Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Changes in 2026 to laws governing ballot measures

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 00:08, 8 March 2026 by Ryan Byrne (contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Laws governing ballot measures in the U.S.
BallotLaw final.png

Laws governing ballot measures in the U.S.

Changes to laws governing ballot measures

Types of ballot measures

Ballot measure policy topics


Select a state from the dropdown to learn more about laws governing ballot measures in that state.

As of March 7, 2026, two bill had been enacted into law concerning ballot measures, initiatives, veto referendums, referrals, local ballot measures, and recall elections in 2026. Ballotpedia tracked 372 legislative proposals on these topics.

On this page, you will find:

Legislation approved in 2026 by legislative vote

The Partisan Direction Index (PDI) measures the partisan support behind legislation. The index ranges from -100%to +100%, where –100% means only Democrats voted 'Yes,' +100% means only Republicans did, and zero means equal support from both parties. PDI accounts for the percentage of each party's members who voted 'Yes.'

Partisan Direction Index (PDI) Classification Scale
PDI Range (Continuous)Class (Ordinal)Description
-100% to -60%DemocraticMostly or entirely Democratic support; little or no Republican support
-60% to -20%Lean DemocraticPredominantly Democratic, with some Republican support
-20% to +20%BipartisanBoth parties showed majority support. No single party drove the support
+20% to +60%Lean RepublicanPredominantly Republican, with some Democratic support
+60% to +100%RepublicanMostly or entirely Republican support; little or no Democratic support

Legislation

The table below presents a list of bills passed in 2026, along with the percentages of Democrats and Republicans who voted in favor of these bills.

Partisanship of ballot measure-related bills, 2025
StateBillD Support (%)R Support (%)MarginClassDescription
South DakotaSB 5100.0%98.9%D+1.1%BipartisanRequire ballot measure titles to include language stating whether the measure is a legislative referral or a citizen-initiated measure
UtahHB 2425.6%98.7%R+93.2%RepublicanChange procedures and rules governing initiative and referendum petition signature removal statements

Legislation enacted in 2026 by state

South Dakota

Senate Bill 5

Senate Bill 5 Vote Senate House
Yes No NV Yes No NV
Total 32 0 32 64 1 5
Democratic (D) 3 0 0 5 0 0
Republican (R) 29 0 3 59 1 5

Utah

House Bill 242

  • House Bill 242: The legislation made several changes to the procedures and rules governing initiative and referendum petition signature removal statements, including:
    • prohibiting paying individuals to gather signature removal statements based on the number of statements collected;
    • creating a badge requirement for persons paid to gather signature removal statements; and
    • prohibiting voters from submitting signature removal statements by mail using prepaid postage.
House Bill 242 Vote Senate House
Yes No NV Yes No NV
Total 21 7 1 57 12 5
Democratic (D) 0 5 1 1 12 1
Republican (R) 21 1 0 56 0 5

Legislation proposed in 2026

The following map shows the number of bills related to ballot measures or recall elections in each state. Click on a state to see a list of bills in that state. Click Back in the upper left-hand corner to return to the map.

Rulings in 2026

The following is a list of court rulings issued in 2026 that affected the ballot measure process.

Missouri

Nicholson v. Missouri

On January 23, 2026, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that Senate Bill 22 (SB 22), enacted in 2025, violated the state constitution's original purpose requirement (Article III, Section 21). The opinion stated, "To pass constitutional muster, the Court must look to the original version of the bill and compare it with the final version. There must be some logical connection between the original purpose of the bill and all of the final provisions in the bill." The court held that SB 22, as enacted, violated its original purpose.[2]

SB 22 made several changes, including increasing the word limit for ballot summaries for legislative referrals from 50 to 100 words; extending the deadline for final rulings on ballot measure challenges from 56 to 70 days before an election; allowing the secretary of state to rewrite ballot summaries up to three times before a court may do so; and permitting the attorney general to appeal a preliminary injunction that blocks a state law from taking effect.[3]

See also

Footnotes