Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

John Crabtree recall, Visalia Unified School District, California (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Visalia Unified School District recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
John Crabtree
Recall status
Did not go to a vote
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2020
Recalls in California
California recall laws
School board recalls
Recall reports

An effort to recall John Crabtree from his position as president and Trustee Area 4 representative of the Visalia Unified School District Board of Education in California did not go to a vote in 2020. The petition was approved for circulation in August 2020. Recall supporters had to collect 2,411 signatures by November 18, 2020, to get the recall on the ballot.[1] They did not submit any petition signatures by the deadline.[2]

The effort began in June 2020. Recall supporters listed the district's deficit, the board's decision to not build a fifth high school, and Crabtree's negligent leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic as reasons for the recall effort. Crabtree responded by saying that the district would not have a deficit if new student projections proved accurate, that the high school plan was canceled in the design phase due to cost increases, and that it was difficult for the district to build a virtual program from scratch at the end of the school year in response to the pandemic.[3]

Crabtree was elected to the board in November 2013 and re-elected in November 2018. His term was scheduled to expire on December 9, 2022.[4]

To read about other recall efforts related to the coronavirus and government responses to the pandemic, click here.

Recall supporters

The petition included the following reasons for recall:[3]

1. Knowingly adopted a budget with over $4 million deficit in 2019-20 with no published plan to reduce costs to balance the budget in 2020-21.
2. This deliberate budget deficit makes the impact of the current state budget crisis far worse for VUSD including massive layoffs of district staff and loss of services to students.
3. Mr. Crabtree announced that VUSD will not build the fifth Visalia high school with the General Obligation bonds approved by Visalia voters and did not express any intent to rescind the bonds and relieve voters of this tax liability.
4. Upon the onset of the COVID19 pandemic and resulting school closures, Mr. Crabtree’s leadership was grossly negligent in sustaining a level of quality education for our students and educational support for parents and families.[5]

Recall opponents

Crabtree responded to the allegations in the recall petition as follows:[3]

1. Budget was passed with deficits, pending allocation of revenues from the usual sources. District was not in a deficit when accounting for new students, which aren’t part of the budget pending outcome of that growth. New administration had several challenges to cutting cost which came later. District is no longer in deficit with recently passed budget.
2. District has been making many changes to operate more efficiently and balance the budget. This sometimes includes moving employees to different positions, but rarely resulting in layoffs. To date no students services have suffered. More likely improved.
3. Unanimous decision by board stopped high school in the design phase because of the cost increases to build, reimbursements from the state were looking less likely and the COVID-19 crises. No bonds or cost related to them have been issued. Possible for high school in future.
4. Our district, like many others, were caught off guard by the pandemic. Being near the end of the year made it extremely difficult for staff to build a program from scratch. Considering the nature of this, I would say they did an outstanding job.[5]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in California

Recall supporters filed the notice of intent to recall with the Tulare County Registrar of Voters on June 23, 2020. Crabtree filed his response to the recall petitions on June 26, 2020.[3] The county approved the petition for circulation in August 2020. To get the recall on the ballot, supporters had to collect 2,411 signatures (20% of registered voters) from the school district's Trustee Area 4.[1][6] Recall supporters did not submit any petition signatures by the deadline.[2]

If the petition had been submitted by the deadline, the county would have had 30 days to verify the signatures. If enough signatures had been verified, the school board would have had 14 days to schedule the recall election between 88 and 125 days after the date the county verified the signatures.[1][6]

Recalls related to the coronavirus

See also: Recalls related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) and government responses to the pandemic

Ballotpedia covered 35 coronavirus-related recall efforts against 94 officials in 2022, accounting for 13% of recalls that year. This is a decrease from both 2020 and 2021. COVID-related recalls accounted for 37% of all recall efforts in both 2020 and 2021. In 2020, there were 87 COVID-related recalls against 89 officials, and in 2021, there were 131 against 214 officials.

The chart below compares coronavirus-related recalls to recalls for all other reasons in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

2020 recall efforts

See also: School board recalls

Ballotpedia tracked 29 school board recall efforts against 64 board members in 2020. Four recall elections were held in 2020. The school board recall success rate was 7.8%.

The chart below details the status of 2020 recall efforts by individual school board member.

See also

External links

Footnotes