Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Board of County Councilors recalls, Clark County, Washington (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Clark County Board of Councilors recall
Clarkcountylogo.png
Officeholders
Jeanne Stewart
Julie Olson
Marc Boldt
Recall status
Did not go to a vote
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2016
Recalls in Washington
Washington recall laws
County commission recalls
Recall reports

An effort to recall Jeanne Stewart, Julie Olson, and Council Chair Marc Boldt from their positions on the Clark County Board of Councilors in Washington was launched on June 28, 2016. Fellow councilor Tom Mielke filed three separate petitions for Stewart, Olson, and Boldt, who are the majority voting bloc of the council. Mielki and David Madore have been the minority in several 3-2 votes since Boldt and Olson took office in January 2016. Mielke's letters said that the three targets "committed acts of malfeasance, misfeasance and violated (their) oath of office."[1]

On July 6, the council voted to use county funds to pay for the legal defense of the three councilors facing recall. Stewart, Olson, and Boldt voted in favor of this decision, while Mielke and Madore voted against it. The vote was followed by a heated exchange among the councilors. Mielke questioned the legitimacy of such an action, but Clark County Deputy Prosecutor Jane Veto said the councilor's decision was justified by state law.[2]

The recall did not go to a vote because it was dismissed by the superior court on July 29.[3]

Recall supporters

Statement of charges

Mielke gave four examples of the three councilors' wrongdoing. The following quotes come from the petition for Boldt, although The Columbian reported that the three petitions were almost identical.[4]

  • he knowingly violated the law by violating the Open Public Meetings Act, RCW 42.30, in an effort to have Clark County hire an outside investigator to undertake an investigation of Councilor Boldt’s political rival, David Madore;
  • he breached his fiduciary duty by grossly wasting public funds by awarding a contract to The Columbian newspaper to serve as the County’s paper of record despite the fact that it was neither the low-cost bidder nor the most widely circulated eligible paper. Rather the contract was a quid pro quo reward to The Columbian for favorable coverage regarding Councilor Boldt and attacks on his rival Councilor Madore and to punish the other lower-cost most-widely-circulated bidder, The Reflector, for negative coverage regarding Councilor Boldt, Stewart and Olson -- and objective, more favorable, coverage of Councilor Madore;
  • he purposefully limited the access of his political rivals on the BOCC from advice from the County Prosecutor’s office; and
  • he abdicated his statutory legislative responsibilities by permitting the executive branch of Clark County to unilaterally dissolve a County department without authorization or action taken in public by the legislative authority of the BOCC.[5]

Recall opponents

Response from recall targets

"This is the depth they’ll go to try to pressure and intimidate people that disagree with them," said Olson. She called the recall attempt "meritless and baseless." Boldt said he respected the recall process, but was not worried about the attempt. "[I]t makes me kind of proud of what we’ve done the last six months," he said.[1]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in Washington

In Washington, recall petitions can only be circulated against an official who is guilty of the "commission of some act or acts of malfeasance or misfeasance while in office, or who has violated his oath of office." Thus, before a recall petition can be circulated, a Superior Court judge needs to rule on whether or not the allegations against the targets has some basis in evidence and amount to malfeasance—the deliberate commission of a wrong or criminal action—misfeasance—improper or erroneous action—or a violation of his oath of office. Judges of the Clark County Superior Court recused themselves from the case to avoid a conflict of interest. Cowlitz County Superior Court Judge Stephen M. Warning heard the recall petitions on July 29.[6] Warning dismissed the recall on the grounds that the allegations did not meet the requirements for a recall petition.[3]

If the recall petition had been upheld by the court, proponents would have begun collecting signatures. For each official, they would have needed valid signatures equal to 25 percent of the total number of votes cast in the last election for that office. The petitions for Boldt and Stewart, who were elected countywide, would have required 20,639 and 29,901 signatures, respectively. The petition of Olson, who was elected by district, would have required 6,097 signatures.[1]

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Jeanne Stewart Julie Olson Marc Boldt recall. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes