Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Steven Feldman (North Carolina)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Steven Feldman
Image of Steven Feldman
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 5, 2024

Education

Bachelor's

University of Chicago, 1980

Ph.D

Duke University, 1985

Medical

Duke University, 1985

Contact

Steven Feldman (Libertarian Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent North Carolina's 10th Congressional District. He lost in the general election on November 5, 2024.

Feldman completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Steven Feldman earned a bachelor's degree from the University of Chicago in 1980, an M.D. from Duke University in 1985, and a Ph.D. from Duke University in 1985.[1]

Elections

2024

See also: North Carolina's 10th Congressional District election, 2024

North Carolina's 10th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 Republican primary)

North Carolina's 10th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 Democratic primary)

General election

General election for U.S. House North Carolina District 10

Pat Harrigan defeated Ralph Scott Jr., Steven Feldman, and Todd Helm in the general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 10 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Pat Harrigan
Pat Harrigan (R)
 
57.5
 
233,814
Image of Ralph Scott Jr.
Ralph Scott Jr. (D)
 
38.2
 
155,383
Image of Steven Feldman
Steven Feldman (L) Candidate Connection
 
2.9
 
11,614
Image of Todd Helm
Todd Helm (Constitution Party) Candidate Connection
 
1.4
 
5,884

Total votes: 406,695
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Ralph Scott Jr. advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 10.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 10

Pat Harrigan defeated Grey Mills Jr., Brooke McGowan, Charles Eller, and Diana Jimison in the Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 10 on March 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Pat Harrigan
Pat Harrigan
 
41.2
 
36,028
Image of Grey Mills Jr.
Grey Mills Jr.
 
38.9
 
34,000
Image of Brooke McGowan
Brooke McGowan Candidate Connection
 
10.1
 
8,795
Image of Charles Eller
Charles Eller Candidate Connection
 
6.9
 
6,076
Image of Diana Jimison
Diana Jimison Candidate Connection
 
2.9
 
2,535

Total votes: 87,434
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Libertarian primary election

The Libertarian primary election was canceled. Steven Feldman advanced from the Libertarian primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 10.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Feldman in this election.

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Steven Feldman completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Feldman's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

Steve Feldman is a physician, a medical scientist, and a voice for peace & justice. With his research on health care delivery, he has been rated the #1 expert in the world on dermatology and has worked with physicians in other specialties, insurers, patient advocates, and pharmaceutical company executives (Diane Sawyer interviewed him about his research on Good Morning America).

Feldman’s experiences in medicine have led him to try to see how others perceive things, leading to his book Compartments which had a profound influence on the Presbyterian Church Middle East Study Committee Report, Breaking Down the Walls.

Feldman hopes to bring a fresh perspective to Congress, to help people see their common goals and to work across divides to shrink government, reduce Federal debt, and let people live their lives as they want without hurting others.

Feldman has lived in North Carolina for over 40 years and trained at both Duke and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He and his wife Leora have been married for 40 years. They have two sons, one a sportswriter and the other a graduate student studying statistics.
  • We share many goals but may disagree on how what policies will best achieve those goals. We should work together, compromise, and not denigrate the motivations of others.
  • The massive and growing national debt, increasing under both Democratic and Republican administrations, is a threat to our nation and the future of our children
  • Our military should defend our borders and should not be used to tell other people how to live their lives.
1. Reducing government debt. We need to leave our children a country in better shape, including financially, than we found it.

2. I am passionately anti-war. War is immoral, counterproductive, and costly. We should defeat our enemies by making them our friends.
3. We need to be nice to and respectful of others. People of all political persuasions share similar goals and can work together to achieve them. We have good human beings across the political spectrum. We generally have similar goals, although we may disagree (sometimes passionately) on the best way to achieve those goals. Talmudic wisdom says we don’t see things as they are, we see things as we are; our backgrounds affect how we perceive things. All our politicians want to institute policies that they believe are good for American families. We can work together, recognizing our shared goals. We can carefully and respectfully try to understand and consider the positions of others, learn why they think what they do, compromise with each other when there are disagreements on policies, and try different approaches in different places.
4. The best way to influence others is to be a good role model, not to use government force. People should be free to do what they want as long as it doesn’t hurt others.

5. Medicare and Social Security need to be on solid financial footings.
I look up to Martin Luther King, Jr. He ended the terrible mistreatment of people by being peaceful and reaching out to people's shared values. I think we can all learn from his example.
I remember seeing the aftermath of the Kennedy assassination on a black & white TV in 1963. I was 5 years old at the time.
I had a summer job cleaning in a bakery in high school. I was so proud of getting a biweekly paycheck.
Yes, I think experience is, generally, helpful. Knowing how the system works is helpful. When I finished medical school at Duke, I did internship at the same institution. Knowing how Duke worked helped me and my patients. I'm sure that having experience in government is beneficial.
Our greatest challenge will be getting the Federal debt under control. Without a strong financial basis, every other aspect of Federal government (national defense, paying our oblgations) will be weakened.
I think 2 years is very reasonable especially if that time is used productively. Longer terms have the advantage of giving representatives more time to know each other and work together, but the shorter term is good for holding representatives accountable to the voters.
I don't feel strongly about term limits. On the one hand, I think it is good to have change, but I think it is often best to leave that to the voters.
Absolutely yes. People have similar goals but often disagree (passionately) on the policies that will best achieve those goals. We should not denigrate the motivations of others. Instead, listening carefully and respectfully to why they think what they do will be more productive.

The issue of abortion may be the best example of this. I strongly believe the government should not regulate women’s control of their own bodies, and I know murder is wrong. I respect the beliefs of people who think that a fetus is a baby; I don’t have the certainty that the fetus is a baby or is not a baby. People who want to protect unborn babies do not want to control women’s bodies; they just want to prevent the murder of unborn babies; people who don’t want the government to impose on women’s control of their own bodies don’t want to kill babies; they just want women to have autonomy over their bodies. There’s a conflict between these two views. . Some compromise may be reasonable. Putting pro-Choice and pro-Life advocates in a room together to come up with a reasonable compromise would be my preference. Keeping government out of funding abortions seems a reasonable start to me. Making abortion illegal after a certain period of gestation seems reasonable to me. Having different rules in different states depending on the views of the people in those different places seems reasonable to me. I don’t think there’s any one correct answer to this problem.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Steven Feldman campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024* U.S. House North Carolina District 10Lost general$181,429 $164,167
Grand total$181,429 $164,167
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on January 3, 2024


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
Republican Party (12)
Democratic Party (4)