Florida Water and Land Conservation Initiative, Amendment 1 (2014)
- 1 Text of measure
- 2 Fiscal note
- 3 Background
- 4 Support
- 5 Opposition
- 6 Media editorial positions
- 7 Polls
- 8 Path to the ballot
- 9 See also
- 10 External links
- 11 References
The Florida Water and Land Conservation Initiative, Amendment 1 is on the November 4, 2014 ballot in the state of Florida as an initiated constitutional amendment. The measure, upon voter approval, would dedicate 33 percent of net revenues from the existing excise tax on documents to the Land Acquisition Trust Fund.
The Land Acquisition Trust Fund would be expended to acquire and improve conservation easements, wildlife management areas, wetlands, forests, fish and wildlife habitats, beaches and shores, recreational trails and parks, urban open space, rural landscapes, working farms and ranches, historical and geological sites, lands protecting water and drinking water resources and lands in the Everglades Agricultural Areas and the Everglades Protection Area. The fund is designed to manage and restore natural systems and to enhance public access and recreational use of conservation lands.
The leading organization campaigning for the initiative is Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc.
For a referred amendment to win in Florida, it must win a supermajority vote of 60 percent of those voting on the question, according to Section 5 of Article XI. This change was made via Amendment 3 in 2006.
Text of measure
The official title reads as follows:
|“||Water and Land Conservation - Dedicates funds to acquire and restore Florida conservation and recreation lands||”|
The official ballot summary reads as follows:
|“||Funds the Land Acquisition Trust Fund to acquire, restore, improve, and manage conservation lands including wetlands and forests; fish and wildlife habitat; lands protecting water resources and drinking water sources, including the Everglades, and the water quality of rivers, lakes, and streams; beaches and shores; outdoor recreational lands; working farms and ranches; and historic or geologic sites, by dedicating 33 percent of net revenues from the existing excise tax on documents for 20 years.||”|
- See also: Article X, Florida Constitution
|SECTION 28. Land Acquisition Trust Fund. --
|“|| WATER AND LAND CONSERVATION – DEDICATES FUNDS TO ACQUIRE AND RESTORE FLORIDA CONSERVATION AND RECREATION LANDS, #12-04
This amendment does not increase or decrease state revenues. The state revenue restricted to the purposes specified in the amendment is estimated to be $648 million in Fiscal Year 2015-16 and grows to $1.268 billion by the twentieth year. Whether this results in any additional state expenditures depends upon future legislative actions and cannot be determined. Similarly, the impact on local government revenues, if any, cannot be determined. No additional local government costs are expected. 
The Land Trust Acquisition Fund (LATF) was created by the Florida Legislature in 1963. The LATF was designed to fund the Outdoor Recreation and Conservation Program, which would primarily purchase land for parks and recreation areas. Originally, the legislature allocated revenue from a five percent tax on outdoor clothing and equipment, including bathing suits. In 1968, the legislature abandoned the tax and funded the LATF through the sale of recreation bonds. These bonds were paid for by a documentary stamp tax on real estate transactions and financial documents. Since 2009, however, appropriations for the fund have been slashed. The initiative is an attempt to provide a new revenue source for the LATF.
The measure is sponsored by the organization Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc.
- See also: A full list of supporters
- 1000 Friends of Florida
- Alachua Conservation Trust
- Audubon Florida
- The Conservation Fund
- The Conservancy of Southwest Florida
- Conservation Trust for Florida
- Defenders of Wildlife
- Everglades Foundation
- Florida Conservation Coalition
- Florida Wildlife Federation
- Green Party of Florida
- The Nature Conservancy
- Rails to Trails Conservancy
- Sierra Club
- Trust for Public Land
- Alliance of Florida Land Trusts
- American Planning Association, Florida Chapter
- Amphibian and Reptile Conservancy
- Apalachicola Riverkeeper
- Caloosahatchee River Citizens Association (Riverwatch)
- Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast
- Democratic Environmental Caucus of Florida
- Democratic Women’s Club of Florida
- Destination Orlando
- East Coast Greenway Alliance
- Emerald Coastkeeper
- Federation of Garden Clubs
- Florida Consumer Action Network
- Florida Native Plant Society
- Florida Outdoor Recreation Coalition
- Florida Society for Ethical Ecotourism
- Florida Trail Association
- Florida Trust for Historic Preservation
- IDEAS (Intellectual Decisions on Environmental Awareness Solutions)
- Indian Riverkeeper
- League of Women Voters of Florida
- League of Conservation Voters
- National Wildlife Federation
- North American Butterfly Association
- North American Native Fishes Association
- Paddle Florida
- Progress Florida
- Reef Relief
- Save the Manatee Club
- Sea Turtle Conservancy
- South Florida Wildlands Association
- St. Johns River Alliance
- St. Johns Riverkeeper
- Surfrider Foundation
- Tampa Bay Conservancy
- Tampa Bay Watch
- Urban Environment League of Greater Miami
- Brasington's Adventure Outfitters
- Collany Properties
- Live Oak Production Group
- Pinewood Properties, Inc.
