Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Dan O'Connell

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Dan O'Connell
Image of Dan O'Connell
Elections and appointments
Last election

August 6, 2024

Education

High school

Fort Zumwalt South High School

Bachelor's

Missouri University of Science and Technology, 2013

Graduate

Webster University, 2013

Personal
Birthplace
Louisville, Ky.
Religion
Roman Catholic
Profession
Engineer
Contact

Dan O'Connell (Republican Party) ran for election to the Missouri State Senate to represent District 23. He lost in the Republican primary on August 6, 2024.

O'Connell completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Dan O'Connell was born in Louisville, Kentucky. He earned a high school diploma from Fort Zumwalt South High School. He studied architectural engineering at the University of Missouri, Rolla and civil engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. O’Connell also earned an MBA from Webster University in 2013. His career experience includes working as a field engineer and consultant.[1][2]

Elections

2024

See also: Missouri State Senate elections, 2024

General election

General election for Missouri State Senate District 23

Adam Schnelting defeated Matt Williams in the general election for Missouri State Senate District 23 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Adam Schnelting
Adam Schnelting (R)
 
55.1
 
51,308
Image of Matt Williams
Matt Williams (D) Candidate Connection
 
44.9
 
41,822

Total votes: 93,130
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Missouri State Senate District 23

Matt Williams advanced from the Democratic primary for Missouri State Senate District 23 on August 6, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Matt Williams
Matt Williams Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
9,913

Total votes: 9,913
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Missouri State Senate District 23

Adam Schnelting defeated Phil Christofanelli, Rich Chrismer, and Dan O'Connell in the Republican primary for Missouri State Senate District 23 on August 6, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Adam Schnelting
Adam Schnelting
 
50.3
 
9,563
Image of Phil Christofanelli
Phil Christofanelli
 
27.7
 
5,267
Rich Chrismer
 
15.4
 
2,928
Image of Dan O'Connell
Dan O'Connell Candidate Connection
 
6.6
 
1,245

Total votes: 19,003
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for O'Connell in this election.

2020

See also: Missouri State Senate elections, 2020

General election

General election for Missouri State Senate District 23

Incumbent Bill Eigel defeated Richard Orr in the general election for Missouri State Senate District 23 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Bill Eigel
Bill Eigel (R)
 
57.2
 
57,988
Image of Richard Orr
Richard Orr (D) Candidate Connection
 
42.8
 
43,406

Total votes: 101,394
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Missouri State Senate District 23

Richard Orr advanced from the Democratic primary for Missouri State Senate District 23 on August 4, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Richard Orr
Richard Orr Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
14,370

Total votes: 14,370
(100.00% precincts reporting)
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Missouri State Senate District 23

Incumbent Bill Eigel defeated Eric Wulff and Dan O'Connell in the Republican primary for Missouri State Senate District 23 on August 4, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Bill Eigel
Bill Eigel
 
71.3
 
15,018
Image of Eric Wulff
Eric Wulff
 
15.7
 
3,310
Image of Dan O'Connell
Dan O'Connell Candidate Connection
 
13.0
 
2,737

Total votes: 21,065
(100.00% precincts reporting)
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Dan O'Connell completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by O'Connell's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am an Engineer, Catholic, and candidate for Missouri's 23rd Senate District against three guys who are all too busy competing for space under Trump's shadow to take care of their neighbors and nation.

Since 2020 so many of us have been trying to simply survive week to week, kept in constant fear of looming disease, war, famine and death. If you're reading this thinking "No matter who wins, I lose" come November, know you're not alone.

We all deserve to be represented by someone that puts the needs of their constituents over that of their donors or career aspirations.

I believe so strongly that we deserve better that I sold my business and put my entire savings into a campaign the local Republican party has ignored just like how they ignore YOU. They have lost their way and are obsessed with how they can control you. They want us to distrust our neighbors, and fear anyone who thinks differently.

This survival mindset and degradation of our societal norms means that even small acts of kindness and basic civilities break down. It pervades our society at all levels, and shows just how much our leaders don't care about anyone other than themselves.

We deserve a representative that is beholden to his voters alone that isn't afraid of you or the status quo, prioritizes your well-being over political theatrics.

Help me tell them that enough is enough; let's bring integrity and true service back to politics.
  • I am Pro-Life. To me that means not just protecting the unborn, but all lives. Because all lives matter.

    Each of my opponents have been serving St. Charles for most of their careers and have only ensured a child born in Missouri has the same chance at seeing their 5th birthday as a child in Kuwait or Qatar. Since 2021 that number has increased by 15%.

    Their policies and actions have only lead to increased suffering of children, child starvation, and higher child suicide rates. Children are suffering and they blame anyone other than themselves.

