Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

Texas Proposition 7, Homestead Tax Limit for Surviving Spouses of Disabled Individuals Amendment (2021)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Texas Proposition 7
Flag of Texas.png
Election date
November 2, 2021
Topic
Taxes
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

2021 measures
November 2
Texas Proposition 1 Approved
Texas Proposition 2 Approved
Texas Proposition 3 Approved
Texas Proposition 4 Approved
Texas Proposition 5 Approved
Texas Proposition 6 Approved
Texas Proposition 7 Approved
Texas Proposition 8 Approved
Polls
Voter guides
Campaign finance
Signature costs

Texas Proposition 7, the Homestead Tax Limit for Surviving Spouses of Disabled Individuals Amendment, was on the ballot in Texas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 2, 2021. It was approved.[1]

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to allow the surviving spouse of a disabled individual to maintain a homestead property tax limit if the spouse is 55 years of age or older at the time of the death and remains at the homestead.

A "no" vote opposed amending the state constitution, thereby maintaining that a person who is 55 years of age or older and is the surviving spouse of a disabled individual is not eligible for the homestead property tax limit on school district property taxes after the disabled individual has died.



Election results

Texas Proposition 7

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,285,384 87.12%
No 190,109 12.88%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Overview

What did Proposition 7 do?

See also: Text of measure

Proposition 7 allowed the surviving spouse of a disabled individual to maintain a homestead property tax limit if the spouse is 55 years of age or older at the time of the death and remains at the homestead. A homestead property tax limit applies to school district property taxes. In order to qualify for the disabled exemption and tax limit, the individual must also qualify to receive disability benefits under the Federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Program administered by the Social Security Administration. Property taxes on the residence of a disabled individual do not increase from the year the individual qualifies for the exemption and tax limit. The amendment also added a temporary provision that would refund taxes to spouses of a deceased disabled individual for the 2020 and 2021 tax years that exceeded the amount that should have been paid with the tax limit.[2]

How did Proposition 7 get on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67 percent) supermajority vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives. This amendment was introduced as House Joint Resolution 125 on March 8, 2021. On April 12, 2021, the state House passed HJR 125 in a vote of 147-0, with three not voting. On May 14, 2021, the Senate approved HJR 125 in a vote of 30-0 with one excused.[1]

Have Texas voters considered other measures related to the tax limit?

See also: Related ballot measures

Since 2000, Ballotpedia has tracked four ballot measures related to property taxes limitations for disabled individuals. All four were approved with more than 75% of the vote.

How often do amendments pass in Texas?

See also: List of Texas ballot measures

Between 1995 and 2019, voters approved 91% (154 of 169) and rejected 9% (15 of 169) of the constitutional amendments that appeared on statewide ballots in Texas. An average of 13 measures appeared on odd-year statewide ballots. The number of ballot measures on odd-year statewide ballots ranged from 7 to 22.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[2]

The constitutional amendment to allow the surviving spouse of a person who is disabled to receive a limitation on the school district ad valorem taxes on the spouse’s residence homestead if the spouse is 55 years of age or older at the time of the person’s death.[3]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 8, Texas Constitution

The measure amended section 1-b(d) of Article 8 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2]

Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.

(d) Except as otherwise provided by this subsection, if a person receives a residence homestead exemption prescribed by Subsection (c) of this section for homesteads of persons who are 65 years of age or older or who are disabled, the total amount of ad valorem taxes imposed on that homestead for general elementary and secondary public school purposes may not be increased while it remains the residence homestead of that person or that person's spouse who receives the exemption. If a person who is 65 years of age or older or who is disabled dies in a year in which the person received the exemption, the total amount of ad valorem taxes imposed on the homestead for general elementary and secondary public school purposes may not be increased while it remains the residence homestead of that person's surviving spouse if the spouse is 55 years of age or older at the time of the person's death, subject to any exceptions provided by general law. The legislature, by general law, may provide for the transfer of all or a proportionate amount of a limitation provided by this subsection for a person who qualifies for the limitation and establishes a different residence homestead. However, taxes otherwise limited by this subsection may be increased to the extent the value of the homestead is increased by improvements other than repairs or improvements made to comply with governmental requirements and except as may be consistent with the transfer of a limitation under this subsection. For a residence homestead subject to the limitation provided by this subsection in the 1996 tax year or an earlier tax year, the legislature shall provide for a reduction in the amount of the limitation for the 1997 tax year and subsequent tax years in an amount equal to $10,000 multiplied by the 1997 tax rate for general elementary and secondary public school purposes applicable to the residence homestead. For a residence homestead subject to the limitation provided by this subsection in the 2014 tax year or an earlier tax year, the legislature shall provide for a reduction in the amount of the limitation for the 2015 tax year and subsequent tax years in an amount equal to $10,000 multiplied by the 2015 tax rate for general elementary and secondary public school purposes applicable to the residence homestead.

