Arizona Proposition 139, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024)
| Arizona Right to Abortion Initiative | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Election date November 5, 2024 | |
| Topic Abortion | |
| Status Cleared for signature gathering | |
| Type Constitutional amendment | Origin Citizens |
The Arizona Right to Abortion Initiative may appear on the ballot in Arizona as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024.
This ballot initiative would establish the fundamental right to abortion that the state of Arizona may not interfere with before the point of fetal viability (defined as the point of pregnancy when there is significant chance of the survival of the fetus outside of the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures) unless justified by a compelling state interest (defined as a law or regulation enacted for the limited purpose of improving or maintaining the health of the individual seeking abortion care that does not infringe on that individual's autonomous decision making).[1]
Additional information on abortion-related ballot measures
In 2024, 11 statewide ballot measures related to abortion were certified in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New York, Nevada, and South Dakota for the general election ballot on November 5. This was the most on record for a single year.
- You can find a list of 2024's certified and proposed measures here: 2024 abortion-related ballot measures and state context.
- Information on abortion-related ballot measures since 1970 is available here: History of abortion ballot measures.
Overview
What would this amendment do?
- See also: Constitutional changes
This measure would amend the Arizona Constitution to establish the fundamental right to abortion that the state of Arizona may not interfere with before the point of fetal viability. Fetal viability is defined in the measure as the point of pregnancy when there is significant chance of the survival of the fetus outside of the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures. This right would not be interfered with unless justified by a compelling state interest. In the measure, a compelling state interest is defined as a law or regulation enacted for the limited purpose of improving or maintaining the health of the individual seeking abortion care that does not infringe on that individual's autonomous decision making.[1]
What is the status of abortion in Arizona?
- See also: Status of abortion in Arizona
As of April 9, abortion is legal for up to 15 weeks of pregnancy in Arizona. On April 9, 2024, the Arizona Supreme Court, in a 4-2 decision, upheld a law enacted in 1864 prohibiting abortion in most circumstances except to save the life of the mother. The law ordered prosecution for "a person who provides, supplies or administers to a pregnant woman, or procures such woman to take any medicine, drugs or substance, or uses or employs any instrument or other means whatever, with intent thereby to procure the miscarriage of such woman, unless it is necessary to save her life." The Arizona State Legislature never repealed the law, and the Court ruled it became enforceable following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. The Arizona Supreme Court stayed enforcement of the abortion ban for 14 days to allow legal challenges to the ruling.[2] On April 24, 2024, the Arizona House of Representatives passed House Bill 2677 by 32-29, which would repeal the 1864 abortion ban.[3] The Arizona State Senate voted 16-14 to pass the repeal on May 1, 2024. In Arizona, a repeal can only take effect 90 days after the adjournment of the state legislature.[4] On May 13, the Arizona Supreme Court granted a motion to stay the enforcement of the 1864 law until August 12, 2024.[5]
How will this amendment qualify for the 2024 ballot?
- See also: Path to the ballot
For a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment to qualify for the November 5, 2024, ballot in Arizona, at least 383,923 valid signatures need to be submitted to the secretary of state by July 3, 2024. This is equal to 5 percent of votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election. If the secretary of state certifies that enough valid signatures were submitted, the initiative is put on the next general election ballot. On April 2, 2024, the Arizona for Abortion Access campaign announced that it collected at least 506,892 petition signatures, and would continue to collect signatures until election day.[6]
Text of measure
Constitutional changes
- See also: Arizona Constitution
The ballot measure would add Article 2, Section 8.1 to the Arizona Constitution. The following underlined text would be added and struck-through text would be deleted:[1]
Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.
A. Every individual has a fundamental right to abortion, and the state shall not enact, adopt or enforce any law, regulation, policy or practice that does any of the following:
1. Denies, restricts or interferes with that right before fetal viability unless justified by a compelling state interest that is achieved by the least restrictive means.
2. Denies, restricts or interferes with an abortion after fetal viability that, in the good faith judgment of a treating health care professional, is necessary to protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.
3. Penalizes any individual or entity for aiding or assisting a pregnant individual in exercising the individual’s right to abortion as provided in this section.
B. For the purposes of this section:
1. “Compelling state interest” means a law, regulation, policy or practice that meets both of the following:
(a) Is enacted or adopted for the limited purpose of improving or maintaining the health of an individual seeking abortion care, consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and evidence-based medicine.
(b) Does not infringe on that individual’s autonomous decision making.
2. “Fetal viability” means the point in pregnancy when, in the good faith judgment of a treating health care professional and based on the particular facts of the case, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’s sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures.
