Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Nancy Wallace
Nancy Wallace (Green Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent Maryland's 8th Congressional District. She lost in the general election on November 5, 2024.
Wallace also ran for election to the U.S. Senate to represent Maryland. She did not appear on the ballot for the general election on November 5, 2024.
Biography
Nancy Wallace was born in Long Island, New York. She graduated from Walt Whitman High School and earned a bachelor's degree in political science from Yale University. Her career experience includes lobbying for international environmental issues, founding and leading the International Entanglement Network, working as a director for the Sierra Club, co-founding Sustainable Montgomery, and working as a data coordinator for ecological restoration projects for the Department of Commerce. She also worked for Electronic Data Systems (EDS), Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), and the Department of Treasury. Wallace has served on the board of directors of the Center for Safer Wireless and Silver Spring Time Bank.[1]
Elections
2024
U.S. House
General election
General election for U.S. House Maryland District 8
Incumbent Jamie Raskin defeated Cheryl Riley and Nancy Wallace in the general election for U.S. House Maryland District 8 on November 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Jamie Raskin (D) | 76.8 | 292,101 |
![]() | Cheryl Riley (R) | 20.5 | 77,821 | |
Nancy Wallace (G) | 2.5 | 9,612 | ||
Other/Write-in votes | 0.2 | 786 |
Total votes: 380,320 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Maryland District 8
Incumbent Jamie Raskin defeated Eric Felber in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Maryland District 8 on May 14, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Jamie Raskin | 94.8 | 103,071 |
![]() | Eric Felber | 5.2 | 5,636 |
Total votes: 108,707 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Maryland District 8
Cheryl Riley defeated Michael Yadeta in the Republican primary for U.S. House Maryland District 8 on May 14, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Cheryl Riley | 69.2 | 9,647 |
![]() | Michael Yadeta | 30.8 | 4,290 |
Total votes: 13,937 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Endorsements
Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Wallace in this election.
U.S. Senate
General election
General election for U.S. Senate Maryland
The following candidates ran in the general election for U.S. Senate Maryland on November 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Angela Alsobrooks (D) | 54.6 | 1,650,912 |
![]() | Larry Hogan (R) | 42.8 | 1,294,344 | |
![]() | Mike Scott (L) ![]() | 2.3 | 69,396 | |
Patrick Burke (Unaffiliated) (Write-in) | 0.0 | 879 | ||
![]() | Billy Bridges (Unaffiliated) (Write-in) ![]() | 0.0 | 70 | |
Robin Rowe (Unaffiliated) (Write-in) | 0.0 | 17 | ||
Christy Helmondollar (Unaffiliated) (Write-in) | 0.0 | 3 | ||
Irwin Gibbs (Unaffiliated) (Write-in) | 0.0 | 2 | ||
Other/Write-in votes | 0.2 | 5,755 |
Total votes: 3,021,378 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Moshe Landman (G)
- Nancy Wallace (G)
- Shaunesi Deberry (Unaffiliated)
- Keith Packer (No Party Affiliation)
- Emmanuel Osuchukwu (Unaffiliated)
- Michael Sigmon (Progressive Party)
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. Senate Maryland
The following candidates ran in the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate Maryland on May 14, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Angela Alsobrooks | 53.4 | 357,052 |
![]() | David Trone | 42.8 | 286,381 | |
Joseph Perez | 0.7 | 4,688 | ||
![]() | Michael Cobb Sr. | 0.7 | 4,524 | |
![]() | Brian Frydenborg ![]() | 0.5 | 3,635 | |
![]() | Scottie Griffin | 0.5 | 3,579 | |
![]() | Marcellus Crews ![]() | 0.5 | 3,379 | |
![]() | Andrew Wildman | 0.3 | 2,198 | |
![]() | Robert Houton ![]() | 0.3 | 1,946 | |
![]() | Steven Seuferer ![]() | 0.2 | 1,664 |
Total votes: 669,046 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Juan Dominguez (D)
- William Jawando (D)
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. Senate Maryland
The following candidates ran in the Republican primary for U.S. Senate Maryland on May 14, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Larry Hogan | 64.2 | 183,661 |
Robin Ficker | 27.8 | 79,517 | ||
Chris Chaffee | 3.2 | 9,134 | ||
Lorie Friend ![]() | 2.1 | 5,867 | ||
![]() | John Myrick ![]() | 1.7 | 4,987 | |
![]() | Moe Barakat ![]() | 0.8 | 2,203 | |
![]() | Laban Seyoum | 0.3 | 782 |
Total votes: 286,151 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- John Teichert (R)
- Christopher Puleo (R)
- Ray Bly (R)
- John Thormann (R)
Endorsements
Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Wallace in this election.
2022
See also: Maryland gubernatorial and lieutenant gubernatorial election, 2022
General election
General election for Governor of Maryland
The following candidates ran in the general election for Governor of Maryland on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Wes Moore (D) | 64.5 | 1,293,944 |
Dan Cox (R) ![]() | 32.1 | 644,000 | ||
![]() | David Lashar (L) ![]() | 1.5 | 30,101 | |
![]() | David Harding (Working Class Party) | 0.9 | 17,154 | |
Nancy Wallace (G) ![]() | 0.7 | 14,580 | ||
Kyle Sefcik (Independent) (Write-in) ![]() | 0.0 | 596 | ||
Other/Write-in votes | 0.2 | 4,848 |
Total votes: 2,005,223 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for Governor of Maryland
The following candidates ran in the Democratic primary for Governor of Maryland on July 19, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Wes Moore | 32.4 | 217,524 |
![]() | Tom Perez | 30.1 | 202,175 | |
![]() | Peter Franchot | 21.1 | 141,586 | |
![]() | Rushern Baker III (Unofficially withdrew) ![]() | 4.0 | 26,594 | |
![]() | Douglas F. Gansler | 3.8 | 25,481 | |
![]() | John B. King Jr. | 3.7 | 24,882 | |
![]() | Ashwani Jain ![]() | 2.1 | 13,784 | |
![]() | Jon Baron | 1.8 | 11,880 | |
![]() | Jerry Segal | 0.6 | 4,276 | |
![]() | Ralph Jaffe | 0.4 | 2,978 |
Total votes: 671,160 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Laura Neuman (D)
- Mike Rosenbaum (D)
Republican primary election
Republican primary for Governor of Maryland
Dan Cox defeated Kelly Schulz, Robin Ficker, and Joe Werner in the Republican primary for Governor of Maryland on July 19, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Dan Cox ![]() | 52.0 | 153,423 | |
![]() | Kelly Schulz | 43.5 | 128,302 | |
Robin Ficker ![]() | 2.8 | 8,268 | ||
Joe Werner | 1.7 | 5,075 |
Total votes: 295,068 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Democratic. In Maryland's 8th Congressional District, incumbent Chris Van Hollen (D) chose not to run for re-election in 2016, instead seeking election to the U.S. Senate. Jamie Raskin (D) defeated Dan Cox (R), Nancy Wallace (Green), and Jasen Wunder (Libertarian) in the general election on November 8, 2016. Raskin defeated eight other candidates in the Democratic primary, while Cox defeated Jeffrey Jones, Elizabeth Matory, Aryeh Shudofsky and Shelly Skolnick to win the Republican nomination. Additionally, Wallace defeated Charles Galloway and Elizabeth Croydon to win the Green Party primary. The primary elections took place on April 26, 2016.[2][3]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | ![]() |
60.6% | 220,657 | |
Republican | Dan Cox | 34.2% | 124,651 | |
Green | Nancy Wallace | 3.1% | 11,201 | |
Libertarian | Jasen Wunder | 2% | 7,283 | |
N/A | Write-in | 0.1% | 532 | |
Total Votes | 364,324 | |||
Source: Maryland State Board of Elections |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
33.6% | 43,776 | ||
David Trone | 27.1% | 35,400 | ||
Kathleen Matthews | 23.9% | 31,186 | ||
Ana Sol Gutierrez | 5.5% | 7,185 | ||
William Jawando | 4.6% | 6,058 | ||
Kumar Barve | 2.4% | 3,149 | ||
David Anderson | 1.2% | 1,511 | ||
Joel Rubin | 1.1% | 1,426 | ||
Dan Bolling | 0.5% | 712 | ||
Total Votes | 130,403 | |||
Source: Maryland State Board of Elections |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
44.4% | 20,647 | ||
Jeffrey Jones | 20.1% | 9,343 | ||
Elizabeth Matory | 15.7% | 7,295 | ||
Shelly Skolnick | 12.5% | 5,835 | ||
Aryeh Shudofsky | 7.4% | 3,421 | ||
Total Votes | 46,541 | |||
Source: Maryland State Board of Elections |
Campaign themes
2024
U.S. House
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Nancy Wallace did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.
