Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District election, 2026

← 2024
Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District
General election
Election details
Filing deadline: Pending
Primary: August 11, 2026 General: November 3, 2026
How to vote
Poll times: 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Voting in Wisconsin
Race ratings
Cook Political Report: Toss-up DDHQ and The Hill: Pending Inside Elections: Tilt Republican Sabato's Crystal Ball: Toss-up
Ballotpedia analysis
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2026
See also
Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District 1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th • 8th Wisconsin elections, 2026 U.S. Congress elections, 2026 U.S. Senate elections, 2026 U.S. House elections, 2026 Alabama U.S. House racesAlaska U.S. House raceArizona U.S. House racesArkansas U.S. House racesCalifornia U.S. House racesColorado U.S. House racesConnecticut U.S. House racesDelaware U.S. House raceFlorida U.S. House racesGeorgia U.S. House racesHawaii U.S. House racesIdaho U.S. House racesIllinois U.S. House racesIndiana U.S. House racesIowa U.S. House racesKansas U.S. House racesKentucky U.S. House racesLouisiana U.S. House racesMaine U.S. House racesMaryland U.S. House racesMassachusetts U.S. House racesMichigan U.S. House racesMinnesota U.S. House racesMississippi U.S. House racesMissouri U.S. House racesMontana U.S. House racesNebraska U.S. House racesNevada U.S. House racesNew Hampshire U.S. House racesNew Jersey U.S. House racesNew Mexico U.S. House racesNew York U.S. House racesNorth Carolina U.S. House racesNorth Dakota U.S. House raceOhio U.S. House racesOklahoma U.S. House racesOregon U.S. House racesPennsylvania U.S. House racesRhode Island U.S. House racesSouth Carolina U.S. House racesSouth Dakota U.S. House raceTennessee U.S. House racesTexas U.S. House racesUtah U.S. House racesVermont U.S. House raceVirginia U.S. House racesWashington U.S. House racesWest Virginia U.S. House racesWisconsin U.S. House racesWyoming U.S. House raceSubmit

All U.S. House districts, including the 3rd Congressional District of Wisconsin, are holding elections in 2026. The general election is November 3, 2026. To learn more about other elections on the ballot, click here.

Candidates and election results

Note: The following list includes official candidates only. Ballotpedia defines official candidates as people who:

• Register with a federal or state campaign finance agency before the candidate filing deadline
• Appear on candidate lists released by government election agencies

Note: At this time, Ballotpedia is combining all declared candidates for this election into one list under a general election heading. As primary election dates are published, this information will be updated to separate general election candidates from primary candidates as appropriate.

General election

The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.

General election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Incumbent Derrick Van Orden, Laura Benjamin, Emily Berge, Rebecca Cooke, and Rustin Provance are running in the general election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on November 3, 2026.

		Candidate
		Derrick Van Orden (R)
		Laura Benjamin (D)
		Emily Berge (D)
		Rebecca Cooke (D)
		Rustin Provance (Independent)

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined.
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Candidate profiles

This section includes candidate profiles that may be created in one of two ways: either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey, or Ballotpedia staff may compile a profile based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements after identifying the candidate as noteworthy. For more on how we select candidates to include, click here.

Emily Berge

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography:  "Emily Berge was elected to the Eau Claire City Council in 2018 and elected as City Council President in 2023. A mental health counselor, small business owner, and mom, she understands the challenges facing our communities. Her experience, including her past role as president of the League of Wisconsin Municipalities, equips her to address critical issues like housing, healthcare, and water quality. Emily is running to represent Wisconsin’s Third Congressional District, bringing both her professional experience and a leadership style grounded in stability and empathy."

---

Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.

---

Emily leads with empathy and stability working to solve real problems for people. We need leaders who won't get swept up in the chaos but will lead with discipline and empathy. Emily's experiences of leading during difficult times, including navigating threats and protests during the pandemic and the arrival of refugees, have honed her ability to handle adversity with grace and steadiness.