3. “State” means this state, any agency of this state or any political subdivision of this state. [7]
Support
Arizona for Abortion Access was leading the campaign in support of the initiative.[8]
Supporters
Officials
- Vice Pres. Kamala D. Harris (D)
- Gov. Katie Hobbs (D)
- State Sen. Jacky Rosen (D)
- State Rep. Athena Salman (D)
- Tucson Mayor Regina Romero (D)
Political Parties
Organizations
- Indivisible Project
- ACLU of Arizona
- American Association of University Women
- Amnesty International
- Arizona Public Health Association
- Healthcare Rising Arizona
- Human Rights Campaign
- League of Women Voters of Arizona
- Living United for Change Arizona
- National Council of Jewish Women Arizona
- Open Society Foundation
- Opportunity Arizona
- Our Voice Our Vote
- Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona
- Reproductive Freedom For All
- The Fairness Project
- Think Big America
- VetsForward
- YWCA Southern Arizona
Arguments
Opposition
It Goes to Far was leading the campaign opposing the initiative.[9]
Opponents
Organizations
- Arizona Catholic Conference Bishops
- Arizona Right to Life
- Moms for America
- Priests for Life
- Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising
- Secular Pro-Life
- Students for Life Action
- Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America
Arguments
Campaign finance
The Arizona for Abortion Access PAC is registered to support the ballot measure.[10]
The It Goes Too Far PAC is registered to oppose the ballot measure.[10]
| Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support | $33,637,450.09 | $2,403,829.90 | $36,041,279.99 | $33,637,045.95 | $36,040,875.85 |
| Oppose | $1,296,998.82 | $60,981.85 | $1,357,980.67 | $1,133,749.41 | $1,194,731.26 |
| Total | $34,934,448.91 | $2,464,811.75 | $37,399,260.66 | $34,770,795.36 | $37,235,607.11 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.[10]
| Committees in support of Proposition 139 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
| Arizona for Abortion Access | $33,637,450.09 | $2,403,829.90 | $36,041,279.99 | $33,637,045.95 | $36,040,875.85 |
| Total | $33,637,450.09 | $2,403,829.90 | $36,041,279.99 | $33,637,045.95 | $36,040,875.85 |
Opposition
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in opposition to the initiative.[10]
| Committees in opposition to Proposition 139 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
| It Goes Too Far | $1,296,998.82 | $60,981.85 | $1,357,980.67 | $1,133,749.41 | $1,194,731.26 |
| Total | $1,296,998.82 | $60,981.85 | $1,357,980.67 | $1,133,749.41 | $1,194,731.26 |
Polls
- See also: 2024 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Arizona Right to Abortion Initiative (2024) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBS News/YouGov | 5/10/24-5/16/24 | 1510 LV | ± 3.3% | 65% | 21% | 14% |
| Question: "In the election were held today, and there was an amendment on the ballot to establish the constitutional right to an abortion in Arizona, would you vote:" | ||||||
| Noble Predictive Insights | 5/7/24-5/14/24 | 1003 RV | ± 3.09% | 41% | 41% | 18% |
| Question: "In 2024, there may be a ballot measure that establishes the fundamental right to an abortion within the point of fetal viability (between 24 and 28 weeks). Would you support or oppose this measure?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Background
Status of abortion in Arizona
On April 9, 2024, the Arizona Supreme Court upheld an 1864 law in a 4-2 ruling prohibiting abortion in most circumstances except to save the life of the mother. The law, enacted before Arizona was a state, ordered prosecution for "a person who provides, supplies or administers to a pregnant woman, or procures such woman to take any medicine, drugs or substance, or uses or employs any instrument or other means whatever, with intent thereby to procure the miscarriage of such woman, unless it is necessary to save her life.”[2] The legislature never repealed the law, and the Court ruled it became enforceable following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. The Arizona Supreme Court stayed enforcement of the abortion ban for 14 days to allow legal challenges to the ruling.
