Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Arkansas Issue 3, Government Burden of Free Exercise of Religion Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Arkansas Issue 3
Flag of Arkansas.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Religion
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Arkansas Issue 3, the Government Burden of Free Exercise of Religion Amendment, was on the ballot in Arkansas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022. The measure was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to provide that "government shall not burden a person's freedom of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability."

A "no" vote opposed amending the state constitution to provide that "government shall not burden a person's freedom of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability."


Election results

Arkansas Issue 3

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 433,473 49.59%

Defeated No

440,686 50.41%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Overview

What would Issue 3 have done?

See also: Text of measure and constitutional changes

The measure would have amended the state constitution to provide that the government cannot burden a person’s freedom of religion— including burdens resulting from a rule of general applicability— except if the government demonstrates that the burden is necessary to further a compelling government interest using the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. The measure would have allowed a person to cite this amendment as a claim or defense in a judicial, administrative, or other proceeding to obtain relief against the government.[1]

The measure would have provided that free exercise of religion means the exercise of religion under Section 24 of Article 2 of the Arkansas Constitution, which provides that "All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; no man can, of right, be compelled to attend, erect, or support any place of worship; or to maintain any ministry against his consent. No human authority can, in any case or manner whatsoever, control or interfere with the right of conscience; and no preference shall ever be given, by law, to any religious establishment, denomination or mode of worship, above any other."

The amendment would have been named the Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment in the state constitution. The constitutional amendment would have stated that the purpose of the amendment was to "guarantee that the freedom of religion is not burdened by state and local law" and "provide a claim or defense to persons whose religious freedom is burdened by government."

The amendment was modeled on the United States Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which was signed into law by President Bill Clinton (D) in 1993. The federal law was found to be inapplicable to state laws by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1997. As of 2022, 21 states had enacted a RFRA law applicable to the state's own laws.

What did supporters and opponents say about this amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

State Rep. Jimmy Gazaway (R), the amendment’s sponsor in the House, said, "There may come a day when you wish you had these protections in the Arkansas Constitution." According to Arkansas Online, Gazaway said that the amendment "would provide a stronger protection for religious freedom because it would only have to be proven that the government was burdening religious liberty, not that it was a substantial burden."[2] Rep. Mary Bentley (R) said, "We have executive branches come and executive branches go, and I don't want an executive branch that changes our law. Governors have really done things to infringe on people's religious freedoms, and I don't want that to happen in the future."[3]

Alison Gill, vice president of legal and policy matters at American Atheists, said, "There were at least four major waves of harmful legislation propagated in 2021: anti-trans youth legislation, religious exemptions to COVID-related public health protections, broad denial-of-care bills, and bills that undermine abortion access. ... Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) measures at the state level create a limited exemption from state laws whenever religious organizations say that their activities are burdened. RFRAs have been used to attack nondiscrimination protections, access to contraception and abortion, and even child labor laws. In the wake of the pandemic and state-imposed public health restrictions, activists have rebranded these bills as necessary to protect churches from government overreach."[4]

How were religious gatherings affected by executive orders and laws stemming from COVID?

On March 11, 2020, Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson (R) declared a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. On March 26, 2020, Hutchinson issued executive order 20-10 prohibiting confined indoor and outdoor gatherings of 10 or more people, though the order did not apply to businesses, places of worship, or governing bodies. On April 4, 2020, Hutchinson issued executive order 20-13, which instructed businesses and places of worship to limit the number of people in a building so that a distance of 6 feet could be maintained between all occupants.[5][6]

The Arkansas State Legislature passed House Bill 1211 during the 2021 legislative session. The bill prohibits the governor from limiting a religious organization from holding religious services during a disaster emergency. Under the bill, a governor can require religious organizations to comply with "neutral health, safety, or occupancy requirements" under state or federal law if such requirements apply to all other organizations and businesses. It also states that the governor cannot enforce health, safety, or occupancy requirements that "impose a substantial burden on a religious organization" unless the governor demonstrates that the requirements are essential to further a compelling governmental interest and are the least restrictive means of doing so. The bill allows religious organizations to file lawsuits against the governor seeking declaratory, injunctive, and/or compensatory relief from a court if they feel that the law has been violated.[7]