    That's not Pro-Life. That's just more performative politics.
  • Your boss should have no business deciding who can patch you up, what pill you have to swallow, or what shots you have to take. Imagine a world where your health isn’t tied to your job. No more sticking it out in a dead-end position just because you're afraid to lose your healthcare. Where fear of medical bills chains you to a life you never wanted to live. When YOU have the control, insurance companies have to step up their game and compete for your hard-earned cash by actually covering what you need, not what they want. That's the freedom I'm fighting for – the freedom to make choices for your health without Uncle Sam or Big Brother breathing down your neck. It will be cheaper, easier, and more effective for everyone.
  • Missouri students currently rank 21st in standardized testing across the nation, while our state also ranks 49th in teacher pay. This is not how a capitalist society rewards the dedication and professionalism of our teachers. My opponents brag about getting them a salary increase to $40k/year. They don't seem to realize it's insulting to tell someone trusted with our children to be grateful they're being paid about a little more than a Warehouse worker, but a little less than a ditch digger. The hostility towards Missouri's Educational system is doing the kind of damage to our society that will take generations to heal. Children should not be subjected to the whims of national extremist talking points.
I genuinely want to improve the lives of everyone in our state. My entire campaign is funded by me personally, no donors, no dark money funds. Just the love of my neighbors and strong desire to make the world a better place.

Teachers and First Responders should have the right to strike.

YOU are the only one who should be making decisions about your healthcare.

Our schools should not be subject to any power higher than the local communities that fund them.

Water and air should be clean, clear, and accessible for all.

No child deserves to starve or be denied access to healthcare.

All costs of adoption should be covered by the state.

Any money spent on education should be tax-deductible.
Considering the target market of Republican voters in St. Charles, Missouri, I look up to Ronald Reagan. Reagan's leadership, principles, and ability to communicate a vision for a stronger America have always resonated with me. He was a man who stood firm on his beliefs, worked tirelessly to reduce the size of government, and promoted economic policies that led to significant growth and prosperity.

Ronald Reagan's example is one I strive to follow because he demonstrated the importance of strong leadership, clear communication, and unwavering commitment to conservative values. He understood that the strength of our nation lies in its people and their ability to thrive with less government interference. Reagan's focus on personal responsibility, free-market principles, and a strong national defense are the pillars that I believe in and aim to uphold in my own political career.

Just like Reagan, I am dedicated to fostering an environment where businesses can flourish, families can feel secure, and individual freedoms are protected. His legacy is a testament to what principled leadership can achieve, and it is this legacy that inspires me as I seek to serve the people of Missouri's 23rd Senate District.
Those that read deeper into my political philosophies may find they run parallel to "The Conscience of a Conservative" by Barry Goldwater.

This book lays down foundational principles of limited government, personal responsibility, and individual liberty. All themes that align with my advocacy for free market healthcare, labor rights, and tax reform.

It also articulates a vision of conservatism that stresses the importance of upholding constitutional principles and protecting citizens' rights from excessive governmental control.
Authenticity: You need someone genuine, not a flip-flopper who changes tunes faster than a DJ on Saturday night. Someone who knows who they are, what they stand for, and isn’t afraid to tell it like it is, no matter who’s listening.

I have answered every question in every forum as directly as possible.

Courage: It’s about having the guts to take the hard hits. When the heat’s on, this person doesn’t melt away but stands firm, ready to fight for what’s right, even if it means standing alone.

I have literally stood with you at protests, standing up for your rights, and even arranging legal representation when jack booted federal agents seized weapons in St. Charles.

If my constituents are having problems, I'll be there to help them find a solution.

Transparency: No secret deals or backroom handshakes. You deserve to know where they stand, what they’re doing, and why they’re doing it—clear as day, every single day.

I've been campaigning for 4 years now, and my answers have always been direct, have never changed, and I have never deleted a post.

Commitment: Look for the grinder, the last one to leave the office, the first one to show up at the town hall. This isn’t a 9-to-5 gig; it’s a passion, a calling. They’re in it because they believe they can make a difference.

I have financed and managed all of my campaigns out of pure commitment to my neighbors and nation. I know we all deserve better than what we have, and put my money where my mouth is.

Respect for Community: This is about more than just listening. It’s about understanding—truly getting what everyday life is like for the folks back home because they live it with you. They don’t just show up at election time; they’re a part of the fabric of the community.

If St. Charles has a protest, I'll always be there. Even if I disagree, the core duty of an elected official means they should still be there to listen.
First and foremost, dedication. From my very first job as a mover, I learned the importance of rolling up my sleeves and getting the job done right. This work ethic has stayed with me throughout my career as an engineer and community leader. When I commit to something, I see it through with unwavering focus and determination.