- Plum Creek
- Allison DeFoor (R), former environmental advisor to Gov. Jeb Bush
- Edward Osborne "E. O." Wilson, academic sociobiologist and conservationist
A Florida Water and Land Legacy video featuring biologist Jim Stevenson.
Allison DeFoor (R), former vice chair of the Republican Party of Florida and former environmental advisor to Gov. Jeb Bush (R), called on conservatives to support the amendment. He said:
|“||I support Amendment 1 because, without raising new taxes, it will enhance sources of drinking water, manage fish and wildlife habitats, add and restore lands, protect beaches and shores and maintain state and local parks...
Supporting Amendment 1 falls squarely in line with my belief that conservation is all about conservative values and ideas. Conservation is, by definition conservative. Republicans have a long tradition of it, nationally and in Florida. Teddy Roosevelt, Richard Nixon, George H.W. Bush were leaders. In Florida, Gov. Bob Martinez created Preservation 2000. Gov. Jeb Bush created a similar effort, Florida Forever. In Jacksonville, Mayor John Delaney led the way in local conservation, creating a legacy that will continue for generations. All Republicans, like me...
Conservatives believe that government spending should be directed first toward the limited number of things that only government can do well. Securing a clean water supply and the conservation of lands falls in the wheelhouse of this definition.
Conservatives also believe that, whenever possible, government funding for these essential functions should not rely on higher taxes to get there.
Finally, conservatives believe that public spending should be tied to measurable returns on investment. In the case of Amendment 1, if clean water and preserved lands for future generations isn’t enough, consider the impact of these assets on Florida’s No. 1 economy: tourism. Fundamentally, only Hawaii and Alaska have their economy and environments as deeply tied together as we do in Florida.
On top of that, it’s important to remember that every segment of Florida’s economy depends on the natural beauty that draws people and businesses to our state. Without pristine waters and unspoiled landscapes, Florida will lose the special appeal that has fueled our growth and prosperity.
Amendment 1 fulfills these principles: It ensures that our state dedicates adequate dollars into the most essential of public goods — protecting our waters and conserving our lands; it “lives within our means” by ensuring that taxes aren’t raised to do so; and it provides an earnest return on investment for generations to come...
If the people of Florida approve Amendment 1, we will together have secured our common interest in the most clear and direct way. And to this old Florida cracker, there’s nothing as conservative as that. 
—Allison DeFoor, 
A Florida Water and Land Legacy video titled "There's only one Everglades."
Other arguments in favor of the amendment include:
- Will Abberger, the campaign chairperson for Florida’s Water and Land Legacy, said, “Having a source of clean drinking water, ensuring that the quality of our rivers, lakes and streams is good, and protecting our beaches, is something that is important enough that it shouldn’t be subject to whatever political winds are blowing in Tallahassee.”
- Sen. David Simmons (R-10) encouraged the Citrus Club and the NAIOP, commercial real-estate associations, to back Amendment 1. He said that Amendment 1’s fund is a good way to fix water issues, rather than by restricting development. He said, “Nitrates are seeping into the aquifer and migrating. The theory that dilution is the solution to pollution isn't working. We don't want to be drinking out of the toilet, and that's what we're doing right now. We want to be drinking pristine, pure water… It behooves you to resolve this.”
- Rae Ann Wessel, director of Natural Resource Policy at the Sanibel Captiva Conservation Foundation, noted, “These are the things that make projects like preservation, conservation, and restoration pay for themselves, not in an obvious way sometimes, but it feeds the economy of Florida which is predominately underwritten by tourism.”
As of September 17, 2014, Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc. has received $3,844,448 in contributions.
|PAC||Amount raised||Amount spent|
|Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc.||$3,844,448||$2,829,950|
Top 5 contributors:
|The Trust for Public Land||$458,157|
|Gladys G. Cofrin||$406,000|
|Paul Tudor Jones II||$250,000|
|Florida Wildlife Federation||$212,870|
|Jape Holley Taylor||$200,000|
- Senate President Don Gaetz (R-1)
- House Speaker Will Weatherford (R-38)
- Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam (R)
- Florida Chamber of Commerce
- Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam (R) stated, “I've certainly demonstrated my support for buying easements and accomplishing water and wildlife benefits from the use of acquisition programs. But I'm troubled by writing into the constitution elements of the budget.”
- David Hart, the executive vice president of the Florida Chamber of Commerce, argued, “What our board historically has been concerned about is that we don’t follow the path of California, where so many mandates have been put in their constitution that their legislature is incapable of balancing the budget anymore.”