---

Emily has seen first hand the impacts of lack of affordable housing, inaccessible healthcare, including mental healthcare, and toxins in our water over her years serving the residents of Eau Claire and advocating for communities of all sizes throughout Wisconsin. The people of Western and Central Wisconsin deserve better. Emily believes that everyone who wants a home should have a home, that your zip code or bank account shouldn't determine one's ability to receive healthcare, and our land, air, and water must be protected, not only for today, but for future generations.

---

Emily believes civil rights are the foundation of a just and healthy democracy. Every person, no matter their race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, income, or ability, deserves equal protection under the law and full access to opportunity. From voting rights to LGBTQ+ protections, reproductive freedom to disability access, Emily will fight to ensure that no one is left behind or treated as less than. She knows that civil rights are not negotiable—and she will stand up to those who seek to divide, discriminate, or roll back the progress generations have fought to achieve.

Voting information

See also: Voting in Wisconsin

Ballotpedia will publish the dates and deadlines related to this election as they are made available.

Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses

Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Survey responses from candidates in this race

Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Expand all | Collapse all

Please list below 3 key messages of your campaign. What are the main points you want voters to remember about your goals for your time in office?

Emily Berge (D)

Emily leads with empathy and stability working to solve real problems for people. We need leaders who won't get swept up in the chaos but will lead with discipline and empathy. Emily's experiences of leading during difficult times, including navigating threats and protests during the pandemic and the arrival of refugees, have honed her ability to handle adversity with grace and steadiness.

Emily has seen first hand the impacts of lack of affordable housing, inaccessible healthcare, including mental healthcare, and toxins in our water over her years serving the residents of Eau Claire and advocating for communities of all sizes throughout Wisconsin. The people of Western and Central Wisconsin deserve better. Emily believes that everyone who wants a home should have a home, that your zip code or bank account shouldn't determine one's ability to receive healthcare, and our land, air, and water must be protected, not only for today, but for future generations.

Emily believes civil rights are the foundation of a just and healthy democracy. Every person, no matter their race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, income, or ability, deserves equal protection under the law and full access to opportunity. From voting rights to LGBTQ+ protections, reproductive freedom to disability access, Emily will fight to ensure that no one is left behind or treated as less than. She knows that civil rights are not negotiable—and she will stand up to those who seek to divide, discriminate, or roll back the progress generations have fought to achieve.

What areas of public policy are you personally passionate about?

Emily Berge (D)

Emily believes that everyone, no matter their income level, should have access to healthcare and housing. She is also passionate about protecting and expanding civil rights for all regardless of their background, sexual orientation, gender, race, or ethnicity. Emily will work for economic fairness and make sure billionaires and corporations pay their fair share, working people earn fair and livable wages, and big money out of politics.

What qualities do you possess that you believe would make you a successful officeholder?

Emily Berge (D)

As a current officeholder, I have several qualities that make me successful in serving my constituents. I serve with empathy and stability. I listen to understand not to respond which also serves me well as a mental health counselor. I stick to my values but am also open minded and value learning about different perspectives. I am not afraid of conflict and I believe it is ok to disagree. I have learned a lot from people with differing opinions. I always strive to be respectful but can be firm when needed. I am always caring for people and this is what motivates me to serve my community.

What is the first historical event that happened in your lifetime that you remember? How old were you at the time?

Emily Berge (D)

When I was in Kindergarten, I remember when the Challenger Space Shuttle exploded. My Kindergarten teacher sat us all down in a circle on the rug in front of her chair, and she told us how a space shuttle exploded and how there was a teacher on board. I remember her being very sad but calm and explained this horrific thing in a way that made sense to 5 and 6 year olds.

What was your very first job? How long did you have it?

Emily Berge (D)

I started babysitting around age 12 and continued babysitting or nannying (with other jobs) until I had my first professional job post college. Even though the pay was never good (a few bucks an hour when I first started and never making over minimum wage), I have always loved caring for children. It is why I choose my undergraduate degree in Human Development and Family Studies and why I decided to go in counseling. Now as I work to create policies to better my community, I always remember what is best for the young ones because they are often the most vulnerable. And I really do believe it does take a village to raise a child.