Next is integrity. In every role I’ve taken on, whether in my professional career or community service, I’ve always prioritized doing what’s right over what’s easy. I believe in transparency, accountability, and honesty. The people of St. Charles deserve someone who will stand up for them with a clear conscience and strong moral compass.

Then there’s resilience. Life throws curveballs, but it’s how we handle them that defines us. I've faced challenges head-on, learning and growing from each experience. This resilience ensures that I won’t back down when the going gets tough, and I’ll fight tirelessly for the interests of our community.

Another key quality is pragmatism. I’m a problem solver by trade. As an engineer, I approach issues with a practical mindset, always looking for the most effective solutions. I believe in common-sense policies that deliver real results, not just empty promises.

Lastly, community focus. Growing up and living in St. Charles, I deeply understand and share the values and concerns of our community. I’m not just a politician; I’m your neighbor. My decisions are always guided by what’s best for our families, our local businesses, and our future.
Legislation: First and foremost, crafting and passing laws that make life better for everyone back home. This isn't just about throwing ideas into the air; it's about making sure they land, make sense, and work hard for the people.

Budget Oversight: You better believe it's their duty to oversee where the dollars are flowing. They need to tighten the purse strings, ensure taxpayer money is spent wisely, and fight like hell to prevent wastage. It's all about getting the most bang for your buck.

Constituent Services: This isn’t just shaking hands and kissing babies. It’s about being the bridge between the public and the maze of government services. Lost in paperwork? Need help navigating red tape? They’re your go-to, making sure your voice is heard and your problems get solved.

Advocacy: They've got to be the champion for local interests, standing up to big-time pressures, whether it’s from other parts of the state or big corporations. They fight for what the district needs, from securing funding for local projects to protecting local jobs.

Accountability: They answer to you—period. They keep you informed, take your calls, show up and face the music, even when the tune isn’t so friendly. Transparency isn’t just a buzzword; it’s the only way they do business.
When I think about the legacy I want to leave, it's all about real, tangible change that stands the test of time. I want to be remembered as the guy who stood up, stepped in, and made things happen for Missouri’s 23rd Senate District. I envision a legacy where the community thrives because we tackled the tough issues head-on and didn’t shy away from the hard conversations.

First and foremost, I want to be the advocate who reformed our healthcare system, ensuring that every Missourian has access to affordable, high-quality care without being chained to a job they hate. I want families to feel secure, knowing they have the freedom to choose the best for their health without financial fear.

Next, I aim to be the champion for our state workers, the one who gave teachers, first responders, and all public servants the rights they deserve to negotiate and strike when necessary. This isn't just about better wages—it's about respect, dignity, and ensuring that those who serve our community are treated fairly.

Lastly, I want to leave behind a district where economic opportunities are abundant, where our education system is top-notch, and where our infrastructure supports the growth and safety of every citizen. I want people to say, "Dan O’Connell made our lives better."

So, let’s roll up our sleeves and get to work. Because this legacy isn’t just about me; it’s about all of us, about building a future that we can be proud of, together.
The first historical event that I vividly remember is the Gulf War, which started in 1990 when I was about 5 years old. Growing up in St. Charles, Missouri, I recall watching the news with my family and seeing the images of the conflict on television. It was a time when patriotism was strong, and there was a real sense of unity and support for our troops.

This event left a lasting impression on me, highlighting the importance of national security and the sacrifices made by our military. It also instilled in me a deep respect for those who serve our country and the values of freedom and democracy that they defend. These early memories have shaped my commitment to supporting veterans, strengthening our national defense, and ensuring that we always honor the service and sacrifices of our armed forces.
One of the biggest struggles in my life has been balancing my deep commitment to public service with the demands of my professional career and personal life. It's no secret that wearing multiple hats—being a dedicated engineer, an active community leader, and a loving family man—requires a lot of energy, focus, and sometimes sacrifices.

As an engineer, I've always been driven to solve problems and create solutions that make a tangible difference. But this professional dedication often meant long hours and significant pressure to deliver excellence. Simultaneously, my commitment to public service and community involvement has been a core part of who I am, from leading local initiatives to advocating for better policies that impact our daily lives.

The struggle has been finding that equilibrium—ensuring that neither my career nor my civic duties overshadowed my responsibilities and love for my family. There were times when it felt like I was walking a tightrope, trying to give my best in every role without compromising on any front.

Yet, through this struggle, I’ve learned the value of resilience, the importance of prioritizing what truly matters, and the strength of community support. It’s this experience that drives me to push for policies that create better work-life balance, support for working families, and stronger community ties, because I know firsthand how challenging it can be to juggle these aspects of life.

