Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Municipal elections in San Jose, California (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Top 100 Cities Banner.jpg




2018
2015
2016 San Jose elections
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Election dates
Filing deadline: N/A
Primary election: June 7, 2016
General election: November 8, 2016
Election stats
Offices up: City council
Total seats up: 5
Other municipal elections
U.S. municipal elections, 2016
Five of the 10 seats on the San Jose City Council were up for election in the primary on June 7, 2016. District 4 Councilman Manh Nguyen was defeated by Lan Diep and District 10 Councilman Johnny Khamis defeated Michael Sodergren in their respective primaries. The other three primary elections, in Districts 2, 6, and 8, were for seats held by term-limited incumbents. None of the candidates in those races received a majority of the vote, so the top two vote-getters in each district faced off in the November general election.[1]


Pro-business Mayor Sam Liccardo had a working majority on the city council heading into the 2016 election. Vice Mayor Rose Herrera and Councilmen Chappie Jones, Khamis, Manh Nguyen, and Tam Nguyen formed the core of the mayor's coalition, with Councilman Pierluigi Oliverio contributing votes on some issues. However, with Manh Nguyen's defeat in the June 2016 primary and Herrera and Oliverio term limited out of office in 2016, labor supporters hoped to shift the balance of power in November.[2] Learn more about the balance of power and other issues that faced San Jose by clicking here.


The primary candidate field for the open race in District 6 featured eight candidates vying to replace Oliverio. Four candidates competed in the District 2 primary and five ran for the District 8 seat. Candidates Steve Brown and Sergio Jimenez in District 2, Helen Chapman and Dev Davis in District 6, and Sylvia Arenas and Jimmy Nguyen in District 8 were the top two vote-getters in their respective races. They competed in the runoff elections in November.[1]

Elections

General election

Candidate list

District 2

Steve Brown
Sergio Jimenez

District 6

Helen Chapman
Devora Davis

District 8

Sylvia Arenas
Jimmy Nguyen

Results

Sergio Jimenez defeated Steve Brown in the general election for San Jose City Council District 2.
San Jose City Council District 2, General Election, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Sergio Jimenez 54.97% 17,629
Steve Brown 45.03% 14,441
Total Votes 32,070
Source: Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, "Official Final Results," December 8, 2016


Devora Davis defeated Helen Chapman in the general election for San Jose City Council District 6.
San Jose City Council District 6, General Election, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Devora Davis 53.85% 20,360
Helen Chapman 46.15% 17,450
Total Votes 37,810
Source: Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, "Official Final Results," December 8, 2016


Sylvia Arenas defeated Jimmy Nguyen in the general election for San Jose City Council District 8.
San Jose City Council District 8, General Election, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Sylvia Arenas 50.14% 17,258
Jimmy Nguyen 49.86% 17,161
Total Votes 34,419
Source: Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, "Official Final Results," December 8, 2016

Primary election

Candidate list

Incumbents Ash Kalra, Pierluigi Oliverio and Rose Herrera were term limited from seeking re-election to their District 2, 6 and 8 seats.

District 2

District 4

District 6

District 8

District 10

Note: Unofficial results put Diep ahead of Nguyen by 28 votes out of more than 17,000 in the District 4 primary. An automatic recount put Diep's lead at 14 votes. A second recount, funded by Nguyen, confirmed that Diep won the election.

Ballot measures

See also: Santa Clara County, California ballot measures

November 8, 2016

Measure E: San Jose Additional Hours for Part-Time Workers Approveda

A yes vote was a vote in favor of requiring employers with 36 or more employees to give additional work hours to existing part-time employees before hiring new employees, including subcontractors and temporary workers, so long as the additional hours did not require overtime pay rates.
A no vote was a vote against this initiative to require employers with 36 or more employees to give additional work hours to existing part-time employees before hiring new employees, including subcontractors and temporary workers, so long as the additional hours did not require overtime pay rates.

Measure G: San Jose Business Tax Increase Approveda

A yes vote was a vote in favor of raising the base business tax from $150 to $195, increasing the per-employee tax and per-rental unit tax such that business with more employees or more rental units pay higher rates, allowing online business registration and payment, and raising the maximum cap on business taxes from $25,000 per year to $150,000 per year.
A no vote was a vote against this proposal to raise the base business tax from $150 to $195, increasing the per-employee tax and per-rental unit tax such that business with more employees or more rental units pay higher rates, allowing online business registration and payment, and raising the maximum cap on business taxes from $25,000 per year to $150,000 per year.

Measure X: San Jose-Evergreen Community College Bond Issue Approveda

A yes vote was a vote in favor of issuing $748,000,000 in bonds to fund classroom upgrades and repairs.
A no vote was a vote against issuing $748,000,000 in bonds to fund classroom upgrades and repairs.

