This Giving Tuesday, help ensure voters have the information they need to make confident, informed decisions. Donate now!
Colorado Supreme Court
| Colorado Supreme Court |
|---|
| Court Information |
| Justices: 7 |
| Founded: 1876 |
| Location: |
| Salary |
| Associates: $221,302[1] |
| Judicial Selection |
| Method: Assisted appointment |
| Term: 10 years |
| Active justices |
| {{{Officeholders}}} |
Founded on August 1, 1876, the Colorado Supreme Court is the state's court of last resort. Decisions made by the supreme court apply to all other courts in the state. When cases are heard in the supreme court, all the court's justices sit en banc, or in a full panel, to hear every case.[2] Funding to operate the court comes from the state's general fund.[3]
Justices
The court is composed of seven justices—six associate justices and one chief justice. Justices serve 10-year terms.[4]
| Judge | Appointed By |
|---|---|
Judicial selection
- See also: Judicial selection in Colorado
In 1966, voters in Colorado passed a constitutional amendment requiring that the state's judges be appointed by the governor. Previously, judges were elected by voters. The state's current system is also known as a merit selection method of judicial selection. Under the process, within 30 days of a vacancy, the Colorado Supreme Court Nominating Commission must meet and consider candidates based upon their applications, recommendations and personal interviews. The commission then compiles a list of 2-3 nominees and submits the list to the governor. The governor appoints one nominee from the list. If the governor does not select a nominee within 15 days, the chief justice of the supreme court must then appoint a nominee from the list.[5]
Qualifications
To be considered for appointment to the court, a candidate must be:
- registered to vote in the state
- licensed to practice law in Colorado (for at least the past five years)
- under the age of 72 when applying for consideration
Chief justice
The chief justice is elected by the other justices on the court. Additionally, the chief justice is the executive head of the state judicial system and is the ex-officio chair of the Colorado Supreme Court Nominating Commission. Other duties include appointing the chief judge to the court of appeals and the district courts. The chief justice may also appoint active or retired judges to serve on the state's courts.[4]
Retention
When first appointed, all judges in the state, including those on the supreme court, serve a provisional term of at least 2 years. In order to continue serving on the court, they must run for retention in the next general election. After their first term and re-election, justices on the supreme court run for retention every 10 years.[6]
Judicial performance
In 1988, the Colorado General Assembly created judicial performance commissions which were to conduct a fair and constructive evaluation of the state's judges. The evaluation information is designed to help voters make informed decisions when voting on whether to retain a judge who runs to remain on the bench.
The Colorado Commission on Judicial Performance created procedures to evaluate all the state's judges, including the justices of the supreme court. The areas for evaluation include:
- integrity
- knowledge and understanding of law, evidence and legal procedures
- communications skills
- preparation, attentiveness and control during judicial proceedings
- sentencing practices
- management of court docket (or schedule)
- case management and disposition
- administrative ability
- punctuality
- effectiveness in working with parties
- service to legal professionals and public[7]
Written profiles and recommendations for retention are provided to voters in the state's "Blue Book" election guide sent to voters before each election. The information is also available on the commission's web site.[7][8]
Jurisdiction
|
Most of the cases that come before the court are appeals of decisions issued by the Colorado Court of Appeals. However, under Article VI of the Colorado Constitution the following types of cases are under the direct jurisdiction of the supreme court:
The court is responsible for licensing and disciplining lawyers in the state. All legal practice rules and procedures, for both civil and criminal cases, are the exclusive responsibility of the court. In addition, the court also oversees the following:
|
Caseloads
|
Elections
2020
- See also: Colorado Supreme Court elections, 2020
The terms of two Colorado Supreme Court justices expired on January 11, 2021. The two seats were up for retention election on November 3, 2020.
2018
- See also: Colorado Supreme Court elections, 2018
Candidates and results
- See also: Colorado Supreme Court elections, 2018
Colorado Supreme Court, Richard Gabriel's seat
Richard Gabriel was retained to the Colorado Supreme Court on November 6, 2018 with 74.3% of the vote.
