Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
North Dakota 60% Vote Requirement for Constitutional Amendments Measure (2026)
North Dakota 60% Vote Requirement for Constitutional Amendments Measure | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Ballot measure process and Ballot measure supermajority requirements |
|
Status On the ballot |
|
Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
The North Dakota 60% Vote Requirement for Constitutional Amendments Measure is on the ballot in North Dakota as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2026.
A "yes" vote supports requiring constitutional amendments initiated by citizens or referred by the state legislature to receive a 60% vote to be adopted. |
A "no" vote opposes establishing a 60% supermajority vote requirement to adopt constitutional amendments, thereby leaving in place current requirements that constitutional amendments receive a simple majority vote (50%+1) to be adopted. |
Overview
What would the amendment change about constitutional amendments in North Dakota?
- See also: Text of measure
Currently, constitutional amendments in North Dakota must be approved by a simple majority (50%+1) of voters. The amendment would require amendments to receive a 60% supermajority vote to be adopted. The supermajority requirement would apply to both constitutional amendments proposed by initiative petition and amendments referred to the ballot by the state legislature.[1]
What have supporters and opponents said about the measure?
- See also: Support and Opposition
State Sen. Jeff Barta (R-43) said, “It’s quite likely that we all agree that it should be possible to change our state’s foundational document, however it should be more difficult than it currently is.”[2]
The League of Women Voters of North Dakota testified against the amendment, arguing that “The citizen initiative process is a hallmark of direct democracy. It promotes civic engagement, increases government accountability, and provides a channel for North Dakotans to elevate an issue that might otherwise not be addressed. For example, property taxes became a priority this session due in large part to a citizen initiative in 2024 to address it. There is power in North Dakotans organizing around an issue through the initiative process. … Initiated and referred measures play an important role in supporting citizen participation in the governance of the state. HCR 3003 would limit that role.”[3]
Do other states have supermajority requirements for constitutional amendments?
Currently, out of the 49 states where voters decide constitutional amendments (Delaware is the only state where voters do not decide constitutional amendments), 11 states require a supermajority vote or other election vote threshold for constitutional amendments. New Hampshire has the highest vote requirement for constitutional amendments at two-thirds (66.67%). The second-highest vote requirement for constitutional amendments is in Florida, which requires a 60% supermajority. Colorado has a 55% vote requirement to amend the constitution, while in Hawaii, Minnesota, and Wyoming, a majority of the total ballots cast in an election are required, meaning a blank vote has the same effect as a 'no' vote in these three states. The other five states have other requirements, such as requiring a simple majority vote on the ballot measure itself and a certain percentage of voter turnout or ballots cast.
There were 26 ballot measures related to supermajority requirements between 1912 and 2024. Twelve measures were approved, and 14 measures were defeated.
Are similar measures on the ballot in other states in 2026?
California
- California Vote Requirements for Initiatives Requiring Supermajority Votes Amendment (2026) - On the ballot
North Dakota
South Dakota
- South Dakota Constitutional Amendment L, 60% Vote Requirement for Constitutional Amendments Measure (2026) - On the ballot
Utah
Text of measure
Constitutional changes
The measure would amend section 9 of Article III and section 16 Article IV of the state constitution. The following struck-through text would be deleted and underlined text would be added:[1]
Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.
Article III
Section 9. A constitutional amendment may be proposed by initiative petition. If signed by electors equal in number to four percent of the resident population of the state at the last federal decennial census, the petition may be submitted to the secretary of state. If the secretary of state finds the petition is valid, the secretary of state shall place the measure on the ballot. If at least sixty percent of votes cast for a proposed constitutional amendment are affirmative, the measure is deemed enacted. All other provisions relating to initiative measures apply hereto to initiative measures for constitutional amendments.
Article IV
Section 16. Any amendment to this constitution may be proposed in either house of the legislative assembly, and if. If agreed to upon a roll call by a majority of the members elected to each house, the question must be submitted to the electors and if a majority. If at least sixty percent of the votes cast thereon upon the question are in the affirmative, the amendment is a part of this constitution.[4]
Support
Supporters
Officials
- Sen. Kathy Hogan (D)
- Sen. David Hogue (R)
- Sen. Janne Myrdal (R)
- Rep. Glenn Bosch (R)
- Rep. Lawrence Klemin (R)
- Rep. Mike Lefor (R)
- Rep. Robin Weisz (R)
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Officials
- Sen. Sean Cleary (R)
Organizations
Arguments
Campaign finance
Ballotpedia did not identify committees registered to support or oppose the ballot measure.
