Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

Idaho Constitutional Amendment HJR4, Require 35 Legislative Districts Amendment (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Idaho Constitutional Amendment HJR 4
Flag of Idaho.png
Election date
November 3, 2020
Topic
State legislatures measures
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature


Idaho Constitutional Amendment HJR 4, the Require 35 Legislative Districts Amendment was on the ballot in Idaho as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2020. It was approved.


A "yes" vote supported removing language in the state constitution that allows the legislature to have between 30 and 35 legislative districts and instead requiring the legislature to consist of 35 districts.

A "no" vote opposed adding the requirement of 35 legislative districts to the Idaho Constitution, thereby maintaining that the number of legislative districts be determined by state statute.


Election results

Idaho Constitutional Amendment HJR4

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

525,779 67.95%
No 247,966 32.05%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

How did Constitutional Amendment HJR 4 change how the number of legislative districts is determined?

See also: Measure design

The amendment removed language in the state constitution that allowed the legislature to have between 30 and 35 districts and, instead, required the state to have 35 state legislative districts. Any future changes to the number of legislative districts in the state would have to be decided by voters as a constitutional amendment. At the time of the election, the number of legislative districts was determined by state statute, which meant the state legislature can vote to adjust the number between 30 and 35. At the time of the election, the Idaho State Senate contained 35 Senators, who were elected from 35 districts. The Idaho House of Representatives contained 70 Representatives, who were elected from the same 35 districts, with two being elected from each constituency.[1]

Who supported and opposed Constitutional Amendment HJR 4?

See also: Path to the ballot

House Speaker Scott Bedke (R) sponsored the House Joint Resolution 4. In Idaho, both chambers of the state legislature need to pass a constitutional amendment by a two-thirds vote during one legislative session to refer an amendment to the ballot. The measure passed in the Idaho House of Representatives on February 18, 2020, in a vote of 65-3 with two representatives absent. The measure passed in the Senate by a vote of 31-4 on March 4, 2020, with all no votes from Democratic senators.[2]

How did the number of Idaho's legislative districts compare to other states?

See also: Districts by state

With a total of 70 state legislative districts, Idaho had the seventh lowest number of state legislative districts in the U.S. at the time of the election. Pennsylvania had the highest number of state legislative districts with 253, and Nebraska had the lowest number since it has a unicameral system with 49 districts.

Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question was as follows:[1]

Shall Section 2, Article III, of the Constitution of the State of Idaho be amended to require that the Senate shall consist of thirty-five members; and shall Section 4, Article III, of the Constitution of the State of Idaho, be amended to require that the Legislature shall be apportioned to thirty-five legislative districts?[3]

Ballot summary

The ballot summary was as follows:[4]

The purpose of the proposed amendment is to permanently set the number of senators in the Idaho

Legislature, as well as the number of legislative districts in Idaho, at 35. (There are twice as many representatives as senators, which this amendment would not change.) Since 1992, there have been 35 districts and senators, but the Idaho Constitution permits as few as 30 and as many as 35 districts and senators, with the number determined during redistricting (the process of redrawing legislative district boundaries after a United States census). lf this amendment is adopted, the number of districts and senators would be fixed at 35 and could not be changed during redistricting.[3]

Constitutional changes

See also: Idaho Constitution

The measure amended sections 2 and 4 of Article III of the Idaho Constitution. The following underlined text was added and struck-through text was deleted:[2][1] Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.

Section 2. MEMBERSHIP OF HOUSE AND SENATE. (1) Following the decennial census of 1990 2020 and in each legislature thereafter, the senate shall consist of not less than thirty nor more than thirty-five members. The legislature may fix the number of members of the house of representatives at not more than two times as many representatives as there are senator. The senators and representatives shall be chosen by the electors of the respective counties or districts into which the state may, from time to time, be divided by law.

Section 4. APPORTIONMENT OF LEGISLATURE. The members of the legislature following the decennial census of 1990 2020 and each legislature thereafter shall be apportioned to not less than thirty nor more than thirty-five legislative districts of the state as may be provided by law. [3]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2020
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The State legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.


The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 26, and the FRE is 5. The word count for the ballot title is 53, and the estimated reading time is 14 seconds. The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 15, and the FRE is 32. The word count for the ballot summary is 104, and the estimated reading time is 27 seconds.


