Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
South Dakota Constitutional Amendment L, 60% Vote Requirement for Constitutional Amendments Measure (2026)
South Dakota Constitutional Amendment L | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Ballot measure process and Ballot measure supermajority requirements |
|
Status On the ballot |
|
Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
South Dakota Constitutional Amendment L, the 60% Vote Requirement for Constitutional Amendments Measure, is on the ballot in South Dakota as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2026.[1]
A "yes" vote supports requiring a 60% majority by voters to approve constitutional amendments. |
A "no" vote opposes raising the vote threshold, maintaining a simple majority vote requirement for approving constitutional amendments. |
Overview
What would this amendment change about the ballot measure process in South Dakota?
- See also: Text of measure
This amendment would require a 60% supermajority vote to approve a constitutional amendment. This would apply to both initiated and referred constitutional amendments. Currently, constitutional amendments in South Dakota require a simple majority (more than 50%) of votes to be approved.[1]
Do other states have supermajority requirements for constitutional amendments?
Currently, 11 states require more than a simple majority to pass constitutional amendments. Three states require a supermajority to pass a constitutional amendment: New Hampshire requires two-thirds (~66.67%), Florida requires 60%, and Colorado requires 55%. In Hawaii, Minnesota, and Wyoming, approval of a constitutional amendment requires a majority of all ballots cast in the election, not just votes on the amendment, so leaving the question blank has the effect of a 'No' vote. Another five states use different requirements, such as combining a simple majority vote on the amendment with a minimum level of voter turnout or the number of ballots cast. 38 states require a simple majority to approve constitutional amendments.
Have South Dakotans voted on supermajority requirements for ballot measures before?
South Dakota voters previously decided on two amendments that would have created supermajority requirements—Amendment C in 2022, and Amendment X in 2018. Both amendments were rejected by voters.
- Amendment C: Rejected in 2022 by 67%-33%, would have required 60% vote to approve ballot measures increasing taxes or fees. It also would have required the state to appropriate $10 million or more in the first five fiscal years.
- Amendment X: Rejected in 2018 by 54%-46%, would have increased the threshold of voter approval required to enact a constitutional amendment to 55% of those voting on the amendment.
Text of measure
Constitutional changes
- See also: South Dakota Constitution
The ballot measure would amend Section 3 of Article XXIII of the South Dakota Constitution. The following underlined text would be added and struck-through text would be deleted:[1]
Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.
AnyA constitutional amendment or revision must be submitted to the voters and shall become becomes a part of the Constitution only when if approved by a majority of the votes cast thereon an affirmative vote of sixty percent of the votes cast on the question. The Legislature may provide for the withdrawal by its sponsors of an initiated amendment, by its sponsors, at any time prior to its submission to the voters.
[2]
Support
Supporters
Officials
- State Sen. John Carley (R)
- State Sen. Tamara Grove (R)
- State Sen. Kevin Jensen (R)
- State Sen. Jim Mehlhaff (R)
- State Sen. Ernie Otten Jr. (R)
- State Sen. Carl Perry (R)
- State Sen. Sue Peterson (R)
- State Sen. Tom Pischke (R)
- State Rep. Aaron Aylward (R)
- State Rep. Spencer Gosch (R)
- State Rep. Leslie J. Heinemann (R)
- State Rep. John Hughes (R)
- State Rep. Travis Ismay (R)
- State Rep. Dylan Jordan (R)
- State Rep. Terri Jorgenson (R)
- State Rep. Tina Mulally (R)
- State Rep. Brian Mulder (R)
- State Rep. Kathy Rice (R)
- State Rep. Brandei Schaefbauer (R)
- State Rep. John Sjaarda (R)
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Organizations
Arguments
Campaign finance
Ballotpedia did not identify ballot measure committees registered to support or oppose the ballot measure.[3]
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Background
Amendment C (June 2022)
In June 2022, South Dakota voters rejected Constitutional Amendment C, which would have required a three-fifths (60%) supermajority vote for the approval of ballot measures that would increase taxes or fees or that would require the state to appropriate $10 million or more in the first five fiscal years. The requirement would have applied to constitutional amendments and state statutes that are placed on the ballot through citizen initiative or that are referred to the ballot by the state legislature. As of 2021, ballot measures in South Dakota required a simple majority vote (50%+1) to be adopted. Amendment C was placed on the ballot by the South Dakota State Legislature.