The bill includes an emergency clause, stating, "It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and response of the executive branch to the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have highlighted the need to address the constitutional rights of the citizens of Arkansas, particularly the right to the free exercise of religion; that this act prohibits government interference with the free exercise of religion during a disaster emergency such as the current pandemic; and that this act is immediately necessary to ensure the protection of the constitutional rights of Arkansans to freely exercise religion."[7]

How did this amendment get on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a simple majority vote is required in both the Arkansas State Senate and the Arkansas House of Representatives.

The amendment was sponsored by Sen. Jason Rapert (R) and Rep. Jimmy Gazaway (R). The measure was passed in the Senate on April 22, 2021, and in the House on April 27, 2021. The measure was passed along party lines with Republicans in favor and Democrats against. Representative Josh Miller was the only Republican legislator to vote against the amendment. Senator Larry Teague was the only Democratic legislator to vote in favor of the amendment.[1]

Text of measure

Popular name

The popular name was as follows:[1]

A Constitutional Amendment to Create the "Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment."[8]

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[1]

An amendment to the Arkansas Constitution to create the "Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment"; and to provide that government may never burden a person's freedom of religion except in the rare circumstance that the government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is in furtherance of a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest.[8]

Constitutional changes

See also: Amendments, Arkansas Constitution

The measure would have added a new amendment to the Arkansas Constitution. The following struck-through text would have been deleted and underlined text would have been added.

Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.

SECTION 1. This amendment shall be known and may be cited as the "Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment".

SECTION 2. (a) The General Assembly finds:

(1) The framers of the United States Constitution, recognizing free exercise of religion as an unalienable right, secured its protection in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution;
(2) The framers of the Arkansas Constitution of 1874, also recognizing the free exercise of religion as an unalienable right, secured the protection of religious freedom in Arkansas Constitution, Article 2, § 24;
(3) Federal and state laws "neutral" toward religion may burden religious exercise as surely as laws intended to interfere with religious exercise;
(4) Governments should not burden religious exercise without compelling justification;
(5) In Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), the United States Supreme Court virtually eliminated the requirement that the government justify burdens on religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion;
(6) The compelling interest test as set forth in prior court rulings is a workable test for striking sensible balances between religious liberty and competing government interests in areas ranging from public education (pedagogical interests and religious rights, including recognizing regulations necessary to alleviate interference with the educational process versus rights of religious freedom), national defense (conscription and conscientious objection, including the need to raise an army versus rights to object to individual participation), and other areas of important mutual concern; and
(7) The United States Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb, to establish the compelling interest test set forth in prior federal court rulings, but in City of Boerne v. Flores, 117 S.Ct. 2157 (1997), the United States Supreme Court held the act unconstitutional, stating that the right to regulate was retained by the states.

(b) The purpose of this amendment is to:

(1) Guarantee that the freedom of religion is not burdened by state and local law; and
(2) Provide a claim or defense to persons whose religious freedom is burdened by government.

SECTION 3. As used in this amendment:

(1) "Demonstrates" means meeting the burden of going forward with the evidence and of persuasion;
(2) "Freedom of religion" means the free exercise of religion under Arkansas Constitution, Article 2, § 24;
(3) "Government" means:
(A) A branch, department, agency, or instrumentality of the State of Arkansas;
(B) A political subdivision of the state, including without limitation a county, municipality, township, or other unit of local government;
(C) An official acting on behalf of government; and
(D) A person acting under the color of law of the State of Arkansas; and
(4) "Rule" means a statement of Arkansas law, including without limitation a:
(A) Statute;
(B) Rule;
(C) Regulation;
(D) Ordinance;
(E) Administrative provision;
(F) Administrative ruling;
(G) Guideline; or
(H) Requirement.

