Public policy made simple. Dive into our information hub today!

Massachusetts Clean Energy Standards Initiative (2018)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Massachusetts Clean Energy Standards Initiative
Flag of Massachusetts.png
Election date
November 6, 2018
Topic
Energy
Status
Not on the ballot
Type
State statute
Origin
Citizens



The Massachusetts Clean Energy Standards Initiative was not on the ballot in Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute on November 6, 2018.

Amber Houghstow filed two versions of the initiative. Both versions were designed to require non-municipal retail electricity suppliers to provide 16 percent of sales from clean-energy sources by December 31, 2019. The percentage amount of sales from clean-energy sources would have increased by 4 percentage points each year until December 31, 2022, under the initiative. The percentage amount would then have needed to increase 5 percentage points each year until December 31, 2028. In 2029 and each year thereafter, the percentage amount would have needed to increase 6 percentage points each year.[1][2]

Both versions were designed to require municipal retail electricity suppliers, such as light boards and local electric departments, to provide 7 percent of sales from clean-energy sources by December 31, 2021. The percentage amount of sales from clean-energy sources would have increased by 4 percentage points each year until December 31, 2028. The percentage amount would then have needed to increase 5 percentage points each year until December 31, 2035. In 2036 and each year thereafter, the percentage amount would have needed to increase 6 percentage points each year.[1][2]

Both versions would have considered the following sources of energy as clean energy:[1][2]

  • Solar photovoltaic or solar thermal;
  • Wind
  • Ocean thermal, wave, or tidal energy
  • Geothermal
  • Hydroelectric, provided that facilities meet standards related to river flows, water quality, and fish passage and protection; and
  • Advanced biomass and landfill gas conversion with zero or negative fuel lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions using waste from agricultural crops, food, or animals, energy crops, biogas, and liquid biofuel, or algae.

Version 17-27, but not Version 17-26, would also have created a Council on Environmental Justice tasked with making recommendations about reducing co-pollutants, the impact of regulations, and mitigating energy price increases in low-income communities.[2]

Text of measure

Petition summary

The attorney general approved two versions of this initiative for circulation:[3]

Full text

The full text of the measure is available for Initiative 17-26 and Initiative 17-27.

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Massachusetts

In Massachusetts, the number of signatures required to place an indirect initiated state statute on the ballot is equal to 3.5 percent of votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election. The first 3 percent is collected in order to refer the indirect initiative to the Massachusetts General Court. If members of the General Court pass and the governor signs the initiative, then the initiative becomes law. If the legislature declines to act on an initiative or the governor vetoes it, sponsors of the initiative need to collect additional signatures equal to 0.5 percent of the votes cast for governor.

To make the 2018 ballot, sponsors of this initiative needed to collect the first round of 64,750 signatures between September 20, 2017, and November 22, 2017. Petitioners did not submit signatures for the initiative to the office of the secretary of the commonwealth by the deadline on December 6, 2017. If signatures had been submitted, and the General Court had rejected or not acted on the initiative by May 2, 2018, then an additional 10,792 signatures would have been required by July 4, 2018.

Petitioners filed two versions of the initiative. On September 6, 2017, Attorney General Maura Healey (D) approved both versions of the initiative for signature gathering. Signatures were not submitted for either version.[3]

See also

Footnotes