The amendment was rejected by 67.43%-32.57%.
Amendment X (2018)
In November 2018, South Dakota voters rejected Constitutional Amendment X, which would have increased the threshold of voter approval required to enact a constitutional amendment to 55% of those voting on the amendment. Amendment X was placed on the ballot by the South Dakota State Legislature.
The amendment was rejected by 54.32%-45.68%.
Supermajority requirements for constitutional amendments
- See also: Supermajority requirement
Voters decide on constitutional amendments in 49 of 50 states. Legislatures are required to seek voter approval to amend their state constitutions. Delaware is the one state where voter approval is not required for state constitutional amendments.
As of 2025, 11 states required a supermajority vote or other election vote threshold for constitutional amendments:
- New Hampshire had the highest vote requirement at two-thirds (66.67%).
- Florida had the second-highest vote requirement at 60%.
- In Colorado, a 55% vote of voters was required to amend the state constitution.
- In Hawaii, Minnesota, and Wyoming, a majority of the total ballots cast in an election was required, meaning a blank vote has the same effect as a 'no' vote in these three states.
- The other five states—Illinois, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, and Tennessee—had other requirements, such as requiring a simple majority vote on the ballot measure itself and a certain percentage of voter turnout or ballots cast.
The following map shows the election vote threshold requirements for state constitutional amendments:
Ballotpedia tracked 26 ballot measures related to supermajority requirements between 1912 and 2024. Twelve measures were approved, and 14 measures were defeated.
State | Year | Measure | Type | Description | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | 2024 | Proposition 5 | LRCA | Decrease the vote threshold from two-thirds to 55% for local bond measures to fund housing projects and public infrastructure | ![]() |
Ohio | 2023 | Issue 1 | LRCA | Increase to 60% for constitutional amendments | ![]() |
Arizona | 2022 | Proposition 132 | LRCA | Increase to 60% for tax increase-related measures | ![]() |
Arkansas | 2022 | Issue 2 | LRCA | Increase to 60% for constitutional amendments and citizen-initiated measures | ![]() |
South Dakota | 2022 | Amendment C | LRCA | Increase to 60% for constitutional amendments and citizen-initiated measures | ![]() |
South Dakota | 2018 | Amendment X | LRCA | Increase to 60% for tax increase-related and certain appropriations-related measures | ![]() |
Colorado | 2016 | Amendment 71 | CICA | Increase to 55% for constitutional amendments | ![]() |
Arizona | 2008 | Proposition 105 | CICA | Change from a simple majority vote to a majority of registered voters for a tax-related initiative | ![]() |
Washington | 2007 | HJR 4204 | LRCA | Decrease from 60% to a simple majority for voters to approve school district property tax measures | ![]() |
Florida | 2006 | Amendment 3 | LRCA | Increase to 60% for constitutional amendments | ![]() |
Arizona | 2000 | Proposition 102 | LRCA | Increase to 66.67% for hunting-related measures | ![]() |
Oregon | 1998 | Measure 63 | CICA | Require that a measure proposing a supermajority vote be passed by the same vote threshold | ![]() |
Oregon | 1996 | Measure 46 | CICA | Change from a simple majority vote to a majority of registered voters for a tax-related measure | ![]() |
Utah | 1998 | Proposition 5 | LRCA | Increase to 66.67% for hunting-related measures | ![]() |
Idaho | 1980 | SJR 112 | LRCA | Change from majority of total votes cast for governor to a simple majority vote on an initiative | ![]() |
Oklahoma | 1974 | State Question 495 | LRCA | Change from majority of total ballots cast to a simple majority vote on an initiative | ![]() |
Oklahoma | 1974 | State Question 496 | LRCA | Change from majority of total ballots cast to a simple majority vote on a constitutional amendment | ![]() |
Washington | 1972 | SJR 5 | LRCA | Require 60% for ballot measures to establish lotteries | ![]() |
Idaho | 1934 | HJR 7 | LRCA | Change from majority of total votes cast for governor to a simple majority vote on an initiative | ![]() |
Oregon | 1933 | Measure Nos. 308-309 | LRCA | Require a two-thirds vote of electors for municipal corporations to issue bonds | ![]() |