Campaign website
Wallace’s campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Let the Sun shine in! With a new energy from the strongest source of power we know, the people of this country, let’s shine a light on the wide range of successful policies for tackling our toughest problems to transform our nation to a just, prosperous, sustainable society. Let’s look at the economic strengths of our local communities, the innovations our state legislatures, the wisdom of our traditions, and lessons from other countries. You and I together can implement the wonderful public policy initiatives listed below. Many creative approaches are used today that successfully implement ecological wisdom, social justice, grassroots democracy, and nonviolence. You just might not have heard about them yet! And the costs are usually less than the failed policies of our current government. I hope you are as amazed as I have been at these excellent, realistic, proven policy options, and will have your faith in our people and our power restored as mine has been. And, since this massive a change is a two part effort – the “system change” hand in hand with our personal change – you’ll find action links to things you can do yourself at the end of each topic. Let’s go! “When the people lead, the leaders will follow” – President Dwight D. Eisenhower The two major themes of my campaign are Climate Change and Survival of Women and Girls. These and other key positions are presented below.
|
” |
—Nancy Wallace’s campaign website (2024)[5] |
U.S. Senate
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Nancy Wallace did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.
2022
Nancy Wallace completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Wallace's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|- Emergency mobilization to reverse climate change is the top priority. We can use practical steps that also move us forward on social justice, women's equality, and children's health.
- Social justice, from increasing home ownership with rent-to-own of all public assisted housing, to eliminating the cash bond exploitation, to student skills training for good-paying union jobs in a local, self-reliant economy will be implemented.
- The children's health epidemic, with 1 in every 8 children in the US with neuro-developmental disorders, cancer, learning disabilities, and allergies must be addressed. The decades of toxics introduced in our food, air and water since WWII has now come back to haunt us in our children's bodies and brains.
In each of these programs, we must prioritize rebalancing society from the extreme wealth and racial divisions of today. For instance, public assisted housing should be super insulated by the government free of charge, which reduces natural gas use and climate change, and also lowers utility bills; and the housing should also become rent-to-own, so the government does not continue as a landlord sucking the little financial income of the poor into state accounts, while the middle and upper classes get the benefit of the mortgage tax deduction.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
Campaign website
Wallace's campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Issues: Let the Sun Shine In! With a new energy from the strongest source of power we know, the people of this country, let’s shine a light on the wide range of successful policies for tackling our toughest problems to transform our nation to a just, prosperous, sustainable society. Let’s look at the economic strengths of our local communities, the innovations our state legislatures, the wisdom of our traditions, and lessons from other countries. You and I together can implement the wonderful public policy initiatives listed below. Many creative approaches are used today that successfully implement ecological wisdom, social justice, grassroots democracy, and nonviolence. You just might not have heard about them yet! And the costs are usually less than the failed policies of our current government. I hope you are as amazed as I have been at these excellent, realistic, proven policy options, and will have your faith in our people and our power restored as mine has been. And, since this massive a change is a two part effort – the “system change” hand in hand with our personal change – you’ll find action links to things you can do yourself at the end of each topic. Let’s go! “When the people lead, the leaders will follow”
Fifteen countries already get 100% of their electricity from renewable sources. (1) Our National Research Council says “…renewable resources available in the United States, taken collectively, can supply significantly greater amounts of electricity than the total current or projected domestic demand.” (2) Germany at times meets 100% of its electricity demand from solar and wind, and Canada is already at 65% renewable energy! So let’s do it! 1. I will declare a state-wide emergency to address climate change. We need an emergency economic transformation similar to the 18‐month effort in World War II that pivoted our economy to wartime production. But now, we’re switching to renewable energy production! 2. Set a goal of 100% renewable energy by 2028 with interim goals of 10% transformation for each 6 month interval until the end of 2028. 3. Promote the creation of major new solar and wind energy resources. Most of this renewable transformation will come from wind energy, which is plentiful and for which we have adequate technology right now. We need to ramp up production in the wind turbine factories to rapidly install enough power to meet each interval’s goal of 10% transformation. Installation will create tens of thousands of new jobs. (footnote1 ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100%25_renewable_energy (footnote 2) National Research Council (2010). “Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments”. National Academies of Science. p. 4. 4. Work with each county to develop a transition plan within one month. Detailed proposals have already been drawn up for switching to 100% renewable energy for New York, California and Washington states. In 2014, a plan was published to convert all 50 states to 100% renewable energy.(footnote 3) These plans need to be finalized and implemented. So much of this is already done! 5. Create a "Climate Change Corps," modeled on the Civilian Conservation Corps Provide 100% employment at living wages to help ramp up production in factories that manufacture renewable energy products, and plant trees nationwide to absorb carbon. Planting trees in cities has a triple benefit of carbon absorption, lower temperatures in summer, and enhances livability of communities. Other major benefits to America from a rapid switch to renewable energy: Air Pollution Increased Food You see?? We can do this!!! Resources for You on Climate Change: Special Maryland program to help you install energy efficiency and solar – a free helping hand all along the way: Make Your Home Energy Efficient Get started buying an electric car http://www.which.co.uk/cars/choosing‐a‐car/buying‐a‐car/electric‐car‐guide/ Montgomery County Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Carroll County Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Harford County Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Find a CSA in your area DC model for urban farming and environmental sustainability Footnotes 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100%25_renewable_energy 2 National Research Council (2010). “Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments”. National Academies of Science. p. 4. 3 Mark Schwarz (February 26, 2014). “Stanford scientist unveils 50‐state plan to transform U.S. to renewable energy” http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/february/fifty‐states‐renewables‐022414.html The World Can Transition to 100 Percent Renewable Power, http://thesolutionsproject.org/ 70%, 80%, 99.9%, 100% Renewables — Study Central, http://cleantechnica.com/70‐80‐99‐9‐100‐ renewables‐study‐central/ 4 http://www.afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity_locations.html 5 Stephanie Cooke (October 10, 2011). “After Fukushima, Does Nuclear Power Have a Future?”. New York Times. Antoni Slodkowski (June 15, 2011). “Japan anti‐nuclear protesters rally after quake” . Reuters. Hiroko Tabuchi (July 13, 2011). “Japan Premier Wants Shift Away From Nuclear Power”. New York Times.
