessed October 9, 2025
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.