Support

Supporters

Officials


Arguments

  • Idaho House Speaker and measure sponsor Scott Bedke (R): "[Since the 1980s], we have had 35 legislative districts, and it seems to suit us well. Yet your Constitution says you can have as few as 30. So why would we want to change this? I think the reasoning is as Idaho grows, then our citizens are better served with more legislative districts than fewer. It’s certainly something that we’re all used to for the last 30-plus years. But our Constitution allows for fewer legislative districts, and I think we’d be well-served going forward pegging that at 35."
  • Idaho State Representative Ilana Rubel (D): "Next year's redistricting committee could go down to 30 districts. We've had 35 since the 1990s. But we could go down to 30, which means bigger districts, and more people, and that would diminish access to their legislators... This is a process done by a bipartisan redistricting committee -- three Democrats, three Republicans. That stays the same, there's no monkeying around with the redistricting committee."

Official arguments

The following arguments in support of the amendment were included in the 2020 Idaho Voters' Pamphlet:[4]

1. Setting the number of districts at 35 would prevent the number of districts from being reduced during redistricting in 2021. If the number of districts is reduced, Idaho would have fewer legislators, meaning that Idahoans would have less representation in the Legislature at a time when the state’s population is growing and the Legislature is addressing complex issues related to population growth. With fewer legislators representing more constituents, Idahoans would have less access to their legislators, limiting their ability to discuss issues of concern with the people elected to represent their interests. Additionally, with more constituents per legislator, legislators might not be able to provide as many individuals with constituent services.

2. Setting the number of districts at 35 and thus preventing any reduction in the number of districts would also keep urban and rural interests in balance. If the number of districts is reduced, rural residents could be added to mostly urban districts, and urban residents could be added to mostly rural districts. This could result in legislators being less responsive to some constituents’ interests than others. Furthermore, reducing the number of districts might require districts of great geographical size, which could include many communities that have few interests in common. Large districts might also make travel difficult, and more remote areas of the district could be ignored by legislative candidates during campaigns and by elected legislators who focus on areas where more constituents live. By preserving 35 districts, this amendment makes it more likely that Idaho residents will have representation responsive to their local interests.

3. Redistricting in Idaho is done by the bipartisan Citizens’ Commission for Reapportionment and is often contentious. If the number of districts is set by law, the commission would not need to determine the number of districts, eliminating a potential point of conflict between the commissioners.[3]

Opposition

Opponents

Officials


Arguments

  • Idaho State Representative Heather Scott (R): "I do not think the cost of a constitutional change ($200,000.00 to $300,000.00) justifies the change being made. The districts are currently capped at 35."

Official arguments

The following arguments in opposition to the amendment were included in the 2020 Idaho Voters' Pamphlet:[4]

1. Redistricting is a complicated process, because redistricting plans must comply with several legal requirements that can be in conflict with each other. For example, districts must be roughly equal in population, but must also avoid, to the extent possible, splitting up counties and communities - even though some counties and communities have significantly larger populations than others. Redistricting plans that fail to comply with all requirements can be challenged in court. By adding another fixed requirement, this amendment would make redistricting more difficult and might invite court challenges. The commission currently has the flexibility to determine the number of districts within a certain range because it is possible that a plan with 30 larger districts could better satisfy legal requirements than a plan with 35 smaller districts. The commission’s flexibility should be preserved.

2. Changes to the redistricting process should be proposed well in advance of a redistricting year, with enough time to consider all possible consequences of the change. This amendment would cause a significant change to be made right before redistricting occurs in 2021 without sufficient time to consider the consequences.

3. Reducing the number of legislative districts would mean a corresponding reduction in the number of legislators. This would reduce the size of the government and could potentially save public funds spent on legislator salaries and benefits.[3]

Campaign finance

The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through December 10, 2020.


See also: Campaign finance requirements for Idaho ballot measures

There were no ballot measure committees registered in support of or in opposition to Constitutional Amendment HJR4.[5]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Background

Legislative districts in Idaho

In 1986, voters approved an amendment that allowed the legislature to limit the number of legislative districts between 30 and 35 after the 1990 census. It also prohibited floterial districts, which are separate districts that geographically overlap each other, giving the effect of a multi-member district in the area of overlap.

At the time of the election, Idaho had 35 state Senate districts and 35 state House districts. The state House districts are multi-member districts (MMDs). Candidates for the Idaho House of Representatives run for one out of the two district seats available. This type of multi-member district is called seat/post because instead of running in a pool of candidates with the aim of finishing strongly enough, candidates run for a specific seat as in a single-member district.

Legislative districts by state

See also: State Legislative Districts

Idaho has a total of 70 state legislative districts. Ballotpedia counts senate and house districts towards the total district count, even if they align geographically. Idaho has the seventh lowest number of state legislative districts in the U.S. Pennsylvania has the highest number of state legislative districts with 253, and Nebraska has the lowest number since it has a unicameral system with 49 districts.

The following table details the number of districts and seats in each legislative chamber in the U.S. Chambers with multi-member districts are bolded.