Retention Vote |
% |
Votes |
|||
| ✔ | Yes |
74.3
|
1,497,141 | ||
No |
25.7
|
517,347 | |||
Total Votes |
2,014,488 | ||||
|
|
2016
Justice Hood filed to stand for retention in 2016.[11]
| Colorado Supreme Court, Hood's seat, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Yes votes | |
| 70.98% | ||
| Source: Colorado Secretary of State Official Certified Results | ||
2014
Retention
| Judge | Election Vote |
|---|---|
| Lindsey Miller-Lerman | 68.4% |
2010
| Colorado Supreme Court, Associate Justice 2010 General election results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidates | Votes | Percent | ||
| Michael Bender |
872,387 | 60.4% | ||
| Against retention | 571,029 | 39.6% | ||
| Colorado Supreme Court, Associate Justice 2010 General election results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidates | Votes | Percent | ||
| Nancy Rice |
891,962 | 62% | ||
| Against retention | 548,633 | 38% | ||
| Colorado Supreme Court, Associate Justice 2010 General election results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidates | Votes | Percent | ||
| Alex Martinez |
859,051 | 60% | ||
| Against retention | 584,026 | 40% | ||
| Colorado Supreme Court, Associate Justice 2010 General election results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidates | Votes | Percent | ||
| Allison Eid |
1,338,571 | 74.6% | ||
| Against retention | 456,337 | 25.4% | ||
- Click here for 2010 General Election Results from the Colorado Secretary of State.
2008
| Colorado Supreme Court, Associate Justice 2008 General election results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidates | Votes | Percent | ||
| Gregory Hobbs |
1,282,348 | 72.4% | ||
| Against retention | 489,429 | 27.6% | ||
- Click here (scroll to page 120) for 2008 General Election Results from the Colorado Secretary of State.
2002
| Colorado Supreme Court, Associate Justice 2002 General election results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidates | Votes | Percent | ||
| Nathan Coats |
828,622 | 74.3% | ||
| Against retention | 286,961 | 25.7% | ||
Political outlook
In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan outlook of state supreme court justices in their paper, "State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns." A score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology while scores below 0 were more liberal. The state Supreme Court of Colorado was given a campaign finance score (CFscore), which was calculated for judges in October 2012. At that time, Colorado received a score of -0.29. Based on the justices selected, Colorado was the 16th most liberal court. The study was based on data from campaign contributions by judges themselves, the partisan leaning of contributors to the judges, or—in the absence of elections—the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice but rather an academic gauge of various factors.[12]
Rules of practice
State statutes and rules for practicing in the state's courts, including the supreme court are available online. Check the links below to find more information.
- LexisNexis, "Colorado Court Rules," accessed June 12, 2014
- LexisNexis, "Colorado Revised Statutes," accessed June 12, 2014
Oral arguments
Oral arguments before the supreme court are open to the public. In an oral argument, lawyers for the parties make a presentation before the justices of the court which describes the legal reasons the court should make a ruling that favors their client. Oral arguments in an appellate case are different from the closing arguments presented during jury or court trials in lower courts. Supreme court oral arguments usually involve detailed legal discussions about statutes and prior rulings made by the court, with more of a focus on legal issues instead of facts or evidence.
The court does not issue a decision immediately after an oral argument. The court can take as long as nine months to issue a ruling, but some rulings are issued within a month. The supreme court's website includes a schedule of oral arguments up to two years in advance. Audio files of past oral arguments, dating back to 2010, are also available on the court's website.[13]
Ethics
Judicial conduct
There are four essential canons of judicial conduct which apply to judges serving on the supreme court and all other state judges in Colorado.
| “ |
A judge shall uphold and promote the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.
A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently and diligently.
A judge shall conduct the judge's personal and extrajudicial activities to minimize the risk of conflict with the obligations of judicial office.
A judge or candidate for judicial office shall not engage in political or campaign activity that is inconsistent with the independence, integrity, or impartiality of the judiciary.[14][15] |
” |
Removal of justices
Judges may be removed in multiple ways:
- On the recommendation of the Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline, the Supreme Court may remove, retire, suspend, censure, reprimand or discipline a judge.