What qualities does the U.S. House of Representatives possess that makes it unique as an institution?

Emily Berge (D)

The U.S. House of Representatives holds a unique position within our governmental structure, notably serving as a crucial component of the checks and balances designed to prevent any single branch from becoming too powerful. Furthermore, the system of Congressional Districts ensures representation for the diverse and often distinct communities within each state. As someone familiar with Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District, I understand how the specific needs and character of one area can differ from others within the same state. Having a representative dedicated to understanding and advocating for these unique local needs is vital to ensuring that all voices are accurately heard at the federal level. The relatively short terms and direct election of representatives also contribute to its unique character, fostering a closer connection between the representatives and their constituents.

Do you believe that it's beneficial for representatives to have previous experience in government or politics?

Emily Berge (D)

While I acknowledge my bias as a current elected official with 8 years experience, I firmly believe that prior government or political experience is highly beneficial for those seeking to serve in Congress. The ability to navigate the complexities of passing legislation, overseeing budgets, and effectively engaging with constituents is invaluable. This role demands the capacity to make difficult decisions under intense public scrutiny and provide comfort and stability during challenging times. Elected officials often become the focal point for community frustrations, whether stemming from local or global events. My own experiences, including navigating threats and protests during the pandemic and the arrival of refugees, have honed my ability to handle adversity with grace, empathy, and stability. This accumulated experience is not only vital for effective representation but also a key differentiator in this primary race.

What do you perceive to be the United States’ greatest challenges as a nation over the next decade?

Emily Berge (D)

Over the next decade, our nation faces significant challenges, starting with a growing affordability crisis encompassing housing, healthcare, and food, alongside persistent workforce shortages. Protecting our land, water, and air is also paramount for our future. We must also be vigilant in safeguarding human rights, civil rights, and abortion access, ensuring no one faces discrimination based on their background, appearance, whom they love, or where they come from. These challenges are interconnected and require comprehensive solutions. Fundamentally, addressing these issues requires getting money out of politics, as its influence exacerbates each of these challenges.

Do you believe that two years is the right term length for representatives?

Emily Berge (D)

I believe there are valid arguments for considering a longer term length for representatives. A longer term could allow representatives to dedicate more focus to the complex work of solving problems rather than being in a perpetual cycle of campaigning for the next election. This could lead to more thoughtful and potentially more effective policymaking.

However, the current two-year term also has its advantages. It ensures that representatives remain closely accountable to the will of the people and allows for more frequent opportunities for constituents to voice their approval or disapproval of their representative's performance. A shorter term can also make representatives more responsive to the immediate needs and concerns of their districts.

Ultimately, there are trade-offs to consider between the benefits of stability and focused work that a longer term might offer, and the enhanced accountability and responsiveness that comes with a shorter term.

What are your thoughts on term limits?

Emily Berge (D)

As a current elected official, I believe term limits could be a positive step towards ensuring politicians prioritize serving their constituents over constant fundraising for reelection. Furthermore, term limits could help guarantee that those in office are truly fit to serve. I would support term limits if the term was long enough to allow members of Congress to gain the necessary experience to be effective representatives, as I've personally found that experience and learning from seasoned colleagues is invaluable. While there's a path to implementing term limits that balances fresh perspectives with governmental stability, I also believe that issues like gerrymandering and the influence of money in politics pose significant threats that warrant immediate attention, potentially even more so than the absence of term limits.

Both sitting representatives and candidates for office hear many personal stories from the residents of their district. Is there a story that you’ve heard that you found particularly touching, memorable, or impactful?