SECTION 4. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, government shall not burden a person's freedom of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability.

(b) Government may burden a person's freedom of religion only if the government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person:
(1) Is in furtherance of a compelling government interest; and
(2) Is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest.
(c) A person whose religious freedom has been burdened in violation of this section may assert that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial, administrative, or other appropriate proceeding and obtain appropriate relief against a government.

SECTION 5. (a) This amendment applies to each rule of government and its implementation, regardless of whether the rule:

(1) Is statutory; or
(2) Was adopted prior to or after the effective date of this amendment.
(b) This amendment shall not be construed to:
(1) Authorize a government to burden a religious belief; or
(2) Affect, interpret, or in any way address:
(A) The portions of the United States Constitution, First Amendment, permitting the free exercise of religion or prohibiting laws respecting the establishment of religion; or
(B) Article 2, § 24 of this constitution regarding religious liberty.

SECTION 6.

(a) This amendment shall be liberally construed to effectuate its remedial and deterrent purposes.
(b) If any provision of this amendment or its application to any particular person or circumstance is held invalid, that provision or its application is severable and does not affect the validity of other provisions or applications of this amendment.

SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This amendment shall be effective on and after November 9, 2022.[8]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 17, and the FRE is -6. The word count for the ballot title is 10.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 31, and the FRE is -13. The word count for the ballot summary is 63.

Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations


Arguments

  • State Rep. Jimmy Gazaway (R): "You really have to think about, what is this state going to look like in 30, 40, 50 years? What are our courts going to look like in 30, 40, 50 years? If we allow the people to put it in the constitution it's going to be here."
  • State Rep. Mary Bentley (R): "We have executive branches come and executive branches go, and I don’t want an executive branch that changes our law. Governors have really done things to infringe on people’s religious freedoms, and I don’t want that to happen in the future."
  • Arkansas Family Council: "State and federal measures restoring religious freedom in America came about because courts had so badly eroded religious liberty in America. The laws simply help restore protections for the free exercise of religion. S.J.R. 14 is no different in that regard. It’s just a good measure that will help ensure that our state constitution protects religious liberty in Arkansas. That’s something that all of us ought to be able to support."


Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • ACLU of Arkansas


Arguments

  • State Rep. Josh Miller (R): "There are folks who would say that if it passes, it could open the door for situations like for a mosque to go buy some property next to a Baptist day care and blare their sirens and their Muslim sayings all day long."
  • Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas: "The unintended consequences of this measure would be severe and far-reaching, giving people a basis to challenge and exempt themselves from virtually any state law."
  • ACLU of Arkansas: "The unintended consequences of this measure would be severe and far-reaching, giving people a basis to challenge and exempt themselves from virtually any state law. If enacted, SJR14 would be among the most extreme of its kind in the country, putting Arkansas out of step with nearly all other states and jeopardizing our economy. Similar laws in Indiana and Arizona led to widespread boycotts, costing states millions in revenue. Religious freedom is a fundamental right, but it’s not an excuse to target, harm, or discriminate against people. We urge members of the House to oppose this dangerous and discriminatory amendment."
  • Don Byrd of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty (BJC): "The proposed amendment that advanced in Arkansas strays from the federal version of RFRA in a potentially significant way: by leaving out the word “substantial.” Instead, the law is triggered by *any* burden on religious exercise. ... The precise meaning and legal significance of the “substantial” requirement is still somewhat unsettled. But, it does ensure that not every incidental impact on a person’s religion requires the state to meet the high compelling interest test. Currently, the Arkansas state RFRA provides robust protection for religious freedom while also being mindful of other important state interests, which makes this amendment unnecessary."


Media editorials

See also: 2022 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

Submit links to editor@ballotpedia.org.