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Background
Constitutional amendments in North Dakota
Referred amendments
The North Dakota Legislature can refer a constitutional amendment to the ballot by a simple majority vote in each chamber. The legislature only convenes legislative sessions during odd-numbered years.
Between 2014 and 2024, 11 constitutional amendments referred to the ballot by the state legislature were on the ballot. Five were approved and six were defeated, a 45.45% approval rate. Of the five measures that were approved, all but one received greater than 60% of the vote in favor.
Initiated amendments
North Dakota allows residents to initiate legislation as either a state statute or a constitutional amendment. In North Dakota, citizens also have the power to repeal legislation via veto referendum. The completed petition must be submitted at least 120 days prior to the election. Each initiative has its own unique deadline of one year after it was approved to circulate.
Since North Dakota does not have a voter registration system, the number of signatures required is tied to the population reported by the last decennial census. For statutes and veto referendums, the number of signatures required is 2% of the population. For constitutional amendments, it is 4% of the population. The requirement for 2026 is 15,582 signatures for initiated state statutes and veto referendums and 31,164 signatures for initiated constitutional amendments.
In the past five even-year elections between 2014 and 2024, seven initiated constitutional amendments were on the ballot. Six of the measures were approved and one was defeated, an 85.71% approval rate. Of the six approved measures, all but one received greater than 60% of the vote in favor.
Supermajority requirements for constitutional amendments
- See also: Supermajority requirement
Voters decide on constitutional amendments in 49 of 50 states. Legislatures are required to seek voter approval to amend their state constitutions. Delaware is the one state where voter approval is not required for state constitutional amendments.
As of 2025, 11 states required a supermajority vote or other election vote threshold for constitutional amendments:
- New Hampshire had the highest vote requirement at two-thirds (66.67%).
- Florida had the second-highest vote requirement at 60%.
- In Colorado, a 55% vote of voters was required to amend the state constitution.
- In Hawaii, Minnesota, and Wyoming, a majority of the total ballots cast in an election was required, meaning a blank vote has the same effect as a 'no' vote in these three states.
- The other five states had other requirements, such as requiring a simple majority vote on the ballot measure itself and a certain percentage of voter turnout or ballots cast.
The following map shows the election vote threshold requirements for state constitutional amendments:
Ballotpedia tracked 26 ballot measures related to supermajority requirements between 1912 and 2024. Twelve measures were approved, and 14 measures were defeated.
State | Year | Measure | Type | Description | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | 2024 | Proposition 5 | LRCA | Decrease the vote threshold from two-thirds to 55% for local bond measures to fund housing projects and public infrastructure | ![]() |
Ohio | 2023 | Issue 1 | LRCA | Increase to 60% for constitutional amendments | ![]() |
Arizona | 2022 | Proposition 132 | LRCA | Increase to 60% for tax increase-related measures | ![]() |
Arkansas | 2022 | Issue 2 | LRCA | Increase to 60% for constitutional amendments and citizen-initiated measures | ![]() |
South Dakota | 2022 | Amendment C | LRCA | Increase to 60% for constitutional amendments and citizen-initiated measures | ![]() |
South Dakota | 2018 | Amendment X | LRCA | Increase to 60% for tax increase-related and certain appropriations-related measures | ![]() |
Colorado | 2016 | Amendment 71 | CICA | Increase to 55% for constitutional amendments | ![]() |
Arizona | 2008 | Proposition 105 | CICA | Change from a simple majority vote to a majority of registered voters for a tax-related initiative | ![]() |
Washington | 2007 | HJR 4204 | LRCA | Decrease from 60% to a simple majority for voters to approve school district property tax measures | ![]() |
Florida | 2006 | Amendment 3 | LRCA | Increase to 60% for constitutional amendments | ![]() |
Arizona | 2000 | Proposition 102 | LRCA | Increase to 66.67% for hunting-related measures | ![]() |
Oregon | 1998 | Measure 63 | CICA | Require that a measure proposing a supermajority vote be passed by the same vote threshold | ![]() |
Oregon | 1996 | Measure 46 | CICA | Change from a simple majority vote to a majority of registered voters for a tax-related measure | ![]() |
Utah | 1998 | Proposition 5 | LRCA | Increase to 66.67% for hunting-related measures | ![]() |
Idaho | 1980 | SJR 112 | LRCA | Change from majority of total votes cast for governor to a simple majority vote on an initiative | ![]() |