Legislative seats and districts
State Senate districts Senate seats House districts House seats Total districts Total seats
Alabama 35 35 105 105 140 140
Alaska 20 20 40 40 60 60
Arizona 30 30 30 60 60 90
Arkansas 35 35 100 100 135 135
California 40 40 80 80 120 120
Colorado 35 35 65 65 100 100
Connecticut 36 36 151 151 187 187
Delaware 21 21 41 41 62 62
Florida 40 40 120 120 160 160
Georgia 56 56 180 180 236 236
Hawaii 25 25 51 51 76 76
Idaho 35 35 35 70 70 105
Illinois 59 59 118 118 177 177
Indiana 50 50 100 100 150 150
Iowa 50 50 100 100 150 150
Kansas 40 40 125 125 165 165
Kentucky 38 38 100 100 138 138
Louisiana 39 39 105 105 144 144
Maine 35 35 151 151 186 186
Maryland 47 47 67[6] 141 114 188
Massachusetts 40 40 160 160 200 200
Michigan 38 38 110 110 148 148
Minnesota 67 67 134 134 201 201
Mississippi 52 52 122 122 174 174
Missouri 34 34 163 163 197 197
Montana 50 50 100 100 150 150
Nebraska 49 49 0 0 49 49
Nevada 21 21 42 42 63 63
New Hampshire 24 24 204 400 228 424
New Jersey 40 40 40 80 80 120
New Mexico 42 42 70 70 112 112
New York 63 63 150 150 213 213
North Carolina 50 50 120 120 170 170
North Dakota 47 47 47 94 94 141
Ohio 33 33 99 99 132 132
Oklahoma 48 48 101 101 149 149
Oregon 30 30 60 60 90 90
Pennsylvania 50 50 203 203 253 253
Rhode Island 38 38 75 75 113 113
South Carolina 46 46 124 124 170 170
South Dakota 35 35 35 70 70 105
Tennessee 33 33 99 99 132 132
Texas 31 31 150 150 181 181
Utah 29 29 75 75 104 104
Vermont 13 30 104 150 117 180
Virginia 40 40 100 100 140 140
Washington 49 49 49 98 98 147
West Virginia 17 34 67 100 84 134
Wisconsin 33 33 99 99 132 132
Wyoming 30 30 60 60 90 90
Total 1,938 1,972 4,826 5,411 6,764 7,383

Ballot measures in Idaho

See also: History of Initiative & Referendum in Idaho and List of Idaho ballot measures
  • From 1996 to 2018, 36 measures have been on the ballot in Idaho.
  • Between 1996 and 2018, an average of three measures have appeared on even-numbered election year ballots in Idaho.
  • Between 1996 and 2018, 26 of 36, or 72 percent, of Idaho ballot measures have been approved by voters.
  • Conversely, 10 of 36, or 28 percent, of measures have been defeated.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Idaho Constitution

In Idaho, both chambers of the state legislature need to pass a constitutional amendment by a two-thirds vote during one legislative session to refer an amendment to the ballot.

The amendment was introduced on February 6, 2020, as House Joint Resolution 4 by House Speaker Scott Bedke (R). The measure passed in the Idaho House of Representatives on February 18, 2020, in a vote of 65-3 with two representatives absent. The measure passed in the Senate by a vote of 31-4 on March 4, 2020, with all no votes from Democratic Senators.[2]

Vote in the Idaho House of Representatives
February 18, 2020
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 47  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total6532
Total percent93%4%3%
Democrat1211
Republican5321

Vote in the Idaho State Senate
March 4, 2020
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 24  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3140
Total percent88.6%11.4%0.0%
Democrat340
Republican2800

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Idaho

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Idaho.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Idaho State Legislature, "House Joint Resolution 4 Text," accessed February 18, 2020
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Idaho State Legislature, "House Joint Resolution 4," accessed February 18, 2020
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Idaho Secretary of State, "2020 Voters' Pamphlet," accessed September 29, 2020
  5. Idaho Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance Database," accessed March 9, 2020
  6. There are 47 district numbers in the Maryland State House. Counted individually, there are 67 districts. For example, Districts 1A, 1B, and 1C add up to three seats, while District 4—which has three legislators—counts as one district.
  7. Idaho Statutes, "Section 34-1101," accessed July 2, 2025
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Idaho Secretary of State, "Idaho Voter Registration Form," accessed July 2, 2025
  9. Idaho Secretary of State, "Citizenship & Voting," accessed July 2, 2025
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Idaho Secretary of State - Vote Idaho, "Registering To Vote," accessed July 2, 2025
  11. Idaho Legislature, "Idaho Statutes § 34-408," accessed June 26, 2025
  12. Idaho Legislature, "2025 Legislation - House Bill 278," accessed June 26, 2025
  13. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."