So, while the journey has been tough, it has also been incredibly rewarding, shaping me into a more empathetic and determined advocate for the people of Missouri’s 23rd Senate District.
The ideal relationship between the governor and the state legislature should be like a well-oiled machine—full of power, precision, and a dash of finesse. Here's how I see it: the governor, that’s the captain of the ship, steering the course, setting the pace, and making the big calls. But a captain’s nothing without a solid crew, and that’s where the state legislature comes in—powerful, independent, yet fully coordinated.

This relationship should be built on mutual respect and a robust exchange of ideas. The governor proposes the direction, maybe sets out some bold new policies, but then it’s over to the legislature to debate, refine, and enact these ideas. They’re not just rubber stampers; they're the quality control, the safety check, ensuring that every decision is in the best interest of the public.

And let’s not forget about checks and balances. The governor needs to respect the legislative process, not try to bulldoze through it. Meanwhile, the legislature should engage constructively, not just oppose for opposition’s sake. It's about coming together to hash out the best possible outcomes for the people, not scoring political points.

In short, the ideal scenario is one where the governor and the legislature push each other to be better, challenging each other to come up with the best solutions for the state's challenges. It’s a partnership, tough but fair, always aiming for what’s best for the public. That’s the gold standard we should all strive for.
Healthcare Accessibility and Affordability: This is a beast we’ve been wrestling with for ages, and it’s not getting any easier. The costs are sky-high, and too many folks are just one medical bill away from financial disaster. We need a game plan that brings down costs and makes healthcare something every Missourian can count on without breaking the bank.

Economic Diversification and Job Creation: With the world changing faster than ever, Missouri needs to step up its game in diversifying its economy. We're talking about investing in tech, energy, and modern manufacturing. We can't just stick to the old playbook; we need jobs that are future-proof, that’ll keep young folks in the state and attract new talent.

Education and Workforce Development: This ties right back to our economic game plan. Our schools and training programs need to be top-notch to prepare our workforce for the jobs of tomorrow. We're looking at not just throwing money at the problem, but innovating our approach to education—from K-12 to vocational training—making it more adaptable and aligned with industry needs.

Infrastructure Modernization: Roads, bridges, broadband—you name it, we need to fix it or build it better. Infrastructure isn’t just about making things look nice; it’s about laying down the foundation for economic growth and community safety. Plus, let's not forget about the impact of climate change; we need infrastructure that can stand up to whatever the weather throws at us.

Social Cohesion and Public Safety: Last but definitely not least, we’ve got to ensure our communities are safe and cohesive. This means tackling crime, yes, but also addressing the underlying issues like inequality, education gaps, and community-police relations. It’s about building trust and making sure everyone feels they have a stake in Missouri’s future.
Absolutely, building relationships with other legislators isn't just beneficial—it's essential! Let's break it down real simple: Politics, like life, is all about relationships. Whether you're pushing through a new law or trying to tweak an old one, having allies in your corner can make all the difference.

Think of it this way: no one legislator can cover all the bases alone. You've got your areas of expertise, sure, but when you weave your strengths with those of others, that’s when you really start cooking with gas. It's about synergy, about pulling together diverse perspectives and skills to tackle the big issues facing our state.

And let's not forget—legislation isn't just about having the best ideas; it's about getting those ideas across the finish line. When you've got solid relationships, you've got a network. You know who to call to rally the troops, who to strategize with over coffee, and who might need a little extra convincing to see things your way. It's about understanding, negotiating, and sometimes just plain old horse-trading to get things done.

So, yes, fostering strong relationships with fellow legislators is more than beneficial—it's a strategic move that's crucial for effective governance. It's about building bridges, not walls, and making sure that when it’s time to step up, you’re not standing alone. Let's get in there, build those alliances, and make some real change happen—it’s go time!
I know Lincoln is an iconic and cliche choice, but hear me out. He wasn’t just a President; he was a leader who steered the United States through its most divisive, turbulent period, the Civil War, with a blend of resolve and immense compassion.

Lincoln was all about preserving the Union and pushing forward with monumental changes, such as the Emancipation Proclamation. His ability to navigate extremely contentious political waters, work across the aisle, and maintain his moral compass could serve as a powerful blueprint for any legislator aiming to make a real impact, especially in today’s polarized environment.

Lincoln's leadership style—his emphasis on unity, his strategic thinking, and his unwavering commitment to values—aligns with the reform-driven legislator I aspire to emulate. His approach to governance, balancing strong leadership with a deep respect for humanity, sets a standard that remains relevant and inspirational.
Right now I just want healthcare and less dead kids.

