Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Arizona Single-Subject Requirement for Ballot Initiatives Amendment (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Arizona Single-Subject Requirement for Ballot Initiatives Amendment
Flag of Arizona.png
Election date
November 3, 2020
Topic
Direct democracy measures
Status
Not on the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature


The Arizona Single-Subject Requirement for Ballot Initiatives Amendment was not on the ballot in Arizona as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2020.

The ballot measure would have added a provision to the Arizona Constitution that requires citizen-initiated ballot measures to embrace a single subject. The ballot measure would have also required the initiative's subject to be expressed in the ballot title, or the initiative would be considered void.[1]

Text of measure

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 4, Arizona Constitution

The ballot measure would have amended Section 1 of Article 4 of the Arizona Constitution. The full text of the ballot measure is available here.

Support

Arguments

  • Rep. Mark Finchem (R-11) said, "If you have multiple subjects that are crammed into a single bill, quite often the voters have a question about what they’re really voting for. So I think this is wholly appropriate. ... If nothing it helps the voter initiative process because people know what’s in the darn thing."[2]

Opposition

Arguments

  • Rep. Athena Salman (D-26) said, "My concern with this bill is that it is restricting the citizen’s voice, restricting the citizen’s right that they’ve had since we became a state. ... And historically, because there is so much involved in getting something on the ballot, as long as the topic is related, citizens can go forth and propose something holistically."[2]

Background

Arizona Chamber v. Kiley

In 2017, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry v. Daniel J. Kiley—a case that addressed the voter-approved Proposition 206 (2016). Proposition 206 enacted statutes related to minimum wage and paid sick time, which the plaintiff (Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry) argued was two subjects in violation of the single-subject rule.[3]

The Arizona Supreme Court held that the single-subject rule found in Section 13 of Article 4 of the Arizona Constitution applied to legislative statutes but not citizen-initiated statutes. The opinion stated that Section 1 of Article 4, not Section 13, governed citizen-initiated statutes and that Section 1 did not include a single-subject rule.[3]

Path to the ballot

Amending the Arizona Constitution

See also: Amending the Arizona Constitution

In Arizona, a simple majority vote is needed in each chamber of the Arizona State Legislature to refer a constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.

House Concurrent Resolution 2032

The ballot measure was introduced into the Arizona State Legislature as House Concurrent Resolution 2032 (HCR 2032) during the 2020 legislative session. On February 26, 2020, the Arizona House of Representatives passed HCR 2032 in a party-line vote of 31-28. House Republicans supported the resolution, and House Democrats opposed the resolution.[4]

Vote in the Arizona House of Representatives
February 26, 2020
Requirement:
Number of yes votes required: 31  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total31281
Total percent51.67%46.67%1.67%
Democrat0281
Republican3100

See also

External links

Footnotes