Measure F: San Jose Pension Modification Agreement Approveda

A yes vote was a vote in favor of developing an agreement between first responder and city employee bargaining groups to, among other provisions, stop funding retiree health care for new employees, reduce costs of supplemental pension payments, and reinstate disability retirement provisions for first responders and city employees.
A no vote was a vote against this measure to develop an agreement between first responder and city employee bargaining groups to, among other provisions, stop funding retiree health care for new employees, reduce costs of supplemental pension payments, and reinstate disability retirement provisions for first responders and city employees.

June 7, 2016

Measure C: San Jose Medical Marijuana Collectives Initiative Defeatedd

A "yes" vote would replace the city's medical marijuana ordinances with less restrictive provisions expanding the city zones in which collectives would operate and allowing collectives to buy products from outside sources.
A "no" vote would leave the city's marijuana laws unchanged.

Measure B: San Jose Sales Tax Measure Approveda

A "yes" vote would enact a 0.25 general percent sales tax for 15 years.
A "no" vote would reject the proposed 0.25 percent sales tax.

Campaign finance

San Jose City Council campaign finance summaries, 2016 calendar year through November 6, 2016[3]
District Candidate Contributions Expenditures Cash Debt
2 Steve Brown $53,488.00 $56,499.43 $2,769.90 $4,592.23
2 Sergio Jimenez* $112,084.09 $109,250.54 $19,514.69 $0.00
6 Helen Chapman $145,419.25 $146,907.80 $13,712.98 $16,000.00
6 Devora Davis $188,506.42 $182,119.95 $22,591.41 $16,364.04
8 Sylvia Arenas $76,108.40 $50,670.50 $26,455.30 $750.00
8 Jimmy Nguyen $78,716.00 $90,428.99 $2,158.55 $9,000.00
*Summary covers the 2016 calendar year through October 22, 2016.

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may not represent all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer, and campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Issues

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo and the business-labor divide

Liccardo defeated Dave Cortese in the 2014 mayoral race. Between the time he took office and the 2016 elections, Liccardo worked with council members generally aligned with business interests. Coalition members voted with Liccardo to postpone studying a commercial development fee that would have funded low-income housing. In addition, the coalition voted to make smaller adjustments to the rent control cap than those favored by labor and affordable housing advocates.[4][5][6] They also sent a worker-friendly proposal, Measure E, to the ballot rather than approving it as an ordinance and authorized Liccardo to write the official ballot argument against it.[7][8]

However, with Liccardo ally Manh Nguyen's loss in the June primary and Herrera and Oliverio term limited out of office, labor supporters saw an opportunity to shift the balance of power on the city council in 2016. Labor interests and business interests lined up on opposite sides of the November runoff election, with the San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce and the South Bay AFL-CIO Labor Council backing opposing slates of candidates.

San Jose City Council endorsements, 2016
District South Bay AFL-CIO Labor Council[9] San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce[10]
2 Sergio Jimenez Steve Brown
6 Helen Chapman Devora Davis
8 Sylvia Arenas Jimmy Nguyen

One issue that divided the two slates was Measure E, the worker-friendly proposal that went before voters in 2016. Measure E proposed requiring businesses to offer part-time employees more hours before bringing in additional workers.[7] Jimenez, Chapman, and Arenas supported the measure while Brown, Davis, and Nguyen opposed it.[11][12][13]

Housing affordability

Like neighbors San Francisco and Oakland, San Jose faced a housing affordability problem in 2016. Housing rental site Zumper ranked San Jose's rental market the fifth most expensive in the country in April 2016, with a median monthly rent of $2,270.[14] By August 2016, the price of a typical home in the city was over $1 million.[15]

In April 2016, Mayor Liccardo and Councilmembers Herrera, Jones, Manh Nguyen, Tam Nguyen, and Khamis voted to lower the cap on rent increases in rent-controlled units from 8 percent to 5 percent.[16][17] However, some councilmembers thought the measure didn't go far enough. Councilman Raul Peralez, who voted against it, said, "It's vastly improved but nowhere near where we could have been."[18]

Rent control also split the city council candidates in District 2 and District 6.

