Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

P. Scott Neville

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
P. Scott Neville
Image of P. Scott Neville
Illinois Supreme Court 1st District
Tenure

2018 - Present

Term ends

2030

Years in position

7

Prior offices
Cook County Circuit Court

Illinois 1st District Appellate Court

Compensation

Base salary

$284,948

Elections and appointments
Last elected

November 3, 2020

Appointed

May 17, 2018

Education

Bachelor's

Culver Stockton College

Law

University of Washington School of Law

Contact

P. Scott Neville (Democratic Party) is a judge for the 1st District of the Illinois Supreme Court. He assumed office on June 15, 2018. His current term ends on December 2, 2030.

Neville (Democratic Party) ran for re-election for the 1st District judge of the Illinois Supreme Court. He won in the general election on November 3, 2020.

Neville first became a member of the court by appointment. He was appointed to the position on May 17, 2018, by the Illinois Supreme Court to replace Justice Charles Freeman, who retired on June 14, 2018.[1] As of December 2020, Neville was one of three judges on the court appointed by the sitting supreme court justices. To read more about judicial selection in Illinois, click here.

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country. As part of this study, we assigned each justice a Confidence Score describing our confidence in the degree of partisanship exhibited by the justices' past partisan behavior, before they joined the court.[2] Neville received a confidence score of Strong Democrat.[3] Click here to read more about this study.

Neville previously served as a judge on the Illinois First District Appellate Court from 2004 to 2018.[4]

Biography

Neville received his undergraduate degree from Culver Stockton College and his J.D. from the Washington University School of Law.[5]

Neville began his legal career as a clerk for Appellate Judge Glenn T. Johnson. Neville was a principal at Neville & Ward, then founded P. Scott Neville, Jr. & Associates, which later merged with Howse, Howse, Neville & Gray. Neville taught at the University of Chicago Law School's Intensive Trial Practice Workshop. In 1999, he was appointed to the Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court. He won election to remain on the court in 2000. Neville was then appointed to the Illinois First District Appellate Court in 2004 and elected to remain on the bench in 2012. The Illinois Supreme Court appointed him to the court in 2018, and he was elected to remain on the court in 2020.[4]

Neville previously served as president of the Cook County Bar Association and as chair of the Illinois Judicial Council. He also co-founded the Alliance of Bar Associations.[4]

Elections

2020

See also: Illinois Supreme Court elections, 2020

General election

General election for Illinois Supreme Court 1st District

Incumbent P. Scott Neville defeated Richard Mayers in the general election for Illinois Supreme Court 1st District on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of P. Scott Neville
P. Scott Neville (D)
 
100.0
 
1,765,329
Richard Mayers (Independent) (Write-in)
 
0.0
 
31

Total votes: 1,765,360
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Illinois Supreme Court 1st District

The following candidates ran in the Democratic primary for Illinois Supreme Court 1st District on March 17, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of P. Scott Neville
P. Scott Neville
 
26.2
 
214,066
Image of Jesse G. Reyes
Jesse G. Reyes
 
20.3
 
165,344
Image of Sheldon Harris
Sheldon Harris
 
15.1
 
123,166
Image of Cynthia Cobbs
Cynthia Cobbs Candidate Connection
 
12.7
 
103,497
Image of Margaret Stanton McBride
Margaret Stanton McBride
 
12.4
 
101,475
Image of Daniel Epstein
Daniel Epstein Candidate Connection
 
8.2
 
66,762
Image of Nathaniel R. Howse
Nathaniel R. Howse
 
5.1
 
41,205
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.0
 
22

Total votes: 815,537
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

2018

The Illinois Supreme Court appointed Neville to the court on May 17, 2018.[1]

2012

See also: Illinois judicial elections, 2012

Neville was elected without opposition to remain on the First District Appellate Court on November 6, 2012. He won the Democratic primary, receiving 44% of the vote.[6]

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

P. Scott Neville did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

Analysis

Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship (2020)

See also: Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship and Ballotpedia Courts: Determiners and Dissenters

Last updated: June 15, 2020

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country as of June 15, 2020.