Nebraska | 1920 | Amendment 39 | CCR | Change from a majority of total ballots cast to a simple majority vote on a constitutional amendment, provided that 35% of those who vote in the election vote on the amendment | ![]() |
Arizona | 1916 | Measure Nos. 100-101 | LRCA | Change from a simple majority vote on an initiative to a majority of total ballots cast | ![]() |
California | 1915 | Proposition 7 | LRCA | Increase to 66.67% for citizen-initiated bond measures | ![]() |
Ohio | 1912 | Amendment | CRCA | Change from majority of total ballots cast to a simple majority vote on a constitutional amendment | ![]() |
Oregon | 1912 | Measure Nos. 310-311 | LRCA | Change from a simple majority vote on a constitutional amendment to a majority of total ballots cast | ![]() |
Oregon | 1912 | Measure Nos. 322-323 | CICA | Change from a simple majority vote on an initiative to a majority of total ballots cast | ![]() |
Path to the ballot
Amending the South Dakota Constitution
- See also: Amending the South Dakota Constitution
A simple majority vote is required during one legislative session for the South Dakota State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 36 votes in the South Dakota House of Representatives and 18 votes in the South Dakota State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.
House Joint Resolution 5003 (HJR 5003)
The following is the timeline of the constitutional amendment in the state legislature:[4]
- January 14, 2025: South Dakota House State Affairs Committee introduced the constitutional amendment as House Joint Resolution 5003 (HJR 5003).
- January 17, 2025: The House State Affairs Committee passed HJR 5003 by 11-2, advancing the amendment to the full House of Representatives.
- January 22, 2025: The House of Representatives voted 61-5, with three members absent, to approve HJR 5003. To pass the amendment, 36 votes were required. HJR 5003 had the support of 60 Republicans and one Democrat, while five Democrats voted against the amendment. The amendment then advanced to the South Dakota State Senate.
- January 29, 2025: The amendment was referred to the South Dakota Senate State Affairs Committee.
- March 6, 2025: The Senate State Affairs Committee voted 6-1 to pass the amendment, advancing the amendment to the full Senate.
- March 10, 2025. The State Senate voted 29-4, with two members absent, to pass the amendment, to approve HJR 5003. For the Senate to pass the amendment, 18 votes were needed. The amendment had the support of 29 Republicans, while two Democrats and two Republicans voted against the amendment.
Votes Required to Pass: 36 | |||
Yes | No | NV | |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 61 | 5 | 3 |
Total % | 88.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% |
Democratic (D) | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Republican (R) | 60 | 0 | 3 |
Votes Required to Pass: 18 | |||
Yes | No | NV | |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 29 | 4 | 2 |
Total % | 82.8% | 11.4% | 5.7% |
Democratic (D) | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Republican (R) | 29 | 2 | 1 |
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in South Dakota
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in South Dakota.
See also
View other measures certified for the 2026 ballot across the U.S. and in South Dakota.
Explore South Dakota's ballot measure history, including constitutional amendments.
Understand how measures are placed on the ballot and the rules that apply.
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 South Dakota Legislature, "House Joint Resolution 5003 Text," accessed January 24, 2025
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source.
- ↑ South Dakota Campaign Finance Reporting, "Search Committees," accessed March 18, 2025
- ↑ South Dakota Legislature, "House Joint Resolution 5003," accessed January 24, 2025
- ↑ South Dakota Secretary of State, “General Voting Information,” accessed July 23, 2024
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 South Dakota Secretary of State, “Register to Vote, Update Voter Registration or Cancel Voter Registration,” accessed July 23, 2024
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed July 23, 2024
- ↑ 2025 South Dakota Legislature, "HB 1066," accessed April 2, 2025
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 South Dakota Secretary of State, "General Voting Information," accessed July 23, 2024