Breast Milk Emergency – Wallace and Elder Call for 100% Breast Milk Protection in Observance of World Breastfeeding Week August 1-7, 2022 We Declare an Emergency for Clean, Safe Breast Milk in Maryland Based on New EPA PFAS Safety Recommendations Two Emergency Steps to Protect Breast Milk Will Be Wallace-Elder Program (1) Emergency Drinking Water Purification Needed Now Breastfeeding is a crucial start to a healthy life. We support Maryland mothers’ right to clean water and clean food, so their breast milk is safe for nursing babies. Unfortunately we all consume toxic chemicals in our food, water, and the air we breathe from industrial manufacturing and use. Chemicals such as mercury, PCBs, PFAS and TCE all accumulate in human bodies and they don’t go away. So an American mother’s body becomes a reservoir of environmental toxins. A study of 45 women in Massachusetts showed that the average concentration of PFOA (arguably the deadliest of all PFAS or “forever chemicals”) was 10,950 over the EPA threshold, while the highest concentration was 40,250 times over the limit. These toxins pass into breast milk, and then into infants’ fragile, developing brain and other organs. PFAS levels in breast milk have been found 40,000 times over EPA guidelines for drinking water. Yet this is the only liquid that these infants drink. PFAS and these other toxics have been linked to a host of cancers. In children, PFAS also causes a decrease in infant live birth rates, and development of ADHD and childhood asthma. We consider the new, stronger EPA health advisory on PFAS “permanent poisons” that was published in June 2022 as establishing clear scientific grounds to declare an emergency in Maryland for breast milk protection. Recent testing has shown 100% of American breast milk has these toxic PFAS. This threat to babies must be addressed immediately, not wait for years for legislation and regulation. Other toxics such as mercury, lead and arsenic are also present in Maryland drinking water and pass into breast milk of nursing mothers. In the absence of the EPA providing these life-saving regulations, we call on the state of Maryland — and we promise if elected — to regulate all PFAS as a class of hazardous chemicals in food and water, and to require all PFAS compounds to be reduced to levels under the current limits of detection in drinking water, groundwater, and surface water. If elected, Nancy and Pat will immediately provide reverse osmosis drinking water filters to every house and apartment with a nursing mother on an emergency basis. These “RO filters” will provide clean water for mothers, and also clean water for mixing infant formula. The financial benefit from the improved health of the babies and their families will more than outweigh the cost. These reverse osmosis filters will also create truly clean drinking water for all members of the households, removing nearly all of these toxic chemicals:
We also call for these additional measures to evaluate and reduce the known sources of these toxins in Maryland food and water:
Scientific Call for Dramatic Reduction in PFAS Exposure US Center for Disease Control (CDC) warning to pregnant women on mercury in seafood, also passes through breast milk Mercury is a second toxic poison that is transmitted through breast milk to babies. Mercury causes harm to developing brains and immune systems. It also crosses the placenta during pregnancy to harm a fetus’ brain development. There is no “safe” limit for mercury intake, yet it is found in our drinking water and seafood. The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) already recommends pregnant women restrict their intake of seafood because of mercury levels, but never prints the words “this recommended amount is safe” because no amount is safe. We must prioritize protection of mothers and babies today from mercury which will also occur with these emergency water filters. We call on the Maryland governor to implement maximum protection immediately, even now during this election season, to protect babies from these dangerous, permanent poisons. Just as we have provided free testing kits for COVID-19 to the entire public, we can provide water filters which eliminate these toxics while additional community testing and regulations are developed. To protect babies in the future, we also support a building requirement that all new homes must have whole-house reverse osmosis filters. This will allow any purchaser to safely plan their pregnancies or entertain grandchildren knowing that Maryland drinking water will not harm them. Since these “forever chemicals” persist in the groundwater and streams and there is no known way to remove PFAS from our bodies, the only way to protect Marylanders long-term is to ensure filtered water at the least cost, when housing is constructed. (2) Emergency Testing of Chesapeake Seafood and Public Posting – Nursing Mothers’ Right to Know Mothers also have a right to know the amount of toxic chemicals in foods which pass through breast milk to babies including PFAS and mercury. Seafood especially accumulates these poisons thousands of times higher than the surrounding water. Maryland needs an immediate, robust food testing program with the results provided on websites for the public. Mothers and children’s doctors can then make their best decisions given the many other benefits of breast feeding. Sexism in Maryland Democratic and Republican Parties Ignoring Women and Babies’ Health As a women’s issue, and a children’s issue, we believe that breast milk has not been taken seriously as a political issue in Maryland politics. Pat Elder, our lieutenant governor candidate who is a national expert on PFAS, and governor candidate Nancy Wallace will make this issue a top priority for their administration. All parents and caretakers of children will benefit with a healthy start to our children’s lives. Today’s cancer epidemic in children must stop, and this is one step we can take in Maryland immediately to protect our babies’ health and future. Babies Can’t Wait – Breast Milk Needs Emergency Protection Now Breastfeeding babies have an inalienable right to clean breast milk and clean infant formula. Nursing mothers have a right to clean drinking water without toxic chemicals, without paying extra for expensive purified water. And they have a right to all taxpayer funded studies of food toxics so they can make their best decisions about nursing and diet. Scientific studies including by the National Academy of Sciences are raising the alarm about these chemicals, and we must follow the science with the best protections for our people and the environment immediately. _____________________________________________________ PCB= polychlorinated bipheyls PFAS = poly and perfluoroalkyd substances, a group of 4,700 industrial chemicals using fluorine in artificial molecules TCE = trichloroethylene used in paints and industrial grease removers _____________________________________________________________ “Rainwater everywhere on Earth unsafe to drink due to “forever chemicals” [PFAS], study finds”, August 9, 2022
We have experienced many deaths and tremendous suffering from our national culture of violence, but none cut so deeply into the heart of our communities as the abuse of physical power by the our own government via the police. The institutions we should trust to protect and help us, instead betray us with suspicion, assumed guilt, fear, and murder. Although many police officers deserve praise for their service, too many we trust to protect and help us instead betray us with hostile suspicion and quick resort to fatal violence. A long-standing pattern of abuse of the state’s police power for African Americans, particularly men, has become known to all our country. We must act immediately to stop police violence, stop all instances of violence in our culture, and bring peace to our families, streets, and the relationship between communities and law enforcement. Our goal is peace in our communities, with police respecting people in every interaction, each step of their work – and return to their best role, peace keepers. A. Prevention of Police Violence and Reduction in Community Violence 1. Increased screening and training for local police – use federal and state support to distribute best practices from the most successful, tolerant police forces in the country; the federal government should help local departments help other local departments. Emphasize de-escalation with more training hours than weapons training hours. 2. Eliminate disparity between communities and their police forces – Fund a state survey of racial parity of local police forces to their communities; pro-actively identify areas with significant gaps and then support local recruitment to achieve parity quickly. Set a three-year goal for each state and local force to have 50% of the officers living in the jurisdiction they are policing. 3. Early intervention to identify problem officers – Determine simpler systems for identifying officers with records of unnecessary violence, to improve on the current, complex system that often doesn’t work in time or is too much of a local administrative burden to work effectively. 