Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Washington, D.C., Initiative 81, Entheogenic Plants and Fungus Measure (2020)
Washington, D.C. Initiative 81 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 3, 2020 | |
Topic Local law enforcement | |
Status![]() | |
Type Initiative | Origin Citizens |
Washington, D.C., Initiative 81, the Entheogenic Plants and Fungus Measure, was on the ballot in Washington, D.C., as an initiative on November 3, 2020. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to: * declare that police shall treat the non-commercial cultivation, distribution, possession, and use of entheogenic plants and fungi among the lowest law enforcement priorities and *define entheogenic plants and fungi as species of plants and fungi that contain ibogaine, dimethyltryptamine, mescaline, psilocybin, or psilocyn. |
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to declare that police shall treat the non-commercial cultivation, distribution, possession, and use of entheogenic plants and fungi—including psilocybin mushrooms, peyote, and iboga—as among the lowest law enforcement priorities. |
Election results
District of Columbia Initiative 81 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
214,685 | 76.18% | |||
No | 67,140 | 23.82% |
Overview
What was Initiative 81 designed to do?
Initiative 81 was designed to declare that police shall treat the non-commercial cultivation, distribution, possession, and use of entheogenic plants and fungi as among the lowest law enforcement priorities. The ballot initiative defined entheogenic plants and fungi as species of plants and fungi that contain ibogaine, dimethyltryptamine, mescaline, psilocybin, or psilocyn. Examples include psilocybin mushrooms, also known as magic mushrooms or shrooms, peyote, and iboga. The ballot initiative also asked the D.C. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for D.C. to cease the prosecution of residents who engage with entheogenic plants and fungi.[1]
- See also: Background
Washington, D.C., was the second jurisdiction to vote on a ballot measure related to psilocybin and the first to vote on a ballot measure related to multiple entheogenic plants and fungi. In 2019, voters in Denver, Colorado, approved Initiated Ordinance 301, which declared that the adult use and possession of psilocybin mushrooms were of the city's lowest law enforcement priorities.[2] The governing bodies of Oakland and Santa Cruz, California, and Ann Arbor, Michigan, passed resolutions through their local governments to decriminalize entheogenic plants or psychoactive plants and fungi.[3][4]
At the election on November 3, 2020, voters in Oregon decided two ballot initiatives—Oregon Measure 109 and Oregon Measure 110—related to entheogenic plants. Measure 109 was designed to create a program for administering psilocybin, such as psilocybin-producing mushrooms and fungi, to individuals aged 21 years or older.[5] Measure 110 was designed to decriminalize Schedule I - IV controlled substances, including entheogenic plants listed as scheduled drugs, from Class A misdemeanors to Class E violations.[6]
Who was behind the campaigns surrounding Initiative 81?
- See also: Campaign finance
Decriminalize Nature D.C. led the campaign in support of Initiative 81. The campaign had raised $802,473, including $641,378 from the New Approach PAC. The New Approach PAC was founded in 2014, with an initial focus on marijuana-related ballot measures. In 2020, the New Approach PAC also supported Oregon Measure 109.[7]
Ballotpedia had not identified political action committees (PACs) organized to oppose Initiative 81.
Text of measure
Ballot title
The official ballot title was as follows:[1]
“ |
If enacted, this Initiative would:
|
” |
Full text
The full text of the ballot initiative is as follows:[1]
Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.