The study presented Confidence Scores that represented our confidence in each justice's degree of partisan affiliation. This was not a measure of where a justice fell on an ideological spectrum, but rather a measure of how much confidence we had that a justice was or had been affiliated with a political party. The scores were based on seven factors, including but not limited to party registration.[7]

The five resulting categories of Confidence Scores were:

  • Strong Democrat
  • Mild Democrat
  • Indeterminate[8]
  • Mild Republican
  • Strong Republican

This justice's Confidence Score, as well as the factors contributing to that score, is presented below. The information below was current as of June 2020.

Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship (2020)

P. Scott
Neville

Illinois

  • Partisan Confidence Score:
    Strong Democrat
  • Judicial Selection Method:
    Elected
  • Key Factors:
    • Was a registered Democrat
    • Donated over $2,000 to Democratic candidates
    • Received donations from Democrat-affiliated individuals or organizations


Partisan Profile

Details:

Neville was a registered Democrat. He donated $123,101 to Democratic candidates and organizations. Neville received donations from groups that regularly funded Democratic candidates. He was first appointed to the court by the Illinois Supreme Court when the court had a Democratic majority. Neville received an endorsement from the Cook County Democratic Party.



State supreme court judicial selection in llinois

See also: Judicial selection in Illinois


The seven justices of the Illinois Supreme Court are chosen by popular vote in partisan elections and serve 10-year terms, after which they must compete in uncontested, nonpartisan retention elections to remain on the court.[9]

Supreme court justices in Illinois are elected to represent specific districts. The seven justices are divided among five districts (three allocated to Cook County and the others divided evenly among the other four districts) and are voted into office by the residents of their respective regions.[9]

Qualifications

To serve on the supreme court, a judge must be:

  • a U.S. citizen;
  • a district resident; and
  • licensed to practice law in Illinois.[9]

Chief justice

The chief justice of the supreme court is chosen by peer vote to serve a three-year term.[9]

Vacancies

See also: How vacancies are filled in state supreme courts

In the event of a midterm vacancy, the Illinois Supreme Court is responsible for appointing an interim justice. If a justice is appointed more than 60 days before the next primary election, the justice must run in a partisan election in the next general or judicial election to remain on the court. The appointed justice's term will end on the first Monday in December after their election. If a justice is appointed less than 60 days before the next primary election, the justice will have to run in a partisan election to remain on the court in the second general election. The appointed justice's term will end on the first Monday in December after their election[9]

The map below highlights how vacancies are filled in state supreme courts across the country.


See also

Illinois Judicial Selection More Courts
Seal of Illinois.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
BP logo.png
Courts in Illinois
Illinois Appellate Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Elections: 202520242023202220212020201920182017
Gubernatorial appointments
Judicial selection in Illinois
Federal courts
State courts
Local courts

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 The State Journal-Register, "Justice Charles Freeman announces retirement from Illinois Supreme Court," May 17, 2018
  2. We calculated confidence scores by collecting several data points such as party registration, donations, and previous political campaigns.
  3. The five possible confidence scores were: Strong Democrat, Mild Democrat, Indeterminate, Mild Republican, and Strong Republican.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Illinois Courts, "P. Scott Neville, Jr.," accessed July 7, 2021
  5. [https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/1/22/21076081/p-scott-neville-jr-illinois-supreme-court-democratic-candidate-2020-primary-election The Chicago Sun-Times, "Candidate profile P. Scott Neville, J," accessed July 7, 2021]
  6. Illinois State Board of Elections, "Election Results, 2012, Judicial," accessed July 7, 2021
  7. The seven factors were party registration, donations made to partisan candidates, donations made to political parties, donations received from political parties or bodies with clear political affiliation, participation in political campaigns, the partisanship of the body responsible for appointing the justice, and state trifecta status when the justice joined the court.
  8. An Indeterminate score indicates that there is either not enough information about the justice’s partisan affiliations or that our research found conflicting partisan affiliations.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 National Center for State Courts, "Methods of Judicial Selection," accessed September 8, 2021