From there I'll let the holy spirit take me where I need to be.
At the very start of this campaign, my dog Django was diagnosed with a mass cell tumor that was taking over the entire right side of his face. He had two months to live if we didn't find him proper treatment.

Through a truly divine sequence of events, we were able to set him up a treatment plan very quickly through the Mizzou Veterinary Oncology Clinic. The doctors there recommended a course of Radiation treatments for him that included:

20 Treatments, each requiring mild anesthesia, 2 hours of specialized technician time, and use of their extremely expensive radiation therapy machines, plus 10-20 hours of oversight by their specialist doctors.

If this were a human, and I told you the treatment was $80,000 would you believe it? If you went through treatment and the "paid by insurance bill" was $800,000 would that seem about right?

Django's entire bill for that cancer treatment was well under $8,000. Start to finish.

I'm sure Radiation Therapy on a Dog is very different than Human treatments, but is it really 10x-100x more expensive? It's all the same technology and staff involved.

What's the real difference? You have 8 other people between you and your doctor that get to weigh in on what treatment is best for their balance sheets. Each of those people need to make a living off your suffering.

If you don't like it, too bad, because HR picks the policies and you should be grateful to still have a job and insurance since cancer tends to make you a pretty bad employee.

Erin and I have been blessed with the resources to afford these procedures, and Django has since completed his treatment and is doing well in recovery.

Will you fare the same? What if you didn't have to worry like Django?
Absolutely, the legislature should have a strong hand in overseeing and granting the use of emergency powers. Here's the deal: emergency powers are like a heavy-hitting tool in the government's toolkit—they're necessary when you've got to act fast and hard, but just like any powerful tool, you've got to handle it with care.

Now, why should the legislature be involved? Because they're the voice of the people, that's why. When you’re talking about making quick decisions that can seriously affect every Joe and Jane in the street—whether it’s locking down a city or doling out funds in a crisis—you better believe that should come with oversight. It’s about checks and balances, keeping everything above board and ensuring that these powers aren’t abused.

The legislature’s role is to put a leash on these powers, to make sure they’re used rightly and justly. They need to be the watchdog, making sure that when the dust settles, we don’t find ourselves stuck with decisions that shouldn’t have been made or, worse, stuck in a state of emergency longer than necessary.

This isn’t just about keeping things tight—it's about maintaining trust in the system. People need to know that their elected officials aren’t just going rogue with the authority granted to them in times of crisis. So, yes, the legislature should absolutely oversee and grant the use of emergency powers—it’s a safeguard for democracy, ensuring that even in the worst of times, the rule of law and the voice of the people remain paramount.
If I'm stepping into the Senate Rotunda, the first piece of legislation I'm throwing down on the table is all about giving our state workers—the backbone of our community—the power they deserve. I'm talking teachers, first responders, and corrections officers. These folks should have the same rights as you and I to negotiate fair compensation for the dedication and professionalism they have shown for us in the last four years.

Why kick off with this? Because it’s not just about making a statement; it's about making an immediate impact. Overhauling healthcare is a marathon, not a sprint, and while that’s on my agenda, giving our state workers the right to stand up for themselves is something we can get across the finish line fast. This isn’t just about fairness; it's about respect and ensuring our frontline heroes have the leverage they need to negotiate for the conditions and compensation they rightfully deserve.

This move sets the tone for my tenure—it tells everyone that I’m here not just to push papers but to push for real, tangible change. It tells every worker out there that I’ve got their back, and I’m here to fight the good fight right from the get-go. So, let’s strap in, gear up, and get ready to bring some long-overdue justice to our state workers. It's go time!
When it comes to financial transparency and government accountability, let me tell you straight—this is the backbone of genuine public service. Without crystal-clear transparency and rock-solid accountability, you've got nothing more than a magician's show, all smoke and mirrors with no real substance.

Here’s my take: Every dollar that flows through government hands should be tracked, traced, and accounted for, like a hawk watching its prey. We’re talking about public money, your money. It needs to be spent wisely, efficiently, and openly. Anytime those funds are misused or mishandled, it’s not just a breach of trust, it’s a slap in the face to every hard-working citizen who expects—and deserves—better from their leaders.

Accountability? It’s non-negotiable. Officials must stand up and take responsibility for their actions. If they mess up, they gotta own it, fix it, and learn from it. No passing the buck, no burying mistakes under layers of bureaucracy. And if they can’t stand the heat of accountability, then maybe they shouldn’t be in the kitchen of governance.