- Bernard E. "Barney" Smith, the board chair of the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, said the documentary tax, which would fund the conservation fund, is currently utilized for "transportation and housing trust funds — funds that have proven to consistently stimulate Florida’s economy and create jobs." Therefore, the conservation fund would hurt other programs that currently utilize revenues from the documentary tax.
Media editorial positions
- Bradenton Herald said, "Voters will have to wrestle control of land acquisition and conservation away from politicians to put Florida back on the road to preserving land that will safeguard water, wildlife and vegetation. That opportunity exists today… Once a national leader in land conservation, Florida lost its way. Clean water and thriving ecosystems are vital to the state's quality of life and economic prosperity. Future generations will benefit from today's sound investments in public land."
- The Gainesville Sun said, “But is Florida still an immature society? With a population approaching 20 million, haven't we matured to the point that we ought to be about the business of preserving great swaths of unique Florida landscapes — beaches, wetlands, forests, lakes and rivers — for the benefit of our children and their children?… That's why it'll be up to the voters next year to impose some level of adult supervision over the Legislature's future use and abuse of Documentary Stamp funds.”
- Ocala Star Banner said, "Lawmakers who say that spending choices should be left in their hands fail to acknowledge their failure to protect Florida's environment. The Florida Forever program had funded conservation purchases, but the Legislature has slashed its funding more than 97 percent since 2009… Now that voters from across the state have helped put the Water and Land Legacy initiative on the ballot, more of us must help it get the 60 percent support needed for passage."
- The Tampa Tribune said, “There are no longer guarantees that Florida's environment will be adequately safeguarded, and that should concern all residents, as well as business leaders, who know Florida's natural beauty underpins its appeal. This is why voters need to enthusiastically back Florida's Water and Land Legacy Campaign — a drive to place a proposed amendment to Florida's constitution on the November 2014 ballot."
- See also: Polls, 2014 ballot measures
|Florida Amendment 1 (2014)|
|Poll||Support||Oppose||Undecided||Margin of Error||Sample Size|
|Florida Chamber Political Institute|
|Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to|
Path to the ballot
The initiative’s supporters needed to collect a minimum of 683,149 valid signatures by February 1, 2014, in order to qualify the measure for the November 2014 ballot. Proponents turned in 709,976 valid signatures to the Department of State.
The measure was certified for the ballot on January 17, 2014.
- Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc.
- Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc. Facebook
- Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc. Twitter
- Florida Secretary of State, "Water and Land Conservation," accessed January 15, 2014
- Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc, "Homepage," accessed June 30, 2014
- Florida Secretary of State, "Constitutional Petition Form," accessed January 20, 2014
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- Florida Office of Economic & Demographic Research, "Financial Impact Statement," accessed January 20, 2014
- Florida Department of Environmental Protection, “Land Acquisition Programs”, accessed January 15, 2014
- Bradenton Herald, "Time for Florida voters to protect natural resources with Water and Land Conservation Amendment," August 28, 2013
- Orlando Sentinel, "Embrace water-quality amendment, Simmons tells real-estate brokers," August 28, 2014
- The Gainesville Sun, "Signatures are needed to put Florida Water and Land Conservation Amendment on the November 214 ballot," September 15, 2013
- The Gainesville Sun, "Alachua County among leaders in getting conservation initiative on ballot," January 18, 2014
- Florida's Water and Land Legacy, Inc., "Endorsements & Supporters," accessed June 11, 2014
- The Florida Current, "Former Bush advisor becomes chairman of group backing conservation lands amendment," February 13, 2014
- Vote Yes on 1 Facebook, "E.O. Wilson declares his support for Amendment 1! ," May 16, 2014
- Miami Herald, "Why conservatives should support Amendment 1 ," June 4, 2014
- Tallahassee Democrat, "Gaetz: Amendment would shift too much land to state control," January 26, 2014
- Island Reporter, "Florida amendment to secure conservation funds makes it to 2014 ballot," January 27, 2014
- Florida Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance," accessed July 8, 2014
- The Gainesville Sun, "Voters should have chance to invest in state’s natural legacy," December 1, 2013
- Ryan Byrne, “E-Mail with Edie Ousley, Vice President of Public Affairs, Florida Chamber of Commerce,” July 24, 2014
- The Florida Times-Union, "Saturday's Lead Letter: Amendment 1 is misguided," May 16, 2014
- Ocala Star Banner, "Editorial: It matters to all Floridians," January 24, 2014
- The Tampa Tribune, "Up to voters to protect Florida's treasures," August 19, 2013
State of Florida
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Chief Financial Officer | Commissioner of Education | Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services | Commissioner of Insurance Regulation | Secretary of Environmental Protection | Director of Economic Opportunity | Chair of Public Service Commission |