Oklahoma | 1974 | State Question 495 | LRCA | Change from majority of total ballots cast to a simple majority vote on an initiative | ![]() |
Oklahoma | 1974 | State Question 496 | LRCA | Change from majority of total ballots cast to a simple majority vote on a constitutional amendment | ![]() |
Washington | 1972 | SJR 5 | LRCA | Require 60% for ballot measures to establish lotteries | ![]() |
Idaho | 1934 | HJR 7 | LRCA | Change from majority of total votes cast for governor to a simple majority vote on an initiative | ![]() |
Oregon | 1933 | Measure Nos. 308-309 | LRCA | Require a two-thirds vote of electors for municipal corporations to issue bonds | ![]() |
Nebraska | 1920 | Amendment 39 | CCR | Change from a majority of total ballots cast to a simple majority vote on a constitutional amendment, provided that 35% of those who vote in the election vote on the amendment | ![]() |
Arizona | 1916 | Measure Nos. 100-101 | LRCA | Change from a simple majority vote on an initiative to a majority of total ballots cast | ![]() |
California | 1915 | Proposition 7 | LRCA | Increase to 66.67% for citizen-initiated bond measures | ![]() |
Ohio | 1912 | Amendment | CRCA | Change from majority of total ballots cast to a simple majority vote on a constitutional amendment | ![]() |
Oregon | 1912 | Measure Nos. 310-311 | LRCA | Change from a simple majority vote on a constitutional amendment to a majority of total ballots cast | ![]() |
Oregon | 1912 | Measure Nos. 322-323 | CICA | Change from a simple majority vote on an initiative to a majority of total ballots cast | ![]() |
State ballot measures that failed supermajority requirements
Since 2000, 30 ballot measures in eight states received more yes votes than no votes but were defeated for not meeting the states' supermajority requirements.
Since 2000, Florida saw the most measures failing supermajority requirements with 13 constitutional amendments defeated despite receiving a majority of the vote in favor. In Florida, constitutional amendments require a 60% vote of approval.
State | Colorado | Florida | Hawaii | Illinois | New Hampshire | Wyoming |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of measures failing supermajority requirements since 2000 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Path to the ballot
Amending the North Dakota Constitution
- See also: Amending the North Dakota Constitution
A simple majority vote is required during one legislative session for the North Dakota State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 48 votes in the North Dakota House of Representatives and 24 votes in the North Dakota State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.
House Concurrent Resolution 3003 (2025)
The following is the timeline of the constitutional amendment in the state legislature:
- January 7, 2025: The amendment was introduced in the House and referred to the committee on Government and Veterans Affairs, which voted 9-5 to pass the amendment on to a vote of the full chamber.
- January 29, 2025: The House of Representatives passed the amendment in a vote of 65-28.
- February 13, 2025: The amendment was introduced in the Senate committee on State and Local Government.
- April 4, 2025: The Senate committee on State and Local Government voted 6-0 to pass the amendment on to a vote of the full chamber.
- April 9, 2025: The Senate passed the amendment by a vote of 33-13.
Votes Required to Pass: 48 | |||
Yes | No | NV | |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 65 | 28 | 1 |
Total % | 69.2% | 29.8% | 1.1% |
Democratic (D) | 0 | 11 | 0 |
Republican (R) | 65 | 17 | 1 |
Votes Required to Pass: 24 | |||
Yes | No | NV | |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 33 | 13 | 1 |
Total % | 70.2% | 27.7% | 2.1% |
Democratic (D) | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Republican (R) | 32 | 9 | 1 |
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in North Dakota
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in North Dakota.
See also
|
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 North Dakota State Legislature, "House Concurrent Resolution 3003," accessed January 31, 2025
- ↑ Minot News, "Resolution raising constitutional ballot measure threshold to 60% passes North Dakota Senate," accessed April 22, 2025
- ↑ League of Women Voters of North Dakota, "HCR 3003," accessed April 22, 2025
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ North Dakota Secretary of State, "Q: What are voting hours in North Dakota?" accessed August 12, 2024
- ↑ Justia, "2023 North Dakota Century Code, 16.1-01-03. Opening and closing of the polls," accessed August 14, 2024
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 North Dakota Secretary of State, “North Dakota….The Only State Without Voter Registration,” accessed April 24, 2023
- ↑ North Dakota Secretary of State, “Voter Registration in North Dakota,” accessed August 12, 2024
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 North Dakota Secretary of State, "ID Requirements for Voting," accessed August 12, 2024