San Jose City Council candidates' positions on stricter rent controls
Race Supports Opposes
District 2[11] Sergio Jimenez Steve Brown
District 6[19] Helen Chapman Devora Davis

The District 6 candidates explained their positions on rent control at a candidate forum in October 2016. Rent control "doesn't help the people that it's supposed to help, necessarily. It doesn't keep rents low, and it also deteriorates the quality of housing," Davis said. "If you could help people in the short term but they're going to be hurt in the long term even more, then it's important to say I have to take a firm stance," she continued. "I can't support rent control, even though it sounds like it's going to help the affordable living problem in San Jose."[19]

Her opponent, Chapman, opposed rent control in the primary but supported it in the runoff election. She explained her change of heart at the October candidate forum, saying, "It's having a friend of mine that I've worked with who's 40 years old and has a daughter in middle school that's getting evicted from her apartment because they sold the apartments. I think it's talking to the mobile park owner that's afraid of losing their home. I think it's the fact that we have 9,000 units of rent-controlled buildings, and people are scared that their buildings are going to be sold out from under them."[19]

San Jose voters had the opportunity to vote on another proposed fix for the affordability crisis in November. Measure A, which was sent to the ballot by a unanimous vote of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, proposed a $950 million bond to fund first-time homebuyer programs, housing for low-income and homeless residents, and loans for out-of-county commuters to move into the county.[20][21] The measure had the backing of city council candidates Jimenez in District 2, Chapman and Davis in District 6, and Nguyen in District 8.[11][19][22] District 8 candidate Arenas voiced general support for increasing the available stock of affordable housing while District 2's Brown criticized Measure A as not "well written."[11][13]

Public employee benefits and public safety

In 2012, San Jose voters approved a ballot measure to change pension benefits for city workers. The measure, which was supported by then-Councilman Liccardo, aimed to address increases in the city's pension spending by limiting public employee benefits and requiring city workers to accept smaller pensions or make larger pension contributions.[23]

Measure B prompted litigation from public employee unions and a drop off in interest in city employment.[24] Thirty-seven of the 50 police officers the city hired in September 2013, after the benefit reductions went into effect, had left the force by July 2014. Five hundred officers left between 2012 and 2016.[25] According to San Jose Police Officers Association president Jim Unland, officers were leaving because "they have the worst pension plan in the state, it provides no disability protections for them if they're seriously hurt."Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many[26]

An initial attempt to address the police shortage by amending Measure B's disability provisions ended when the city council opted not to put the measure on the 2014 ballot.[27] Union representatives claimed that the proposed measure would not have done enough to reverse the understaffing trend. Although then-Mayor Chuck Reed maintained that the adjustments "would not change the savings from Measure B, but they would possibly help with retention and recruitment," firefighters union president Joel Phelan said, "Mayor Reed and his City Council majority's fix to their mistake is akin to pouring gasoline on an already raging fire." South Bay Labor Council head Ben Field added, "They want to look like they're doing something about the problem that they've created," but "it does not solve the public safety crisis—it will not help the city recruit and maintain police officers."[28]

Amid concerns about the police shortfall and the potential for further litigation, San Jose asked a court to repeal Measure B and negotiated a replacement agreement with the public employee unions.[29] The city council put the compromise deal, which proposed restoring disability retirement provisions but discontinuing funding for retiree health care, on the November 2016 ballot.[29][30][21]

All of the November 2016 city council candidates except District 2's Brown, who worried the measure would do little to fix the police shortage, backed the pension reform measure.[11][13][12] Each candidate also offered other suggestions for addressing the police shortfall.

San Jose City Council candidates' proposals to address the police shortage
District 2 Steve Brown:[11]
  • Use funds from the sales tax approved by voters in June 2016 to provide bonuses of up to $20,000 to officers who remain in the department for two years
  • Supplement the police force with outside law enforcement agencies
  • Encourage identification of repeat offenders through collaboration between city police and county probation officers
Sergio Jimenez:[11]
  • Use funds from the sales tax approved by voters in June 2016 to provide officers with raises
  • Remedy the issues that are negatively affecting officer morale
District 6 Helen Chapman:
  • Provide bonuses to officers who remain in the department for a certain number of years[12]
  • Improve officer morale[12]
  • Supplement the police force with additional community service officers[31]
Devora Davis:
  • Require new officers to sign a commitment to remain in the department for a certain number of years[12]
  • Hire a specialist in police recruitment[12]
  • Supplement the police force with additional community service officers[12]
  • Implement predictive policing to focus police patrols in areas where crime is most likely to occur[32]
  • Consider subsidizing home security cameras[32]
District 8 Sylvia Arenas:[13]
  • Offer new hires incentives
  • Supplement the police force with additional community service officers
Jimmy Nguyen:
  • Supplement the police force with additional community service officers[22]
  • Personally attend job fairs to help with officer recruitment[13]

About the city

See also: San Jose, California

San Jose is a city in Santa Clara County, California. As of 2010, its population was 945,942.

City government

See also: Council-manager government

The city of San Jose uses a council-manager system. In this form of municipal government, an elected city council—which includes the mayor and serves as the city's primary legislative body—appoints a chief executive called a city manager to oversee day-to-day municipal operations and implement the council's policy and legislative initiatives.[33]

Demographics

The following table displays demographic data provided by the United States Census Bureau.