On April 24, 2024, the Arizona House of Representatives passed House Bill 2677 by 32-29, which would repeal the 1864 abortion ban. Twenty nine (29) Democrats and 3 Republicans voted for the repeal, and 28 Republicans voted against the repeal.[3] The Arizona State Senate voted 16-14 to pass the repeal on May 1, 2024. In Arizona, a repeal can only take effect 90 days after the adjournment of the state legislature.[4] On May 13, the Arizona Supreme Court granted a motion to stay the enforcement of the 1864 law until August 12, 2024.[5]
U.S. Supreme Court rulings on abortion
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022)
In 2018, Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a clinic and abortion facility in Mississippi, challenged the constitutionality of the "Gestational Age Act" in federal court. The newly-enacted law prohibited abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy except in cases of medical emergencies or fetal abnormalities. The U.S. district court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, holding that the law was unconstitutional, and put a permanent stop to the law's enforcement. On appeal, the 5th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. Click here to learn more about the case's background. On May 17, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear the case.[11]
On June 24, 2022, in a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court of the United States found there was no constitutional right to abortion and overruled Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). In a 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Mississippi's abortion law at issue in the case. Roe v. Wade found that state laws criminalizing abortion prior to fetal viability violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the essential holding of Roe v. Wade but rejected the trimester framework established in the case. The high court affirmed that states could not ban abortions before fetal viability.
Roe v. Wade (1973)
In 1973, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its ruling in Roe v. Wade, finding that state laws criminalizing abortion prior to fetal viability violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The high court held that states can regulate and/or prohibit abortions (except those to preserve the life or health of the mother) once a fetus reaches the point of viability. Roe v. Wade defined fetal viability as "the interim point at which the fetus becomes 'viable,' that is, potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid." The high court further noted that "viability is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."[12]
The ruling established a strict trimester framework to guide state abortion policies. States, according to this framework, were prohibited from banning or regulating abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. During the second trimester, states were permitted to regulate abortion to protect the mother's health. During the third trimester, states were allowed to ban abortion, except in cases where an abortion is needed to preserve the life or health of the mother.[12]
Abortion regulations by state
As of January 7, 2026, 41 states restricted abortions after a certain point in pregnancy.[13] The remaining nine states and Washington, D.C., did not. Of the 41 states with established thresholds for restrictions on abortion:
- Thirteen states restrict abortion after conception
- Four states restrict abortion at six weeks post-fertilization
- Two states restrict abortion at 12 weeks post-fertilization
- Zero states restrict abortion at 15 weeks post-fertilization
- One state restricts abortion at 18 weeks since the last menstrual period
- Three states restrict abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization or 22 weeks after the last menstrual period
- Four states restrict abortion at 24 weeks since the last menstrual period
- Thirteen states restrict abortion at fetal viability
- One state restricts abortion in the third trimester
The maps and table below give more details on state laws restricting abortion based on the stage of pregnancy. Hover over the footnotes in the table for information on legislation pending legal challenges or otherwise not yet in effect.
Some of the terms that are used to describe states' thresholds for abortion restriction include the following:
- Conception: This threshold prohibits all abortions after conception, although some states provide exceptions if the woman's life or health is threatened.[14]
- Fetal heartbeat: This threshold restricts abortions after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which may begin six weeks after the last menstrual period.[15][16]
- Fetal viability: In Roe v. Wade, SCOTUS defined fetal viability. The Supreme Court further noted that "viability is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."[17]
- Last menstrual period: This threshold marks the beginning of a pregnancy from the first day of a woman's last menstrual period.[15]
- Post-fertilization: Thresholds using post-fertilization mark the beginning of pregnancy at the time of conception, which can occur up to 24 hours following intercourse. A threshold of 20 weeks post-fertilization is equivalent to 22 weeks since last menstrual period.[18]
- Post-implantation: Thresholds using post-implantation mark the beginning of pregnancy at the date on which a fertilized egg adheres to the lining of the uterus, roughly five days after fertilization. A threshold of 24 weeks post-implantation is equivalent to 27 weeks since last menstrual period.[18]
Abortion restriction threshold maps
Abortion restrictions by state
