Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Tammy Kemp

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 04:10, 11 November 2025 by MW-MassReplace (contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Tammy Kemp
Texas 204th District Court
Tenure
2014 - Present
Term ends
2026
Years in position
12

Elections and appointments
Last election
November 8, 2022
Education
Bachelor's
University of Oklahoma, 1984
Law
University of Oklahoma, 1988
Contact

Tammy Kemp (Democratic Party) is a judge of the Texas 204th District Court. She assumed office in 2014. Her current term ends on December 31, 2026.

Kemp (Democratic Party) won re-election for judge of the Texas 204th District Court outright after the general election on November 8, 2022, was canceled.

Education

Kemp received a bachelor's degree in finance from the University of Oklahoma in 1984. She graduated from the same school with her J.D. in 1988.[1]

Career

  • 2015-Present: Judge, 204th District Court
  • 2006-2014: Assistant district attorney - criminal law, Dallas County
  • 1999-2000: Criminal law attorney in private practice
  • 1994-1999: Assistant district attorney - business organization and administrative law, Dallas County
  • 1990-1993: Retirement and administrative law assistant, Oklahoma Secretary of State
  • 1988-1990: Assistant attorney general, Oklahoma[1]

Elections

2022

See also: Municipal elections in Dallas County, Texas (2022)

General election

The general election was canceled. Incumbent Tammy Kemp won election in the general election for Texas 204th District Court.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas 204th District Court

Incumbent Tammy Kemp defeated Bree West in the Democratic primary for Texas 204th District Court on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Tammy Kemp
Tammy Kemp
 
52.9
 
62,763
Bree West
 
47.1
 
55,981

Total votes: 118,744
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2018

General election

General election for Texas 204th District Court

Incumbent Tammy Kemp won election in the general election for Texas 204th District Court on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Tammy Kemp
Tammy Kemp (D)
 
100.0
 
473,219

Total votes: 473,219
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas 204th District Court

Incumbent Tammy Kemp defeated Stephen Duplantis in the Democratic primary for Texas 204th District Court on March 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Tammy Kemp
Tammy Kemp
 
77.7
 
84,178
Stephen Duplantis
 
22.3
 
24,121

Total votes: 108,299
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2014

See also: Texas judicial elections, 2014
Kemp ran for election to the 204th District Court.
Primary: She was successful in the Democratic primary on March 4, 2014, receiving 60.7 percent of the vote. She competed against Lena Levario.
General: She won without opposition in the general election on November 4, 2014. [2][3][4] 

Selection method

See also: Partisan election of judges

The judges of the Texas District Courts are chosen in partisan elections. They serve four-year terms, after which they must run for re-election if they wish to continue serving.[5]

Though Texas is home to more than 400 district courts, the courts are grouped into nine administrative judicial regions. Each region is overseen by a presiding judge who is appointed by the governor to a four-year term. According to the state courts website, the presiding judge may be a "regular elected or retired district judge, a former judge with at least 12 years of service as a district judge, or a retired appellate judge with judicial experience on a district court."[6]

Qualifications
To serve on the district courts, a judge must be:

  • a U.S. citizen;
  • a resident of Texas;
  • licensed to practice law in the state;
  • between the ages of 25 and 75;*[7]
  • a practicing lawyer and/or state judge for at least four years; and
  • a resident of his or her respective judicial district for at least two years.[5]

*While no judge older than 74 may run for office, sitting judges who turn 75 are permitted to continue serving until their term expires.[5]

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Tammy Kemp did not complete Ballotpedia's 2022 Candidate Connection survey.

Noteworthy cases

The State of Texas v. Amber Guyger

Judge Kemp presided over the trial of former Dallas police officer Amber Guyger on a charge of murder. Guyger was returning from work on September 6, 2018, when she entered the apartment of her upstairs neighbor, Botham Jean. Believing that she had entered her own apartment and that Jean was an intruder, Guyger fatally shot him. She was arrested on September 9, 2018 and fired from the police force on September 24, 2018.[8] According to The Texas Tribune, the case "sparked a passionate conversation in Dallas about race, policing and gun violence."[9] On October 1, 2019, Guyger was found guilty of murder.[10]

Judge Kemp instructed jurors that they could consider Senate Bill 378, often referred to as the castle doctrine, in reaching their verdict. The law states that deadly force used while in one's own home, car, or business is presumed to be reasonable unless proven otherwise by the prosecution. The prosecution would need to show that the defendant did not believe that the victim was on their property illegally, that they did not have a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary, that they provoked the victim, or that they were engaged in other criminal activity in order to obtain a conviction. It would have applied to the Guyger case if the jury had concluded that she had a reasonable belief that she was in her own apartment at the time of the shooting. Attorney Pete Schulte said that no precedent existed at the time of the trial for applying the castle doctrine (which had been passed in 2007) to cases where the defendant mistakenly believed they were in their own home.[11]

Judge Kemp also instructed jurors that they had the option of finding Guyger guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter. In Texas, a conviction of manslaughter requires that the defendant recklessly caused someone's death, while murder requires that the defendant intentionally or knowingly caused the victim's death.[12]

See also


External links

Footnotes