Demographic Data for San Jose, California
San Jose California
Population 945,942 37,253,956
Land area (sq mi) 178 155,857
Race and ethnicity**
White 39.9% 59.7%
Black/African American 3% 5.8%
Asian 35.9% 14.5%
Native American 0.6% 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.5% 0.4%
Other (single race) 14.8% 14%
Multiple 5.3% 4.9%
Hispanic/Latino 31.6% 39%
Education
High school graduation rate 84.6% 83.3%
College graduation rate 43.7% 33.9%
Income
Median household income $109,593 $75,235
Persons below poverty level 8.7% 13.4%
Source: population provided by U.S. Census Bureau, "Decennial Census" (2010). Other figures provided by U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2014-2019).
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.


Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms San Jose California election. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

San Jose, California California Municipal government Other local coverage
SealofSanJose.png
Seal of California.png
Municipal Government Final.png
Local Politics Image.jpg


External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, "June 7, 2016 Presidential Primary Election," June 30, 2016
  2. Silicon Valley Business Journal, "San Jose's District 8 Council Results Could Shake Up Mayor's Coalition," June 8, 2016
  3. San Jose City Clerk, "Public Portal for Campaign Finance Disclosure and Lobbyist Filings," accessed November 7, 2016
  4. The Mercury News, "San Jose Council Denies Studying Commercial Fees for Affordable Housing," December 18, 2015
  5. San Jose Inside, "San Jose City Council Lowers Rent Control Cap to 5 Percent," April 20, 2016
  6. People Acting in Community Together, "San Jose Renters Ask City for Protection," May 13, 2015
  7. 7.0 7.1 The Mercury News, "San Jose Voters to Decide on 'Opportunity to Work,'" June 28, 2016
  8. Silicon Valley Business Journal, "San Jose Mayor to Write Ballot Argument against Part-Time Worker Measure," June 29, 2016
  9. South Bay AFL-CIO Labor Council, "November 8, 2016 General Election Endorsements," accessed October 11, 2016
  10. San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce, "ChamberPAC's Final Endorsements for the November Elections," September 29, 2016
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 The Mercury News, "San Jose: District 2 Election Offers Voters Two Dramatically Different Choices," September 18, 2016
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 The Mercury News, "San Jose: District 6 Election a Tight Race between Davis and Chapman," September 24, 2016
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 The Mercury News, "San Jose: District 8 Voters Have a Tough Decision in November," October 2, 2016
  14. Zumper, "Zumper National Rent Report: April 2016," April 7, 2016
  15. The Wall Street Journal, "The Typical Home in San Jose Now Costs More than $1 Million," August 10, 2016
  16. San Jose Inside, "San Jose City Council Lowers Rent Control Cap to 5 Percent," April 20, 2016
  17. City of San Jose, "City Council Agenda," April 19, 2016
  18. The Mercury News, "San Jose Council Approves Tightening Rent Control—But Neither Side Is Happy," September 23, 2016
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 The Mercury News, "San Jose: Davis and Chapman Clash over Rent Control during Council Candidates Forum," October 4, 2016
  20. Yes on A for Affordable Housing, "About," accessed October 12, 2016
  21. 21.0 21.1 City of San Jose, "Notice Measure to Be Voted on," accessed August 31, 2016
  22. 22.0 22.1 Jimmy Nguyen - San Jose City Council District 1, "Jimmy on the Issues," accessed October 19, 2016
  23. League of Women Voters of California, "Measure B," accessed October 12, 2016
  24. City of San Jose, "Measure B Litigation," accessed October 21, 2016
  25. NBC Bay Area, "New Audit Puts San Jose Police Staffing Crisis in Numbers," October 4, 2016
  26. KTVU, "San Jose City Council Creates Ballot Initiative on Pension Plan Changes," July 2, 2014
  27. AFSCME, "Measure B - Pension Plan Amendments," December 18, 2015
  28. The Mercury News, "Pension Reform: San Jose Ballot Initiative Would Water Down Measure B—Is It Enough?" July 1, 2014
  29. 29.0 29.1 The Mercury News, "San Jose: Leaders to Finalize Measure B Replacement Ballot," August 12, 2016
  30. San Jose Inside, "Santa Clara County Voter's Guide to All 32 Local Ballot Measures," September 7, 2016
  31. Helen Chapman for City Council, "Making San Jose Safer - A Working Plan of Action," May 4, 2016
  32. 32.0 32.1 Devora "Dev" Davis - City Council District 6," accessed October 19, 2016
  33. City of San Jose, "Government," accessed October 29, 2014