Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Massachusetts Limit on Required Lot Size for Single-Family Homes Initiative (2026)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Massachusetts Limit on Required Lot Size for Single-Family Homes Initiative

Flag of Massachusetts.png

Election date

November 3, 2026

Topic
Land use and development policy
Status

Certified to the legislature

Type
Indirect initiated state statute
Origin

Citizens



The Massachusetts Limit on Required Lot Size for Single-Family Homes Initiative may be on the ballot in Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute on November 3, 2026.

Overview

What would this ballot measure do?

See also: Measure design

The ballot initiative would require cities and towns to allow single-family homes on residentially zoned lots that meet minimum standards of at least 5,000 square feet in area, at least 50 feet of frontage on a street or public way, and access to public sewer and water services.[1]

According to Massachusetts' Comprehensive Housing Plan for 2025-2029, "Much of Massachusetts is covered by zoning districts that are quite simple: single family homes with a minimum lot area of one-half to two acres."[2] In effect, the initiative would preempt local zoning rules that require lots for single-family homes to be larger than 5,000 square feet, which is about 0.12 acres, as long as the other conditions are met.

Measure design

The measure would prohibit any law or zoning ordinance from restricting single-family residences in a residential zoning district. It would also prohibit any law from requiring a special permit or approval to use land for single-family residences in a residential zoning district. The measure only applies to residential zoning lots that measure at least 5,000 square feet in area, at least 50 feet of frontage on a street or public way, and that have access to public sewer and water services.[1]

The measure would allow the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities to issue guidelines and policies, including dimensional setbacks, limits on building size and height, and restrictions on short-term rentals.[1]

Text of measure

Full text

The full text of the ballot measure is below:[1]

Support

LegalizeStarterHomes.png

Legalize Starter Homes is leading the campaign in support of the initiative.[3]

Supporters

  • Jesse Kanson-Benanav, Executive Director of Abundant Housing Massachusetts[4]
  • Harvard economics professor Ed Glaeser[4]
  • Greg Reibman, president and CEO of the Charles River Chamber[4]

Arguments

  • Pioneer Institute senior housing fellow Andrew Mikula: "Massachusetts is in the throes of a harrowing housing shortage that has raised prices and contributed to a lot of outmigration, especially among young people who are trying to form families for the first time. By allowing homes to be built on smaller lots, academic research shows that facilitates the construction of smaller, lower-cost homes and also more homes."
  • Legalize Starter Homes: "This ballot question was carefully written based on existing state law, evidence from other states that this reform works, and compelling academic studies that large minimum lot size requirements in Massachusetts make homes more expensive and scarce. If this ballot question is successful, it would be nothing less than a far-reaching expansion of opportunity for a new generation of homeowners to thrive in Massachusetts."


Opposition

Opponents

Ballotpedia has not located arguments in support of the ballot measure. You can share arguments, along with source links for this information, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arguments

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org.


Background

Land prices in Massachusetts

According to Zippia, as of 2023, land in Massachusetts cost more than land in any state in the country except Rhode Island.[5] When considering only farm land, the World Population Review ranks Massachusetts as the third most expensive state for the price of land per acre, as of 2025.[6]

Most policy advocates agree that Massachusetts land and housing is expensive, with the state "[facing] a housing affordability crisis, with costs soaring amid limited supply."[4] But the Common Wealth Beacon states that housing advocates disagree on how to solve the housing affordability crisis, with some stating that removing barriers to building more housing is the solution and others stating that rent control policies are better designed to solve the issue.[4]

MBTA communities law (2021)

In 2021, the Massachusetts General Court passed the MBTA (Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority) communities law, also known as section 3A of the Zoning Act. The law created a zoning policy that encourages middle housing in neighborhoods served by public transit. The Massachusetts state government's website on the law explained that the law was designed to solve the Massachusetts housing crisis.[7]

The law requires that MBTA communities have "at least one zoning district of reasonable size in which multi-family housing is permitted" without special permits or permission.[7] MBTA communities are defined as a community that hosts MBTA service, is adjacent to a community that hosts MBTA service, or has been added to the MBTA system.[7] In total, there are 177 communities in Massachusetts that are subject to the MBTA communities law. Click here to see a list of communities subject to the communities law.


Path to the ballot

Process in Massachusetts

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Massachusetts

An indirect initiated state statute is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends state statute. There are nine (9) states that allow citizens to initiate indirect state statutes.

While a direct initiative is placed on the ballot once supporters file the required number of valid signatures, an indirect initiative is first presented to the state legislature. Legislators have a certain number of days, depending on the state, to adopt the initiative into law. Should legislators take no action or reject the initiative, the initiative is put on the ballot for voters to decide.

In Massachusetts, the number of signatures required for an indirect initiated state statute is equal to 3% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. Massachusetts also has a distribution requirement that requires no more than 25% of the certified signatures on any petition can come from a single county.

The state Legislature has until the first Wednesday of May in the election year to pass the statute. If the legislature does not pass the proposed statute, proponents must collect a second round of signatures equal to 0.5% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. The Legislature also has the power to place an alternative measure alongside the proposed statute via a simple majority vote of the state legislature.

A simple majority vote is required for voter approval. However, the number of affirmative votes cast for the measure must be greater than 30% of the votes cast in the election.

The requirements to get an initiated state statute certified for the 2026 ballot:

Stages of this initiative

The following is the timeline of the initiative:[8]

  • August 5, 2025: The Massachusetts Attorney General announced that the initiative had been filed.
  • September 3, 2025: The Massachusetts Attorney General announced that the initiative had been cleared and that supporters could begin gathering signatures for the initiative.
  • November 19, 2025: Legalize Starter Homes, the campaign in support of the measure, announced they had collected more than 100,000 signatures in support of the measure.[9]
  • January 5, 2026: The state Elections Division announced that it had certified 89,216 valid signatures in support of the initiative. As such, it was certified to go before the state legislature in the 2026 legislative session.[10]

External links

See also

Footnotes