| State abortion restrictions based on stage of pregnancy | ||
|---|---|---|
| State | Does the state restrict abortion after a specific point in pregnancy? | Threshold for restriction |
| Alabama | Yes | Conception |
| Alaska | No | None |
| Arizona | Yes | Fetal viability[19][20] |
| Arkansas | Yes | Conception |
| California | Yes | Fetal viability |
| Colorado | No | None |
| Connecticut | Yes | Fetal viability |
| Delaware | Yes | Fetal viability |
| Florida | Yes | Six weeks post-fertilization |
| Georgia | Yes | Six weeks post-fertilization |
| Hawaii | Yes | Fetal viability |
| Idaho[21] | Yes | Conception |
| Illinois | Yes | Fetal viability |
| Indiana | Yes | Conception |
| Iowa | Yes | Six weeks post-fertilization |
| Kansas | Yes | 20 weeks since last menstrual period |
| Kentucky | Yes | Conception |
| Louisiana | Yes | Conception |
| Maine | Yes | Fetal viability |
| Maryland | No | None |
| Massachusetts | Yes | 24 weeks post-fertilization |
| Michigan | No | None |
| Minnesota | No | None |
| Mississippi | Yes | Conception |
| Missouri | Yes | Fetal viability[22][23] |
| Montana | Yes | Fetal viability |
| Nebraska | Yes | 12 weeks post-fertilization |
| Nevada | Yes | 24 weeks post-fertilization |
| New Hampshire | Yes | 24 weeks since last menstrual period |
| New Jersey | No | None |
| New Mexico | No | None |
| New York | Yes | Fetal viability |
| North Carolina | Yes | 12 weeks post-fertilization |
| North Dakota | Yes | Conception[24][25] |
| Ohio | Yes | 20 weeks post-fertilization[26] |
| Oklahoma | Yes | Conception |
| Oregon | No | None |
| Pennsylvania | Yes | 24 weeks since last menstrual period |
| Rhode Island | Yes | Fetal viability |
| South Carolina | Yes | Six weeks post-fertilization |
| South Dakota | Yes | Conception |
| Tennessee | Yes | Conception |
| Texas | Yes | Conception |
| Utah | Yes | 18 weeks since last menstrual period |
| Vermont | No | None |
| Virginia | Yes | Third trimester since last menstrual period |
| Washington | Yes | Fetal viability |
| Washington, D.C. | No | None |
| West Virginia | Yes | Conception |
| Wisconsin | Yes | 20 weeks post-fertilization |
| Wyoming | Yes | Fetal viability[27] |
| Sources:Guttmacher Institute, "State Policies on Later Abortions," accessed August 16, 2024; CNA, "TRACKER: Check the status of abortion trigger laws across the U.S.," accessed August 16, 2024; The Fuller Project, "How major abortion laws compare, state by state," accessed August 16, 2024 | ||
History of abortion ballot measures
- See also: History of abortion ballot measures
In 2022, there were six ballot measures addressing abortion — the most on record for a single year. Measures were approved in California, Michigan, and Vermont. Measures were defeated in Kansas, Kentucky, and Montana.
From 1970 to November 2022, there were 53 abortion-related ballot measures, and 43 (81%) of these had the support of organizations that described themselves as pro-life. Voters approved 11 (26%) and rejected 32 (74%) of these 43 ballot measures. The other 10 abortion-related ballot measures had the support of organizations that described themselves as pro-choice or pro-reproductive rights. Voters approved seven (70%) and rejected three (30%).
Before Roe v. Wade in 1973, three abortion-related measures were on the ballot in Michigan, North Dakota, and Washington, and each was designed to allow abortion in its respective state.
The following graph shows the number of abortion-related ballot measures per year since 1970:
Constitutional rights
The topic constitutional rights addresses ballot measures that establish a state constitutional right to abortion. Campaigns that support these measures often describe themselves as pro-choice or pro-reproductive rights.
Constitutional interpretation
The topic constitutional interpretation addresses ballot measures designed to provide that state constitutions cannot be interpreted to establish a state constitutional right to abortion. These types of amendments are designed to address previous and future state court rulings on abortion that have prevented or could prevent legislatures from passing certain abortion laws. Campaigns that support these measures often describe themselves as pro-life.
| State | Year | Measure | Yes | No | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas | 2022 | No State Constitutional Right to Abortion and Legislative Power to Regulate Abortion Amendment | 41.03% | 58.97% |  |
| Kentucky | 2022 | No State Constitutional Right to Abortion Amendment | 47.65% | 52.35% | |
| Louisiana | 2020 | Amendment 1: No Right to Abortion in Constitution Amendment | 62.06% | 37.94% |  |
| Alabama | 2018 | Amendment 2: State Abortion Policy Amendment | 59.01% | 40.99% | |
| West Virginia | 2018 | Amendment 1: No Right to Abortion in Constitution Measure | 51.73% | 48.27% | |
| Tennessee | 2014 | Amendment 1: No State Constitutional Right to Abortion and Legislative Power to Regulate Abortion Amendment | 52.60% | 47.40% | |
| Florida | 2012 | Amendment 6: State Constitution Interpretation and Prohibit Public Funds for Abortions Amendment | 44.90% | 55.10% | |
| Massachusetts | 1986 | Question 1: No State Constitutional Right to Abortion and Legislative Power to Regulate Abortion Amendment | 41.83% | 58.17% | |
Path to the ballot
Process in Arizona
In Arizona, the number of signatures required to qualify an initiated constitutional amendment for the ballot is equal to 15 percent of votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election. Petitions can be circulated for up to 24 months. Signature petitions must be submitted four months prior to the election at which the measure is to appear.