4. Full funding for social workers – Dramatically increased funding for social workers at the local level; the federal government can help communities by re-programming funds from the federal Department of Energy, as we switch from nuclear power to safe, local renewable electricity. Social workers are our front line to help protect children from abuse, which is a major predictor and cause of adult violence in both police and other adults. 5. Elevate violent offenders to non-violent paths – Promote the successful model of Richmond, California’s “life mapping program” which, under a Green Party mayor Gayle McLaughlin, reduced street murder of all kinds by 83%. This public/private partnership reduced street violence to historic lows. The reduced overall community violence changes the community’s atmosphere for all. http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2014/01/06/richmond-reports-lowest-homicide-total-in-33-years-credits-multipronged-efforts/ 6. Provide mental health rapid response to accompany police – Provide 24-hour, on site mental health response individuals to accompany police to any possible mental health-related situation. Trained specialists have precedence in initial assessment of a situation. This will protect the officers, emotionally disturbed individuals, and the community immediately. The program will also pay for itself in the long run with reduced health care and legal costs. B. Avoidance of Physical Confrontation and Violent Police Response 7. Mental health units have priority – Support establishing Mental Health units in all local social service departments as a professional standard, which police must call for all behavioral and mental health incidents before drawing any weapon. Put emphasis on simple containment of the person using non-violent means, no matter how disruptive temporarily to traffic or neighborhoods, putting the disturbed person’s life ahead of “maintaining order” for its own sake. 8. Raise the standard for “acceptable force” above the legal minimum – Implement the 30 recommendations of the Police Chiefs Research Forum (PERF), a group of police chiefs and commanders. In January 2016 the group issued a 30-point policy paper, among them calling for a redefinition of acceptable force and many other specific, practical means to reduce excessive force. http://samuelwalker.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/PERF30Principles.pdf C. Accountability and Truth 8. Local citizen oversight boards– support implementation of oversight boards in all police departments, with all three components of authority to make independent investigations, review of police department’s investigation, and audit of internal review processes. The federal role should provide program training and measurement systems for local programs. 9. Automatic external investigation of every police killing – a local or state investigation should occur with every police killing, without having to wait for federal intervention which may be delayed or politically influenced. Set a common expectation among police that all taking of life will have this external review. 10. Police body camera footage as public property –set a national standard that this footage is gathered in the course of public service, and is to be made available to the community within a set time period such as seven days of any killing. In this unique case, an officers’ important personal right to privacy is outweighed by the security risk to the public of problem officers, since only the police have the state-granted authority to take life in certain circumstances. Resources for You on Community Peace/Stopping Police Violence: Record incidents and preserve evidence – The Maryland chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union has an app to help you legally monitor, record, and report police interactions. Download here. The app’s main functions are:
Nancy and Pat support Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in the strongest possible terms. VOTING RIGHTS Nancy Wallace and Pat Elder strongly believe that all Maryland citizens should be able to vote in state, county and local elections. This fundamental right of a human being to have a voice in their own government is the basic contract by which the government exists in the first place. Incarceration should not waive that right. The viewpoint of people for whom the system is not working, who have been incarcerated, is particularly important in solving our problems. All voices should be included. This inclusion also serves as a subtle brake on the tendency of governments and elites to concentrate power to themselves, and to imprison opposition. Since Maryland has the highest rate of incarceration of Black men in the United States, the current prohibition on this voting leaves out major input from people with lived experience on our problems from our public policy decisions. GOVERNANCE REFORM – BREAK THE PARALYSIS OF MD STATE GOVERNMENT Nancy Wallace and Pat Elder recommend major reforms to the state government processes especially the state legislature in order to bring real representative democracy to Maryland. Reform is also needed so the state legislature can quickly address the crises of climate change. Our undemocratic, elitist, current legislative processes have led to Maryland’s public policy paralysis. The well-known rule of thumb is that it takes three years to get even a good, small bill through the Maryland legislature. This delay is now actually dangerous, demoralizing our citizens and stopping critical climate program consideration. We propose a “Green Democracy” package of state government reforms, based on four principles: 1) True Majority Voting (aka Ranked Choice Voting or RCV) – We must have real representative democracy in every county and state election which reflects the majority of the electorate’s preferences – through Ranked Choice Voting. Also, the state legislature itself should use RCV with on-the-record voting for selecting committee chairs and subcommittee chairs. RCV is used in Maine, Alaska, New York City, San Francisco, Takoma Park and many other jurisdictions in the US and other countries. Learn more about RCV here. 2) Citizen Equality – Every citizen is equal to any other, so every citizen’s elected representative should be equal to every other representative. Seniority – the length of time someone has served in the legislature – has to stop being the basis for committee assignments and committee chair appointment, with its massive power to “kill” a bill that the party leadership does not like. A first-time elected representative is just as important as a 30-year representative, as are their constituents. The current system is a recipe for paralysis and policy failure through invisible, despotic control by party leadership. 3) Citizen Empowerment – citizens must be able to initiate major policy changes and new directions themselves, without waiting for the legislature to consider and reject a change, as we have now. The simple citizen referendum we have in our counties and throughout the US is prohibited in Maryland at the state level. Citizens must be able to launch ballot initiatives from the state legislature to exercise our freedom as citizens. 4) One-Session Decision Making – We must have a government that is able to act quickly on the major programs required for an emergency response to the climate change catastrophe. The legislature should be in session at least six months, and expanded salaries and staff resources provided for legislators to consider major new policy approaches thoroughly. State legislators should work throughout the year instead of just 90 days, and the antique requirements to “read” a bill three times on the floor of the chamber should be dropped. We have computers now, folks. Specific Reforms to Implement These Principles: 1. True Majority Representation b) RCV should be used not only for general elections, but also for elections within the state legislature such as Speaker of the House, President of the Senate, and all committee chairs within the committees. This will ensure the leadership is truly representing the majority’s preference. c) Recorded votes at all levels of state legislature – Basic accountability of representatives to the citizens requires us knowing how our representatives voted on every vote. Then we can see if the majority’s values and positions were supported by the people we elected, or if they went off track once they went to Annapolis. Every vote in subcommittee, committee, and the chamber floor should be a recorded vote, and available online for citizens to see immediately. You are our representatives, we are paying your salary, and we want to see how you vote. 2. Citizen Equality b) The leadership and committee chairs’ duties should only be administrative – to schedule committee meetings, hearings, and votes. Every bill should be voted on in subcommittee and committee, with a recorded vote, in the order it was introduced. c) Committee assignments should be made by Ranked Choice Voting, so representatives get the assignment that each one wants the most – everybody is equal. There is no seniority in choice of committees – in fact, one might say that after four or eight years on one committee, that person should move on, and let representatives with new fresh ideas have a chance to influence programs. d) Leadership (Speaker of the House and President of the Senate) should be elected by Ranked Choice Voting, with on-the-record, on-the-Internet voting. Control of the floor of the House and Senate are key powers and voters have the right and responsibility to know how their elected representatives voted. 