Jim Douglas (West Virginia)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Jim Douglas
Candidate, West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals Division 2
Eleventh Family Court Circuit
Tenure
Present officeholder

Elections and appointments
Last election
June 9, 2020
Next election
May 12, 2026
Education
Bachelor's
University of Charleston
Law
West Virginia University
Graduate
West Virginia University
Personal
Profession
Attorney
Contact

Jim Douglas is a judge of the Eleventh Family Court Circuit in West Virginia.

Douglas is running for election for the Division 2 judge of the West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals. He is on the ballot in the general election on May 12, 2026.[source]

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Douglas earned his B.A. from the University of Charleston. He later received his M.A. and J.D. from West Virginia University. His career experience includes working as an attorney.[1]

Elections

2026

See also: West Virginia intermediate appellate court elections, 2026

General election

The general election will occur on May 12, 2026.

General election for West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals Division 2

Incumbent Dan Greear (Nonpartisan) and Jim Douglas (Nonpartisan) are running in the general election for West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals Division 2 on May 12, 2026.

Candidate
Dan Greear (Nonpartisan)
Image of Jim Douglas
Jim Douglas (Nonpartisan)

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.

2020

See also: West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals elections, 2020

General election

General election for Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

William Wooton defeated Joanna I. Tabit, Kris Raynes, and Jim Douglas in the general election for Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia on June 9, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of William Wooton
William Wooton (Nonpartisan)
 
30.8
 
117,927
Image of Joanna I. Tabit
Joanna I. Tabit (Nonpartisan)
 
29.6
 
113,116
Image of Kris Raynes
Kris Raynes (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
19.9
 
76,191
Image of Jim Douglas
Jim Douglas (Nonpartisan)
 
19.7
 
75,247

Total votes: 382,481
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2018

See also: West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals special elections, 2018

General election

Special general election for Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

The following candidates ran in the special general election for Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Evan Jenkins
Evan Jenkins (Nonpartisan)
 
36.0
 
182,133
Image of Dennise Renee Smith
Dennise Renee Smith (Nonpartisan)
 
13.9
 
70,394
Image of Jeffrey Kessler
Jeffrey Kessler (Nonpartisan)
 
11.9
 
60,077
Image of Jim Douglas
Jim Douglas (Nonpartisan)
 
9.4
 
47,609
Image of Robert Frank
Robert Frank (Nonpartisan)
 
5.9
 
29,751
Image of William Stewart Thompson
William Stewart Thompson (Nonpartisan)
 
5.9
 
29,613
Jim O'Brien (Nonpartisan)
 
5.7
 
28,766
Image of Brenden Long
Brenden Long (Nonpartisan)
 
4.0
 
20,443
Martin Sheehan (Nonpartisan)
 
3.7
 
18,639
Image of William Schwartz
William Schwartz (Nonpartisan)
 
3.6
 
18,291

Total votes: 505,716
(100.00% precincts reporting)
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2016

See also: West Virginia local trial court judicial elections, 2016

West Virginia held general elections for county judicial offices on May 10, 2016. This date coincided with partisan primaries for statewide and federal offices. The 2016 election was the first nonpartisan election for the state's judicial seats since statehood in 1863. Learn more about this change here. Candidates interested in filing for the election submitted paperwork by January 30, 2016. Jim Douglas defeated incumbent Sharon Mullens in the general election for the West Virginia Family Court Circuit 11, Division 5 seat.[2]

West Virginia Family Court Circuit 11, Division 5 General Election, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Jim Douglas 51.59% 18,151
Sharon Mullens Incumbent 48.41% 17,030
Total Votes 35,181
Source: West Virginia Secretary of State, "Election Results Center," accessed May 10, 2016

Selection method

See also: Nonpartisan election of judges

Judges of the West Virginia Family Courts are each elected to six- and eight-year terms. Their initial term is six years and every subsequent term is eight years.[3] The elections for this court are nonpartisan contested elections. To serve on this court, a judge must be a state citizen, a circuit resident, at least 30 years of age and have five years of law practice in the state.[4]

Campaign themes

2026

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Jim Douglas has not yet completed Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey. If you are Jim Douglas, click here to fill out Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey.

Who fills out Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey?

Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's Ballotpedia profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for.  More than 26,000 candidates have taken Ballotpedia's candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.

Help improve Ballotpedia - send us candidate contact info.


2020

Jim Douglas did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

2016

Douglas' campaign website listed the following themes for 2016:

The United State Constitution, Amendment XIV, guarantees all Americans equal protection of the laws of this country and the various states.

Therefore, it is essential that courts promote and pay homage to the venerable predictability function of the law. This means that in a given factual context, the legal result should be the same each and every time those same facts are presented in a dispute. This is indispensable for practitioners to be able to advise their clients in law suits. Nowhere is this concept more necessary than in the field of family law.

Families are the veritable bedrock of our American society. Nothing should command more attention in the legal world than matters involving families and children. So, West Virginia Family Courts need to try to get it right for the sake of not only the current litigants, but the litigants that follow. We must not only account for the making of our laws, we must predict the outcome of their application.

Law must be honored and invoked, but tempered with equity. Sometimes courts have no signposts in the laws, then, in such case, they must do that which should be or should have been done.

A Family Judge must be guided by, indeed he or she must pledge fealty to, four (4) basic principles:

1. All citizens have the right of access to their courts and the equal right to be heard when they get there. The West Virginia Constitution, Article III, Section 17 assures West Virginians of this. Therefore, Family Court Judges should not limit the amount of time any party can have to present his or her case.

2. The law favors speedy justice. Continuances, then, should not be easily or lightly given by a judge. Lawyers should be prepared to go to court.

3. No one can realize the right to go to court, or to plead his or her case, or to have prompt relief if court is not convened or open. Thus, a judge has to hold court, and he or she should have to work if they are going to hold judicial office. Of course, even judges need vacations, but judges should get to court promptly and be prepared to stay after regular quitting time in order to finish a case.

Orders from a hearing should be promptly prepared, and a judge should quickly enter proper orders. A delay in the writing and filing or family court orders can occasion loss, defeat resolution of issues, impede finality of disputes, and disrupt the appellate process.

4. And in the end:

"...it is our future that lays down our law of today."

- Friedrich Nietzsche, Human, All Too Human

[5]

—Jim Douglas (2016), [6]


Campaign finance summary

Campaign finance information for this candidate is not yet available from OpenSecrets. That information will be published here once it is available.

See also


External links

Footnotes