Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
Colorado Proposition KK, Excise Tax on Firearms Dealers, Manufacturers, and Ammunition Vendors Measure (2024)
Colorado Proposition KK | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 5, 2024 | |
Topic Taxes and Firearms | |
Status![]() | |
Type State statute | Origin State legislature |
Colorado Proposition KK, the Excise Tax on Firearms Dealers, Manufacturers, and Ammunition Vendors Measure, was on the ballot in Colorado as a legislatively referred state statute on November 5, 2024. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported levying a 6.5% excise tax on the manufacture and sale of firearms and ammunition to be imposed on firearms dealers, manufacturers, and ammunition vendors and appropriating the revenue to the Firearms and Ammunition Excise Tax Cash Fund to be used to fund crime victim services programs, mental and behavioral health programs for children and veterans, and school security and safety programs. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a 6.5% excise tax on the manufacture and sale of firearms and ammunition to be imposed on firearms dealers, manufacturers, and ammunition vendors. |
Election results
Colorado Proposition KK |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
1,675,123 | 54.37% | |||
No | 1,406,112 | 45.63% |
Overview
What did Colorado Proposition KK do?
- See also: Text of measure
The measure enacted a 6.5% excise tax on the sale of firearms and ammunition to be levied on firearms manufacturers, dealers, retailers, and ammunition vendors. The tax was set to take effect beginning on April 1, 2025, and was expected to generate approximately $39 million in state tax revenue per year. A firearms dealer, manufacturer, or ammunition vendor is not subject to the excise tax if the business's sales of firearms or ammunition are less than $20,000 per year. Sales to peace officers, law enforcement agencies, and active duty military were designed to be exempt from the excise tax.[1][2]
The tax was expected to generate $9.0 million in 2024-25, $35.8 million in 2025-26, and $36.9 million in 2026-27. Revenue from the tax was designed to be appropriated to the Firearms and Ammunition Excise Tax Cash Fund and distributed each year as follows:[2]
- $30 million to the Colorado Crime Victim Services Fund for crime victim services grants;
- $5 million to the Behavioral and Mental Health Cash Fund for veterans' mental health services;
- $3 million to the Behavioral and Mental Health Cash Fund for children's behavioral health crisis response services; and
- $1 million to the School Disbursement Program Cash Fund, subject to annual appropriation by the state legislature.
What did supporters and opponents say about the measure?
- See also: Support and Opposition
State Rep. Monica Duran (D-23), who sponsored the bill in the House, said the bill is intended to raise state revenue and not to discourage gun ownership, “It’s not removing anything. It’s not impacting anyone’s Second Amendment rights whatsoever. This is really looking at keeping those services available that families, parents and kids need,” she said.[3]
The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) opposed the measure, saying, "Firearms and ammunition are already subject to an 11% federal excise tax through the Pittman-Robertson Act, along with a variety of other state and local taxes and fees. California is the only other state to enact similar legislation. This tax should be seen as nothing more than an attack on the Second Amendment and those who exercise their rights under it."[3]
Why was this measure on the ballot?
- See also: Path to the ballot and Background
This measure required voter approval under TABOR since it would increase state revenue. TABOR limits the amount of money the state of Colorado can take in and spend. It limits the annual increase for some state revenue to inflation plus the percentage change in state population. Any money collected above this limit is refunded to taxpayers unless the voters allow the state to spend it.
The bill was passed in the Senate along partisan lines with all 12 Republicans voting against. Of Senate Democrats, 18 voted in favor, three voted against, and two were absent. In the House, Republicans were split with six in favor and 10 opposed while all but one Democrat voted in favor.
Since 1992, when TABOR was adopted, through 2023, Colorado voters have decided on 38 statewide ballot measures that were designed to increase revenue for the state, which required voter approval under TABOR. Of the 38 measures, 12 (31.58%) were approved and 26 (68.42%) were defeated. To read about the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, click here.
Do other states have a similar tax?
California became the first state to levy an additional excise tax on the sale of firearms and ammunition after Assembly Bill 28 took effect in July 2024. . The legislation made California the first state in the U.S. to enact a separate excise tax on the sale of firearms and ammunition aside from the state's 6% sales tax. The sales of firearms and ammunition are also subject to a federal excise tax of 10% for pistols and revolvers or 11% for other types of firearms and ammunition. Revenue from California's excise tax was expected to generate $160 million per year and was set to be used to fund violence prevention programs and school safety and infrastructure projects.[4]
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for the measure was as follows:
“ | SHALL STATE TAXES BE INCREASED BY $39,000,000 ANNUALLY TO FUND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, INCLUDING FOR MILITARY VETERANS AND AT-RISK YOUTH, SCHOOL SAFETY AND GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION, AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND OTHER VIOLENT CRIMES BY AUTHORIZING A TAX ON GUN DEALERS, GUN MANUFACTURERS, AND AMMUNITION VENDORS AT THE RATE OF 6.5% OF THE NET TAXABLE SALES FROM THE RETAIL SALE OF ANY GUN, GUN PRECURSOR PART, OR AMMUNITION, WITH THE STATE KEEPING AND SPENDING ALL OF THE NEW TAX REVENUE AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE?[5] | ” |
Full text
The full text of the measure can be read below.
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.
The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 39, and the FRE is -27. The word count for the ballot title is 89.