Opposition

  • Arkansas Business Editorial Board: "Issue No. 3 is unnecessary. The state Constitution, not to mention the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as well as a host of other state and federal laws, already protects the free exercise of religion."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Arkansas ballot measures

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this measure, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls

See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Arkansas Issue 3, Government Burden of Free Exercise of Religion Amendment (2022)
Poll
Dates
Sample size
Margin of error
Support
Oppose
Undecided
Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College 10/17/2022-10/18/2022 974 LV ± 3.9% 36% 39% 25%
Question: "Issue 3, known as the “Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment”, states that state government may never burden a person’s freedom of religion except in the rare circumstance that the government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is in furtherance of a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest. If the election were held today, would you vote for or against Issue 3?"
Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College 09/12/2022 835 LV ± 3.8% 32.5% 34.5% 33%
Question: "Issue 3, known as the “Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment”, states that state government may never burden a person’s freedom of religion except in the rare circumstance that the government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is in furtherance of a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest. If the election were held today, would you vote for or against Issue 3?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Background

Article 2, Arkansas Constitution

See also: Arkansas Constitution, Article 2, Section 4

The current constitution of Arkansas, in Section 24 of Article 2, titled Religious Liberty, states:[9]

All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; no man can, of right, be compelled to attend, erect, or support any place of worship; or to maintain any ministry against his consent. No human authority can, in any case or manner whatsoever, control or interfere with the right of conscience; and no preference shall ever be given, by law, to any religious establishment, denomination or mode of worship, above any other.[8]

Executive orders issued due to COVID-19 in Arkansas

See also: Executive orders issued by governors and state agencies in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Arkansas

On March 11, 2020, Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson (R) declared a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. On March 26, 2020, Hutchinson issued executive order 20-10 prohibiting confined indoor and outdoor gatherings of 10 or more people, though the order did not apply to businesses, places of worship, or governing bodies. On April 4, 2020, Hutchinson issued executive order 20-13, which instructed businesses and places of worship to limit the number of people in a building so that a distance of 6 feet could be maintained between all occupants.[10][11]

Arkansas House Bill 1211 (Act 94), 2021

The Arkansas State Legislature passed House Bill 1211 during the 2021 legislative session. The bill prohibits the governor from limiting a religious organization from holding religious services during a disaster emergency. Under the bill, a governor can require religious organizations to comply with "neutral health, safety, or occupancy requirements" under state or federal law if such requirements apply to all other organizations and businesses. It also states that the governor cannot enforce health, safety, or occupancy requirements that "impose a substantial burden on a religious organization" unless the governor demonstrates that the requirements are essential to further a compelling governmental interest and are the least restrictive means of doing so. The bill allows religious organizations to file lawsuits against the governor seeking declaratory, injunctive, and/or compensatory relief from a court if they feel that the law has been violated.[7]

The House passed the bill by a vote of 75-10, with 15 members not voting. Among Republican representatives, 75 voted in favor, five did not vote, and none voted against. Among Democratic representatives, two voted in favor, 10 voted against, and 10 did not vote. The bill was passed unanimously in the Senate with four Democratic senators not voting. The bill took effect on February 10, 2021, without the governor's signature.[7]

The bill includes an emergency clause, stating, "It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and response of the executive branch to the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have highlighted the need to address the constitutional rights of the citizens of Arkansas, particularly the right to the free exercise of religion; that this act prohibits government interference with the free exercise of religion during a disaster emergency such as the current pandemic; and that this act is immediately necessary to ensure the protection of the constitutional rights of Arkansans to freely exercise religion."[7]

History of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)

Employment Division v. Smith, 1990

In Employment Division v. Smith of 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that rights under the free exercise of religion clause of the First Amendment are not violated when laws of general applicability conflict with a person's religion. In this case, the Supreme Court held that the state of Oregon could deny unemployment benefits to an individual who was fired for illegally using the hallucinogenic drug peyote, despite the drug being used as part of a religious ritual.[12][13]

United States Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993

The United States Congress passed and President Bill Clinton (D) signed House Resolution 1308, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), in 1993.