3. Citizen Empowerment b) Allow new incorporation of municipalities – municipalities were previously halted by the state legislature in order to centralize control at the state and county level. For instance, citizens of Silver Spring have expressed that they would like their own jurisdiction, because they don’t get fair consideration of their own issues when dealing with a large county program. With the older, pre-existing municipalities of Takoma Park on one side, and Kensington and Chevy Chase on the other, Silver Spring is not allowed to implement initiatives on their own like these older towns. It then has less of a community spirit and less commitment to resolving local issues, feeling disempowered. We need more sense of community in America, not less. It should be up to the local people as to whether they have a local jurisdiction of their own. 4. One-Session Decisions b) Consider bills in the order in which they were introduced – not only for hearings as we do today, which can be just five minutes and a formality – but also real committee and subcommittee votes. Every proposal should see the light of day. The new ones are especially important, and should not be “put in the drawer” and killed because established leadership doesn’t support them – which happens with nearly all new ideas in the current system. All votes should be recorded and available on the Internet immediately. c) Extend the session to at least six months – with extension in pay for members and staff. A year should be considered, since the planet is dying and we need massive transformation of our government programs now. This will also stop the abuse of representatives and staff, who go without sleep and weekends during the “shot clock” atmosphere of the current 90 days. Members should be able to get reasonable amounts of sleep throughout the session, with reliable weekends off. This will support women as parents and lower-income people entering the political arena, and bring important new voices into the legislative process. It will also allow more evening sessions, which will encourage more citizen participation in hearings. It will also provide more time for the public to communicate with members on issues and reduce the “back door” work which determines so much in the state legislature today – and which gives corporations, professional lobbyists, and “insiders” the upper hand. d) Fund adequate staff support for legislators – Every member should have their own staff person, not sharing staff as in the House of Delegates. Members from the same district may have different positions, and deserve staff who are dedicated to those positions and have time to research new proposals. Since the state has a $2.3 billion “rainy day fund” and then pleads it doesn’t have the money for the legislators to have adequate staff, it certainly appears that the representatives are disempowered, and the leadership elite then can make all significant decisions themselves. e) The legislature should decide the state budget, not the governor – the current system where the governor sets the budget and the legislature can only increase individual budget items disempowers the representatives, and puts overly concentrated power in one person, the governor. No other state the US has this system. It undercuts the fundamental exercise of a representative democracy. Summary: In conclusion, we need real democracy and rapid public policy decisions in this time of climate emergency and the continuing crises in social justice. Our current Maryland legislative processes are killing us and the planet with indecision, delay, unfairness, and lack of transparency. We must have equal representation of new and old representatives’ citizens, we must move quickly, we must have an easier way for the public to endorse a different view than the establishment, and we must have a way for new ideas to see the light of day. After 240 years, major reform to our Maryland legislative processes is long overdue and desperately needed for our survival.
The Green Party and I support single-payer universal health care and preventive care for all. Our current health care system lets tens of thousands of people die each year by excluding them from adequate care, while its exorbitant costs are crippling our economy. The United States is the only industrialized nation in the world without a national health care system. Under a universal, comprehensive, national single-payer health care system, the administrative waste of private insurance corporations would be redirected to patient care. If the United States were to shift to a system of universal coverage and a single payer plan, as in Canada and many European countries, the savings in administrative costs would be more than enough to offset the cost of additional care. Expenses for businesses currently providing coverage would be reduced, while state and local governments would pay less because they would receive reimbursement for services provided to the previously uninsured, and because public programs would cease to be the “dumping ground” for high-risk patients and those rejected by health maintenance organizations (HMOs) when they become disabled and unemployed. In addition, people would gain the peace of mind in knowing that they have health care they need. No longer would people have to worry about the prospect of financial ruin if they become seriously ill, are laid off their jobs, or are injured in an accident. Greens support a wide-range of health care services, not just traditional medicine which too often emphasizes “a medical arms race” that relies upon high-tech intervention, surgical techniques and costly pharmaceuticals. Chronic conditions are often best cured by alternative medicine. We support the teaching, funding and practice of holistic health approaches and as appropriate, the use of complementary and alternative therapies such as herbal medicines, homeopathy, naturopathy, traditional Chinese medicine and other healing approaches. Greens recognize that our own health is also intimately tied to the health of our communities and environment. To improve our own health, we must improve the quality of our air, water and food and the health of our workplaces, homes and schools. The Green Party and I unequivocally support a woman’s right to reproductive choice, no matter her marital status or age, and that contraception and safe, legal abortion procedures be available on demand and be included in all health insurance coverage in the U.S., as well as free of charge in any state where a woman’s income falls below the poverty level. I will support the following national changes: 1. Single-Payer Health Care Enact a universal, comprehensive, national single-payer health plan that will provide the following with no increase in cost:
2. Men’s contraception Women today have 12 different methods of modern contraception that are effective, reversible, and relatively safe. Men have none. The only methods are permanent sterilization or ineffective. Yet, 50% of the pregnancies in the US are still unplanned. Men should be enabled to take control of their own reproductive decisions, and become equal, responsible partners in this most important decision of our lives. Given the advances in medicine and technology in the past 70 years, men should have access to safe, inexpensive, effective, reversible male contraceptives. I believe this is a human right for men, and a major protection from unplanned pregnancy for women. Men today have essentially the same limited set of reproductive choices as 70 years ago, when vasectomies first became available. All these choices have significant drawbacks. Male contraceptives have had three periods of attention since modern contraceptive research began in the 1960s, but the pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, and health organizations have not followed through to bring successful methods to market. I will introduce legislation to fully fund research for excellent male contraception, and enable all men in the United States to have access to the new products. From a human rights standpoint, men have a fundamental right to control their reproductive decisions equivalent to women’s rights. With the sophistication of modern science, men should have a range of birth control methods that help them implement their own decision when to have a child. A caring man will be bound for life to a child that was not planned, with life-altering consequences for himself as well as for the mother and other family members. Young men in particular need to be empowered to make a conscious choice to be a parent, as an expression of their own vision of their life plan, with full awareness of the responsibilities and benefits of that choice. From a women’s health perspective, effective male contraceptives allow women to have the freedom not to use a female contraceptive, most of which are hormonal with side effects. Also, when combined with female contraception, the use of two methods will lead to a large reduction in unplanned pregnancies. This reduction will save women’s lives and protect children from maternal loss in developing countries. In developed countries, reduced unplanned pregnancies will increase maternal and infant health and improve socioeconomic outcomes particularly for teens. From a family planning perspective, male contraception allows a couple to improve their ability to control reproduction dramatically. Today, all women’s contraceptive methods have a failure rate, with tubal ligation (sterilization) still producing pregnancies for one out of every 200 to 300 women. A couple would be able to greatly decrease the risk of unplanned pregnancy by combining two highly effective, reversible methods. If each partner uses a method that is 99.5% effective, the net risk of conception drops to 0.0025%, near zero. Yet in the United States, nearly 50% of pregnancies are still unintended. From a child welfare standpoint, the ability for a man to implement his decision when he is ready to be a father — for instance after completing his education, achieving a stable partner, and gaining financial stability — would improve child survival and all aspects of social development. Also, a man’s active role in the child-bearing decision encourages a stronger relational foundation for future support of the child. Overall, men represent a major worldwide unmet need for family planning. Our society is morally bound to address this massive need. Male contraceptives are more than a simple “win-win” for men and women – the list of benefits is nearly endless. While vasectomies offer an excellent choice for more mature men who have completed having children, the long stretch from puberty to middle age now offers an excellent opportunity for the public and private sector to achieve major improvement in health, quality of life, and dignity for all people using current institutions and infrastructure. The medical research establishment has not invested significant resources in male contraceptives. Three phases of attention, in the 1960s, 1970s, and mid-2000s, did not lead to any major new methods being brought to market. Public agency funding of research through NIH continues to decline. Contraception has become cast as a women’s issue. Involving men in child-bearing decisions as active and 100% responsible partners will provide a humanizing effect for this topic, empowering half the human race to decide when and why to make one of the most important decisions of their life. At least six new male methods are under study at this time. They include an insert, an herb, several types of drugs, and heat. However, all of this research is being done by individual researchers and teams in small labs and universities. The current researchers are struggling with financial hurdles which are slowing and even stopping research on very promising methods. Immediate major funding is needed to ensure these researchers have support to complete their scientific studies; encourage the regulatory agencies to assign top priority to product reviews; and educate relevant public interest groups on the relationships between improved male contraception and their agendas. Also, the medical industry needs to be persuaded that increased research is warranted by public interest until a suite of inexpensive, accessible, reversible options is available to men worldwide.
Nancy and Pat fully embrace all the recommendations of the Kirwan Commission on Innovation and Excellence in Education, and its resulting Blueprint for Maryland’s Future. We will include full funding in the Governor’s budget each year of our term. We are committed in addition to introducing the Montessori method of education especially in pre-K through second grade. This method emphasizes independence, and it views children as naturally eager for knowledge and capable of initiating learning in a sufficiently supportive and well-prepared learning environment. The state will work with private and public partners to enable this transition. There is broad scientific evidence on the positive efficacy of this Montessori system. See Marshall, Chloë (December 2017). “Montessori education: a review of the evidence base”. NPJ Science of Learning. 2 (1): 11. doi:10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7. ISSN 2056-7936. PMC 6161506. PMID 30631457 We are also committed to making high school a path of continued interest and challenge for students with preparation for college (which is free under a Greens governor), for public service, and for trades and art in each high school. We support establishing service academies and technical academies as a focus point for high school curriculum. We will work with local trade unions and industries to develop curriculum and working internships to ensure each student understands they have a secure path to a good job with which to support a family in the future. We support free public colleges, both two year and four year colleges. Some of the most developed European countries provide free college, and our state and country should do so as well. College is a part of the overall public education, and should be an option for everyone. This has been a Green Party program for decades. We support forgiveness of student debt from Maryland public colleges, whatever the age of the student. We must free our young workers from the burden of major debt repayment to allow them the freedom to create companies, develop their artistic and entertainment talents, and also choose to serve the community as teachers, without tens of thousands of dollars of debt. Mentoring and tutoring are a key part of helping students advance with their grade level. We will recruit adults for special early-education tutoring programs to ensure that grades 1 – 6 are on track. This tutoring is a means of giving back to the community that we think every adult should consider, as part of the invaluable role of elders in our society. Funding for these programs will come in part from a complete audit of state and federal funds given to the schools, and of our many quasi-governmental commissions and agencies which are often inefficient or overstaffed for their responsibilities. Pat has been a school teacher for many years, and continues to teach part-time at Great Mills High School for GED students, in St. Mary’s County. Nancy has been a mentor to three children for 25 years, through their transition to young adulthood, and has encountered the many pressures faced by disadvantaged youth in our urban centers. We care, we show up in the difficult places, and we will dedicate the resources necessary to our children.
The U.S. needs a complete overhaul of our immigration laws, coordinated with transformation of our foreighn policy to help stop supported corrupt governments, harmful trade policies, and unsustainable development in sending countries. Undocumented immigrants should be granted a legal status which includes the chance to become U.S. citizens, and the horrific human sex trafficking stopped through outreach programs in sending countries, and use of our vaunted national intelligence capability to stop this devastation and slavery. Our current situation has created extreme social injustice and untold hidden suffering, both here and abroad. Millions of people are living and working in the U.S. with no legal status, making them subject to extreme exploitation and abuse. This silent, captive class of low and illegally underpaid workers is however convenient for American corporations. The Wall Street Journal has called for completely open borders, to keep wages low and help corporate profits with cheap labor. Washington has been more interested in meeting business needs with repeated, very slow amnesties maintaining the powerless underclass, rather than tackling the source of this human crisis in the first place – US-supported corruption, harmful trade policies, and unsustainable economies in developing countries. Meanwhile, wives and children back home are prey to abuse, rape and murder as enterprising, responsible young fathers and husbands come to the US simply to earn a living. Solving the immigration crisis means a re-orientation of our foreign policy, to focus on helping nations create just, prosperous, and sustainable societies. Migration is almost always a second choice to staying in one’s native country, and the silent suffering by individuals is immense. Our immigration policy should be a way to address all people’s sustainability needs as we undo the damage to local communities worldwide, and chart a course toward sustainable local economies and strong economic partners.