Support
Colorado Supports Crime Victim Services led the Yes on Prop KK campaign. The organization provided a full list of endorsements on its website, which is available here.[6]
Supporters
Officials
- Gov. Jared Polis (D)
- State Sen. Janet Buckner (D)
- State Sen. Chris Hansen (D)
- State Rep. Monica Duran (D)
- State Rep. Meg Froelich (D)
- State Rep. Emily Sirota (D)
Political Parties
Unions
Organizations
- Bell Policy Center
- Caring for Colorado
- Colorado Nurses Association
- Everytown for Gun Safety
- League of Women Voters of Colorado
- Mental Health Colorado
- Moms Demand Action
- Mothers Against Drunk Driving
- Violence Free Colorado
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Organizations
Arguments
Media editorials
- See also: 2024 ballot measure media endorsements
Support
Opposition
Campaign finance
Ballotpedia has not located any committees registered to support the initiative.
Stop Tax Increases registered as a political action committee (PAC) to oppose the initiative. The committee had not yet reported campaign finance activity.[7]
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Methodology
To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.
Background
California excise tax on firearms and ammunition
California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) signed Assembly Bill 28 into law on September 26, 2023. The legislation made California the first state in the U.S. to enact a separate excise tax on the sale of firearms and ammunition aside from the state's 6% sales tax. The sales of firearms and ammunition are also subject to a federal excise tax of 10% for pistols and revolvers or 11% for other types of firearms and ammunition. Revenue from the excise tax was expected to generate $160 million per year and was set to be used to fund violence prevention programs and school safety and infrastructure projects.[8]
Federal excise tax on firearms and ammunition
The sale of firearms and ammunition are subject to a federal excise tax, known as the Firearms and Ammunition Excise Tax (FAET), of 10% for pistols and revolvers or 11% for other types of firearms and ammunition. The tax was first imposed in 1919. It is imposed when an importer sells or uses the firearms or ammunition and is not imposed again unless the firearms or ammunition are further manufactured.[9]
Colorado Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR)
Note: This list includes measures that were required to be referred to the ballot for voter approval under TABOR. The list does not include every ballot measure that may have had a potential effect on TABOR refund amounts.
This measure requires voter approval under TABOR since it would increase state revenue. Because actual revenues generated by Proposition EE exceeded the estimated revenues set out in Proposition EE as approved by voters in 2020, voter approval was required to allow the state to retain the revenue above the estimated revenue.
TABOR limits the amount of money the state of Colorado can take in and spend. It limits the annual increase for some state revenue to inflation plus the percentage change in state population. Any money collected above this limit is refunded to taxpayers unless the voters allow the state to spend it.
Since 1992, when TABOR was adopted, through 2023, Colorado voters decided on 38 statewide ballot measures that were designed to increase revenue for the state, which required voter approval under TABOR. Of the 38 measures, 12 (31.58%) were approved and 26 (68.42%) were defeated.
Of the 38 measures, 19 were referred to the ballot by the state legislature and 19 were placed on the ballot through citizen initiative petitions.
- Of the 19 referred measures, 11 (57.89%) were approved and eight (42.10%) were defeated.
- Of the 19 citizen-initiated measures, one (5.26%) was approved and 18 (94.74%) were defeated.
To read about the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, click here.
The following is a list of firearms-related measures that have been proposed for the ballot but have not been certified pending signature drives or final legislative votes.
There are no remaining potential firearms-related ballot measures for 2024.
Path to the ballot
In Colorado, a legislatively referred state statute must be passed by a simple majority vote in each chamber of the state legislature. Legislatively referred measures do not need to be signed by the governor. Due to the Colorado TABOR, statewide voter approval is required to enact any legislation to increase government revenue at a faster rate than the combined rate of population increase and inflation.
The measure was introduced as House Bill 24-1349 on February 28, 2024. The measure was passed in the House on April 20, 2024, in a vote of 44-18 with three representatives absent. The measure was passed in the House along partisan lines with 44 Democrats voting in favor and one Democrat voting against and 17 Republicans voting against. The Senate passed the measure with amendments on May 8 by a vote of 18-15 and the House concurred with the Senate's amendments on the same day in a vote of 49-11.[1]
|
|
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Colorado
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Colorado.
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Colorado State Legislature, "House Bill 1349," accessed April 23, 2024
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Colorado State Legislature, "House Bill 1349 fiscal statement," accessed May 29, 2024
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 CPR, "Gun purchases would be taxed an extra 11% under a proposal at the Colorado statehouse," accessed May 29, 2024
- ↑ California Governor Gavin Newsom, "Governor Newsom Strengthens California’s Nation-Leading Gun Safety Laws," accessed May 29, 2024
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Yes on Prop KK, "Home," accessed September 24, 2024
- ↑ Colorado TRACER, "Stop Tax Increases," accessed September 3, 2024
- ↑ California Governor Gavin Newsom, "Governor Newsom Strengthens California’s Nation-Leading Gun Safety Laws," accessed May 29, 2024
- ↑ ATF, "Firearms - Guides - Importation & Verification of Firearms, Ammunition and Implements of War - Firearms and Ammunition Excise Tax (FAET)," accessed May 29, 2024
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Mail-in Ballots FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ LexisNexis, "Colorado Revised Statutes, § 1-7-101," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Voter Registration FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Colorado Voter Registration Form," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Go Vote Colorado," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Acceptable Forms of Identification," accessed August 6, 2025
![]() |
State of Colorado Denver (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |