File:BallotLaw final.png
From Ballotpedia
Size of this preview: 595 × 600 pixels. Other resolution: 1,000 × 1,008 pixels.
Original file (1,000 × 1,008 pixels, file size: 178 KB, MIME type: image/png)
 you can send your inquiry to editor@ballotpedia.org |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 16:17, 22 May 2012 | | 1,000 × 1,008 (178 KB) | Pthrower (contribs) | |
| 16:15, 22 May 2012 | No thumbnail | 1,000 × 1,008 (178 KB) | Pthrower (contribs) | {{BP logo}}Category:Law images |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
More than 100 pages use this file. The following list shows the first 100 pages that use this file only. A full list is available.
- 2008 single-subject rule challenges
- ACLU v. Lomax
- Alaskans for Efficient Government v. State
- Armatta v. Kitzhaber
- Badge requirements for ballot initiative signature gatherers
- Ballot title
- Ballot title litigation, 2008-2012
- Bernbeck v. Moore
- Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation
- California Assembly Bill 1914 (2008)
- California Trial Lawyers Association v. Eu
- Canvasser Services v. Employment Department
- Chandler v. City of Arvada
- Changes in 2007 to laws governing ballot measures
- Changes in 2008 to laws governing ballot measures
- Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Association v. Deukmejian
- Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters
- Committee for a Healthy Future v. Carnahan
- Coppernoll v. Reed
- Court cases with an impact on the initiative process
- Dobrovolny v. Moore
- Fashion Valley Mall v. National Labor Relations Board
- Fiscal impact statement
- Frami v. Ponto
- Hartig v. City of Seattle
- Idaho Coalition United for Bears v. Cenarrusa
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. Costco
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. Herbert
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. Jaeger
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. Ralph's
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal Service
- Insurance Industry Initiative Campaign Committee v. Eu
- Invalid signature
- LIMIT v. Maleng
- Laws governing ballot initiative signature gatherers
- Laws governing the initiative process
- Laws governing the initiative process in Alaska
- Laws governing the initiative process in Arizona
- Laws governing the initiative process in Arkansas
- Laws governing the initiative process in California
- Laws governing the initiative process in Colorado
- Laws governing the initiative process in Florida
- Laws governing the initiative process in Idaho
- Laws governing the initiative process in Maine
- Laws governing the initiative process in Massachusetts
- Laws governing the initiative process in Michigan
- Laws governing the initiative process in Mississippi
- Laws governing the initiative process in Missouri
- Laws governing the initiative process in Montana
- Laws governing the initiative process in Nebraska
- Laws governing the initiative process in Nevada
- Laws governing the initiative process in North Dakota
- Laws governing the initiative process in Ohio
- Laws governing the initiative process in Oklahoma
- Laws governing the initiative process in Oregon
- Laws governing the initiative process in South Dakota
- Laws governing the initiative process in Utah
- Laws governing the initiative process in Washington
- Laws governing the initiative process in Wyoming
- Lemons v. Bradbury
- Length of signature gathering periods for ballot initiatives
- Maine Taxpayer Action Network v. Secretary of State
- McGee v. Dunlap
- Measures described as Trojan Horse ballot initiatives
- Meyer v. Grant
- Missourians to Protect Initiative Process v. Blunt
- Montana PIRG v. Johnson
- Nader v. Brewer
- Nader v. McAuliffe
- Nebraska Legislative Bill 39 (2008)
- Oklahomans for Modern Alcoholic Beverage Controls v. Shelton
- On Our Terms '97 PAC v. Secretary of State of Maine
- Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph v. State of Oregon
- Padilla v. Lever
- Paid blocker
- Person v. New York State Board of Elections
- Preserve Shorecliff Homeowners v. City of San Clemente
- Prete v. Bradbury
- Ralph Nader v. Democratic National Committee
- Residency requirements for ballot initiative signature gatherers
- Senate of the State of California v. Bill Jones
- Signature distribution requirements for ballot initiatives
- Single-subject rule for ballot initiatives
- Stenberg v. Moore
- Stranahan v. Meyer
- Superseding initiative
- Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Political Practices Commission
- Term Limits Leadership Council v. Clark
- United Gamefowl Breeders v. Nixon
- Valid signature
- WIN v. Warheit
- Wirzburger v. Galvin
- Yes on Term Limits v. Savage
- Template:Law
- Category:Laws governing petition circulators
- Category:Laws governing the initiative process
- Category:Petition circulator court cases
- Category:Petitioner access lawsuits
- Category:Residency requirements
- Category:Signature requirements
View more links to this file.