Emily Berge (D)

As I've traveled throughout the district, the stories shared by young people have been particularly touching and impactful. What strikes me is that these narratives often aren't highlighted in mainstream media. I've spoken with many young individuals who have, with a sense of resignation, given up on the traditional American dream of homeownership, not seeing a realistic path to ever affording their own place. There's also a pervasive insecurity regarding employment, with concerns about companies being hesitant to hire new graduates amidst an unpredictable economy. I've heard from young people dedicating themselves to public service through programs like AmeriCorps to manage student loan debt, and others who faced the sudden elimination of their federal agency positions without warning. These early adulthood years are so formative, laying the groundwork for the rest of one's life, and it's disheartening to hear how current circumstances are creating roadblocks to opportunity, financial security, and simply the ability for young people to build fulfilling lives.

Tell us your favorite joke.

Emily Berge (D)

How many therapists does it take to change a light bulb? Only one...but the light bulb has to want to change.

Do you believe that compromise is necessary or desirable for policymaking?

Emily Berge (D)

Yes, I do believe that compromise is generally desirable for policymaking, a principle I've observed in my own experience as an elected official. Often, achieving the necessary votes to move forward requires finding common ground and meeting in the middle to bring everyone to the table and pass legislation. However, there are certain fundamental issues, such as human rights and civil liberties, where compromise should not be an option. While I recognize the need for pragmatism in policymaking, I will always remain true to my values in every vote and policy decision I make.

The Constitution says that all bills for raising revenue must originate in the House. What role would this power play in your priorities if elected?

Emily Berge (D)

The House's constitutional authority to originate revenue bills would be a fundamental tool in pursuing my core priorities. I would utilize this power to craft legislation that generates the necessary funding for expanding access to affordable healthcare and mental healthcare services, ensuring these essential programs are adequately supported. Addressing the housing crisis would also be a key focus, with revenue bills funding affordable housing initiatives and community development projects. Furthermore, I would champion a more equitable tax system, ensuring billionaires and large corporations pay their fair share, closing tax loopholes, and implementing policies that reduce income inequality. This approach would not only generate the resources needed to support working families and address economic disparities but also hold the wealthiest Americans accountable, ensuring a fairer tax code for all.

How should the U.S. House use its investigative powers?

Emily Berge (D)

The U.S. House should use its investigative powers to uphold the rule of law and protect our democracy from abuse, no matter who holds power. When the executive branch begins to act more like a dictatorship, governing by unchecked executive orders, ignoring court rulings, or allowing unelected individuals to gut essential programs without oversight, Congress has a duty to act. That includes investigating credible allegations of corruption, such as bribes or gifts from domestic or foreign entities, and holding accountable those who enable or turn a blind eye to these actions. The House must ensure that no branch, and no individual, is above the law. Oversight should never be used for political theater, but when used responsibly, it’s one of our most critical tools for protecting the integrity of our institutions and the interests of the American people.

What organizations or individuals have endorsed your campaign?

Emily Berge (D)

State Senator Jeff Smith, Former State Assembly Representative Dana Wachs; Eau Claire County Chair Nancy Coffey; Eau Claire Area School Board President, Tim Nordin; Eau Claire City Council Vice President Andrew Werthmann, Eau Claire City Council Member Emily Anderson, Eau Claire City Council Member Larry Mboga, Eau Claire City Council Member Jessica Schoen, Eau Claire City Council Member Josh Miller, Eau Claire City Council Member Charlie Johnson, Eau Claire City Council Member Aaron Brewster, Eau Claire City Council Member Nate Otto, Former Eau Claire City Council President Terry Weld, Former Candidate for the 3rd Cd and Veteran Deb McGrath, Eau Claire Area Hmong Mutual Assistance Association Executive Director, True Vue,

What committees interest you?

Emily Berge (D)

Given my experience in local government and mental health care, I would be especially interested in serving on the Energy and Commerce Committee, particularly its Health Subcommittee, to address the urgent need for expanded mental health care access, especially in underserved and rural communities.

I'm also drawn to the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, where I could advocate for smart, equitable investments in roads, public transit, and broadband—investments that benefit both urban centers and rural communities. In addition, the Financial Services Committee, particularly its Housing and Insurance Subcommittee, would allow me to focus on affordable housing, homelessness prevention, and policies for working families.