Overview Our current government has allowed technology to outstrip the regulatory capacity of our agencies and scientists. Corporations are driving our right to privacy into extinction, in just a two or three decades after centuries of defending that as a core value, starting with the Bill of Rights. We need a radical transformation of our regulation, and to put the “Precautionary Principle” into law so new technology must be evaluated before introduction into the market, for privacy as well as health, similar to the federal government’s evaluation of environmental impacts before major decisions. An Electronic Bill of Rights would redress the imbalance between the average consumer’s ability to understand complex technology, and the “data mining” of information by major corporations. Our bodies are an area of privacy under the Constitution. We support full control of our own bodies, also known as “bodily autonomy”. This includes: 1) the right to control one’s reproduction and the right to abortion under Roe vs Wade. 2) the right to express our sexual orientation and gender identity as we choose, free from government interference based on other people’s values and cultural norms. As Abraham Lincoln said, “”Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves.” Technology We must radically transform the US government’s approach to freedom and privacy. The electronic invasion of our lives, including the most private spaces of our homes and our public spaces, violates the basic reason this country exists. Our government spies on hundreds of millions of us, and approves of corporations’ spying on us with avoidance of necessary FCC regulation of wireless data warehousing.
______________________________________________________________________________________ Right to Control One’s Body (first three paragraphs from Green Party National Platform) Women’s right to control their bodies is non-negotiable. It is essential that the option of a safe, legal abortion remains available. The “morning-after” pill must be affordable and easily accessible without a prescription, together with a government-sponsored public relations campaign to educate women about this form of contraception. Clinics must be accessible and must offer advice on contraception and the means for contraception; consultation about abortion and the performance of abortions, and; abortion regardless of age or marital status. We endorse women’s right to use contraception and, when they choose, to have an abortion. This right cannot be limited to women’s age or marital status. Contraception and abortion must be included in all health insurance policies in the U.S., and any state government must be able to legally offer these services free of charge to women at the poverty level. Public health agencies operating abroad should be allowed to offer family planning, contraception, and abortion in all countries that ask for those services. We oppose our government’s habit of cutting family planning funds when those funds go to agencies in foreign countries that give out contraceptive devices, offer advice on abortion, and perform abortions. We encourage women and men to prevent unwanted pregnancies. It is the inalienable right and duty of every woman to learn about her body and to be aware of the phases of her menstrual cycle, and it is the duty for every man to be aware of the functions and health of his and his partner’s bodies. This information is necessary for self-determination, to make informed decisions, and to prevent unintended consequences. Unplanned conception takes control away from individuals and makes them subject to external controls. The “morning-after” pill and option of a safe and legal abortion need to remain available. We support development of men’s contraception so men can also exercise their reproductive rights with non-hormonal, reversible, safe modern contraception. Nancy helped found a non-profit spurring research in these areas. See Male Contraceptive Initiative for the current research options to empower men in this crucial area. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity In keeping with the Green Party’s “10 Green Key Values” of diversity, social justice and feminism, we support full legal and political equality for all persons regardless of sex, gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity, characteristics, and expression. We affirm the rights of all individuals to freely choose intimate partners, regardless of their sex, gender, or gender identity. We and the Green Party affirm the right of all persons to self-determination with regard to gender identity and sex.
Social Justice (see below for Community-Based Economics) Social Justice is one of the “Four Pillars” of the Green Party worldwide. This is a core value to all our work. Our Maryland solutions are: 1) Having a home – we support reversing poverty with a new requirement that all public housing, and housing with state funds, be “rent to own”. Current renters would have past payments credited towards the purchase of their home, and all future payments will go towards ownership. This will build more stable neighborhoods, and allow people to build their capital resources. There is no reason the state government should be a landlord for poor people, extracting more wealth from the poor when they cannot afford it, keeping people poor, even while the country’s official public policy has been to increase home ownership, with all its many personal and community benefits since 1935. A second program will propose a “fair mortgage” for private mortgages where the owner gains equity at the same, steady rate each month over the life of the loan, parallel to the banks gaining their profit at a standard rate. The current mortgages pay the banks nearly all their profit in the first half of the loan, and the owner only builds significant equity in the later half. That is not fair to owners, and is another way of “vacuuming up” wealth from the middle class to the upper 1% and the banking system. 2) Reparations – there are several proposals for reparations to heal some of the inherited damage and loss of wealth from generations of slavery and Jim Crow. I will establish a commission to examine these proposals, and bring one or more to the state legislature for action during my first term. The American Civil Liberties Union has helped introduce a bill in the US Congress, H.R. 40, for this on the federal level. I will model the Maryland Reparations Commission on this approach (https://www.aclu-md.org/en/reparations). 3) Stopping bail bond exploitation – the for-profit bail system must be eliminated. The current system is a cycle of indebtedness for people needing bond that keeps poor people who use them in debt even after they have been cleared of charges. This system is underwritten by nine insurance companies, and a form of it has been declared unconstitutional in onen county in Texas. The industry makes a mockery of our national value that a person is innocent until proven guilty. Instead, the bail bonds companies support keeping poor people in jail while presumed innocent, while wealthier people can walk free, arrange their defense, and continue working while waiting for trial and presumed innocent. Our core values are not just for the rich. Numerous national groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Color of Change advocate for this major change, and Nancy and Pat support this reform whole-heartedly. See this report for more information and recommendations. 4) Free college and forgiveness of student debt – See our Education page for more proposals and our commitments on improving educational access to become income-blind and available to all. We lift up families and neighborhoods as well as the individual student when we open educational opportunities to all. 5) Protection of Black cemeteries and historical communities – we have many cemeteries throughout Maryland that testify to the vibrant Black communities of the past two centuries. These lives deserve equal respect in their memorial places as all other Maryland residents. Yet they have often been overrun by real estate development and fraudulent land grabs for expanding suburbs and farmettes. Their memories have been erased, in our minds and off our zoning maps. We need to support the identification, restoration, and memorialization of this fundamental part of our state history, cherish the contributions of these communities, and include the disinheritance of valuable property ownership in our reparations commission mission. ____________________________________________________________ Community-Based Economics One of the Green Party’s 10 Key Values is Community Based Economics and Economic Justice. We recognize it is essential to create a vibrant and sustainable, community-based economic system that can create jobs and provide a decent standard of living for all people, while maintaining a healthy ecological balance. We are all painfully familiar with the facts of the disappearance of the middle class, the increasing gap between rich and poor in the US, and the hopelessness of young professionals facing crushing student debt. One percent of the US population owns 60% of our wealth. I propose ten concrete steps to rapidly reverse this impoverishment of 99% of the American people:
