Pandemic Response Accountability Committee

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Administrative State-5 Circles-dark text-straight with header-edited.png
Scroll here for more articles
Documenting America's Path.png
Newsletters
Documenting America's Path to Recovery
Weekly Updates
Ballotpedia's polling on the coronavirus pandemic
Changes to elections
Elections • Changes to absentee/mail-in voting procedures • Changes to candidate filing procedures • Changes to political party events • Election postponements • Ballot measure changes
Government responses
Vaccine distribution plans • Travel restrictions • Federal responses • School responses • Mask requirements • State budgets • State responses • State executive orders • Stay-at-home order status • States with stay-at-home orders • States without stay-at-home orders •  Eviction and foreclosure policies • Enacted state legislation • State legislative session changes • School closures • State court closures • Inmate releases • School budget changes • Halloween guidelines
Debate over responses to coronavirus
Elections • Protests • Religious service restrictions • School closures • State lockdowns • Testing • Debates by state
Related coronavirus coverage
Terms and definitions • Officials and candidates affected by coronavirus • Analysis articles • Pandemic effects on candidate filing ratios • Lawsuits • Pandemic Response Accountability Committee • 1918 influenza pandemic • Unemployment filings • Citizen resources • Lost Wages Assistance (LWA) program • State emergency power authority • Municipal emergency power authority • Changes to state emergency power authority •Multistate agreements • Non-governmental responses
Responses to coronavirus by state
This article is a sprout; we plan on making it grow in the future. If you would like to help it grow, please consider donating to Ballotpedia.


See also: Appointment and removal power (administrative state)

Section 15010 of the CARES Act established a Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC) within the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE). According to the act, the PRAC is supposed "to promote transparency and ... prevent and detect fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement; and mitigate major risks that cut across program and agency boundaries."[1] This page covers the organization and responsibilities of the PRAC.

Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency

The Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) is an independent entity within the executive branch created by the Inspector General Reform Act of 2008. Council members include all inspectors general empowered by sections of the Inspector General Act of 1978, those appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and those appointed by agency heads.[2]

PRAC organization

The CARES Act required the chairperson of CIGIE to select the chairperson of PRAC from among inspectors general with experience managing oversight of large organizations and large amounts of spending.[1]

  • On April 7, President Trump removed Glenn Fine from his role as acting Pentagon inspector general. Fine remained at the U.S. Department of Defense, but he was no longer a member of PRAC.[3]
  • On March 30, Michael Horowitz, chair of CIGIE and inspector general for the United States Department of Justice appointed Glenn Fine, the acting inspector general for the Pentagon, to lead PRAC.[4]

The act called for an executive director and deputy executive director of PRAC. The act gave the chair of CIGIE 30 days from the time President Trump signed the act to appoint the executive director. The chair of CIGIE must consult the majority leader of the U.S. Senate, the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, the minority leader of the Senate, and the minority leader of the House of Representatives when making the appointment. A similar appointment process applied to the deputy executive director of PRAC except that the chair of CIGIE must consult with the executive director of PRAC and had 90 days to find a candidate. According to the act, those who would take either of the PRAC leadership roles must have:[1]

  • A demonstrated ability in accounting, auditing, and financial analysis
  • Experience managing oversight of large organizations and expenditures
  • A full-time job working for PRAC

The act set the compensation for the executive director and deputy executive director of PRAC at level IV of the executive schedule, which was $155,500 as of March 2020.[1][5]

PRAC membership

The following officials were members of the PRAC as of April 8, 2020:[1][4][6][3]

PRAC responsibilities

The Administrative State Project
The Administrative State Project Badge.png
Five Pillars of the Administrative State
• Nondelegation
• Judicial deference
• Executive control
• Procedural rights
• Agency dynamics
Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia

The CARES Act established the following purpose for PRAC:[1]

“ The Committee shall conduct and coordinate oversight of covered funds and the Coronavirus response and support Inspectors General in the oversight of covered funds and the Coronavirus response in order to—
(i) detect and prevent fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement; and
(ii) identify major risks that cut across programs and agency boundaries.[7]
 ”

The act outlined the following functions for the committee:[1]

“ (i) developing a strategic plan to ensure coordinated, efficient, and effective comprehensive oversight by the Committee and Inspectors General over all aspects of covered funds and the Coronavirus response;


(ii) auditing or reviewing covered funds, including a comprehensive audit and review of charges made to Federal contracts pursuant to authorities provided in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, to determine whether wasteful spending, poor contract or grant management, or other abuses are occurring and referring matters the Committee considers appropriate for investigation to the Inspector General for the agency that disbursed the covered funds, including conducting randomized audits to identify fraud;

(iii) reviewing whether the reporting of contracts and grants using covered funds meets applicable standards and specifies the purpose of the contract or grant and measures of performance;