This isn’t just about keeping books in order; it’s about respecting the public trust. If I'm gonna fight for you, you better believe I'll do it with transparency and accountability that's as clear as daylight. Because at the end of the day, if you can’t see what’s happening with your own eyes, then folks, we’ve got a bigger problem than just bad governance. We've got a betrayal of the very principles that hold our society together.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

2020

Candidate Connection

Dan O'Connell completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by O'Connell's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

My name is Dan O'Connell, and I am an Engineer, Christian, and candidate for Missouri's 23rd Senate District. I believe the citizens of St. Charles deserve to be represented by someone that puts their needs over large donors from out of the county.

So much of the Republican platform seems to be focused on stoking the fear that comes with our evolving society instead of working to fix what's broken with meaningful change. I have to believe we can do better.

In this day and age Americans shouldn't be worrying if health insurance will be there next time we're sick. We can't be claiming to fight for the unborn while cutting the funding of those trying to help foster children. Donald Trump has done wonderful work giving more power to the states, and now it's time for us to step up and start using them to actually move forward as a society.

  • Pro-Gun, Pro-Science, Pro-Union, Pro-Life, Pro-Child
  • I know the best way to motivate a Missouri businessman is to pay them. Every policy I propose will put a profit incentive for those that are doing right by our state.
  • Residents of St. Charles are in one of the best counties in America. Good jobs, low crime, and excellent schools. So much of the Republican platform seems to be focused on stoking the fear that comes with our evolving society instead of working to fix what's broken with meaningful change. I have to believe we can do better.
I believe every american has the right to fair compensation for their labor, and should not be working sick because they're afraid of losing their health insurance.

Access to healthcare should not be dependent on where you work. It should be purchased alongside car and home insurance where providing bad service or overriding a doctor's recommendation comes with a penalty on the free market.

I support a new gun pre-check system modeled on the TSA's that would allow qualified Missouri Residents to purchase guns over the counter in minutes, skipping paperwork, waiting periods, and lengthy per-transaction background checks. Those qualified for this pre-check system would also be immune to any firearm purchase restrictions created in the future.

I also believe laws should be based on a sound moral and scientifically backed logic that creates meaningful change while protecting Missouri's Citizens. The effects of extreme climate change cannot be denied as our county is flooded for 6 months at a time. We need to invest in this critical infrastructure before it starts destroying the newest parts of our economy.

The Republican Party used to stand for something, and have moral principles. We can become the Grand Old Party again, but not by throwing insults and memes at our opponents, but by having the better ideas and policies that serve our citizens.
A big part of why I'm running is because I finally realized there are virtually no elected Republicans that I genuinely look up to and respect. John McCain was a great man who stood by his principles, even when it went against the party line, which is a trait I have always respected - even when I disagreed with him politically.

What is it to be Republican any more? Support Donald Trump and hate the enemy of the week? That's not a policy that helps anyone other than those who decide what this week's enemy is.

I'm running because I have to believe Republicans want someone that focuses on how things can be better, and working to do the most good they can do for their constituents, not how much bad they can do to "The Others."
An elected official must be open minded, understanding, and humble, yet confident and sure of his beliefs. We must be able to hear new ideas and ask relevant questions that flesh out those ideas into practical laws and social impacts.

Well written laws apply to everyone of all racial and economic backgrounds, to their collective benefit. They put a profit incentive on making the right moral choices without restricting the freedoms of their citizens.

A good legislator will understand not just the issues, but the emotions that drive them into the public's mind. This enables us to write genuinely good laws that solve the core problem, not just the symptoms.

They should also have the moral integrity to refuse the wishes of their largest donors when the laws they want passed are not good for the state. Too many legislators are marching to the beat of their National Committee hoping to be tapped for higher office, and neglecting the constituents they have right now.

A good legislator remembers who they represent first. Not who paid them the most.
I have been personally affected by at least 2 recessions, and like many my age am still paying down a mountain of student debt that genuinely should not have been issued to me.

As someone that graduated at the beginning of a recession, I have worked minimum wage jobs, skilled trade jobs, white collar engineering jobs, and white collar finance. Thanks to our rollercoaster economy, and I have actually changed industries nearly every year of my adult life.

I started studying economics while I was an engineer that was told he was "Lucky" to find work as a grocery store cashier. Someone needed to explain why I was in this situation, what went wrong, how it was going to get better, and what we were going to do about it. Turns out it wasn't immigrants. It was just classic greed and corruption from within our own homes. Immigrants were actually giving me more work than those telling me to "work harder".

The experience was humbling, and helped me filter out the "fake news" and other propganda, and stay focused on the objective facts of the situation. After all, this is the "Show Me" state, so anyone claiming to be pro-life should be looking to improve the Infant or Maternal Mortality rate and not just writing an unconstitutional (for now) abortion ban. This is good work, but there is so much more to do.