- Impeached by a majority vote of the Colorado House of Representatives and convicted by a two-thirds vote of the Colorado State Senate.
- Lose a retention election.[16]
Financial disclosure
In December 2013, the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) released a study on disclosure requirements for state supreme court judges. According to their website, CPI's purpose is "[t]o serve democracy by revealing abuses of power, corruption and betrayal of public trust by powerful public and private institutions, using the tools of investigative journalism."[17] Analysts from the Center reviewed the rules governing financial disclosure in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as personal financial disclosures for the previous three years. The study gave 42 states and Washington, D.C., failing grades. Colorado earned a grade of D in the study. No state received a grade higher than "C." The study also reported 35 instances of questionable gifts, investments overlapping with caseloads, and similar potential ethical quandaries, along with 14 cases in which justices participated although they or their spouses held stock in the company involved in the litigation.[18]
Noteworthy cases
| • On illegal immigration: Initiative #55 | Click for summary→ |
|---|---|
|
On December 31, 2003, the "Defend Colorado Now" initiative was introduced, and, if passed, would have prohibited illegal immigrants from receiving public services except those required by the federal government. The bill was defeated. The initiative was re-filed in 2006, and the court issued a 4-2 ruling that the initiative "violated the state's single-subject rule and therefore could not be on the upcoming ballot."[19] Justice Martinez wrote the majority decision, with Justices Mullarkey, Hobbs and Bender concurring; Justices Coats and Rice dissented. Justice Eid recused herself. According to the Rocky Mountain News, Justice Martinez wrote: "the measure asks voters to approve two subjects: decreasing taxpayer funds for medical and social services and restricting "administrative services" such as registering a vehicle or filing property deeds with the county recorder."[20] | |
Potential noteworthy cases
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners v. Polis
The court agreed to hear a case brought by Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, a Colorado nonprofit organization, against Gov. Jared Polis (D) on April 22, 2019.[21] The court heard arguments in the case on August 13, 2019.[22] The National Association for Gun Rights also joined as a plaintiff in the case. The plaintiffs are suing over HB 1224 (2013), which banned gun magazines that hold more than 15 rounds. A district court and an appeals court have found the law constitutional.[23] Colorado Public Radio noted that the decision in this case could be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, which could allow for a national decision on such laws.[24]
Visiting the court
Oral arguments before both the Colorado Supreme Court and the Colorado Court of Appeals are open to the public. The public can also visit both courts, which are located at the following address:
Ralph L. Carr Colorado Justice Center
2 East 14th Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
Guided tours are offered to groups of 15 or more. A tour can be requested using forms available on the court's website.[25]
Courthouse building
A new supreme court building opened on December 19, 2012. The building is home to the Colorado Supreme Court, the Colorado Court of Appeals, the office of the state attorney general, the supreme court library and other state offices. There is also a museum facility, which is home to the Colorado History Museum, Colorado Historical Society administrative offices, Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation and the State Historical Fund.[26]
Quick courthouse facts
- Known as the Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center, the building is named for the 29th governor of the state. Carr served from 1939 to 1943. He is best known for opposing the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.[26]
- The building measures 697,767 square-feet.
- The architectural style of the building is neoclassical, and it was designed by Fentress Architects.
- The structure is expected to survive for at least 100 years.
