Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Tennessee governor issues 90-day regulatory freeze (2019)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
New Administrative State Banner.png
Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png
Five Pillars of the Administrative State
•Agency control
• Executive control
• Judicial control
•Legislative control
• Public Control
Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia.
Click here to access Ballotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker.


State governments have taken a variety of actions that impact the administrative state at the state level. These actions may address aspects of the regulatory process—such as rulemaking and regulatory review—or interactions between the administrative state and other branches of state government, including judicial deference.

The following news event demonstrates a noteworthy response to administrative practices made by state governments. Click here to view a full list of noteworthy state approaches to address the administrative state.

Tennessee governor issues 90-day regulatory freeze (2019)

Tennessee Governor Bill Lee (R) issued Executive Order 5 on February 1, 2019, which prevented state executive agencies from filing new regulations with the secretary of state’s office for 90 days.[1]

"As part of our efforts to limit the size of state government, we are taking a close look at the regulations we are imposing on citizens and businesses in Tennessee,” said Lee in a statement. "Our goal is to make Tennessee the most job-friendly state in the country and we are working to promote job creation and a commonsense regulatory approach."[2]

Over the course of the 90-day regulatory freeze, the governor's office stated that the executive branch aimed to "develop a framework to better assess the costs and benefits of imposing a new regulation." Tennessee did not have a cost-benefit analysis framework for administrative regulations in place as of the time of Lee's executive order, according to an analysis by the Tennessee Municipal League.[1][3]

Executive agencies could seek an exemption from the governor to file emergency regulations that impact the health, safety or welfare of Tennessee residents. The order also allowed pending regulations approved under Lee’s predecessor, former Governor Bill Haslam (R), to take effect as scheduled.[1]

Haslam issued a similar regulatory freeze for 45 days in 2011.[1]

Lee described his motivation for issuing the regulatory freeze in a February 5, 2019, interview with the Kingsport Times News. "We just want to make sure that before we pass any more regulations, we evaluate the current ones and that we make certain we have an environment for business that is friendly and not over-regulated," said Lee. "I want to have a clear understanding of the regulatory environment."[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Tennessean, "Gov. Bill Lee issues executive order to temporarily halt new regulations," February 1, 2019
  2. ↑ Times Free Press, "Gov. Bill Lee issues executive order for freeze across Tennessee executive branch departments," February 1, 2019
  3. ↑ Tennessee Municipal League, "Fiscal Notes and Cost Benefit Analysis for State Rules and Regulations," accessed February 1, 2019
  4. ↑ Kingsport Times News, "Lee: 'I want to have a clear understanding of the regulatory environment,'" February 5, 2019
v • e
The Administrative State
MainThe Administrative State Project Badge.png
Pillars
Reporting
Laws
Administrative Procedure Act • Antiquities Act • Civil Service Reform Act • Clayton Antitrust Act • Communications Act of 1934 • Congressional Review Act • Electronic Freedom of Information Act • Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 • Federal Housekeeping Statute • Federal Reserve Act • Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 • Freedom of Information Act • Government in the Sunshine Act • Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 • Information Quality Act • Interstate Commerce Act • National Labor Relations Act • Paperwork Reduction Act • Pendleton Act • Privacy Act of 1974 • Regulatory Flexibility Act • REINS Act • REINS Act (Wisconsin) • Securities Act of 1933 • Securities Exchange Act of 1934 • Sherman Antitrust Act • Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act • Truth in Regulating Act • Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Cases
Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner • A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States • Association of Data Processing Service Organizations v. Camp • Auer v. Robbins • Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council • Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe • Federal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of California • Field v. Clark • Food and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation • Humphrey's Executor v. United States • Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Chadha • J.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United States • Lucia v. SEC • Marshall v. Barlow's • Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency • Mistretta v. United States • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius • National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning Company • National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. • Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation • Skidmore v. Swift & Co. • United States v. Lopez • United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. • Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board • Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council • Wayman v. Southard • Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service • Whitman v. American Trucking Associations • Wickard v. Filburn • Wiener v. United States
Terms
Adjudication (administrative state) • Administrative judge • Administrative law • Administrative law judge • Administrative state • Arbitrary-or-capricious test • Auer deference • Barrier to entry • Bootleggers and Baptists • Chevron deference (doctrine) • Civil servant • Civil service • Code of Federal Regulations • Codify (administrative state) • Comment period • Compliance costs • Congressional Record • Coordination (administrative state) • Deference (administrative state) • Direct and indirect costs (administrative state) • Enabling statute • Ex parte communication (administrative state) • Executive agency • Federal law • Federal Register • Federalism • Final rule • Formal rulemaking • Formalism (law) • Functionalism (law) • Guidance (administrative state) • Hybrid rulemaking • Incorporation by reference • Independent federal agency • Informal rulemaking • Joint resolution of disapproval (administrative state) • Major rule • Negotiated rulemaking • Nondelegation doctrine • OIRA prompt letter • Organic statute • Pragmatism (law) • Precautionary principle • Promulgate • Proposed rule • Publication rulemaking • Regulatory budget • Regulatory capture • Regulatory dark matter • Regulatory impact analysis • Regulatory policy officer • Regulatory reform officer • Regulatory review • Rent seeking • Retrospective regulatory review • Risk assessment (administrative state) • Rulemaking • Separation of powers • Significant regulatory action • Skidmore deference • Statutory authority • Substantive law and procedural law • Sue and settle • Sunset provision • Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions • United States Code • United States Statutes at Large
Bibliography
Agencies
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Tennessee_governor_issues_90-day_regulatory_freeze_(2019)&oldid=10302018"