My varied experience has given me first-hand perspective on so many issues that I see our current politicians blinded to. They cry that minimum wage workers should "just" work themselves into a better role, or take night classes. If they were to sit down and do the math, they'd see that it is mathematically impossible to work yourself out of poverty at Missouri's minimum wage. Everyone that works a 40hr/week job deserves to afford both food AND rent.

A Senator's constituents sent them to Jefferson City to decide on key issues that affect the state. It is a Senator's job to work with other legislators to create laws that benefit their constituents and their state.

It is not their job to repost memes from their favorite facebook group and call it "Interacting with their Constituents". They should show moral integrity at all times, and call out one another's failings when appropriate, instead of going out of their way to make excuses.
I would like to establish a new philosophy in Missouri that has our state thinking in decades to grow by the generation, instead of focusing on short-term gains and treating symptoms.

Our current welfare program spends more on administration and oversight than it does helping people. There are newer systems that would enable citizens to collect on claims simply and easily, but with hard caps to prevent excessive abuse.

Every school should be a palace to education. Missouri workers should be sought after as highly educated critical thinkers that every business would want to hire. We don't do this by spending less on education. Anything spent on education at any point in life should be tax-deductible, no matter your social or racial background.

We have industries right now that need skilled workers, and thousands of underemployed workers that are willing to work hard toward a career that isn't just another job "to get by". We could create and promote programs that match employers with these workers, subsidize their training, and lead them into higher income jobs that pay for themselves within 10 years.

Nobody benefits from poverty, and there is simply no reason to continue the cycle in today's age.
If we're including local history, it would probably be the Flood of 1993. I was really little, and was just stoked that Dad was home all the time. It wasn't until I was older that I learned how much long-term economic damage flooding can do to an economy. Flooding is only becoming more regular and more extreme, and the engineers that maintain our infrastructure are openly warning us that we are at risk for major damage again. There is no reason to ignore these warnings just because "it means the liberals might win".

The first major world event that happened in my lifetime would be 9/11. I was sitting in Chemistry class when the principal made an announcement over the PA system stating that a plane had hit a tower. In hindsight, the moment actually gave me perspective on Bush's famous lack of response because most of us just thought it was a weird announcement to make and the teacher just went back to the lecture. It wasn't until about an hour later (well after the second plane had hit) that classes were effectively cancelled and we were all glued to whatever we TV we could find.

Since that day I have been constantly told who to fear and what to be afraid of. First it was "The Terrorists", then it was "The Immigrants", now it's "The Liberals". I'm tired of living in fear, and believe there is no reason any American should be. We have the finest military in the world operating with the most advanced intelligence gathering network ever seen. Much of which was designed and built by St. Charles Residents .

Living in fear just halts progress, hinders economies, and ruins societies. We may not be able to control the bad in the world, but we all control the amount of good we do each day.

My first job was in high school working as a cook at the local Pizza Hut. There I learned the value hard work and was rewarded for picking up any position on the team and leading from the front. Corporate management liked me enough they were recruiting me for management after graduation since they kept seeing me lead the team from the front through long rushes while still keeping a positive attitude in front of angry customers.

It was here I also learned that some people will never make it out of their minimum wage positions no matter how hard they work due to their past life circumstances and personal choices. These relationships have stuck with me to this day and informed my policies on minimum wage, welfare, and other social programs that only people as a tax burden instead of giving them what they need to move forward.
Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged was easily the most influential book to my political philosophy.

I don't necessarily agree with her conclusions, but her process of creating objective good motivated by a profit incentive made me redefine many of my political opinions. Since then I have met with many Missouri Farmers who have taught me the easiest way to convince an American to do something is to simply pay them to do it.

It holds true so universally and on large and small scales. Everyone loves making more money doing the right thing. If that can be properly and clearly communicated, our world would move along so much more smoothly.
I have always been enamored with Captain America's spirit. His moral center was strong enough that when SHIELD started slipping into the dark side, he could bring agents just following orders to question if they had accidentally found themselves on the wrong side of the issues.

Acting on orders is no excuse for trespassing on human rights. It's on all of us to stand up for what's right, even it would cost us our jobs or more. I want to reward that behavior, or at least make it a little less scary for those to make that stand.
I dare not name the song and inflict this poor reader with the same virus.
I have held a new job in a new industry almost every year of my adult life. Not because I'm lazy, or a horrible worker, but because the economics of my chosen industry are very sensitive to public policy and corporate mood.