(iv) reviewing the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration of, and the detection of fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement in, Coronavirus response programs and operations;

(v) reviewing whether competition requirements applicable to contracts and grants using covered funds have been satisfied;

(vi) serving as a liaison to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Secretary of the Treasury, and other officials responsible for implementing the Coronavirus response;

(vii) reviewing whether there are sufficient qualified acquisition, grant, and other applicable personnel overseeing covered funds and the Coronavirus response;

(viii) reviewing whether personnel whose duties involve the Coronavirus response or acquisitions or grants made with covered funds or are otherwise related to the Coronavirus response receive adequate training, technology support, and other resources;

(ix) reviewing whether there are appropriate mechanisms for interagency collaboration relating to the oversight of covered funds and the Coronavirus response, including coordinating and collaborating to the extent practicable with State and local government entities;

(x) expeditiously reporting to the Attorney General any instance in which the Committee has reasonable grounds to believe there has been a violation of Federal criminal law; and

(xi) coordinating and supporting Inspectors General on matters related to oversight of covered funds and the Coronavirus response.[7]

”

The act also requires PRAC to create a user-friendly, public website within 30 days "to foster greater accountability and transparency in the use of covered funds and the Coronavirus response."[1]

See also

Footnotes

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Congress.gov, "Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act," accessed March 30, 2020
  2. ↑ Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, "CIGIE Governing Documents," accessed March 31, 2020
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 POLITICO, "Trump removes independent watchdog for coronavirus funds, upending oversight panel," April 7, 2020
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 POLITICO, "Pentagon watchdog tapped to lead committee overseeing $2 trillion coronavirus package," March 30, 2020
  5. ↑ FederalPay.org, "Executive & Senior Level Pay Tables," accessed March 31, 2020
  6. ↑ U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General, "Additional IG Designated as Members of CIGIE’s Pandemic Response Accountability Committee," April 1, 2020
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
v • e
The Administrative State Project
MainThe Administrative State Project Badge.png
Reporting
Laws
Administrative Procedure Act • Antiquities Act • Civil Service Reform Act • Clayton Antitrust Act • Communications Act of 1934 • Congressional Review Act • Electronic Freedom of Information Act • Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 • Federal Housekeeping Statute • Federal Reserve Act • Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 • Freedom of Information Act • Government in the Sunshine Act • Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 • Information Quality Act • Interstate Commerce Act • National Labor Relations Act • Paperwork Reduction Act • Pendleton Act • Privacy Act of 1974 • Regulatory Flexibility Act • REINS Act • REINS Act (Wisconsin) • Securities Act of 1933 • Securities Exchange Act of 1934 • Sherman Antitrust Act • Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act • Truth in Regulating Act • Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Cases
Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner • A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States • Association of Data Processing Service Organizations v. Camp • Auer v. Robbins • Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council • Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe • Federal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of California • Field v. Clark • Food and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation • Humphrey's Executor v. United States • Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Chadha • J.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United States • Lucia v. SEC • Marshall v. Barlow's • Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency • Mistretta v. United States • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius • National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning Company • National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. • Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation • Skidmore v. Swift & Co. • United States v. Lopez • United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. • Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board • Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council • Wayman v. Southard • Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service • Whitman v. American Trucking Associations • Wickard v. Filburn • Wiener v. United States
Terms
Adjudication (administrative state) • Administrative judge • Administrative law • Administrative law judge • Administrative state • Arbitrary-or-capricious test • Auer deference • Barrier to entry • Bootleggers and Baptists • Chevron deference (doctrine) • Civil servant • Civil service • Code of Federal Regulations • Codify (administrative state) • Comment period • Compliance costs • Congressional Record • Coordination (administrative state) • Deference (administrative state) • Direct and indirect costs (administrative state) • Enabling statute • Ex parte communication (administrative state) • Executive agency • Federal law • Federal Register • Federalism • Final rule • Formal rulemaking • Formalism (law) • Functionalism (law) • Guidance (administrative state) • Hybrid rulemaking • Incorporation by reference • Independent federal agency • Informal rulemaking • Joint resolution of disapproval (administrative state) • Major rule • Negotiated rulemaking • Nondelegation doctrine • OIRA prompt letter • Organic statute • Pragmatism (law) • Precautionary principle • Promulgate • Proposed rule • Publication rulemaking • Regulatory budget • Regulatory capture • Regulatory dark matter • Regulatory impact analysis • Regulatory policy officer • Regulatory reform officer • Regulatory review • Rent seeking • Retrospective regulatory review • Risk assessment (administrative state) • Rulemaking • Separation of powers • Significant regulatory action • Skidmore deference • Statutory authority • Substantive law and procedural law • Sue and settle • Sunset provision • Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions • United States Code • United States Statutes at Large
Bibliography
Agencies
v • e
Ballotpedia
About
Editorial
Tech
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Pandemic_Response_Accountability_Committee&oldid=8219300"