Lastly, the Education and the Workforce Committee would provide an avenue to support children and families through early childhood education, workforce development, and family services.

You can ask candidates in this race to fill out the survey by clicking their names below:

• Derrick Van Orden
• Laura Benjamin
• Rebecca Cooke

Campaign finance

Name	Party	Receipts*	Disbursements**	Cash on hand	Date
Derrick Van Orden	Republican Party	$2,384,267	$1,225,321	$1,675,752	As of June 30, 2025
Laura Benjamin	Democratic Party	$22,503	$12,035	$10,468	As of June 30, 2025
Emily Berge	Democratic Party	$150,878	$64,119	$86,758	As of June 30, 2025
Rebecca Cooke	Democratic Party	$1,950,996	$693,966	$1,267,169	As of June 30, 2025
Rustin Provance	Independent	$0	$0	$0	Data not available***
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2026. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC). * According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." ** According to the FEC, a disbursement "is a purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit or gift of money or anything of value to influence a federal election," plus other kinds of payments not made to influence a federal election. *** Candidate either did not report any receipts or disbursements to the FEC, or Ballotpedia did not find an FEC candidate ID.

General election race ratings

See also: Race rating definitions and methods

Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:

• Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
• Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
• Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.
• Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.

Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.

Race ratings: Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District election, 2026
Race tracker	Race ratings
	9/30/2025	9/23/2025	9/16/2025	9/9/2025
The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter	Toss-up	Toss-up	Toss-up	Toss-up
Decision Desk HQ and The Hill	Pending	Pending	Pending	Pending
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales	Tilt Republican	Tilt Republican	Tilt Republican	Tilt Republican
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball	Toss-up	Toss-up	Toss-up	Toss-up
Note: Ballotpedia reviews external race ratings every week throughout the election season and posts weekly updates even if the media outlets have not revised their ratings during that week.

Ballot access

This section will contain information on ballot access related to this state's elections when it is available.

District history

The section below details election results for this office in elections dating back to 2020.

2024

See also: Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District election, 2024

Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District election, 2024 (August 13 Democratic primary)

Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District election, 2024 (August 13 Republican primary)

General election

General election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Incumbent Derrick Van Orden defeated Rebecca Cooke in the general election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on November 5, 2024.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Derrick Van Orden (R)	51.3	212,064
		Rebecca Cooke (D)	48.6	200,808
		Other/Write-in votes	0.1	309

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 413,181
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Rustin Provance (Independent)

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Rebecca Cooke defeated Katrina Shankland and Eric Wilson in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on August 13, 2024.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Rebecca Cooke	50.5	42,316
		Katrina Shankland	41.6	34,812
		Eric Wilson	7.9	6,624
		Other/Write-in votes	0.0	24

---

	There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 83,776
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Tara Johnson (D)
• Aaron Nytes (D)

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Incumbent Derrick Van Orden advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on August 13, 2024.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Derrick Van Orden	99.6	52,533
		Other/Write-in votes	0.4	211

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 52,744
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2022

See also: Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District election, 2022

General election

General election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Derrick Van Orden defeated Brad Pfaff in the general election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on November 8, 2022.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Derrick Van Orden (R)	51.8	164,743
		Brad Pfaff (D)	48.1	152,977
		Other/Write-in votes	0.1	202

---

	There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 317,922
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Rustin Provance (L)

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Brad Pfaff defeated Rebecca Cooke, Deb McGrath, and Mark A. Neumann in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on August 9, 2022.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Brad Pfaff	38.9	24,041
		Rebecca Cooke	31.1	19,221
		Deb McGrath	19.1	11,770
		Mark A. Neumann	10.8	6,672
		Other/Write-in votes	0.0	25

---

	There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 61,729
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Brett Knudsen (D)
• Justin Bradley (D)

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Derrick Van Orden advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on August 9, 2022.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Derrick Van Orden	99.3	65,164
		Other/Write-in votes	0.7	471