Every time I worked my way out of the hole of unemployment, and I know it was only through sheer luck many of those instances. I've met others along the way that were not so lucky, and it pains me to see how they are continuing to pay for bad luck and one poor choice decades ago.
Previous experience in government is always beneficial, but at the state level, I don't believe it is a requirement. Most in the state legislature are serving in their first elected term.

Everyone has to start somewhere, and every congressional session faces issues that have never been seen by that body before. That is why we need faith in our representatives so they cannot
The COVID Shutdown and our lack of response will have economic echoes for most of the next decade. We will need to aggressively stimulate our economy and help Missouri businesses rebuild.

People will need whole new careers. Simply attracting minimum wage to say we created more "jobs" will only maintain a cycle of poverty and restrict our ability to innovate and genuinely grow. The work still needs to be done, but we need to be investing in education and skilled workers.

I would seek partnerships with Missouri businesses to help subsidize apprentices and trade schools.
The ideal relationship would be a symbiotic partnership, with the governor easily passing legislature passed by a body of this citizen's representatives, and enforced through the executive branch.

A governor could then use that relationship to call for support when requesting federal help by asking the state legislature to pass bills supporting his requests.
There is no good that comes from cutting off communication with any other legislator! Republican or Democrat, bills won't be passed until it has the required amount of votes, and even then you want the bills to be palatable to all sides so you aren't imposing the will of a 51% majority on a 49% of a minority.

True legislation is built in the halls of congress and in working out deals and compromises in thousands of small meetings leveraging personal relationships. If the details of a bill are being worked out on the main floor of the Senate something has already gone horribly wrong. Egos and public image are now in play, and people will be reluctant to negotiate or back down because they've already publicly supported an extreme.

Working together in smaller conference rooms lets representatives be honest with each other and seek solutions that actually benefit their constituents, Simply seeking to deny "wins" by "The Others" on principle alone only means the state isn't moving forward and everyone is still unhappy with the problems we sent our representatives to solve.

I will always support moving forward with legislation that objectively benefits the state. No matter what team sponsored it.
I would serve in whatever capacity my state required of me. Given my Engineering and Business background, I would likely try to find myself on Task Forces more than the long-standing legislative committees.
I am not a member of the local republican leadership. Most of why I am running is because I am disgusted with the lack of moral consistency and integrity shown by the Republican leadership in my state and county.

I would consider joining the leadership, but so far the reception my local Republican Committee has been predictably cold, and I expect the same once I find myself in Jefferson City.
The last Republican I genuinely respected was John McCain. A true American that had the moral integrity to stand against his party when they were wrong, and didn't flinch when he took a beating for calling them out on it. I wish we had more men like him, but right now we only seem to have Republicans that think rigging an election and denying healthcare is what's best for America.
I would serve in whatever capacity my country requires of me. Right now I see a state on fire, and am only going to focus on putting that out before moving onto the next one.

In the words of Ron Swanson: Don't half-ass two things. Whole-ass one thing.
There is a man in my district that I really met when he cracked a joke about being "Slave Labor". He works as a furniture mover making just over minimum wage.

He hasn't collected a paycheck for over a year. Due to a previously higher income his child support and alimony are being garnished at a higher level than his paycheck. This could be resolved with a court order, but lawyers that work for free take years to work through a case.

Yes, he is paying for sins of the past, but he also knows his children are being mistreated by the ex-wife. He cannot file for custody because that also takes lawyers.

He has no ability to work out of his current career because he has no way to make savings and must work a restaurant job that allows him to eat discarded food. With no savings, and no free time, there is no way this man working 80 hours a week can move forward in life. He will inevitably end up on social assistance programs when his body or soul finally gives out. His children are already on social welfare programs because his ex-wife doesn't work and he doesn't make enough to cover the bills.

Our systems are broken. This is an intelligent man working 80 hours a week with no hope of life going better for him. Yes he has committed sins in the past, but he's done his best to stay within the law. With a minimal amount of assistance, he could have some breathing room to actually work his way out of poverty and prevent an entire family from being a burden on our welfare system.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.


Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Dan O'Connell campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024* Missouri State Senate District 23Lost primary$4,991 $17,683
2020Missouri State Senate District 23Lost primary$4,846 N/A**
Grand total$9,838 $17,683
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete
** Data on expenditures is not available for this election cycle
Note: Totals above reflect only available data.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on April 15, 2020
  2. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on July 20, 2024


Current members of the Missouri State Senate
Leadership
Majority Leader:Tony Luetkemeyer
Minority Leader:Doug Beck
Senators
District 1
Doug Beck (D)
District 2
District 3
District 4
Karla May (D)
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
Ben Brown (R)
District 27
District 28
District 29
Mike Moon (R)
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
Republican Party (24)
Democratic Party (10)