TEMPORARY PROVISION.

(a) The changes to the law made by Section 1, Chapter 1284 (H.B. 1313), Acts of the 86th Legislature, Regular Session, 2019, are validated.
(b) An action taken by a tax official in reliance on Section 1, Chapter 1284 (H.B. 1313), Acts of the 86th Legislature, Regular Session, 2019, is validated.
(c) A collector who collected school district ad valorem taxes from a surviving spouse who, under the law as amended by Section 1, Chapter 1284 (H.B. 1313), Acts of the 86th Legislature, Regular Session, 2019, was entitled to receive a limitation on school district taxes on the spouse’s residence homestead shall calculate the school district taxes that should have been imposed for the 2020 and 2021 tax years taking into account the change in law made by that Act and, if the taxes collected by the collector for those tax years exceed the taxes that should have been imposed as calculated under this subsection, the collector shall refund to the surviving spouse the difference between the taxes collected and the taxes that should have been imposed as calculated under this subsection.
(d)AAThis temporary provision expires January 1, 2023.

[3]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2021
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 21, and the FRE is 28. The word count for the ballot title is 46, and the estimated reading time is 12 seconds.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Progress Texas
  • Texas Freedom Caucus

Arguments

  • Representative Jake Ellzey (R): "The surviving spouse of a disabled homeowner should not be saddled with an unexpected large increase in their tax bill. That only magnifies the tragedy of the loss of their spouse and if they are on a fixed income it even further compounds their difficulties. If a couple has a disability exemption for their homestead, when the disabled person passes away, the surviving spouse loses the exemption. HJR125 protects the surviving spouse from the loss of an important benefit."


Opposition

If you are aware of any opponents or opposing arguments, please send an email with a link to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Texas ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2021 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on Proposition 7.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • The Fort Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board: "The first of two amendments expanding property-tax exemptions, this would allow the surviving spouses of elderly disabled Texans to continue to benefit from a property-tax freeze and an additional homestead exemption of up to $10,000. ... Our recommendation: Yes."
  • The San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "We recommend voters cast a ballot FOR Proposition 7. This amendment protects an important benefit for the surviving spouses of disabled people. It validates a Texas law passed in 2019 but not included in the state constitution because the legislative session ended before lawmakers approved the required joint resolution. Because of this, some counties enforced the law and others did not."
  • The Austin American-Statesman Editorial Board: "Homestead exemptions are a valuable tool to help longtime residents stay in their homes, and the additional protections are especially important for seniors and disabled residents on limited incomes. Disabled Texans who work full-time earn nearly $15,000 less, on average, than those without disabilities. Preventing them — and their families — from being taxed out of their homes is the right thing to do. Prop 7 delivers sensible protections that voters should support."
  • The Dallas Morning News Editorial Board: "Recommendation: Yes. Currently, a person gets a homestead tax limitation if they are either disabled or older than 64. After they die, the benefit only passes to their spouse if the spouse qualifies under the age category. This amendment extends the benefit to widowed spouses of disabled Texans. This is a common-sense update."
  • El Paso Times Editorial Board: "Proposition 7 is about consistency. It’s about ensuring disabled homeowners receive the same support as seniors, and their spouses aren’t hit with a surprise tax bill after their partner dies. Voters should wholeheartedly support Prop 7 on the Nov. 2 ballot."

Opposition

  • The Austin Chronicle Editorial Board: "Propositions 7 and 8: AGAINST. These are both tweaks to existing state law regarding what property tax homestead exemptions can continue to be claimed by the surviving spouse of a deceased owner. Prop 7 applies when the owner was disabled (lowering the surviving spouse's age of eligibility to 55), Prop 8 to service members killed in the line of duty (as opposed to "in combat" as current law reads). To support them in good faith, one must support the exemptions themselves, which we do not. We are all for making it easier for taxing entities in Texas to account for personal hardship; we do not think that linking favorable tax treatment to moralistic virtue signaling is the way to go. Our democracy is in crisis precisely because the people who run this place want to preserve the benefits of good government for whom they deem the right kind of people; this is more of that, and it should be rejected."