The text of the act is as follows:

City of Boerne v. Flores, 1997

In City of Boerne v. Flores of 1997, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to state laws. In 2000, the U.S. RFRA was amended to limit its applicability to federal laws.[14]

State RFRA laws

According to Becket Law, the following 21 states had adopted an RFRA law applicable to the state's own laws as of 2021.[15]

  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • Connecticut
  • Florida
  • Idaho
  • Illinois

  • Indiana
  • Kansas
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • New Mexico

  • Oklahoma
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • South Carolina
  • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Virginia


Arkansas and Indiana enacted RFRA laws in 2015.[16]

Lawsuits about state actions and policies in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

See also: Lawsuits about state actions and policies in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020-2021

Ballotpedia’s coverage of COVID-19 included how federal, state, and local governments responded, and how those responses influenced election rules and operations, political campaigns, the economy, schools, and more.

To read about lawsuits concerning state actions and policies in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, including those surrounding exercise of religion, click here.

Ballot measures in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

See also: Ballot measures in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and coronavirus-related regulations

Ballotpedia tracked ballot measures proposed in response to the pandemic or pandemic-related regulations and restrictions. Some of these changes, such as state constitutional amendments, required ballot measures for ratification. Others were citizen-initiated proposals, meaning campaigns collect signatures to put policies and laws on the ballot for voters to decide. A list of measures related to COVID-19 can be found here.

Texas Proposition 3, which was approved in 2021, amended the state constitution to prohibit the state or any political subdivision from enacting a law, rule, order, or proclamation that limits religious services or organizations.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Arkansas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a simple majority vote is required in both the Arkansas State Senate and the Arkansas House of Representatives.

The amendment was passed in the Senate on April 22, 2021, by a vote of 27-4 with four members absent or not voting. The House passed the amendment on April 27, 2021, by a vote of 75-19 with six members absent or not voting. The measure was passed along party lines with most Republicans in favor and Democrats against. Republican Representative Josh Miller was the only Republican legislator to vote against the amendment. Larry Teague was the only Democratic legislator to vote in favor of the amendment.[1]

Vote in the Arkansas State Senate
April 22, 2021
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 18  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2744
Total percent77.14%11.43%11.43%
Democrat142
Republican2502
Independent100

Vote in the Arkansas House of Representatives
April 27, 2021
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 51  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total75196
Total percent75.00%19.00%6.00%
Democrat0184
Republican7512

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Arkansas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Arkansas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Arkansas State Legislature, "SJR 14," accessed April 27, 2021
  2. Arkansas Online, "House committee advances religious liberty amendment," accessed May 17, 2021
  3. Arkansas Online, "Religious freedom amendment to go to public vote," accessed August 2, 2021
  4. Salon, "The Christian nationalist assault on democracy goes stealth — but the pushback is working," accessed July 24, 2021
  5. Arkansas Governor, "Executive Order 20-10," accessed July 24, 2021
  6. Arkansas Governor, "Executive Order 20-13," accessed July 24, 2021
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 LegiScan, "Arkansas House Bill 1211," accessed July 17, 2021
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  9. Text of Article 1 Section 24
  10. Arkansas Governor, "Executive Order 20-10," accessed July 24, 2021
  11. Arkansas Governor, "Executive Order 20-13," accessed July 24, 2021
  12. Wikipedia, "Employment Division v. Smith," accessed July 24, 2021
  13. BJC Online, "The evolution of RFRA," accessed July 24, 2021
  14. Brittanica, "Religious Freedom Restoration Act," accessed July 24, 2021
  15. Becket Law, "FEDERAL & STATE RFRA MAP," accessed July 24, 2021
  16. NCSL, "State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts," accessed July 24, 2021
  17. Arkansas Code, "Title 7, Chapter 5, Subchapter 304," accessed April 3, 2023
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Arkansas Secretary of State, "Voter Registration Information," accessed July 29, 2024
  19. Arkansas Secretary of State, "Arkansas Voter Registration Application," accessed November 1, 2024
  20. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  21. Arkansas Secretary of State, "Frequently Asked Questions," accessed July 29, 2024