---

	There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 65,635
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Denise Hurless (R)

2020

See also: Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District election, 2020

General election

General election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Incumbent Ronald James Kind defeated Derrick Van Orden in the general election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on November 3, 2020.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Ronald James Kind (D)	51.3	199,870
		Derrick Van Orden (R)	48.6	189,524
		Other/Write-in votes	0.1	224

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 389,618
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Incumbent Ronald James Kind defeated Mark A. Neumann in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on August 11, 2020.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Ronald James Kind	80.6	53,064
		Mark A. Neumann	19.4	12,765
		Other/Write-in votes	0.0	12

---

	Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 65,841
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Justin Bonner (D)

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3

Derrick Van Orden defeated Jessi Ebben in the Republican primary for U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 on August 11, 2020.

		Candidate	%	Votes
✔		Derrick Van Orden	65.9	36,395
		Jessi Ebben	34.1	18,835
		Other/Write-in votes	0.0	21

---

	There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source	Total votes: 55,251
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

• Tim Peters (R)
• John Garske (R)
• Kevin Ruscher (R)
• Jonathan Sundblom (R)
• Alex Virijevich (R)
• Brandon Cook (R)
• Shannon Moats (R)

District analysis

This section will contain facts and figures related to this district's elections when those are available.

See also

Wisconsin	2026 primaries	2026 U.S. Congress elections
Wisconsin congressional delegation Voting in Wisconsin Wisconsin elections: 2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018	Democratic primary battlegrounds Republican primary battlegrounds U.S. Senate Democratic primaries U.S. Senate Republican primaries U.S. House Democratic primaries U.S. House Republican primaries	U.S. Congress elections U.S. Senate elections U.S. House elections Special elections Ballot access

External links

• Search Google News for this topic

Footnotes

[show]

Wisconsin's current delegation to the United States Congress

Senators

Tammy Baldwin (D)

Ronald Johnson (R)

Representatives

District 1

Bryan Steil (R)

District 2

Mark Pocan (D)

District 3

Derrick Van Orden (R)

District 4

Gwen Moore (D)

District 5

Scott Fitzgerald (R)

District 6

Glenn Grothman (R)

District 7

Tom Tiffany (R)

District 8

Tony Wied (R)

Republican Party (7)

Democratic Party (3)

Ballotpedia

About

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

---

Executive: Leslie Graves, Founder and CEO • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer

Communications: Alison Graves, Director of Communications • Carley Allensworth • Abigail Campbell • Frank Festa • Sarah Groat • Nathaniel Harwood • Dillon Redmond • Erica Shumaker
External Relations: Geoff Pallay, Director of External Relations • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy • Ashley Fleming • Thomas Mardik • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski, Director of Operations • Amanda Herbert • Mandy Morris • Caroline Presnell • Kelly Rindfleisch
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Director of Technology Operations • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Beth Dellea • Travis Eden • Tate Kamish • Margaret Kearney • Eric Lotto • Joseph Sanchez • Mary Susmitha

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

---

Editorial Content

Josh Altic, Director of Content • Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data • Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures • Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News • Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion • Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections • Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law • Joel Williams. Managing Editor of Events • Andrew Bahl • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Joseph Brusgard • Emma Burlingame • Kelly Coyle • Jon Dunn • Thomas Ellis • Nicole Fisher • Joseph Greaney • Thomas Grobben • Brianna Hosea • Molly Kehoe • Tyler King • Glorie Martinez • Norm Leahy, Senior Editor • Nathan Maxwell • Jimmy McAllister • Brandon McCauley • Ellie Mikus • Ellen Morrissey • Mackenzie Murphy • Kaley Platek • Samantha Post • Adam Powell • Annelise Reinwald • Ethan Rice • Spencer Richardson • Victoria Rose • Briana Ryan • Myj Saintyl • Maddy Salucka • Emma Soukup • Alexis Thacker • Mina Vogel • Samuel Wonacott • Trenton Woodcox