Rhonda Brooks recall, Golden Valley, Arizona (2015)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Golden Valley Fire District Board recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
Rhonda Brooks
Recall status
Recall approved
Recall election date
May 19, 2015
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2015
Recalls in Arizona
Arizona recall laws
Special district recalls
Recall reports

An effort to recall Rhonda Brooks from her position on the Golden Valley Fire District board in Mohave County, Arizona, was launched in June 2014. A recall election was set for May 19, 2015. Rhonda Brooks was recalled and replaced by Earlene Mahar.[1][2]

This was the second recall petition initiated targeting Brooks. In this case, Brooks was accused of attempting to force fire district chief Tom O'Donohue out of office, filing frivolous legal complaints, failing to comply with public records requests and inappropriately cancelling public contracts.[1]

Her recall attempt revolved, in part, around her efforts to continue contracting with a private ambulance business and to prevent the Golden Valley Fire District's application to provide ambulance and emergency medical services through public funding.[1]

Earlene Mahar was the only one to file as a candidate opposing Brooks. Thus, voters saw Mahar and Brooks on their ballots. Ballots were mailed to eligible voters on April 23, 2015, and were due back by 7 p.m on May 19, 2015.[3]

Election results

Golden Valley Fire District recall
ResultVotesPercentage
Red x.svgRhonda Brooks 414 33.96%
Yes check.svgEarlene Mahar 795 65.22%
Red x.svgWrite-in 10 0.82%
Election results via: Mohave County Elections Office accessed May 19, 2015

Recall supporters

Recall supporter arguments

Fire Chief Tom O'Donohue

Golden Valley Fire District Director Steve Robinson filed the recall petition against Brooks, and Chief Tom O'Donohue was the first person to sign the petition. Robinson stated, "Rhonda Brooks misled voters by refusing to acknowledge her platform was to force Chief O'Donohue out of office."[1]

The recall petition also argued that Brooks filed "minor" open meeting law complaints with the office of the Arizona attorney general, which cost the fire district thousands of dollars. Furthermore, Brooks was accused of failing to respond to public records requests and canceling over $600,000 in public contracts, according to the petition. Lastly, the petition complained that Brooks stifled the district's attempt to start an ambulance service and, instead, contracted with American Medical Response.[1]

The following statement in support of the recall of Rhonda Brooks appeared on the ballot:[4]

Grounds for the Demand of Recall of Rhonda Brooks

We, the qualified electors of the electoral district from which Rhonda Brooks, of the Golden Valley Fire District Board of Directors was elected, demand her recall. The grounds for this demand for recall are as follows:
  1. Rhonda Brooks misled the Voters by refusing to acknowledge her platform was to force Chief O'Donohue out of Office.
  2. Ms. Brooks filed repeated Open Meeting Law complaints with the Attorney General's office for minor or non-existent errors by the District and staff, costing the District thousands of dollars.
  3. Ms. Brooks violated State Statutes, refusing to fulfill public records requests, while demanding dozens of requests be immediately filed by the District; she disclosed confidential information from Executive Sessions.
  4. Ms. Brooks contacted businesses with Out-of-District contracts with GVFD, wanting, even attempting to cancel those contracts; which could cost the District $100s of Thousands in lost revenue.
  5. Ms. Brooks attempted to sabotage the Board approved Application for Ambulance Service by contracting the current provider, possibly giving confidential information to them. She acted in spite of overwhelming support for Golden Valley FD's attempt to acquire the service and provide better service to the citizens and travelers in the District.
The citizens of Golden Valley have the right to recall Rhonda Brooks from the Board. (quote)
—Golden Valley Fire District Director Steve Robinson[4]

Recall opponents

Response from Rhonda Brooks

Rhonda Brooks began her refutation by reminding voters that accusations on a recall need not be truthful and require no evidence and went on to respond to each item in the list of accusations. The full text of the response from Rhonda Brooks that appeared on the ballot is below:[4]

Statement of the Defense by Rhonda Brooks

Accusations in a recall petition are not required to be truthful, as is apparent from Mr. Robinson's statement.
  1. No one board member can fire the fire chief. The fire chief does not hold any office. He is simply an employee, like any other employee.
  2. Open meeting laws are like all laws. They are meant to be followed.
  3. Private e-mails are not public records. No confidential information was ever given to anybody.
  4. An informed board member would be well aware that a single board member cannot affect a contract.
  5. Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize an ambulance service when we enjoy a perfectly good ambulance business that is only paid for by the users of that service.
My primary job as a GVFD Director is public safety of the taxpayers in our district. This involves protecting the taxpayers' money, as well as their safety. It is the responsibility of each board member to assure the taxpayers that their money is being handled correctly. The recent financial disaster with the public's money has proven this is not the case. Vote for the candidate that will serve you, rather than serve the fire chief. (quote)
—Rhonda Brooks[4]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in Arizona

Recall proponents needed to collect 483 signatures. They turned in approximately 750 signatures. The recall petition was verified as sufficient, and the recall election was scheduled to be held on May 19, 2015.[5][6]

The form of the election dictated by law for this type of recall is a special election at which both the targeted official and any opposing candidates that choose to file are presented to voters, along with a statement of the grounds for recall against Rhonda Brooks and a statement from Rhonda Brooks in defense. It was possible that Rhonda Brooks could have been retained through receiving the most votes at the election. Before the recall petition was submitted, Betty Vernon, deputy elections director of the Mohave County Elections Department, explained, "If [Robinson] is able to collect enough signatures then there will be an election. Ms. Brooks will be a candidate and there will be an opposing candidate position for which one or more interested people will file and run for against Ms. Brooks. Ms. Brooks is not automatically recalled with the completion of the signatures."[2][5]

In this case, Earlene Mahar was the only one to file as a candidate opposing Brooks. Therefore, voters saw Mahar and Brooks on their ballots.[3]

See also

External links

Additional reading

Recent news

This section links to a Google news search for the term "Rhonda + Brooks + recall"


Footnotes