- The supreme court building exceeds energy efficiency standards by 30 percent. It has a green roof to filter rain water and a system to harvest daylight to use in lighting the building.[26]
History
The discovery of gold in 1858 brought a huge influx of people seeking their fortunes into the area that would eventually become the state of Colorado. The city of Denver was established on November 17, 1858. A need for order and a system of justice became evident early on and in the hills, areas were divided into "miners districts". The districts were established informally in areas where there were large groups of miners. The districts established property boundaries, defined property rights, elected officers, set up courts and punished criminals.[2]
Most of current day Colorado was originally part of Arapahoe County in the Territory of Kansas. An election in 1859 established the Territory of Jefferson, but it wasn't until 1861 that the territory was officially recognized by the Union. The territory's first court session was held on July 10, 1861. When Colorado was admitted to the Union in 1876, its constitution "provided for a Supreme Court with a bench of three justices, as well as four judicial districts, with one judge serving each."[2]
The Colorado Supreme Court was established even before Colorado became the 38th state. The state was first known as the Territory of Jefferson, and a supreme court was established in 1859. Once Colorado was recognized as an official territory of the United States, a new supreme court was set up in 1861. The first justices to serve on the court were appointed by then-president Abraham Lincoln. Three justices served on the court and the court began hearing cases on July 10, 1861, in Denver. The first case to be heard by the court was Gardner v. Dunn.[2]
The state was admitted to the union on August 1, 1876. The original constitution called for a supreme court with three justices. In 1905, the court increased to its current number of seven justices.[2]
Notable firsts
- Justice Gregory K. Scott was the first black person appointed to the court and served from January 15, 1993, until 2000.[27]
- Justice Jean E. Dubofsky was the first woman appointed to the court. She served from 1979 until 1987.[28]
- Justice Alex Martinez was the first Hispanic appointed to the court, where he served from 1997 until October 2011.[29]
- Justice Monica Márquez became the first Hispanic female and the first openly gay judge to be appointed to the court in 2010.[30]
Former justices
| All former justices of the Colorado Supreme Court:[31] | click for list → |
|---|---|
| Name: | Dates served: |
| Allison H. Eid | -2006 |
| Rebecca L. Kourlis | 1995-2006 |
| Gregory K. Scott | 1993-2000 |
| Anthony F. Vollack | 1986-1998 |
| George E. Lohr | 1979-1997 |
| Howard M. Kirshbuam | 1983-1997 |
| William H. Erickson | -1996 |
| Luis D. Rovira | 1979-1995 |
| Joseph R. Quinn | 1980-1993 |
| Jean E. Dubofsky | 1979-1987 |
| Paul V. Hodges | 1967-1987 |
| William D. Neighbors | 1983-1986 |
| William H. Erickson | 1971-1985 |
| Robert B. Lee | 1969-1983 |
| James K. Groves | 1968-1980 |
| Jim R. Carrigan | 1976-1979 |
| Edward E. Pringle | 1961-1979 |
| Donal E. Kelley | 1967-1979 |
| Edward C. Day | -1976 |
| Robert H. McWilliams | 1961-1970 |
| O. Otto Moore | 1949-1969 |
| Leonard v. B. Sutton | 1956-1968 |
| Albert T. Frantz | 1957-1967 |
| William E. Doyle | 1959-1961 |
| Hilbert Schauer | 1965-1967 |
| Alva Loiselle | 1971-1980 |
| Frank H. Hall | 1956-1964 |
| Francis J. Knauss | 1951-1961 |
| E. V. Holland | 1933-1959 |
| John R. Thim | 1966-1972 |
| John P. Cotter | 1965-1981 |
| Charles S. House | 1965-1978 |