The requirements to get initiated constitutional amendments certified for the 2024 ballot:
- Signatures: 383,923 valid signatures were required.
- Deadline: The deadline to submit signatures was July 3, 2024.
If the secretary of state certifies that enough valid signatures were submitted, the initiative is put on the next general election ballot. The secretary of state verifies the signatures through a random sampling of 5 percent of submitted signatures working in collaboration with county recorders. If the random sampling indicates that valid signatures equal to between 95 percent and 105 percent of the required number were submitted, a full check of all signatures is required. If the random sampling shows fewer signatures, the petition fails. If the random sampling shows more, the initiative is certified for the ballot.
Stages of this ballot initiative
- On September 12, 2023, the Arizona for Abortion Access organization filed this ballot initiative with the secretary of state's office.
- On September 21, 2023, Arizona for Abortion Access announced it was launching its signature drive.[29]
- Arizona for Abortion Access said it gathered 506,892 petition signatures on April 2, 2024.[6]
See also
|
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Arizona Secretary of State, "Arizona for Abortion Access Amendment," accessed August 8, 2023
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Associated Press, "What to know about abortion in Arizona under the near-total 1864 ban," April 10, 2024
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 AZLeg, "Bill History for HB2677," accessed April 25, 2024
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Washington Post, "Arizona Senate votes to repeal 1864 abortion ban. What it means, and what’s next," May 1, 2024
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 The Guardian, "Arizona supreme court delays enforcement of 1864 abortion ban," May 14, 2024
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 NBC News, "Arizona abortion rights amendment backers says they've gathered signatures needed for 2024 ballot," April 2, 2024
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source.
- ↑ Arizona for Abortion Access, "Homepage," accessed January 10, 2023
- ↑ It Goes Too Far, "Homepage," accessed January 10, 2023
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 See the Money AZ, "Ballot Measures," accessed April 12, 2024
- ↑ SCOTUSblog, "Court to weigh in on Mississippi abortion ban intended to challenge Roe v. Wade," May 17, 2021
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Cornell University Law School, "Roe v. Wade," accessed April 27, 2017
- ↑ Note: Exceptions to these thresholds are generally provided when pregnancy threatens the mother's life or health.
- ↑ The Fuller Project, "How major abortion laws compare, state by state," accessed December 4, 2022
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Kaiser Family Foundation, "States with Gestational Limits for Abortion," August 1, 2020
- ↑ Guttmacher Institute, "State Bans on Abortion Throughout Pregnancy," September 1, 2021
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, Roe v. Wade, January 22, 1973
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Guttmacher Institute, "The Implications of Defining When a Woman Is Pregnant," May 9, 2005
- ↑ Voters approved Proposition 139 on November 5, 2024, amending the state constitution to provide for the fundamental right to abortion, among other provisions. The amendment was set to go into effect once Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) certified the election results following the November 25, 2024, canvass deadline.
- ↑ Axios, "When Arizona's new abortion measure will take effect," November 7, 2024
- ↑ In a 6-3 decision in Moyle v. United States (consolidated with Idaho v. United States), the U.S. Supreme Court on June 27, 2024, reinstated a U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho ruling that temporarily blocked the state of Idaho from enforcing the part of a 2022 law that barred abortion in case of certain medical emergencies.
- ↑ Voters approved Amendment 3, which provided for a right to abortion in the state constitution. The amendment was set to take effect 30 days after the election.
- ↑ Missouri Independent, "Missouri voters approve Amendment 3, overturn state’s abortion ban," November 5, 2024
- ↑ On November 21, 2025, the North Dakota Supreme Court ruled that SB 2150, a law prohibiting most abortions, was constitutional. While only two of the five justices believed the law was constitutional, it would have taken four justices to overturn the law.
- ↑ North Dakota Monitor, "North Dakota abortion ban deemed constitutional in split opinion from state Supreme Court," November 21, 2025
- ↑ Ohio voters approved Issue 1 in 2023, allowing the state to restrict abortion only after fetal viability. However, the state's previous restrictions on abortion—such as SB 127, which banned abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization—remained on the books. As of August 2024, courts had not weighed in on the interaction between Issue 1 and the older laws.
- ↑ The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled on January 7, 2026, that two 2023 laws that placed restrictions on abortion and abortion pills violated the Wyoming Constitution
- ↑ Note: Florida Amendment 4 needed to receive a 60% vote to be approved.
- ↑ KJZZ, "Arizona for Abortion Access seeks 600,000 signatures to put issue on the 2024 ballot," accessed September 21, 2023
 |
State of Arizona Phoenix (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