Background

House Bill 1313 (2020)

During the 2019 legislative session, the Texas State Legislature passed and Governor Greg Abbott (R) signed House Bill 1313 (HB 1313), which authorized the surviving spouse of a disabled individual to retain a homestead tax limit on the residence if the spouse died before January 1, 2020. The 2021 amendment retroactively validated HB 1313.[4]

Property tax exemptions and limits for disabled individuals

At the time of the election, disabled individuals may apply for a $10,000 homestead tax exemption and a limit on school district property taxes. In order to qualify for the disabled exemption and tax limit, the individual must also qualify to receive disability benefits under the Federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Program administered by the Social Security Administration. Property taxes on the residence of a disabled individual or their surviving spouse do not increase from the year the individual qualifies for the exemption and tax limit.[5]

Related ballot measures

Between 2000 and 2021, Ballotpedia tracked four Texas ballot measures related to property taxes limitations for disabled individuals:

  • Approveda Proposition 1 (2015): Proposition 1 amended the state constitution to authorize the state legislature to provide for a reduction of the limitation on the total amount of ad valorem taxes that may be imposed for those purposes on the homestead of an elderly or disabled person.
  • Approveda Proposition 1 (May 2007): Proposition 1 authorized the state legislature to provide for by law a reduction of the limitation amount on homesteads for the elderly or disabled.
  • Approveda Proposition 17 (September 2003): The measure prohibited an increase in school property taxes on residence homesteads of disabled persons.
  • Approveda Proposition 13 (September 2003): The measure authorized county, city, town, and junior college districts to freeze property taxes on a residential homestead of a person who was disabled or aged 65 or older.

Referred amendments on the ballot

See also: List of Texas ballot measures

The following statistics are based on ballot measures between 1995 and 2020 in Texas:

  • Ballots featured 169 constitutional amendments.
  • An average of 13 measures appeared on odd-year statewide ballots.
  • The number of ballot measures on odd-year statewide ballots ranged from 7 to 22.
  • Voters approved 91% (154 of 169) and rejected 9% (15 of 169) of the constitutional amendments.
Legislatively-referred constitutional amendments, 1995-2020
Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Odd-year average Odd-year median Odd-year minimum Odd-year maximum
169 154 91.1% 15 8.9% 12.8 11 7 22


During the 2021 regular and first special legislative sessions, 251 constitutional amendments were filed in the Texas State Legislature. In the regular session, legislators filed 218 amendments, and in the first special session, legislators filed 33 amendments. Between 2009 and 2020, an average of 192 constitutional amendments were filed during regular legislative sessions. The state legislature approved an average of nine constitutional amendments during regular legislative sessions. Therefore, the average rate of certification during regular legislative sessions was 4.7%. In 2021, eight of the 218 proposed constitutional amendments were certified for the ballot during the regular session, meaning the rate of certification was 3.7%, down from 4.6% in 2019.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Texas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as House Joint Resolution 125 on March 8, 2021. On April 12, 2021, the state House passed HJR 125 in a vote of 147-0, with three not voting. On May 14, 2021, the Senate approved HJR 125 in a vote of 30-0 with one excused.[1]

Vote in the Texas House of Representatives
April 12, 2021
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 100  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total14703
Total percent98.0%0.0%2.0%
Democrat6700
Republican8003

Vote in the Texas State Senate
May 14, 2021
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3001
Total percent96.77%0.00%3.33%
Democrat1300
Republican1701

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Texas State Legislature, "House Joint Resolution 125 Overview," accessed April 13, 2021
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Texas State Legislature, "House Joint Resolution 125 Text," accessed April 13, 2021
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Texas State Legislature, "House Bill 1313," accessed May 18, 2021
  5. Comptroller Texas, "AGE 65 OR OLDER OR DISABLED EXEMPTIONS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS," accessed May 18, 2021
  6. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  7. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  8. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed July 28, 2024
  10. Texas Secretary of State, "Request for Voter Registration Applications," accessed July 28, 2024
  11. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  12. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  13. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  14. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  15. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  16. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Identification Requirements for Voting," accessed October 9, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content