| James C. Shannon | 1965-1966 |
| John M. Comley | 1963-1965 |
| Howard W. Alcorn | 1961-1971 |
| Abraham S. Bordon | 1961-1961 |
| William J. Shea | 1959-1965 |
| Samuel Mellitz | 1958-1961 |
| James E. Murphy | 1957-1966 |
| John Hamilton King | 1957-1970 |
| Edward J. Daly | 1954-1959 |
| Kenneth Wynne | 1953-1958 |
| Edward J. Quinlan | 1953-1954 |
| John A. Cornell | 1953-1953 |
| Patrick B. O’Sullivan | 1950-1957 |
| Ernest A. Inglis | 1950-1957 |
| Raymond E. Baldwin | 1949-1963 |
| Edwin C. Dickenson | 1942-1950 |
| Arthur F. Ells | 1940-1949 |
| Newell Jennings | 1937-1953 |
| Allyn L. Brown | 1936-1953 |
| Christopher L. Avery | 1930-1942 |
| John W. Banks | 1927-1937 |
| George E. Hinman | 1926-1940 |
| John P. Kellogg | 1924-1925 |
| Frank D. Haines | 1925-1936 |
| William M. Maltbie | 1925-1950 |
| John E. Keeler | 1922-1926 |
| Lucien F. Burpee | 1921-1924 |
| Howard J. Curtis | 1920-1927 |
| William S. Case | 1919-1921 |
| Edward B. Gager | 1918-1922 |
| John K. Beach | 1913-1925 |
| George W. Wheeler | 1910-1930 |
| Alberto T. Roraback | 1908-1919 |
| Milton A. Shumway | 1917-1918 |
| William Hamersley | 1894-1908 |
| Simeon E. Baldwin | 1893-1910 |
| Silas A. Robinson | 1910-1910 |
| John M. Thayer | 1907-1917 |
| Samuel O. Prentice | 1901-1920 |
| Frederick B. Hall | 1897-1913 |
| Edward W. Seymour | 1889-1892 |
| Augustus H. Fenn | 1893-1897 |
| David Torrance | 1890-1906 |
| Charles Bartlett Andrews | 1889-1901 |
| Sidney Burr Beardsley | 1887-1889 |
| Origen Storrs Seymour | 1870-1874 |
| LaFayette Sabine Foster | 1870-1876 |
| Miles Tobey Granger | 1876-1887 |
| Dwight Loomis | 1875-1891 |
| Dwight Whitefield Pardee | 1873-1890 |
| James Phelps | 1873-1875 |
| Elisha Carpenter | 1866-1894 |
| Henry Dutton | 1861-1866 |
| Charles Johnson McCurdy | 1863-1867 |
| Thomas Belden Butler | 1861-1873 |
| John Duane Park | 1864-1889 |
| David Curtis Sanford | 1854-1864 |
| William Wolcott Ellsworth | 1847-1861 |
| Joel Hinman | 1842-1870 |
| William Lucius Storrs | 1840-1861 |
| Roger Minott Sherman | 1839-1842 |
| Henry Matson Waite | 1834-1857 |
| Jabez Williams Huntington | 1834-1840 |
| Samuel Church | 1833-1854 |
| Clark Bissell | 1829-1839 |
| Thomas Scott Williams | 1829-1847 |
| David Daggett | 1826-1834 |
| James Lanman | 1826-1829 |
| William Bristol | 1819-1826 |
| Asa Chapman | 1818-1825 |
| John Thompson Peters | 1818-1834 |
| James Gould | 1816-1819 |
| Stephen Titus Hosmer | 1815-1833 |
| Calvin Goddard | 1815-1818 |
| Jonathan Ingersoll | 1811-1816 |
| John Cotton Smith | 1809-1811 |
| Roger Griswold | 1808-1809 |
| Simeon Baldwin | 1808-1817 |
| Jeremiah Gates Brainard | 1808-1829 |
| Nathaniel Smith | 1808-1819 |
| William Edmond | 1808-1819 |
| John Trumbull | 1808-1819 |
| Zephaniah Swift | 1808-1819 |
| Tapping Reeve | 1808-1815 |
| Stephen Mix Mitchell | 1808-1814 |
Proposal to establish judicial term limits
In 2008, a ballot measure was proposed called the Judicial Term Limits Initiative; it would have limited the number of terms judges in Colorado could serve. The official ballot initiative read:
"An amendment to the Colorado constitution limiting terms for state court judges, and, in connection therewith, making a full term of office four years for justices of the supreme court, judges of the court of appeals, district court judges, county court judges, judges of the probate and juvenile courts of Denver, and any other state court judge with jurisdiction inferior to the supreme court; and limiting judges who are retained after January 1, 2010, from serving for more than three full terms of office at the same judicial level after January 1, 2010."
This initiative did not make it onto the ballot.