|
Support
Decriminalize Nature D.C. led the campaign in support of the ballot initiative.[9] Melissa Lavasani, a budget officer at the D.C. Department of Energy and Environment, proposed the ballot initiative.[10]
Supporters
Political Parties
Organizations
Arguments
Opposition
Arguments
Campaign finance
The Campaign to Decriminalize Nature DC PAC was registered to support Initiative 81. The committee had raised $802,473. The New Approach PAC provided $641,378 to the committee.[7]
Ballotpedia had not identified PACs registered to oppose the ballot initiative.[7]
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $623,437.74 | $179,035.54 | $802,473.28 | $627,439.43 | $806,474.97 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $623,437.74 | $179,035.54 | $802,473.28 | $627,439.43 | $806,474.97 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the ballot initiative.[7]
Committees in support of Initiative 81 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Campaign to Decriminalize Nature DC | $623,437.74 | $179,035.54 | $802,473.28 | $627,439.43 | $806,474.97 |
Total | $623,437.74 | $179,035.54 | $802,473.28 | $627,439.43 | $806,474.97 |
Donors
The following were the top three donors to the support committee.[7]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
New Approach PAC | $556,000.00 | $85,378.23 | $641,378.23 |
Mintwood Strategies | $43,000.00 | $91,489.56 | $134,489.56 |
Adam Eidinger | $5,100.00 | $1,117.75 | $6,217.75 |
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
Washington, D.C., Initiative 81, Entheogenic Plants and Fungus Measure (2020) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Support | Oppose | Undecided | Margin of error | Sample size | ||||||||||||||
FM3 Research 8/16/2020 - 8/24/2020 | 60.0% | 24.0% | 16.0% | +/-4.0 | 620 | ||||||||||||||
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org. |
Background
Entheogens
Initiative 81 was written with the term entheogenic plants and fungi. In 1979, five academics, including Carl A. P. Ruck and Daniel Staples of Boston University, proposed the term entheogens to describe "states of shamanic and ecstatic possession induced by mind-altering drugs." "In a strict sense," wrote the academics, "only those vision-producing drugs that can be shown to have figured in shamanic or religious rites would be designated entheogens, but in a looser sense, the term could also be applied to other drugs, both natural and artificial, that induce alterations of consciousness similar to those documented for ritual ingestion of traditional entheogens." Ruck et al. described the term hallucinogen as having a biased, negative meaning: "The verb 'hallucinate,' however, immediately imposes a value judgment upon the nature of the altered perceptions, for it means 'to be deceived or entertain false notions.'"[11]
Laws that legalized or decriminalized psilocybin
As of 2020, four local governments—Denver, Colorado; Oakland, California; Santa Cruz, California; and Ann Arbor, Michigan—had passed laws that decriminalized psilocybin or changed law enforcement priorities regarding psilocybin.
Denver Initiated Ordinance 301 (2019)
In 2019, voters in Denver, Colorado, approved Initiated Ordinance 301, which declared that the adult use and possession of psilocybin mushrooms were of the city's lowest law enforcement priorities.[2]
Oakland and Santa Cruz, California
The Oakland City Council voted on a resolution to decriminalize hallucinogen psilocybin on June 4, 2019. The resolution asked law enforcement to cease prosecutions of adults for the use and possession of entheogenic plants. Councilmember Noel Gallo, who sponsored the resolution, said, "Half of my family is Native American. I grew up with my grandmother, and those plants were visible in our backyard."[3]
On January 28, 2020, the Santa Cruz City Council voted on a resolution that stated that "the investigation and arrest of individuals involved with the adult possession, use, or cultivation of psychoactive plants and fungi listed on the Federal Schedule 1 list for personal adult use and clinical research be among the lowest priorities for the city of Santa Cruz."[4]
Ann Arbor, Michigan
On September 21, 2020, the Ann Arbor City Council voted on a resolution that declared entheogenic plants to be considered the city's lowest law enforcement priorities. The resolution stated, "The use of entheogenic plants, which can catalyze profound experiences of personal and spiritual growth, have been shown by scientific and clinical studies and traditional practices to be beneficial to the health and well-being of individuals and communities in addressing these conditions."[12]
Oregon Measure 109 and Measure 110 (2020)
- See also: Oregon Measure 109 and Oregon Measure 110
At the election on November 3, 2020, voters in Oregon decided two ballot initiatives—Oregon Measure 109 and Oregon Measure 110—related to entheogenic plants.
Measure 109 was designed to create a program for administering psilocybin, such as psilocybin-producing mushrooms and fungi, to individuals aged 21 years or older. Measure 109 allows people to purchase, possess, and consume psilocybin at a psilocybin service center and under the supervision of a psilocybin service facilitator after undergoing a preparation session.[5]
Measure 110 was designed to decriminalize Schedule I - IV controlled substances, including some entheogenic plants, from Class A misdemeanors to Class E violations.[6] Oregon was the first state to legalize psilocybin and the first state to decriminalize all Schedule I - IV controlled substances.
Path to the ballot
Process in Washington, D.C.
In Washington, D.C., the Board of Elections is responsible for overseeing the ballot initiative process. After the D.C. Board of Elections approves a petition for a ballot initiative, proponents have 180 days to gather a number of signatures equal to at least 5 percent of the voters registered citywide. Once signatures are filed with the Board of Elections, staff have 30 days to count and review the signatures. Moreover, signatures from 5 percent of registered voters in five of eight city wards are required to meet the city's distribution requirement.