Resources for you on Community-Based Economics and Economic Justice There is an amazing grassroots economic revolution going on in the country, building on the union movement of the 1930s, the cooperatives movement of the 1970s, fair trade in the 1980s, the local farming movement of the last 20 years, and the sharing approach using technology-based communications of the last 10 years. These are all blossoming into something called the New Economy. New Economy Coalition: http://neweconomy.net/ Here’s just a partial list of economic structures which give workers and communities a fair deal. You can patronize them locally as customers, join as workers and members, and advocate for adoption in your business:
1 http://www.selfsufficiencystandard.org/index.html
We need to use the tax code to redistribute our over-concentration of wealth from the top 1% and large, multi-national corporations. I support reinstating estate and capital gains taxes at 1970s rates. Increase subsidies for solar, wind, geothermal, tidal energy. Stop subsidies for the petroleum, natural gas, and nuclear industries. All corporations should pay income taxes (60% of the large corporations currently pay no tax). End farm bill subsidies for grains that contribute to the national obesity epidemic and subsidize large agribusiness, and balance the market for fruits and vegetables. Tax policy should be used as a driver to redistribute the extreme concentration of wealth in the hands of an elite few individuals and large, multi-national corporations, back to 99% of Americans to re-establish the middle class. Currently, 1% of the population owns 60% of the wealth in the US, which is unconscionable. The estate tax and the capital gains tax should be reinstated at the rates of the 1970s. These were successful tools in protecting the middle class for decades, and their removal in the 1980s were a major reason for the rapid increase in over-concentration. I will also support major reform of federal corporate taxation so the two-thirds of all US corporations that do not pay any US taxes, are taxed at a fair rate. For instance, Prudential financial services giant had $3.5 billion in profits in 2014, and paid zero income tax. I also support tax assistance to enable employee-owned companies, to build a more just, equal society, parallel to the residential mortgage interest deduction from the 1930s which encourages home ownership. The tax system should support our emergency switch to renewable energy to reverse climate change. I support removing all tax subsidies for the petroleum, natural gas, and nuclear industries, including the Price Anderson Act shielding the nuclear industry from bearing its full cost. I support tax subsidies for renewable energy as a minimum step in fighting climate change, since every second counts towards planetary survival. And Congress needs to end our massive farm bill tax subsidies for the four grains which are the basis of our snack foods, and instead provide a fair, free market for production of healthier fruits and vegetables.
Nancy and Pat support a variety of transit options that allow for innovation and flexibility in our new, all-electric transit grid. We support evolving our communities to safe, walkable neighborhoods that provide most services and products within walking distance. Bicycles including electric bicycles, tricycle carts for the elderly, tree-lined walking paths for pedestrians, and small-scale, frequent public transit create safe, sustainable communities that are pleasant and human-centered. We and the Green Party support a transportation policy that emphasizes the use of mass transit and alternatives to the automobile and truck for transport. We call for major public investment in mass transportation, so that such systems are cheap or free to the public and are safe, accessible, and easily understandable to first-time users. We need ecologically sound forms of transportation that minimize pollution and maximize efficiency. We and the Green Party support the proposed Baltimore Regional Transportation Authority (BRTA) that can finish the Red Line Light Rail system, and the Baltimore Transit Equity Coalition that is fighting for this light rail. The transportation service currently offered is concentrated in mostly white and affluent neighborhoods while many low-income communities of color in east and west Baltimore have barely any service at all. Car-centered systems exacerbate many of the problems these communities already face, making it harder to access the jobs, health services, and clean air that folks need to live. Surfaces impermeable to rainwater, polluted storm run-off; paved over or polluted wetlands, the heat island effect, air pollution, and acid rain are all directly related to a transportation system run amuck. Massive subsidies to the auto and fossil fuel industries through highways as well as an unworkable approach by urban planners maintain the auto’s dominance of our cityscapes and inherited patterns of disadvantaged, Black and minority transit deserts . The present-day approach of upgrading streets to accommodate increased traffic generates new traffic because access is now easier, and people will now take jobs further from their homes or purchase homes further from their jobs. Some people shift from public transit to private cars due to the trip time in cars being shorter. As patronage for public transit decreases, public transit loses funding, becomes less viable, and service deteriorates thus encouraging even more people to use their cars. To counteract these trends and reduce auto use, we advocate the following strategies: 1. Pedestrians and Bicyclists
2. Mass Transit
3. Motor Vehicles
4. Air Travel
5. Freight We call for incentives to get long-distance truck hauling off of our highways and on to railways. We favor the removal of any administrative impediments to efficient long-haul freight transport by rail. Time is lost when switching goods from one railroad to another, even when the trains are the same size and gauge, and this waste can be eliminated.
The second campaign theme is relieving the violence and oppression of women at home in the US, and finding ways to support women’s survival in other countries. The facts on women and girls’ suffering in the United States and around the world are so overwhelming it is difficult to take in at once. Three women die in the US every day from domestic violence. Child abuse is rampant. Violence against women is an hour by hour show in our mainstream entertainment. In other countries, millions of women and girls are dying each year from lack of family planning, discrimination in food supply, 39,000 child brides per day, killings and torture for choosing a husband, and inadequate education. The list seems endless and we often turn away in hopelessness. But we must not. There has been progress, in many countries and cultures. In the US, we can make violence against women prevented and prosecuted as the individual tragedy it is, instead of a daily expectation which the courts and police are all too familiar. Internationally, we can increase support for the many successful efforts begun by thousands of dedicated people through for the US government. One of the Green Party’s 10 Key Values is Feminism and Gender Equity. We can address this holocaust of women and girls through appropriate use of federal programs by:
Resources for You on Women’s Survival: What You Can Do To Stop Domestic/Sexual Violence http://ndvsac.org/get‐involved/what‐you‐can‐do‐to‐stop‐domesticsexual‐violence/ Video on what you can do – Emma Watson speech http://www.msnbc.com/the‐last‐word/watch/emma‐watson‐if‐not‐me‐who‐if‐not‐now‐when‐ 332137027735[4] |
” |
—Nancy Wallace's campaign website (2022)[6] |
2016
The following issues were listed on Wallace's campaign website. For a full list of campaign themes, click here.
“ |
|
” |
—Nancy Wallace's campaign website, http://www.nancywallace.us/issues/ |
Campaign finance summary
Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.
See also
2024 Elections
External links
Personal |
Footnotes
- ↑ Nancy Wallace for Congress, "Meet Nancy," accessed October 23, 2024
- ↑ Maryland State Board of Elections, "2016 Presidential Primary Election State Candidates List," accessed February 5, 2016
- ↑ The New York Times, "Maryland Primary Results," April 26, 2016
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Nancy Wallace’s campaign website, “Issues,” accessed October 23, 2024
- ↑ Nancy Wallace for Governor, “Issues,” accessed October 14, 2022