See also
- Judicial selection in Colorado
- Colorado judicial news
- Colorado blogs
- News: Colorado Supreme Court strikes down limits on political committee contributions, February 24, 2012
External links
- Colorado Judicial Branch, "Supreme Court," accessed June 12, 2014
- Colorado Judicial Branch, "Colorado Judicial Learning Center," accessed June 12, 2014
- YouTube, "Colorado Courts YouTube Channel," accessed June 12, 2014
- Colorado Bar Association, accessed June 12, 2014
- Colorado Supreme Court Library, June 12, 2014
- Findlaw, "Colorado Supreme Court opinions"
- Colorado Appeals Blog Discusses Colorado Supreme Court and Colorado Court of Appeals decisions and rule changes.
- Colorado Supreme Court, "Initiative #55 (2006)," June 26, 2006, archived January 7, 2011
- Clear The Bench Colorado - judicial accountability and reform movement
- Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection, accessed June 12, 2014
- Higher Courts blog
Footnotes
- ↑ The salary of the chief justice may be higher than an associate justice.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Judicial Branch, State of Colorado, "Welcome to the Colorado Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, An Historical Guide," June 4, 2014
- ↑ Judicial Branch, State of Colorado, "Court Facts," June 4, 2014
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Judicial Branch, State of Colorado, "Colorado Supreme Court," accessed June 4, 2014
- ↑ Judicial Branch, State of Colorado, "The Colorado Merit Selection System, Judicial Nominating Commissions," accessed June 4, 2014
- ↑ Colorado Bar Association, "Where Do (Colorado) Judges Come From?" accessed June 12, 2014
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Judicial Branch, State of Colorado, "Colorado Courts at a Glance," accessed June 4, 2014
- ↑ State of Colorado, Office of Judicial Peformance Evaluation, accessed June 4, 2014
- ↑ Colorado Court System, "Annual Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2014," accessed April 6, 2015
- ↑ Colorado Court System, "Fiscal Year 2013, Supreme Court Caseload Trends"
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedFiling - ↑ Stanford University, "State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns," October 31, 2012
- ↑ Judicial Branch, State of Colorado, "Oral Arguments," accessed June 10, 2014
- ↑ Judicial Branch, State of Colorado, "Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct," July 1, 2010
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ National Center for State Courts, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Colorado: Removal of Judges"
- ↑ Center for Public Integrity, "About The Center for Public Integrity," accessed March 2, 2018
- ↑ Center for Public Integrity, "State supreme court judges reveal scant financial information," December 5, 2013
- ↑ Original Defend Colorado Now Amendment
- ↑ Sara Burnett, Rocky Mountain News, June 13, 2006, archived October 6, 2008
- ↑ Colorado Supreme Court, "Court Announcements April 22, 2019," accessed May 9, 2019
- ↑ The Denver Post, "Colorado attorney general argues for ban on large-capacity gun magazines," August 13, 2019
- ↑ KKTV, "State Supreme Court to decide on large-capacity magazine ban," April 23, 2019
- ↑ Colorado Public Radio, "Colorado Supreme Court To Decide Fate Of Ban On High-Capacity Magazines," April 23, 2019
- ↑ Colorado State Judicial Branch, "Visiting the Supreme Court," accessed June 12, 2014
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Courthouse News Service, "Colorado Supreme Court Gets Grand New Home," December 17, 2012
- ↑ Colorado Judicial Branch, "Press Release: Justice Gregory Kellam Scott," March 6, 2000, accessed June 3, 2014
- ↑ CBA CLE Legal Connection, "Raising the Bar: 'Famous Firsts' Honored by the Colorado Women’s Bar Association Foundation," September 2, 2011
- ↑ Gordon and Rees LLP
- ↑ Fox News Latino, "First Latina, openly gay Colorado Supreme Court justice," December 12, 2010, archived January 22, 2012
- ↑ Judicial Branch, State of Colorado, "Colorado Supreme Court Justices, by Session," accessed June 4, 2014
Federal courts:
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals • U.S. District Court: District of Colorado • U.S. Bankruptcy Court: District of Colorado
State courts:
Colorado Supreme Court • Colorado Court of Appeals • Colorado District Courts • Colorado County Courts • Denver Probate Court • Denver Juvenile Court • Colorado Municipal Courts • Colorado Water Courts
State resources:
Courts in Colorado • Colorado judicial elections • Judicial selection in Colorado
| ||||||||