Stages of this ballot initiative
![]() |
---|
Coronavirus pandemic |
Select a topic from the dropdown below to learn more.
|
On December 20, 2019, the campaign Decriminalize Nature D.C. submitted a petition for the ballot initiative to the D.C. Board of Elections. On February 18, 2020, the Board of Elections concluded that the proposal conformed to the district's laws and published the ballot title.[13]
Decriminalize Nature D.C. asked the Board of Elections to postpone the start of the circulation period for the ballot initiative due to the coronavirus pandemic. Seth Rosenberg, a campaign spokesperson, said, "The combination of public fear, lack of testing, and an expanding shutdown of 2020 election activities has made it obvious this isn’t the time to be knocking on doors and engaging DC voters. Now is the time for our campaigners to focus on themselves and their families’ well-being."[14] On May 6, 2020, the D.C. Board of Elections approved the petition for signature gathering.[15]
Melissa Lavasani, spokesperson for Decriminalize Nature D.C., said the campaign would mail petitions to households instead of conducting an in-person signature drive. Lavasani stated, "We can’t be outside getting signatures, so we’re trying to be inventive and work with the system we have. We’re trying to beef up the envelope so people don’t throw it in the trash. We’re trying to make it nice and inviting."[16]
The Washington, D.C. Council approved a bill on May 5, 2020, to allow petitions to be distributed, printed, signed, scanned (uploaded), and sent to proponents. Voters still needed to sign physical copies of the petitions.[17] Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) said, "These changes will allow eligible District residents to download petition sheets from campaigns at home, print them out, circulate them for physical signatures within their small social networks or families, and return them electronically to the campaigns."[18] Decriminalize Nature D.C. mailed petitions to more than 220,000 households in Washington, D.C.[19]
Nikolas Schiller, the campaign’s field director, said that the campaign ended up receiving about 7,000 signatures by mail.[20]
On July 6, 2020, the campaign Decriminalize Nature D.C. reported filing 36,249 signatures with the D.C. Board of Elections.[21] In Washington, D.C., the number of signatures required for a ballot initiative is equal to 5 percent of the district's registered voters. As of May 31, there were 496,701 registered voters in Washington, D.C.[22] Therefore, 5 percent was equal to 24,836.
On August 5, 2020, the D.C. Board of Elections announced that, after verifying a random ample, the board had concluded that 25,477 of the submitted signatures were valid; therefore, Initiative 81 was certified for the ballot.[20]
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 D.C. Board of Elections, "Entheogenic Plant and Fungus Policy Act of 2020," accessed March 15, 2020 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "title" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ 2.0 2.1 Decriminalize Denver, "Denver Psilocybin Mushroom Decriminalization Initiative," accessed January 7, 2019
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Washington Post, "Oakland decriminalizes ‘magic mushrooms’ and other natural psychedelics," June 5, 2020
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 CBS San Francisco, "Santa Cruz City Council Votes To Decriminalize Magic Mushrooms," January 28, 2020
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregon Initiative 34," July 2, 2019
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Oregon Secretary of State, "Initiative 44" August 15, 2019
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 D.C. Office of Campaign Finance, "Financial Reports," accessed August 17, 2020
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Decriminalize Nature D.C., "Homepage," accessed March 16, 2020
- ↑ Washington Post, "Vote to decriminalize ‘magic mushrooms,’ other psychedelics may reach D.C. ballot in November," February 5, 2020
- ↑ Ruck, Carl A.P., Jeremy Bigwood, Danny Staples, Jonathan Ott, and R. Gordon Wasson. 1979. '"Entheogens." Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 11: 1-2.
- ↑ MLive, "Ann Arbor OKs move to decriminalize psychedelic mushrooms, plants," September 21, 2020
- ↑ Marijuana Moment, "Ballot Language Approved For Washington, D.C. Psychedelics Decriminalization Measure," February 19, 2020
- ↑ Decriminalize Nature D.C., "Press Release: the Campaign to Decriminalize Nature Dc Postpones Adoption of Circulating Petition Citing Public Safety," accessed March 15, 2020
- ↑ Marijuana Moment, "Campaign To Decriminalize Psychedelics In DC Cleared For Signature Gathering," May 6, 2020
- ↑ WAMU, "Magic Mushrooms Initiative Will Move Forward In D.C. Despite Coronavirus, Proponents Say," April 17, 2020
- ↑ Washington, D.C. Council, "Coronavirus Omnibus Temporary Amendment Act of 2020," accessed May 6, 2020
- ↑ Marijuana Moment, "DC Council Approves Bill That Will Help Psychedelics Decriminalization Initiative Qualify For Ballot Despite Coronavirus," May 5, 2020
- ↑ Decriminalize Nature D.C., "All DC Voter Households to Receive Initiative 81 Petition by Mail in Coming Days," June 12, 2020
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 The Washington Post, "D.C. residents to vote on decriminalization of ‘magic mushrooms’ on November ballot," August 5, 2020
- ↑ Twitter, "Decriminalize Nature D.C.," July 6, 2020
- ↑ D.C. Board of Elections, "Registered Voters," May 31, 2020